Normal
Explorer Ji,The SGGS is NOT a "History" book per se....SGGS need NOT mention any hsitorical event...any mentioned are at Guru Jis discretion....You may be confusing this with the Bachittar Natak which is an "AUTOBIOGRAPHY..of supposedly Guru Gobind Singh Ji....and as an autobiography..it ABSOLUTELY has to mention ALL important historical happenings...which IT FAILS..and is thus Failed the Litmus test of being an autobiography of GGS. Actually the BNG comes across a very ANTI-MUSLIM BIASED composition...an insult to GGS.2. Although the Physical building/history of Akal Takhat is NOT mentioned in SGGS..the PHILOSPHY/GURMATT Foundation on which the Akal Takhat is Based is mentioned many times in SGGS...in FACT the SGGS is the defacto and TRUE "JATHEDAR" of Akal Takhat as this is our GURU..and ONLY the GURU can sit on this Throne. Same goes for..for example..qualities of a PARDHAAN....GURMUKH...MANMUKH...Bhagat...SANT..etc etc etc are Provided in SGGS..even though there may be No mention of the SGPC Pardhaan..or Makkarr in SGGS....etc etc.3. Knowledge changes daily..with the vast RESOURCES available Today..it is aFALLACY to go on quoting DEAD PERSONS... Compare Fareedkotee teeka with that of Prof Sahib Singh...he made so many new assertions...see Prof sahib singh DEPART RADICALLY form the widely accepted Mohan Pothis Fable..WHY ?? Becasue Prof Sahib Singh, Vir Singh Bhai Kahn Singh nabha etc brought NEW OUTLOOK..a fresh new look at gurmatt/sikhi/history etc based on their TIME !!! What was not possible in Nirmala/Udasis period of Gurdawra Control....became possible after the Singh Sabha/Gurdwara Sudhaar Movement liberated the Gurdwaras.... Most of our Written RESOURCES are still waiting to be researched according to new 22nd century methods...The New Generation will NOT simply accept the sheer nonsense lying down...my six grade student went for a Sant Samagam on Japji Sahib Katha...she got up and came abck after five minutes when the Sant Mahapurash told the audience that GUru Nanak ji ahd a Very special set of Kharrawwan which enabled Guru Ji to cover Vast distances in the wink of an eye...!! This kharrawwaan are supposedly in a special gurdwara known only to the sant mahapurahs...the Sant Ji then commented..eh Communist..nastik log han...ehnan wich Guru partee SHARDHAA nahin hai.. to .this comment is now added NEW vocabulary..kalaafghani hai..Gurmatt is a Modern religion..not for BLIND Shardhaloos.. TODAY..Singh sahib Darshan Singh Ji has equal knowledge to the Past scholars such as Gyani Ditt Singh/Prof Gurmukh Singh.. whom were EXCOMMUNICATED in their time as well by the same blind ones that exist today. Prof Gurmukh Singhs excommwas OVER TURNED recently..whats to say the exact same wont happen to the one against Darshan Singh a few decades down the road ?? Its Not simply said that SIKHS think AFTER the FACT..never before/on time.:happysingh::happykaur:
Explorer Ji,
The SGGS is NOT a "History" book per se....SGGS need NOT mention any hsitorical event...any mentioned are at Guru Jis discretion....
You may be confusing this with the Bachittar Natak which is an "AUTOBIOGRAPHY..of supposedly Guru Gobind Singh Ji....and as an autobiography..it ABSOLUTELY has to mention ALL important historical happenings...which IT FAILS..and is thus Failed the Litmus test of being an autobiography of GGS. Actually the BNG comes across a very ANTI-MUSLIM BIASED composition...an insult to GGS.
2. Although the Physical building/history of Akal Takhat is NOT mentioned in SGGS..the PHILOSPHY/GURMATT Foundation on which the Akal Takhat is Based is mentioned many times in SGGS...in FACT the SGGS is the defacto and TRUE "JATHEDAR" of Akal Takhat as this is our GURU..and ONLY the GURU can sit on this Throne. Same goes for..for example..qualities of a PARDHAAN....GURMUKH...MANMUKH...Bhagat...SANT..etc etc etc are Provided in SGGS..even though there may be No mention of the SGPC Pardhaan..or Makkarr in SGGS....etc etc.
3. Knowledge changes daily..with the vast RESOURCES available Today..it is aFALLACY to go on quoting DEAD PERSONS... Compare Fareedkotee teeka with that of Prof Sahib Singh...he made so many new assertions...see Prof sahib singh DEPART RADICALLY form the widely accepted Mohan Pothis Fable..WHY ?? Becasue Prof Sahib Singh, Vir Singh Bhai Kahn Singh nabha etc brought NEW OUTLOOK..a fresh new look at gurmatt/sikhi/history etc based on their TIME !!! What was not possible in Nirmala/Udasis period of Gurdawra Control....became possible after the Singh Sabha/Gurdwara Sudhaar Movement liberated the Gurdwaras.... Most of our Written RESOURCES are still waiting to be researched according to new 22nd century methods...The New Generation will NOT simply accept the sheer nonsense lying down...my six grade student went for a Sant Samagam on Japji Sahib Katha...she got up and came abck after five minutes when the Sant Mahapurash told the audience that GUru Nanak ji ahd a Very special set of Kharrawwan which enabled Guru Ji to cover Vast distances in the wink of an eye...!! This kharrawwaan are supposedly in a special gurdwara known only to the sant mahapurahs...the Sant Ji then commented..eh Communist..nastik log han...ehnan wich Guru partee SHARDHAA nahin hai.. to .this comment is now added NEW vocabulary..kalaafghani hai..Gurmatt is a Modern religion..not for BLIND Shardhaloos.. TODAY..Singh sahib Darshan Singh Ji has equal knowledge to the Past scholars such as Gyani Ditt Singh/Prof Gurmukh Singh.. whom were EXCOMMUNICATED in their time as well by the same blind ones that exist today. Prof Gurmukh Singhs excommwas OVER TURNED recently..whats to say the exact same wont happen to the one against Darshan Singh a few decades down the road ?? Its Not simply said that SIKHS think AFTER the FACT..never before/on time.:happysingh::happykaur:
