☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Social Lounge
Articles
General
Pakistan Army Chief’s vitriolic speeches make India Vigilant of Pak Future intentions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dalvinder45" data-source="post: 226554" data-attributes="member: 26009"><p>The dastardly terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22 was a direct signal to the Modi government living in the illusion that the situation in J&K is normalised.</p><p></p><p>The despicable accounts of Hindus being singled out, after asking them to recite the kalma, and women asked to go ask Modi to save them, are heart wrenching.</p><p></p><p>At least 26 tourists were killed and many injured by four terrorists -- two Pakistanis of TRF@LeT and two Kashminiris. The executions were ISIS-style.</p><p></p><p>The attack was obviously planned well in advance with the area kept under surveillance; perhaps since Pakistan army chief Asim Munir called J&K Pakistan's '<a href="https://www.rediff.com/news/column/will-pakistans-generals-never-learn/20250419.htm" target="_blank"><strong>jugular vein</strong></a>' and ranted about the two-nation theory.</p><p>Does the government have a counter-terrorist strategy beyond hopping from one incident to another -- Gurdaspur, Pathankot, Uri, Pulwama (the list is endless) and now Pahalgam? More importantly, where is the spine?</p><p></p><p>Since 2014, the government has undertaken two cross-border actions against Pakistan: the 'surgical strike' in response to 19 killed in terrorist attack at Uri, and the Balakot standoff air strike after suffering 40 killed in a terrorist car bombing at Pulwama.</p><p></p><p>Both these were <em>reactive</em> actions. Pakistani terrorists have also inflicted multiple beheadings through BAT actions along the LoC and inside J&K.</p><p></p><p>NSA Ajit Doval has been going around announcing his New India doctrine -- that India will take the battle to where the threat originates.</p><p></p><p>Is this what we are doing?</p><p></p><p>To add to this is PM Modi's cliche, "<em>Ghar Mein Ghus Kar Maarenge</em>" -- which Pakistan is practising, not India.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://im.rediff.com/news/2025/apr/24pahalgam-site-of-attack2.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>IMAGE: Security forces patrol the site of the attack on tourists in Baisaran near Pahalgam, April 24, 2025. Photograph: Adnan Abidi/Reuters</p><p>The Pahalgam terror attack has shown the mirror to India "once again"; that there is no counter-terror policy and the government is spineless beyond hollow rhetoric to appease the public at home.</p><p></p><p>The CI grid in J&K was weakened by relocating troops to eastern Ladakh when the PLA crossed the LAC; concurrent to the mainstream media playing the script of J&K fully normalised, with the '3-Bags Full Brigade' dancing and clapping to His Master's Voice.</p><p></p><p>How can one be so damn stupid in a state bordering Pakistan and the LoC running over difficult terrain?</p><p></p><p>A three-star veteran described the recent prolonged operations in Kathua area as the last vestiges of terrorism in J&K, comparing it with Hamas.</p><p></p><p>To top this, the overall strength of the Indian Army was reduced by over one lakh and the military's manpower hollowed by stopping army recruitment for full three years and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh saying in Parliament that 158 organisations were consulted before thrusting the 'Agniveer' concept on the military; can he explain which 58 organisations were these -- Pakistani, Chinese or both combined?</p><p></p><p>We have a formidable strength of Army Special Forces whose primary role is cross-border, but the government is happy making the firefighting within J&K, instead of CPOs.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://im.rediff.com/news/2025/apr/24funeral.jpg?w=670&h=900" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>IMAGE: People pay their last respects to the victims of the Pahalgam terror attack, in Mumbai. Photograph: ANI Photo</p><p>The accent continues: global sympathies (is anyone prepared to blame Pakistan?); perpetrators will not be spared (Pakistan has an unending supply); this is an act<em> of frustration</em> (b******); diplomatic offensive will finish Pakistan (by itself?); PoK wants to join India; Pakistan is scared of India's military response, so on and so forth.</p><p></p><p>Interestingly, reports of the 66-vehicle convoy of Amit Shah to Pahalgam has attracted attention, as did reports of audio of families of victims being muted as soon as they began asking questions and accountability from Amit Shah. Then there is the CCS meeting -- to which no service chief or CDS was invited.</p><p></p><p>The media quotes intel sources as saying 42 terror launch pads are active in PoK and 115 Pakistani terrorists are active in J&K, although the South Asia Terrorism Portal gives a figure of 3,235 terrorists in J&K.</p><p></p><p>While fresh encounters have broken out in Kulgam and Udhampur's Dudu-Basantgarh areas, India's diplomatic response, termed "massive", mainly comprises: suspension of Indus Water Treaty; Pakistan high commission reduced to 30-strong; Pak military personnel declared persona non-grata, Attari border closed; visas cancelled; and Pakistanis asked to leave within 48 hours.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://im.rediff.com/news/2025/apr/23vinay-narwal-last-rites3.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>IMAGE: Indian Navy personnel carry the coffin of Lieutenant Vinay Narwal, outside his residence in Karnal, Haryana. Photograph: Bhawika Chhabra/Reuters</p><p>The Indus Water Treaty is for the waters Indus, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas and Sutlej.</p><p></p><p>Means what?</p><p></p><p>Stopping the water flow implies diverting the waters to canals, and in the absence of canals, till the reservoirs(s) are full.</p><p></p><p>The Indus, Jhelum and Chenab rivers have no canals so the waters will continue to flow into Pakistan -- so who are we fooling?</p><p></p><p>We abandoned our embassy in Kabul despite Taliban assurances, so why is the Pakistan high commission reduced to 30 -- to protect foreign postings of our babus in Pakistan?</p><p></p><p>Why not reduce the strength to three or kick out all Pakistanis, leaving the high commission to Indian employees?</p><p></p><p>The ground truth is that unless we are prepared to acknowledge our shortcomings, including massive intelligence failures, punish those responsible and take corrective actions, we will continue in the same vein.</p><p></p><p>A military response by the government, if at all, would likely be another 'surgical strike', which has led to a veteran's wife saying, "The Baloch Liberation Army is perhaps better off than us".</p><p></p><p>A veteran close to the establishment writes, "Who is bothered -- politicians are busy drawing political mileage and the babudom is busy working out the next cash flow."</p><p></p><p><img src="https://im.rediff.com/news/2025/apr/24pahalgam-smit-parmar-funeral7.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>IMAGE: The mortal remains of Yatish Parmar, a victim of Pahalgam terror attack, is consigned to the flames. Photograph: Amit Dave/Reuters</p><p>Terrorism and insurgency in J&K had subsided when India demolished East Pakistan -- for the simple reason that Pakistan understands power.</p><p></p><p>We need to follow Chanakya's dictum of <em>Saam</em>, <em>Daam</em>, <em>Dand</em>, <em>Bhed</em> for strategising against Pakistan, transporting the proxy war back into PoK/Pakistan, and liberation of Balochistan and Sindh must top the agenda.</p><p></p><p>The China-Pakistan-Bangladesh anti-India nexus is expanding, and Amit Shah expressing inability to fence 450-km of the India-Bangladesh border and talking of installing electronic surveillance system along our border with Pakistan in the next three years and then instal the same along the border with Bangladesh, indicates we are not serious at all about border security.</p><p></p><p>How many more terror attacks are required for the government to wake up?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dalvinder45, post: 226554, member: 26009"] The dastardly terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22 was a direct signal to the Modi government living in the illusion that the situation in J&K is normalised. The despicable accounts of Hindus being singled out, after asking them to recite the kalma, and women asked to go ask Modi to save them, are heart wrenching. At least 26 tourists were killed and many injured by four terrorists -- two Pakistanis of TRF@LeT and two Kashminiris. The executions were ISIS-style. The attack was obviously planned well in advance with the area kept under surveillance; perhaps since Pakistan army chief Asim Munir called J&K Pakistan's '[URL='https://www.rediff.com/news/column/will-pakistans-generals-never-learn/20250419.htm'][B]jugular vein[/B][/URL]' and ranted about the two-nation theory. Does the government have a counter-terrorist strategy beyond hopping from one incident to another -- Gurdaspur, Pathankot, Uri, Pulwama (the list is endless) and now Pahalgam? More importantly, where is the spine? Since 2014, the government has undertaken two cross-border actions against Pakistan: the 'surgical strike' in response to 19 killed in terrorist attack at Uri, and the Balakot standoff air strike after suffering 40 killed in a terrorist car bombing at Pulwama. Both these were [I]reactive[/I] actions. Pakistani terrorists have also inflicted multiple beheadings through BAT actions along the LoC and inside J&K. NSA Ajit Doval has been going around announcing his New India doctrine -- that India will take the battle to where the threat originates. Is this what we are doing? To add to this is PM Modi's cliche, "[I]Ghar Mein Ghus Kar Maarenge[/I]" -- which Pakistan is practising, not India. [IMG]https://im.rediff.com/news/2025/apr/24pahalgam-site-of-attack2.jpg[/IMG] IMAGE: Security forces patrol the site of the attack on tourists in Baisaran near Pahalgam, April 24, 2025. Photograph: Adnan Abidi/Reuters The Pahalgam terror attack has shown the mirror to India "once again"; that there is no counter-terror policy and the government is spineless beyond hollow rhetoric to appease the public at home. The CI grid in J&K was weakened by relocating troops to eastern Ladakh when the PLA crossed the LAC; concurrent to the mainstream media playing the script of J&K fully normalised, with the '3-Bags Full Brigade' dancing and clapping to His Master's Voice. How can one be so damn stupid in a state bordering Pakistan and the LoC running over difficult terrain? A three-star veteran described the recent prolonged operations in Kathua area as the last vestiges of terrorism in J&K, comparing it with Hamas. To top this, the overall strength of the Indian Army was reduced by over one lakh and the military's manpower hollowed by stopping army recruitment for full three years and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh saying in Parliament that 158 organisations were consulted before thrusting the 'Agniveer' concept on the military; can he explain which 58 organisations were these -- Pakistani, Chinese or both combined? We have a formidable strength of Army Special Forces whose primary role is cross-border, but the government is happy making the firefighting within J&K, instead of CPOs. [IMG]https://im.rediff.com/news/2025/apr/24funeral.jpg?w=670&h=900[/IMG] IMAGE: People pay their last respects to the victims of the Pahalgam terror attack, in Mumbai. Photograph: ANI Photo The accent continues: global sympathies (is anyone prepared to blame Pakistan?); perpetrators will not be spared (Pakistan has an unending supply); this is an act[I] of frustration[/I] (b******); diplomatic offensive will finish Pakistan (by itself?); PoK wants to join India; Pakistan is scared of India's military response, so on and so forth. Interestingly, reports of the 66-vehicle convoy of Amit Shah to Pahalgam has attracted attention, as did reports of audio of families of victims being muted as soon as they began asking questions and accountability from Amit Shah. Then there is the CCS meeting -- to which no service chief or CDS was invited. The media quotes intel sources as saying 42 terror launch pads are active in PoK and 115 Pakistani terrorists are active in J&K, although the South Asia Terrorism Portal gives a figure of 3,235 terrorists in J&K. While fresh encounters have broken out in Kulgam and Udhampur's Dudu-Basantgarh areas, India's diplomatic response, termed "massive", mainly comprises: suspension of Indus Water Treaty; Pakistan high commission reduced to 30-strong; Pak military personnel declared persona non-grata, Attari border closed; visas cancelled; and Pakistanis asked to leave within 48 hours. [IMG]https://im.rediff.com/news/2025/apr/23vinay-narwal-last-rites3.jpg[/IMG] IMAGE: Indian Navy personnel carry the coffin of Lieutenant Vinay Narwal, outside his residence in Karnal, Haryana. Photograph: Bhawika Chhabra/Reuters The Indus Water Treaty is for the waters Indus, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas and Sutlej. Means what? Stopping the water flow implies diverting the waters to canals, and in the absence of canals, till the reservoirs(s) are full. The Indus, Jhelum and Chenab rivers have no canals so the waters will continue to flow into Pakistan -- so who are we fooling? We abandoned our embassy in Kabul despite Taliban assurances, so why is the Pakistan high commission reduced to 30 -- to protect foreign postings of our babus in Pakistan? Why not reduce the strength to three or kick out all Pakistanis, leaving the high commission to Indian employees? The ground truth is that unless we are prepared to acknowledge our shortcomings, including massive intelligence failures, punish those responsible and take corrective actions, we will continue in the same vein. A military response by the government, if at all, would likely be another 'surgical strike', which has led to a veteran's wife saying, "The Baloch Liberation Army is perhaps better off than us". A veteran close to the establishment writes, "Who is bothered -- politicians are busy drawing political mileage and the babudom is busy working out the next cash flow." [IMG]https://im.rediff.com/news/2025/apr/24pahalgam-smit-parmar-funeral7.jpg[/IMG] IMAGE: The mortal remains of Yatish Parmar, a victim of Pahalgam terror attack, is consigned to the flames. Photograph: Amit Dave/Reuters Terrorism and insurgency in J&K had subsided when India demolished East Pakistan -- for the simple reason that Pakistan understands power. We need to follow Chanakya's dictum of [I]Saam[/I], [I]Daam[/I], [I]Dand[/I], [I]Bhed[/I] for strategising against Pakistan, transporting the proxy war back into PoK/Pakistan, and liberation of Balochistan and Sindh must top the agenda. The China-Pakistan-Bangladesh anti-India nexus is expanding, and Amit Shah expressing inability to fence 450-km of the India-Bangladesh border and talking of installing electronic surveillance system along our border with Pakistan in the next three years and then instal the same along the border with Bangladesh, indicates we are not serious at all about border security. How many more terror attacks are required for the government to wake up? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Social Lounge
Articles
General
Pakistan Army Chief’s vitriolic speeches make India Vigilant of Pak Future intentions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top