☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Social Lounge
Articles
General
Pakistan Army Chief’s vitriolic speeches make India Vigilant of Pak Future intentions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dalvinder45" data-source="post: 226555" data-attributes="member: 26009"><p><strong>'It could be the Pakistan army's commercial interest, tactical or strategic interest or one of their leaders.'</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>'Even if you send a message that we have attempted to kill one of the Pakistani generals, that itself will serve the purpose.' </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong><img src="https://im.rediff.com/news/2025/apr/23vinay-narwal-last-rites7.jpg?w=670&h=900" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></strong></p><p></p><p>IMAGE: Navy officers offer a gun salute to Lieutenant Vinay Narwal who was killed in a terror attack near Pahalgam, at a crematorium in Karnal, Haryana, April 23, 2025. Photograph: Bhawika Chhabra/Reuters</p><p>India has <a href="https://www.rediff.com/news/report/-pahalgam-attack-india-acts-tough-takes-5-big-actions-against-pak/20250423.htm" target="_blank">downgraded</a> diplomatic ties with Pakistan post the Pahalgam terror attack on innocent tourists.</p><p></p><p>The TRF is an offshoot of the Lashkar-E-Tayiba, the Pakistan-based terrorist organisation which has been instrumental in organising terror attacks in India, including the infamous 26/11 Mumbai attacks.</p><p>This time the Laskhar crossed the red line by targeting innocent tourists in Pahalgam on April 22, in which 26 people were killed.</p><p></p><p>Worse was the fact they identified tourists by their religion and if they were found to be Hindu, shot dead.</p><p></p><p>This attack happened a week after Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir, addressing an Overseas Pakistanis Convention in Islamabad, stated that Kashmir was the ‘jugular vein of Pakistan’.</p><p></p><p>He further said, ““Our forefathers thought we are different from Hindus in every possible aspect of life. Our religions are different, our customs are different, our traditions are different, our thoughts are different and our ambitions are different. That was the foundation of the two-nation theory that was laid there. We are two nations, we are not one nation.”</p><p></p><p><strong>Are the actions the Government of India has taken so far against Pakistan good enough, or should they have done something more?</strong></p><p></p><p>It is a good first step. I believe that a greater response is called for and that too a well-considered deliberate response is the need of the hour. We should wait.</p><p></p><p>The government is also aware of the anger and anguish that people have. They themselves don’t like what has happened because they have worked very hard to prevent something like this from happening. Yet it has happened and there will be consequences for Pakistan to suffer.</p><p></p><p>The suspension of Indus Water Treaty has never happened. This will hurt Pakistan’s fragile economy and will lead to a rise in anger against the Pakistan army in Pakistan. So this first step is a good step.</p><p></p><p>The government has also annulled the post of defence attaché in New Delhi and it is presumed they can never come back. This is a very major message in international diplomacy.</p><p></p><p><strong>Does India have any military options against Pakistan?</strong></p><p></p><p>Yes, we have and it is all on the table.</p><p></p><p>Obviously I don’t know when it will happen and how it will happen but yes, happen it will.</p><p></p><p>Not only has this government resolved to take the risk but there is also enough backing and anger among other nations who are stating that India should not hesitate to take any action against Pakistan. These nations are ready to back India.</p><p></p><p>We have seen US President Donald Trump supporting India, and so does Russian President Vladmir Putin.</p><p></p><p>India is in a stronger position internationally and it cannot take too long to take action. Now, it could be covert action which is deniable, or demonstrative action, or a combination of the two. But happen it will, as I said.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://im.rediff.com/news/2025/apr/25modi-warns-pakistan.jpg?w=670&h=900" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>IMAGE: Will identify, track and punish every terrorist behind Pahalgam, Prime Minister Narendra Modi tells a public meeting in Madhubani, Bihar, April 24, 2025. Photograph: ANI Photo</p><p><strong>Earlier Pakistan's nuclear status prevented us from going in for a full-fledged war. Does this aspect not concern the Government of India anymore?</strong></p><p></p><p>It used to. This bluff was called in 2019 when the Balakot strike happened.</p><p></p><p>Even presuming Pakistan takes nuclear action, they also know in their heart of hearts that they can be obliterated because India’s response will be massive.</p><p></p><p><strong>Will the international community not intervene to prevent a war between India and Pakistan because both are nuclear States?</strong></p><p></p><p>Nothing can be done if (<em>nuclear</em>) weapons are used. Because it is too late, as there will be no time left to intervene.</p><p></p><p>There will be enough international players that will be telling Pakistan, accept what you have done and the grace punishment, that is short of nuclear option.</p><p></p><p>Everybody is aware of what Pakistan is saying and what they say, they will not do. Nuclear weapons are for deterrence and not for use unless it falls into hands of a mad man or an irrational player.</p><p></p><p>I am not bothered by the nuclear option at this moment but I am bothered about what would be Pakistani General Asif Munir’s response when India takes kinetic action.</p><p></p><p>He is waiting for India to take immediate and reckless action. This will get him the opportunity to rally the nation behind him as his and the Pakistan army's credibility in Pakistan is at an all-time low.</p><p></p><p>Pakistan crossed the red line by asking tourists, are you Hindu? Can you read the kalma? If you cannot, we will kill you. This red line was never crossed by Pakistan.</p><p></p><p>Mind you, this will affect the livelihood of ordinary Kashmiris. For the next two years I don’t see any tourists going to Kashmir. We had 2.3 crore tourists travelling to Kashmir in 2024 and if it falls to nil in the coming months and next year, it will hurt Kashmiris.</p><p></p><p>Pakistan lost a larger plot in provoking India to take action against them. He (<em>Gen Munir</em>) wants India to take action so that he can rally Pakistan as a nation and tell Pakistanis that it is only the Pakistani army that is the custodian of Pakistan. That is General Asif Munir’s game plan.</p><p></p><p><strong>Do you feel Gen Munir executed the Pahalgam massacre to win back popularity in his country?</strong></p><p></p><p>Not popularity, but to shore up his dying image. He is not popular at all. He is facing a lot of criticism from everyone. This was his gamble. </p><p></p><p><strong>You mentioned in your tweet, ‘Did the intemperate speech by Pakistan Army Chief last week, act as a dog whistle?' Was that speech noticed but its implications of fallout ignored?</strong></p><p></p><p>It was probably not taken seriously. People thought the Pakistan army chief makes such statements to keep control of the nation. Therefore it was not taken so seriously.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://im.rediff.com/news/2025/apr/24pahalgam-site-of-attack3.jpg?w=670&h=900" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>IMAGE: The site of the terror attack on tourists in Baisaran near Pahalgam, April 24, 2025. Photograph: Adnan Abidi/Reuters</p><p><strong>A B Vajpayee once said it is easy to start a war but one does not know when the war ends and what shape it ends in. So it is better not to start a war. Do these lines make sense in today’s time? Can we get trapped in a war against Pakistan?</strong></p><p></p><p>We are not going for war against Pakistan. If war starts it will be Pakistan that will start the war, not us. We are going to do punitive action, which is not the same as war. This can be controlled. It is called as escalation control in terms of war theory.</p><p></p><p><strong>What kind of action do you see India taking against the Lashkar-e-Tayiba? Their offshoot The Resistance Front was behind the killing of innocent Indian tourists in Pahalgam.</strong></p><p></p><p>Not Lashkar. I am actually looking for action against the Pakistan army.</p><p></p><p>Ultimately, the fountainhead of terrorism against India is the Pakistan army and not just Lashkar.</p><p></p><p>Lashkar is a proxy and nurtured group of the Pakistani army.</p><p>India this time will look into hurting the Pakistani army’s interest. It could be their commercial interest, tactical or strategic interest or one of their leaders. Just go for it.</p><p></p><p>Even if you send a message that we have attempted to kill one of the Pakistani generals, that itself will serve the purpose. This could be one of the options.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dalvinder45, post: 226555, member: 26009"] [B]'It could be the Pakistan army's commercial interest, tactical or strategic interest or one of their leaders.' 'Even if you send a message that we have attempted to kill one of the Pakistani generals, that itself will serve the purpose.' [IMG]https://im.rediff.com/news/2025/apr/23vinay-narwal-last-rites7.jpg?w=670&h=900[/IMG][/B] IMAGE: Navy officers offer a gun salute to Lieutenant Vinay Narwal who was killed in a terror attack near Pahalgam, at a crematorium in Karnal, Haryana, April 23, 2025. Photograph: Bhawika Chhabra/Reuters India has [URL='https://www.rediff.com/news/report/-pahalgam-attack-india-acts-tough-takes-5-big-actions-against-pak/20250423.htm']downgraded[/URL] diplomatic ties with Pakistan post the Pahalgam terror attack on innocent tourists. The TRF is an offshoot of the Lashkar-E-Tayiba, the Pakistan-based terrorist organisation which has been instrumental in organising terror attacks in India, including the infamous 26/11 Mumbai attacks. This time the Laskhar crossed the red line by targeting innocent tourists in Pahalgam on April 22, in which 26 people were killed. Worse was the fact they identified tourists by their religion and if they were found to be Hindu, shot dead. This attack happened a week after Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir, addressing an Overseas Pakistanis Convention in Islamabad, stated that Kashmir was the ‘jugular vein of Pakistan’. He further said, ““Our forefathers thought we are different from Hindus in every possible aspect of life. Our religions are different, our customs are different, our traditions are different, our thoughts are different and our ambitions are different. That was the foundation of the two-nation theory that was laid there. We are two nations, we are not one nation.” [B]Are the actions the Government of India has taken so far against Pakistan good enough, or should they have done something more?[/B] It is a good first step. I believe that a greater response is called for and that too a well-considered deliberate response is the need of the hour. We should wait. The government is also aware of the anger and anguish that people have. They themselves don’t like what has happened because they have worked very hard to prevent something like this from happening. Yet it has happened and there will be consequences for Pakistan to suffer. The suspension of Indus Water Treaty has never happened. This will hurt Pakistan’s fragile economy and will lead to a rise in anger against the Pakistan army in Pakistan. So this first step is a good step. The government has also annulled the post of defence attaché in New Delhi and it is presumed they can never come back. This is a very major message in international diplomacy. [B]Does India have any military options against Pakistan?[/B] Yes, we have and it is all on the table. Obviously I don’t know when it will happen and how it will happen but yes, happen it will. Not only has this government resolved to take the risk but there is also enough backing and anger among other nations who are stating that India should not hesitate to take any action against Pakistan. These nations are ready to back India. We have seen US President Donald Trump supporting India, and so does Russian President Vladmir Putin. India is in a stronger position internationally and it cannot take too long to take action. Now, it could be covert action which is deniable, or demonstrative action, or a combination of the two. But happen it will, as I said. [IMG]https://im.rediff.com/news/2025/apr/25modi-warns-pakistan.jpg?w=670&h=900[/IMG] IMAGE: Will identify, track and punish every terrorist behind Pahalgam, Prime Minister Narendra Modi tells a public meeting in Madhubani, Bihar, April 24, 2025. Photograph: ANI Photo [B]Earlier Pakistan's nuclear status prevented us from going in for a full-fledged war. Does this aspect not concern the Government of India anymore?[/B] It used to. This bluff was called in 2019 when the Balakot strike happened. Even presuming Pakistan takes nuclear action, they also know in their heart of hearts that they can be obliterated because India’s response will be massive. [B]Will the international community not intervene to prevent a war between India and Pakistan because both are nuclear States?[/B] Nothing can be done if ([I]nuclear[/I]) weapons are used. Because it is too late, as there will be no time left to intervene. There will be enough international players that will be telling Pakistan, accept what you have done and the grace punishment, that is short of nuclear option. Everybody is aware of what Pakistan is saying and what they say, they will not do. Nuclear weapons are for deterrence and not for use unless it falls into hands of a mad man or an irrational player. I am not bothered by the nuclear option at this moment but I am bothered about what would be Pakistani General Asif Munir’s response when India takes kinetic action. He is waiting for India to take immediate and reckless action. This will get him the opportunity to rally the nation behind him as his and the Pakistan army's credibility in Pakistan is at an all-time low. Pakistan crossed the red line by asking tourists, are you Hindu? Can you read the kalma? If you cannot, we will kill you. This red line was never crossed by Pakistan. Mind you, this will affect the livelihood of ordinary Kashmiris. For the next two years I don’t see any tourists going to Kashmir. We had 2.3 crore tourists travelling to Kashmir in 2024 and if it falls to nil in the coming months and next year, it will hurt Kashmiris. Pakistan lost a larger plot in provoking India to take action against them. He ([I]Gen Munir[/I]) wants India to take action so that he can rally Pakistan as a nation and tell Pakistanis that it is only the Pakistani army that is the custodian of Pakistan. That is General Asif Munir’s game plan. [B]Do you feel Gen Munir executed the Pahalgam massacre to win back popularity in his country?[/B] Not popularity, but to shore up his dying image. He is not popular at all. He is facing a lot of criticism from everyone. This was his gamble. [B]You mentioned in your tweet, ‘Did the intemperate speech by Pakistan Army Chief last week, act as a dog whistle?' Was that speech noticed but its implications of fallout ignored?[/B] It was probably not taken seriously. People thought the Pakistan army chief makes such statements to keep control of the nation. Therefore it was not taken so seriously. [IMG]https://im.rediff.com/news/2025/apr/24pahalgam-site-of-attack3.jpg?w=670&h=900[/IMG] IMAGE: The site of the terror attack on tourists in Baisaran near Pahalgam, April 24, 2025. Photograph: Adnan Abidi/Reuters [B]A B Vajpayee once said it is easy to start a war but one does not know when the war ends and what shape it ends in. So it is better not to start a war. Do these lines make sense in today’s time? Can we get trapped in a war against Pakistan?[/B] We are not going for war against Pakistan. If war starts it will be Pakistan that will start the war, not us. We are going to do punitive action, which is not the same as war. This can be controlled. It is called as escalation control in terms of war theory. [B]What kind of action do you see India taking against the Lashkar-e-Tayiba? Their offshoot The Resistance Front was behind the killing of innocent Indian tourists in Pahalgam.[/B] Not Lashkar. I am actually looking for action against the Pakistan army. Ultimately, the fountainhead of terrorism against India is the Pakistan army and not just Lashkar. Lashkar is a proxy and nurtured group of the Pakistani army. India this time will look into hurting the Pakistani army’s interest. It could be their commercial interest, tactical or strategic interest or one of their leaders. Just go for it. Even if you send a message that we have attempted to kill one of the Pakistani generals, that itself will serve the purpose. This could be one of the options. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Social Lounge
Articles
General
Pakistan Army Chief’s vitriolic speeches make India Vigilant of Pak Future intentions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top