• Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
    Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
    Sign up Log in

Reply to thread

Re: Kabir- Guru Connection




So posting "So from your views it seems, that Kabir Ji's views were identical with  our first 5 Gurus & not with the other 5 Gurus .... Unbelievable !" shows great maturity in debating? It shows real modesty right? Also shows great insight? lol


Your views on Ahimsa are wholly wrong, and I've posted several scholarly articles on this. Ahimsa is non-violence. Not one Guru believed in turning the other cheek.


On Kabir:


http://sikhinstitute.org/conn_th_dots/ch3.htm


" Similarly it would be incorrect to say, that Kabir was Guru  Nanak’s  Guru, just because of similarity in their views. Guru Nanak’s  guru also  was none other than Satguru. (Sidh Gosht, GGS, p 972)

                    Had  it been otherwise we would not have had Nanak II  and Nanak III, we would  have had Kabir II and Kabir III or Ramanand III  and Ramanand IV. In the  Guru Granth Sahib, where the bani of the Gurus  is given in each Raga,  in chronological order, and then follow  compositions of various Bhagats,  with Kabir’s bani placed first—and in  some cases also at the end. If  the lineage of gurus had started from  Ramanand, his bani would have been  given first position."


http://urantiabook.org/archive/readers/601_sikhism.htm


"Nanak, like Kabir and others, tried to synthesize the best elements of Islam and Hinduism. He taught a devotional monotheism, referring to God as "The True Name." Nanak rejected ahimsa ................"


Table comparing beliefs:


http://www.sikhmarg.com/english/sikhs-not-hindus.html


Page 72


http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=gqIbJz7vMn0C&pg=PA72&lpg=PA72&dq=sikhs+reject+ahimsa&source=bl&ots=fPD0BkQzZB&sig=mWRsdfaJKHDYLqQBZiyAO4UIDpY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=vCUVUIz2McPA0QXhrYCQDw&ved=0CEwQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=sikhs%20reject%20ahimsa&f=false


Ahimsa means kindness and non-violence towards all living things. Sikhs may support kindness (which is Daya) but the DO NOT support non-violence. You are making the commeon mistake, most Vaishnavite orientated Sikhs do, i.e. confusing Daya with Ahimsa. :motherlylove:


http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/hard-talk/26099-why-do-some-sikhs-confuse-daya-3.html


where we concluded:


Daya  – seeing things from another’s point of view and having sympathy enough  to want to stand up for that person (even if it means sacrificing your  own life). Daya applies to those who potentially have the capacity to  have Daya themselves i.e. humans.

 

 Ahimsa  – not wishing to harm anything, or any creature, and if someone does  something bad to you leaving it to divine retribution and Karma to set  things right.

 

 Daya is subjective.

 Ahimsa is objective.


Top