“”Where has the sharam and dharam gone?””
“Sharam or shame is in hand of Akal.Dharam is to have rithiousness.So what is fuss about it.Brahmins have made them secreative.”
Where did Brahmans come from again? Shame is in the person’s hands. Actions show how much shame the person has.
“”"Munda Santokh Sharam Putt Jholee Dhiaan Kee Krai Bebhoot"””
“Here Saram can also means labour or kirat and other word is Uddam.”
Uddam has nothing to do with Sharam. Neither has kirat or hard work. Please learn proper aarth of Japuji Sahib. Missionary College is the best.
“”"Sharam Dharam Doaye Shup Khloaye Korr Firray Pardhaan Vay Laalo"””
“That is there to counter cruototion and injustice.”
Sharam is sharam. It doesn’t matter if it has to do with pornographic content or corruption anywhere else. All corruption is wrong. Tria chariters are moral corruption. TMC is what I like to call it. TMC = Total Moral Corruption. Guru Sahib Ji wasn’t morally corrupt. Guru Sahib never went to prostitutes to fix them up in history if you ever know. Guru Ji went to magicians, sadhus, yogis, etc. but never went to prostitutes to fix them up. Why? Not the right place and fixing them up isn’t important either as they are unlikely to fix up 100%. Why does Guru Ji talk about prostitutes in Guru Granth Sahib Ji? Guru Ji shows that if people as low as prostitutes can fix up and lead to better life then so can normal people in society. People had an insecure feeling that they are bad and can’t live a better life. This is also true with many people these days. From talking to people, a lot of them just don’t have the inner strength but do want to be GurSikhs. Tria chariters preach the opposite.
“”Has the word lund or land been used in Guru Granth Sahib Ji?””
“did not word Bhug(vagina) and Jon(Yoni again Vagina) used in Guru Granth Sahib?If female Organs can be talked about then why not male one?Did world Khalsa Panth used?Did Pahil used?Did Singh as surname or Kaur used as Surname?What about 5ks?”
I already mentioned Bhagat Kabir Ji’s Shabad. If someone think he/she is smarter than Bhagat Kabir Ji, then that is their issue to take care of. It has nothing to do with me. Not only that, I already mentioned how far the tria chariters go. Lund or laand is slang term and is not appropriate. There are other better ways to say it. Bhug isn’t a slang term. If slang term was used then it could be understood. Live in Punjab and promote tria chariters in a village and see what the person gets. If the villagers don’t make to taste chata, then the tria chariter promoters can come and talk to me.
Khalsa is used in Guru Granth Sahib Ji. Some kakkars are mentioned directly and some are mentioned indirectly though depending on how a person looks at it. Amrit is also mentioned in Guru Granth Sahib Ji. Singh and Kaur were implemented in 1699 and so was Khanday Kee Pahul. Don’t tell me that people didn’t have lunds or lands before. It has to do with time period and other reasons than morality. If someone wants to attack fundamental practices of Sikhs because they aren’t mentioned in Guru Granth Sahib Ji, then that is the person’s issue. Khanday Ke Pahul and 5 kakkars aren’t mentioned in Dasam Granth either. Neither does it tell Sikhs men to have Singh as last name or Sikhs women to have Kaur as last name.
“”If no, then why not?””
“If not then why not?”
This is what I want to know. From what I have learned from Gurmat, it isn’t appropriate.
“”Why is it used in Dasam Granth then?””
“why can not this be used?
Sikhi Rahit Maryada can come over here.Sarbloh is used in there which may not be before.”
I don’t want to get into Sarabloh debate as it isn’t related here. Dasam Granth doesn’t say to prepare Amrit in Sarabloh baata so I don’t know what the issue is. There is no reason to bring in off topic topics into this thread. Sarabloh also has nothing to do with morals.
To people claiming to be Sikhs who have even some love for Guru:
Don't let your soul (aatma) sleep, a sleeping soul dies. Don't let your self-esteem die, a person without Aankh is as good dead physically as spiritually.
