Balbir ji
I don't know why such posts are even started when one always end up contradicting himself. I'm not saying contradiction is bad, it is all good, but what is need of all stupid arguments when the end and the beginning is the same, and the resultant is the wastage of time.. You can utilize the time to do True Simran (as you put it), and people here can keep on continuing their efforts to satisfy their quest to find true naam simran (which you as you said you yourself know but it something which can't be delivered to someone else here on internet, why waste time).
Quote: "Translation only shows the conscious level of the translator's mind. True Guru's message is universal.
Let us exchange our views in Satsangs. The Sikhphilosophydotnet forum is a good platform right now."
- Please look at the inherent contradiction here. You are saying that translation shows conscious level of the translator, perfectly true. But then why are asking to exchange views in "Satsangs" like SPN, please clarify if your views are above concious level ? Also please define Satsang, can we express "Sat" in our views... if it is possible to express the 'Sat' in the views on SPN then everyonw will be the "knower of truth"... isn't it !!
- Regarding Gurmukhi, it is a script and people should learn it to understand what is written by the Guru at the concious level, the real thing would be how to go beyond that level, and that no one can express in views... Tranlations are usually poor, including some given on "SaySatsriakal.com" as well cos as you mentioned it only shows the concious level of the translator. So lets not indulge in wasting time, as not much time is left. Lets come to know the True Simran ourselves before preaching others...
God takes care of all, not just saints or psuedo saints .... am I wrong ?