Normal
Then Abneet ji you are doing what exactly you should do, question, react, and question more.In response to your question about "this source." Read what I wrote a while back. The source is not competent regarding Hindu meanings of Hindu concepts. Not for the first time, a happenstance understanding of the Hindu scriptures is used to distort the teachings of Guru Nanak, and then goes on to claim Hinduism owns Sikhi. The source should be considered with caution.Too many people have too many agendas, political and otherwise, aimed at proving that Sikhism is an offshoot of the "Hindu" belief. Not then a surprise that they write books about it.
Then Abneet ji you are doing what exactly you should do, question, react, and question more.
In response to your question about "this source." Read what I wrote a while back. The source is not competent regarding Hindu meanings of Hindu concepts. Not for the first time, a happenstance understanding of the Hindu scriptures is used to distort the teachings of Guru Nanak, and then goes on to claim Hinduism owns Sikhi. The source should be considered with caution.
Too many people have too many agendas, political and otherwise, aimed at proving that Sikhism is an offshoot of the "Hindu" belief. Not then a surprise that they write books about it.
