Normal
Prakash.s.bagga ji thanks for your posts.I humbly disagree with your statement on ੴ The ੧ is not joined to "E-EAM[ > -kwr["੧ ----> ਇੱਕ and it is not Ek or ਏਕ which is Devanagari/Hindi[/FONT]Of course Ek or ਏਕ is a word in Punjabi with the meaning (One of or from one). ੧ is unambiguously a number 1.Hence EKANKAAR is totally wrong. I realize why you at one time wanted to see the two joined in paintings. That will make it EKANKAAR and unfortunately would have been contrary to Gurbani as written.That only leaves it as stated ੴ (Ik▫oaʼnkār)Sat Sri Akal.
Prakash.s.bagga ji thanks for your posts.
I humbly disagree with your statement on ੴ
The ੧ is not joined to "E-EAM[ > -kwr["
੧ ----> ਇੱਕ and it is not Ek or ਏਕ which is Devanagari/Hindi[/FONT]
Of course Ek or ਏਕ is a word in Punjabi with the meaning (One of or from one). ੧ is unambiguously a number 1.
Hence EKANKAAR is totally wrong. I realize why you at one time wanted to see the two joined in paintings. That will make it EKANKAAR and unfortunately would have been contrary to Gurbani as written.
That only leaves it as stated ੴ (Ik▫oaʼnkār)
Sat Sri Akal.
