Note: It is poet soom sofi, not poet saam sofi. I apologize for the error. Sorry for the mistake.
“So das does the work by mercy of Bhagaouti.,who is Mahakal and who is Kalaka and who is Akal.
Chariter 20 78
You have drugged your self rather in ego and fear of Hindus.
It is from 21st,22nd and 23rd Chaectors.”
I don’t fear hindus. Why would I fear hindus? I fear Guru and Akaal and I fear the unseen soti (stick) of Akaal. Do you? Anyone saying tria chariters (koke shaster / kaama sutra / kaam shaster) isn’t Sikh and doesn’t fear Akaal at all. Not only that, in 1973, Akaal Takht made it clear that tria chariters isn’t work of Guru Gobind Singh Ji. This was before the derawaala/rss influence on Akaal Takht. All day you talk about drugs and sexual stories and promote them yet you think you are preaching Gurmat. Wake up!
That chariter 20 and 78 thing is not related to anoop kuar story. That is some code I use to find some things. It has nothing to do with noop kuar.
Kal can’t = Akaal. These are opposite words. Just Mahakaal is just bigger kaal and can’t be Akaal. Even though poets shyam, raam and soom sufi think so along with poet kal.
Ashutosh is also bihari and he acts holy too but he has been exposed.
RSS agents promote caste system and divide people into caste system.
Vijaydeep, didn’t you make fun of juts on msn when you talked to me? You thought I believed in caste system but I didn’t. Sikhs don’t believe in caste system, know this well. Tria chariters also divide people into caste and divides people. Anyone promoting it is a promoter of caste system. No wonder nihungs have different Amrit for people belonging to different castes. Damdami Taksal also followed this practice until Kartar Singh became their Jathaydar. However, from recent reports, Akhara pind still follows this and gives leftover Amrit to lower castes. This is direct violation of Guru’s maryada and is direct opposition of the most fundamental principles of Gurmat if not the fundamental principle.
“If Gangu can come there inpersonatiin as good cook then why canot otheer people come.But where is term Prostitute been writtan even once?
Say if some lady tires to indulge in adulatry due to Pagan influence while entering as decent lady how can pure minded Sikhs imagine such thing.Just as they are not ******* like you.
At start of 21 Charitar lady is termed as wife of wealthy.So as per your logic all wives of wealth are protiture including mother of das.Well are your father also wealthy?”
Raamjani means prostitute (Chariter 16). How can pure Guru imagine being fooled by a prostitute?
“Na Oh Mrai Naa Thaagai Jaahay, Jin Kay Raam Vsai Mun Maahai”
So Guru doesn’t get fooled.
What is the star for? What are you trying to call me? Are you losing it? Send that word to me in personal message. Why are you putting statements into my mouth? Where did I say all rich women are prostitutes? Are you going to make you case properly or just confuse people and bash them? What is protiture? Never heard of that word. Someone who can’t even type properly is here to debate on big issues. Why do you care if my father is wealthy? You want money to join the right side? Wives of wealth doesn’t make sense either. When did wealth start having wives? My father won’t give you a penny. He isn’t corrupt and doesn’t indulge in corruption. He doesn’t take anyone’s money and neither does he give money as bribes. He never did it and the whole area around my village knows and everyone respects my dad. Do you have any jealousy issues with my dad? If you want to talk bachitter natak granth with him, send me you phone number. He will call you. Don’t blame me after that he was rude to you. He does have anger management problems. He can’t keep it under control. If you are brave, then postmail me your phone #. Next time have proper sentences and type properly or don’t post. Make your statements precise if you are so smart. I don’t like reading confusing words that don’t exist in the dictionary as I don’t like it and is a waste of time.
“There is no prositure but wife of rich who after entering Anandpur sahib wants to comit dualtray with Guru.If Pama or Parmanada can come in and think of wrong about Langer(as he finds its anti caste)and incite Hindu kings, so is not he more then lady trying to comit adultery.”
Sexual positions are described in many other chariters. Chariter followers should first read history and then chariters? A lot of things would be clear. Someone probably read some tria chariters and had a wet kuschee after which the person didn’t read any more. This is a different situation. This has to do with character defamation (note the spelling) of Guru Ji and has nothing to do with opposition of langer or nagara or whatever you want to link to it. Anyone participating in defamation of Guru’s character is not only a Panth dokhi but is an enemy of society and is not even a human; forget about being a Sikh.
