I promise I will drop the car analogies tomorrow! but in the meantime, Why also is it, that when we are driving our car, with a load of family passengers, and the car fails, we start blaming our wife in the passenger seat, or mum in the back seat, especially when they remind us how we forgot to put oil in the sump.
It is a long and hard journey, sometimes it is all too easy to blame our passengers for our own failings, especially when they point them out.
How many times have we been annoyed at our passengers because they have caused us to make a journey in our car that has ended up on the hard shoulder with our hazard lights on. We blame them, when in fact we should be blaming ourselves, not only for driving a defective car, but for compounding the problem by making another feel bad, when it is our own failing.
How many of us spend money on a nice set of wheels, the latest stereo, a new gold plated tissue box for the rear, blacked out windows, when we should really be spending the money on brake pads, oil, new tyres,
I think I have now killed the car analogies for the day, however, there is one cheeky question I have been wanting to post for a while, and here is the place to do it.
Which car, be it a classic, or a modern car, is the car god would drive and why,
I would say that god would drive a Classic 1994 Range Rover 4.2 V8 (funnily enough) LSE (with the extra 8 inches in the back seat), why? well, its unpretentious, powerful, invincible big enough to take a family and 2 dogs, it makes you smile when you drive it, not because other people are thinking balleh balleh (well actually who would, at nearly 20 years old), but because it is just so beautiful to drive, and you constantly get asked by other drivers to help them (especially in the snow).
