Normal
I am not disputing the value of historical information one iota. I am asking about the relevance of the discussion regarding Baba Fareed to this statementWe know that none of the Gurus signed their names to their bani. Guru Arjan Dev inscribed himself on the pages of Aad Granth as Nanak 5. This means that the personal identities of the Bhagats and sants, as well as the gurus, was not as important as their message. All given in the voice of Nanak.So I question why it is even important to raise the issue as a rejection of Muslim or Hindu identities. Seems not entirely relevant to, and certainly not a repudiation of, what our forum member aristotle had posted.And please do not confuse issues with straw man statements like thisContextual specifics, but also red herrings, that have no bearing. welcomekaur
I am not disputing the value of historical information one iota. I am asking about the relevance of the discussion regarding Baba Fareed to this statement
We know that none of the Gurus signed their names to their bani. Guru Arjan Dev inscribed himself on the pages of Aad Granth as Nanak 5. This means that the personal identities of the Bhagats and sants, as well as the gurus, was not as important as their message. All given in the voice of Nanak.
So I question why it is even important to raise the issue as a rejection of Muslim or Hindu identities. Seems not entirely relevant to, and certainly not a repudiation of, what our forum member aristotle had posted.
And please do not confuse issues with straw man statements like this
Contextual specifics, but also red herrings, that have no bearing.
welcomekaur