Tejwant ji,
I am not angry I can assure you.
Learning is only possible with investigation and application. Not with repetition and diversion.
It is not a matter of liking or disliking.
which i have and have offered to re-phrase or explain point by point.
I have not spat, I have posted my objection to diversionary devices that were irrelevant to the subject in hand.
That is because it was not a matter of what I did not understand. And complicity from any quarter is irrelevant.
Firstly I have no gripe and the suggestion I do undermines my fair and logical appraisal.
That there is an absence of connection I agree wholeheartedly with and tried to adress by requesting dialogue on the points not just blind repetition.
Finding out via conversation was my whole point in offering a number of ways to explore the issue rather than juvenile attempts at undermining a position ( a position that was neither comprehended nor examined I might add)
Sorry you have lost me? If I have been impolite in not answering can you please remind me and accept my apologies.
It may have to wait now as it is 1.20 and I get up at 5.00.
Because I have had a lung infection I have been off work (hence lots of time on the internet in bed) Now I am more tickety boo. I must get back to my routines.
I hope this is acceptable?
This is not the first time you have tried this 'it's only a question' approach. Both you and I know that most questions hold an inference! If I asked you 'did you steal that' it carries an inference that I don't trust you or that you are untrustworthy, it infers a suggestion or doubt to those that hear it or read it. I could give you numerous examples that would illustrate this.
I maybe straight forward even a little vociferous at times, but my objection, arguments, disagreements and umbrage are straight forward and honest.
