Normal
Confused Ji. Understood. It isn't that I am opposed to anatta, but rather I have not been convinced of its truth.Here is Bhikkhu Bodhi in the Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma on the topic of Citta and consciousness:My personal conclusion of this is that if "we cannot detect the discrete occasions" then there is little empirical evidence to conclude that it i.e. consciousness or citta, is not permanent. In which case I am left with a permanent consciousness (or citta) which I may as well consider self, consciousness or Atman.I would still be interested in your response on intention, a question from my last post, if you would be so kind to consider it:
Confused Ji. Understood. It isn't that I am opposed to anatta, but rather I have not been convinced of its truth.
Here is Bhikkhu Bodhi in the Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma on the topic of Citta and consciousness:
My personal conclusion of this is that if "we cannot detect the discrete occasions" then there is little empirical evidence to conclude that it i.e. consciousness or citta, is not permanent. In which case I am left with a permanent consciousness (or citta) which I may as well consider self, consciousness or Atman.
I would still be interested in your response on intention, a question from my last post, if you would be so kind to consider it:
