Veerji
Satnaam waheguru
I presume the Akal Takat makes the rules for others to follow.
Just wondered how they came about the answers?
Did they achieve them through meditation or through the Holy Scriptures.
Did they consult a body of people to come to their decisions?
Its not for me to judge who eats what, I say again, you are welcome to eat what you want.
I speak from my personal experiences through meditation and
practical experiences which the divine has bestowed on me.
To me EGO means Edging God outwards.
I try my best to write with the awareness that the same who God resides in you and others
also resides within myself. Its not for me to criticize any one one.
I still remember the Lesson I was taught about Not judging others lest I be judged.
It appears there a shift of conciousness going on in this thread as it has reached nearly a hundred pages.
This is good its getting everyone thinking, questioning and supporting their own attachments.
We all have attachments some to eating some to gambling some to smoking etc etc.
Many of us have Karmic attachments like anger or love which are downloaded into our conciousness at birth, dependant on our stage of evolution!
Ours is the cycle of Lives, the ''Wheel of Eighty Four'' , the ''Wheel of Births and Deaths''
in which all living beings have been imprisoned for countless ages.
I have no desire to patronize in a superior manner which is what the dictionary states is the meaning of Condescending.
I do not need this Karma.
Satnaam Waheguru
amarjit
(con·de·scend(k
n
d
-s
nd
)
intr.v. con·de·scend·ed, con·de·scend·ing, con·de·scends 1. To descend to the level of one considered inferior; lower oneself. See Synonyms at stoop<SUP>1</SUP>.
2. To deal with people in a patronizingly superior manner.)
