Normal
This is ridiculous. It is almost laughable. 47 states have no problem. Only Oregon, Pennsylvania and a third state - I don't know which one - feel the need to protect our children from a turban or a yarmulka or hijab or even a cross. I usually support the ACLU, but in this case they are wrong. :u):By prohibiting religious garb - a law from an intolerant, racist past, the antithesis of what the ACLU stands for - our children are denied the teaching of qualified, devoted teachers, as well as depriving the teachers of a job. Personally, I believe that exposing our children to different beliefs is a good thing. If some start evangelising, that is a different issue to be handled separately, probably at the federal level.:happykaur: :happysingh: Horrors!:rofl!!:Chardi kala!:ice::ice:
This is ridiculous. It is almost laughable. 47 states have no problem. Only Oregon, Pennsylvania and a third state - I don't know which one - feel the need to protect our children from a turban or a yarmulka or hijab or even a cross. I usually support the ACLU, but in this case they are wrong. :u):
By prohibiting religious garb - a law from an intolerant, racist past, the antithesis of what the ACLU stands for - our children are denied the teaching of qualified, devoted teachers, as well as depriving the teachers of a job. Personally, I believe that exposing our children to different beliefs is a good thing. If some start evangelising, that is a different issue to be handled separately, probably at the federal level.
:happykaur: :happysingh: Horrors!
:rofl!!:
Chardi kala!
:ice:
