Normal
Of course it does ! As I said above, its the one and the same but seen through different lenses. Stephen Hawking saw through science lenses and Nanak through theological lenses. The conundrum of course, is, that whilst manmukh searches/creates unknowingly outside into space, [science] with unending quest, the gurmukh is anchored to nam* [see below] and meditates within.Moving on with what you've said above:Call that "pin point" Big Bang or Ekonkar, but are they not words expressing something ?And isn't word a sound with meaning ?And isn't sound a shabd [word] when expounded ?And isn't it the word from whence came creation [John 1:1 King James Bible] ?And isn't it the word [alam] that precedes Quran' Sharif and holds true the creation ?The aggregated sum of all of the above is Sound and sound is Nam.
Of course it does ! As I said above, its the one and the same but seen through different lenses. Stephen Hawking saw through science lenses and Nanak through theological lenses. The conundrum of course, is, that whilst manmukh searches/creates unknowingly outside into space, [science] with unending quest, the gurmukh is anchored to nam* [see below] and meditates within.
Moving on with what you've said above:
Call that "pin point" Big Bang or Ekonkar, but are they not words expressing something ?
And isn't word a sound with meaning ?
And isn't sound a shabd [word] when expounded ?
And isn't it the word from whence came creation [John 1:1 King James Bible] ?
And isn't it the word [alam] that precedes Quran' Sharif and holds true the creation ?
The aggregated sum of all of the above is Sound and sound is Nam.
