Normal
ThanksI am more content now than when I startedI guess one key indicator of deliberate intent to keep it within the family would have been individual gain...and we have established that never happened...the Gurus were selfless and made great sacrifices...so on that basis I am happy to accept the family thing as being just coincidentalBut at the risk of stirring controversy again I will ask the to date unasked Devil's Advocate question....why having started outside the family, did the Gurgaddi never go back outside the family again?Any thoughts to this hypothetical question?It would be helpful for me personally so next time someone makes this accusation to me again, I can be better prepared to answer them! This is the key question that those who are critical will always ask....I daresay some of you reading this thread may have come across this question before...so how would you respond to that person?Thanks again
Thanks
I am more content now than when I started
I guess one key indicator of deliberate intent to keep it within the family would have been individual gain...and we have established that never happened...the Gurus were selfless and made great sacrifices...so on that basis I am happy to accept the family thing as being just coincidental
But at the risk of stirring controversy again I will ask the to date unasked Devil's Advocate question....why having started outside the family, did the Gurgaddi never go back outside the family again?
Any thoughts to this hypothetical question?
It would be helpful for me personally so next time someone makes this accusation to me again, I can be better prepared to answer them! This is the key question that those who are critical will always ask....I daresay some of you reading this thread may have come across this question before...so how would you respond to that person?
Thanks again