Normal
At first glance, this seems to be so misappropriate.This took me back to read again one of the responses by Amarpal ji, in which he replied to member 'care4sikhi'.The things which are bothering me are the impression given by statements of Mr. Amarjit Atwal (to much extent arrogant one, those seem to be). So his stand doesnt align with my meagre thinking.I understand, we need to show unity by adhering to one panthic body, which is Akaal Takhat Sahib. There are some reasons for the rules, and we need to look into the spirit of those rules, and look for healthy and non-controversial alternatives.I happened to read other similar instances by Bhatra's ( I dont know what word 'Bhatra' stand for) at the forums you mentioned.Best Regards.
At first glance, this seems to be so misappropriate.
This took me back to read again one of the responses by Amarpal ji, in which he replied to member 'care4sikhi'.
The things which are bothering me are the impression given by statements of Mr. Amarjit Atwal (to much extent arrogant one, those seem to be). So his stand doesnt align with my meagre thinking.
I understand, we need to show unity by adhering to one panthic body, which is Akaal Takhat Sahib. There are some reasons for the rules, and we need to look into the spirit of those rules, and look for healthy and non-controversial alternatives.
I happened to read other similar instances by Bhatra's ( I dont know what word 'Bhatra' stand for) at the forums you mentioned.
Best Regards.