Taranjeet singh
SPNer
...indeed it is ! Gurbani is positive and active as opposed to it being restrictive and negative. The above shabd is not just positive and factual, but also functionally descriptive, ਭੰਡਹੁ ਹੋਵੈ ਦੋਸਤੀ ਭੰਡਹੁ ਚਲੈ ਰਾਹੁ [meaning, through women social intercourse is found and society comes into being].So is the above actually positive of women or not??
...forgive me Sir !This is the very reason SPN requires the whole Shabad.
...forgive me Sir !
ਭੰਡਿ ਜੰਮੀਐ ਭੰਡਿ ਨਿੰਮੀਐ ਭੰਡਿ ਮੰਗਣੁ ਵੀਆਹੁ ॥ ਭੰਡਹੁ ਹੋਵੈ ਦੋਸਤੀ ਭੰਡਹੁ ਚਲੈ ਰਾਹੁ ॥ ਭੰਡੁ ਮੁਆ ਭੰਡੁ ਭਾਲੀਐ ਭੰਡਿ ਹੋਵੈ ਬੰਧਾਨੁ ॥ ਸੋ ਕਿਉ ਮੰਦਾ ਆਖੀਐ ਜਿਤੁ ਜੰਮਹਿ ਰਾਜਾਨ ॥ ਭੰਡਹੁ ਹੀ ਭੰਡੁ ਊਪਜੈ ਭੰਡੈ ਬਾਝੁ ਨ ਕੋਇ ॥ ਨਾਨਕ ਭੰਡੈ ਬਾਹਰਾ ਏਕੋ ਸਚਾ ਸੋਇ ॥ ਜਿਤੁ ਮੁਖਿ ਸਦਾ ਸਾਲਾਹੀਐ ਭਾਗਾ ਰਤੀ ਚਾਰਿ ॥ ਨਾਨਕ ਤੇ ਮੁਖ ਊਜਲੇ ਤਿਤੁ ਸਚੈ ਦਰਬਾਰਿ ॥੨॥ {ਪੰਨਾ 473}
When speaking of positive of women in Gurbani this is not the usual one I go to. Reason being is that some have interpreted it as not overly positive of women. At first glance it looks like it is. But then look at the wording... is she only being praised for her ability to bring more males (Kings) into the world, and not looked in positive light on her own volition, of being an individual carrying the same divine light? The above can be taken as a statement that her worth is only in comparison to the man she is being connected to and not as an individual in her own right. Of course you COULD infer man means mankind, but mankind does not marry a woman. Half of mankind would marry a man. You COULD infer King could also mean Queen. But it doesn't say so.
So is the above actually positive of women or not??
My favourite tuk to show equality of all humans is this:
"As Gurmukh look upon ALL with a single eye of equality, for in each and every heart the divine light is contained"
That WOULD include women...
Vadda Veer Ji - Gurfateh !Original ji,
..my pleasureFirstly, I want to thank you for posting the whole Shabad.
I read the shabd directly from SGGSJ and do my own translation. Is that what you are asking me to do ?Would you be kind enough to also post the romanised version as many of the participants here do not read Gurmukhi
I'm sorry for coming across like that, perhaps I was a bit reckless with the read and hence, an oversight on my part - sorry. Generally speaking, I feel its a lot safer to say sorry on account I've erred and others haven't, a presumption and move on.Secondly,I am sorry to see that you take everything personally. As a result, something urged you to apologise when my post was directed to the original poster not to Original.
No comment, although, I feel within the academia homogenisation certain formalities ought to be relaxed to allow intellectual independence to harness the essential features of the subject matter rather than rummage through incidentals for completeness.My previous post is to show how understanding Gurbani is important in the context of the whole Shabad/Gurmat idea rather than one/some liners.
...indeed it is ! Gurbani is positive and active as opposed to it being restrictive and negative. The above shabd is not just positive and factual, but also functionally descriptive, ਭੰਡਹੁ ਹੋਵੈ ਦੋਸਤੀ ਭੰਡਹੁ ਚਲੈ ਰਾਹੁ [meaning, through women social intercourse is found and society comes into being].