My Dear fellow SPN'ers
Sat Sri Akal
The Garden of Eden, The parting of the Red Sea, The miracles of Jesus....I could go on for a while as the Bible is a rich source of such material
But other than what was written down within the scriptures themselves, what secondary evidence exists to support these stories? I refer to them as stories deliberately!
More fundamentally......did Jesus really die on the cross and was he then resurrected three days later?
I note there has recently been much debate about the Christian faith on this forum using the integrity, (or otherwise), of the Bible as evidence
I thought I would approach the debate from a different angle and ask if the Christian Jesus was the same as the historical Jesus and if he really survived the crucifixion? I am focussing on Jesus as quite clearly, he is the primary figure in the Christian faith and its message about the redemption of mankind ...although it would have been really interesting to explore the other great Bible stories in Genesis and Exodus etc as well
I appreciate this is a controversial question, possibly bordering on offensive for devout followers, but I have been aware for some time of the belief that Jesus survived the crucifixion and continued to preach until his final days in Kashmir of all places. His tomb is thus supposedly in Srinagar
More background can be found here including some interesting historical references that appear to backup this claim:
http://www.tombofjesus.com/
I appreciate this isn't really a Sikh Philosophy thread so apologies in advance, and I will gladly accept the moderator's view on this
However, if anyone does want to reply, please do so without quoting Biblical scriptures and providing copious hyperlinks to websites that quote Biblical scriptures.
Instead, I am challenging believers to validate their beliefs with hard archaeological and historical evidence
Something that is very easy for us to do in Sikhism as our Gurus existed within the last few hundred years, and we still have original handwritten documents and artefacts that belonged to our Gurus. I think, but could be wrong, that this makes Sikhism fairly unique as far as the World's great religions are concerned
Grateful for your views
:blueturban:
Sat Sri Akal
The Garden of Eden, The parting of the Red Sea, The miracles of Jesus....I could go on for a while as the Bible is a rich source of such material
But other than what was written down within the scriptures themselves, what secondary evidence exists to support these stories? I refer to them as stories deliberately!
More fundamentally......did Jesus really die on the cross and was he then resurrected three days later?
I note there has recently been much debate about the Christian faith on this forum using the integrity, (or otherwise), of the Bible as evidence
I thought I would approach the debate from a different angle and ask if the Christian Jesus was the same as the historical Jesus and if he really survived the crucifixion? I am focussing on Jesus as quite clearly, he is the primary figure in the Christian faith and its message about the redemption of mankind ...although it would have been really interesting to explore the other great Bible stories in Genesis and Exodus etc as well
I appreciate this is a controversial question, possibly bordering on offensive for devout followers, but I have been aware for some time of the belief that Jesus survived the crucifixion and continued to preach until his final days in Kashmir of all places. His tomb is thus supposedly in Srinagar
More background can be found here including some interesting historical references that appear to backup this claim:
http://www.tombofjesus.com/
I appreciate this isn't really a Sikh Philosophy thread so apologies in advance, and I will gladly accept the moderator's view on this
However, if anyone does want to reply, please do so without quoting Biblical scriptures and providing copious hyperlinks to websites that quote Biblical scriptures.
Instead, I am challenging believers to validate their beliefs with hard archaeological and historical evidence
Something that is very easy for us to do in Sikhism as our Gurus existed within the last few hundred years, and we still have original handwritten documents and artefacts that belonged to our Gurus. I think, but could be wrong, that this makes Sikhism fairly unique as far as the World's great religions are concerned
Grateful for your views
:blueturban:
Last edited: