I used to be quite interested in Taoism and in my readings about Sikhi I think there are a lot of parallels.
One being that (in my opinion) the formless and mysterious nature of the Tao is similar to the formless and mysterious nature of the Waheguru.
The very first verses of Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching:
1. The Tao that can be spoken is not the constant & unchanging Tao
The name that can be named is not the constant & unchanging name
The nameless is the origin of Heaven and Earth
The named is the mother of myriad things
Thus, constantly without desire, one observes its essence
Constantly with desire, one observes its manifestations
These two emerge together but differ in name
The unity is said to be the mystery
Mystery of mysteries, the door to all wonders
Do you think this is at least in someway similar to our understanding of the Waheguru?
One being that (in my opinion) the formless and mysterious nature of the Tao is similar to the formless and mysterious nature of the Waheguru.
The very first verses of Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching:
1. The Tao that can be spoken is not the constant & unchanging Tao
The name that can be named is not the constant & unchanging name
The nameless is the origin of Heaven and Earth
The named is the mother of myriad things
Thus, constantly without desire, one observes its essence
Constantly with desire, one observes its manifestations
These two emerge together but differ in name
The unity is said to be the mystery
Mystery of mysteries, the door to all wonders
Do you think this is at least in someway similar to our understanding of the Waheguru?