Normal
Japjisahib JiYou've taken the intended msg for Tejwant Singh out of context. It was in a manner, endearing and complimentary to the on-going discussion and not an interpretation. Furthermore, I specifically used "some commentators" as a suggestive guide to help with the various authors of Gurbani from an academic perspective. It will definitely be interesting to have an authentic account of all the contributors of Bani as enshrined within SGGSJ. Not that it will change the substance but will in fact take the count from 36 to 37 contributors. But, please, that's by-the-by talk for academians and not for believers like you and me. For us it's the letter.Many thanks
Japjisahib Ji
You've taken the intended msg for Tejwant Singh out of context. It was in a manner, endearing and complimentary to the on-going discussion and not an interpretation. Furthermore, I specifically used "some commentators" as a suggestive guide to help with the various authors of Gurbani from an academic perspective. It will definitely be interesting to have an authentic account of all the contributors of Bani as enshrined within SGGSJ. Not that it will change the substance but will in fact take the count from 36 to 37 contributors. But, please, that's by-the-by talk for academians and not for believers like you and me. For us it's the letter.
Many thanks
