Spades ji,
Guru Fateh.
You write:
The contradictions are quite nitid below.
You write:
So you agree that there is a difference.
So, is it a same thing or different? And I am not putting words in your mouth. Those are exactly your words. I do not have to.
What is it?
Let's carry on.
You continue:
I just asked you what you understand by the phrase IK ONG KAAR . Sikhi has no deity as a God as in other religions so there must be a difference of some sort. If there is in your mind then what is it?
Below you claim that Ik Ong Kaar is not a deity.
Here you contradict your own statement above:
Yes, you did. The above are your words, not mine.
So, what is it? Is Ik Ong Kaar a deity or not?
Can you please elaborate the above and what you really mean by that because you are contradicting yourself again here?
Lastly I would like to comment about your statement,"I should have used the word supernatural being if that makes it any better".
For me, in Sikhi, there is no such thing as supernatural being but Nature itself is super and Gurbani expresses that very well.
Regards
Tejwant Singh
