• Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
    Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
    Sign up Log in

Reply to thread

Kaloo Raam is not just wrong on "certain things" but on most of the things. He attacks respected Gursikhs in the panth such as Baba Jarnail Singh Ji, Bhai Veer Singh Ji, Baba Banda Singh Ji and others. He insulted Amrit, 5 banis and numerous other accepted practices. 

 

Patasay have been used in Amrit eversince. The oldest written accounts on Amrit are of spy of Aurangzeb, Abul Durani and Bhai Jeevan singh Ji (previous name Bhai Jait Mal Ji). Bhai Sahib clearly states in his account that five banis were recited, sarabloh was used and patasay were used. Reference of Bhai Kahan Singh is not solid as it is based on hearsay. In any case, this is not the point of discussion here.

 


 

Not all jathebandis approved maryada. Again, it sets minimum requirements but nowhere does it say that reading 5 banis is wrong. No proof was provided as to why 3 banis and not five when most of the jathebandis read five banis. My cousin was told to recite all five banis at Akal Takhat Sahib. Sachkhand exists - "Sachkhand Wassay Nirankar". According to Meharbaan Janamsakhi and Bhagat bani Ithaas much evidence has been provided. I suggest you read it first. I personally have not read these accounts but I still believe Bhagats were Sikhs because their bani is directly in line with Gurubani. Gurbani is clear on the stance that without obtaining naam from Satguru no one can get salvation. This also applies to Bhagats. Sarabloh and bibek have been discussed with you previously so no need to do it again. Jhatka was opposed but for every point evidence was presented. It was not Bhai Sahib who mistranslated but it is you who are doing this. 

 

Rehat Maryada, Missionary printed books, Gurbani, Vaars and Rehatnamas prove it beyond the doubt that Naam is Gurmantar. Professor Sahib Singh agrees with it also. 

 

By insulting other jathebandis and using foul language you are only harming your own jeevan and weakening your own case. When you use foul language just think if Guru Sahib would use the same words. All issues can be resolved with love. SGPC Maryada cannot be accepted entirely. It makes no sense to accept it first and then change it. Change it first and then accept it. I do not reject it but I simply disagree with some points. Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh


Top