Normal
Explorer Ji..i am sure the same words were used by the Pope and his followers of the mighty Church..."Have we all been MISLED..all this while..and ONLY ONE..Galileo galillee managed to see the "truth" ??.....It is possible for all to be misled..and for ONLY dr Jaggee to see the "truth" !!!Just HOW MANY must be there for TRUTH to become the TRUTH ?? Since ONE dr Jaggee is NOT enough..will it have to be 5...10..50..100..??? Rememeber Guru nanak ji is also ONE..and HE saw the TRUTH...mitee dhund jagg chhannan hoya....Satgur Nanak pargaitya!! ( I am NOT comparing as to me Guru nanak Ji is Satgur..but in the case of "number argument" He is still Only ONE...some might have said even then...Have we ALL been MISLED by the Vedas, Purans, the Rams and Krsihans and rishis munis..and ONLY ONE GURU "nanak" saw the TRUTH ?? I respectfully put that JUST ONE is enough to see the TRUTH.
Explorer Ji..
i am sure the same words were used by the Pope and his followers of the mighty Church...
"Have we all been MISLED..all this while..and ONLY ONE..Galileo galillee managed to see the "truth" ??.....It is possible for all to be misled..and for ONLY dr Jaggee to see the "truth" !!!
Just HOW MANY must be there for TRUTH to become the TRUTH ?? Since ONE dr Jaggee is NOT enough..will it have to be 5...10..50..100..??? Rememeber Guru nanak ji is also ONE..and HE saw the TRUTH...mitee dhund jagg chhannan hoya....Satgur Nanak pargaitya!! ( I am NOT comparing as to me Guru nanak Ji is Satgur..but in the case of "number argument" He is still Only ONE...some might have said even then...Have we ALL been MISLED by the Vedas, Purans, the Rams and Krsihans and rishis munis..and ONLY ONE GURU "nanak" saw the TRUTH ?? I respectfully put that JUST ONE is enough to see the TRUTH.
