Normal
Re: Sikhism is not the same as Hinduism..or Islam, .....or Christianity.....etcDear Bhainji ,I am talking of Sikhism as different from Hinduism , because the Hinduism practised today is nothing but BRAHMINISM . Even we all personally had to suffer in 1984 & afterwards , I'm not believing in Khalistan or voilence .I live in LUDHIANA ( PUNJAB ) Does that mean I cannot express my views as a Sikh , now that amounts to GENERALISATION . ALL TALK OF SIKHISM AS A SEPERATE RELIGION IS NOTHING BUT TERRORISM & SEPARATISM . That is I suppose u want to say , what is the difference between this & that of RSS that to live in India as a community Sikhs will have to remain as a part of Hinduism . HAS ANY RELIGION OTHER THAN BRAHMINISM SURVIVED IN INDIA BY BEING A PART OF HINDUISM ? I never said anything against Hindus , they r all my brothers & sisters . Infact my closest friends r Hindus & I don't find much of a difference between Sikhs & Hindus as human beings . But I do want Sikhism as a faith progressing in absolute numbers , because as a way of life it is unparrallel as it actually helps the upliftment of an ordinary mortal in all ways , morally , spiritually & economically ( if practised truthfully ) a true way of LIVING EMANCIPATION . U don't have to worry about voilence or Khalistanis , it is never going to happen as I see things for now . So chill , don't harbour unneccesary fears . As for( so called ) Muslims & Sikh alliance , Islam is too rigid & intolerant to accomodate any other INDEPENDENT RELIGION . Muslims r too much occupied with their TAAQUIA ie religious conversion .So this so called partnership is the handiwork of some people who might deem it to be fit , not neccesary that all proud Sikhs approve of it . no GENERALISATION should be here too . Might not last very long . U r attacking the independence of Sikhism on a wrong premise .Regards ,Dalbir Singh
Re: Sikhism is not the same as Hinduism..or Islam, .....or Christianity.....etc
Dear Bhainji ,
I am talking of Sikhism as different from Hinduism , because the Hinduism practised today is nothing but BRAHMINISM . Even we all personally had to suffer in 1984 & afterwards , I'm not believing in Khalistan or voilence .I live in LUDHIANA ( PUNJAB ) Does that mean I cannot express my views as a Sikh , now that amounts to GENERALISATION . ALL TALK OF SIKHISM AS A SEPERATE RELIGION IS NOTHING BUT TERRORISM & SEPARATISM . That is I suppose u want to say , what is the difference between this & that of RSS that to live in India as a community Sikhs will have to remain as a part of Hinduism . HAS ANY RELIGION OTHER THAN BRAHMINISM SURVIVED IN INDIA BY BEING A PART OF HINDUISM ? I never said anything against Hindus , they r all my brothers & sisters . Infact my closest friends r Hindus & I don't find much of a difference between Sikhs & Hindus as human beings . But I do want Sikhism as a faith progressing in absolute numbers , because as a way of life it is unparrallel as it actually helps the upliftment of an ordinary mortal in all ways , morally , spiritually & economically ( if practised truthfully ) a true way of LIVING EMANCIPATION . U don't have to worry about voilence or Khalistanis , it is never going to happen as I see things for now . So chill , don't harbour unneccesary fears . As for( so called ) Muslims & Sikh alliance , Islam is too rigid & intolerant to accomodate any other INDEPENDENT RELIGION . Muslims r too much occupied with their TAAQUIA ie religious conversion .So this so called partnership is the handiwork of some people who might deem it to be fit , not neccesary that all proud Sikhs approve of it . no GENERALISATION should be here too . Might not last very long . U r attacking the independence of Sikhism on a wrong premise .
Regards ,
Dalbir Singh
