Normal
No, I do not find this problem, once you know someones writing style, the underlying message is not too hard to decipher.If you add that to known opinions, then it can be easier to grasp the context of what is written. This applies to your writings as it does to the SGGS. There are aspects of Creator that are written in stone, the physical, the essence, if you carry those aspects whilst you read, then the obvious becomes irrelevant, you match up what you know with what you are reading and understand on both the obvious level, and the intimated level. That is my belief, those that believe in merely the written word without taking into account what Creator stands for are entitled to theirs
No, I do not find this problem, once you know someones writing style, the underlying message is not too hard to decipher.If you add that to known opinions, then it can be easier to grasp the context of what is written.
This applies to your writings as it does to the SGGS. There are aspects of Creator that are written in stone, the physical, the essence, if you carry those aspects whilst you read, then the obvious becomes irrelevant, you match up what you know with what you are reading and understand on both the obvious level, and the intimated level.
That is my belief, those that believe in merely the written word without taking into account what Creator stands for are entitled to theirs
