discussion

Dear all and Brither Naamdhari Sikh( username here on spn) Iam strating this thread with reluctance as it should be my Naamdhari brother who should have done for the reason best best known to him he never didi it even on my two request My Naamdhari Fellow have some complains with the main...

This is the part of the Rehat approved by the Akal Takht pertaining to the marriage outside of Sikhi. After reading this, please understand that this should close up all debate and questions as questioning the Akal Takht is, as i have heard, forbidden. Of course debate is allowed but please...

hey, for those who wanna put an end to a 4 year old discussion at yahoo, check this high quality discussion site. I checked for the archieve and let me tell u, you really need to be knowledged to be in the discussions http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theevolutiondeceit/ also useful...

((((((( Venture into a fascinating philosophy of Sikhism )))))))) Fateh Ji, There is one thing constant in this world and that is change... and its time to change the punch line of SPN Discussion Forums... Let us see whose punchline gets selected... Each entry will be added to the Poll in this...

There is an excellent dialogue among sikhs all over the world to define a sikh. The recent focus is the 1925 definition of a sikh and its endorsement among various groups. The discussion is about the definition of a Sikh as a "person who believe in the Guru Granth Sahib, believe in the Ten...