vijaydeep Singh
SPNer
Gurfateh
Das is touching the part one at last only.
Well first of all das will talk about few
Sikh writings which talks of contents of Shri Dasham Granth Sahib Ji.
But here writer uses all the more stuff fromo Gyani Gyan Singh Ji.
There are four chapters dealing with.
In most chapters writer has taken the help of Gyani Gyan Singh’s Naveen PAnth Prakash.
Well he did not mention those parts of the same book mention above which say that text which are put in question by writer are by Guru only.
If writer says that these statement of Gyani Ji are false or not authentic then other statement which writer himself uses, taking them from the same book also loose authenticity .
Then by concealing and wrong interpretation writer has also done a forgery, and thought that Sikhs are fool who will not verify the truth of these statement.
So this fact that there was no such text by Tenth Master false as there are two copies called Ananadpuri copies and one is of Patna ,which are dated even before the creation of Khalsa, while the one at Aurangabad, written by Bhai Daya Singh is during the life of Guru, after he left Anandpur Sahib perhaps. It is written about Bhai Mani Singh Ji compiling the Dasham Granth. That Dasham Granth Sahib is not the Dasham Patshah Ju ka Granth as it has text of Tenth Master included within the rearranged version (based upon Gurus and Bhagats and not Ragas) of Guru Granth Sahib. That’s what Bhai Mani Singh did and testimony of killing of Massa Rangher is more to do with that copy.
So as we see that writer does forgery when he talks of the 36.19 verse of Naveen Panth Prakash
It starts as
Which is now the book of the Tenth Master.
Brought in panth/faith calling it indestructible/undividable. (Kahi Lavant Madh Panth Achera while writer writes Kahilavat Madh Panth Vadhera ie called a lot in panth. So either page 319 from Bhasha Vibhag of Punjab is wrong or writer has done a forgery.)
There was not a copy of it at the time of Guru. Happened (that) verse stayed alone. Many places within pothis/booklets . Stayed this Bani/verse of Tenth Guru. (Again Here writer convert yaya into vava ie writes Vahi ie that. Gyani Gyan Singh talks of present day this Dasham Granth Sahib was in booklets while by changing the word writer tries to prove that those pothis only had bani ,what a shame full act. Bani Rahi Dasam Guru yahi while writer replaces yahi with vahi,Shame on those pseudo Sikhs who call Bhag Singh Ambala a scholar)
Instead once Singhs said.
To Guru did request this way.
O ! Guru the verses which are your.
There is need to make a (single) volume at a place.
A Granth equal to Adi Granth.This should also be made and panth with worship/believe in it.
Listening this Tenth Guru said.
Guru Arjan happened big comforter/benefiter /upkari.
I do not want equality to him.
I will not do or you say again.( the remaining verse below are not given by the writer but some verses coming after the following are given by the writer,why is this done ?)
Worth worship is form of Guru Granth.
That only may stay always unique.
In that devotion and knowledge is filled.
That experience is said by Guru in that(text).
I have taken shadow of no one.
Sanskrit , I took Bhakha(I have used Bhakha/Braj instead of Sanskrit).
Reading that the Rasa/pleasure of bravery mounts(the mind).
Towards Sikhs very fearlessness.
Doing that force enemies and agents of them are killed.
(With that they may) Expand their glory and empire.
(these ten lines are omitted and next two lines below are added after the lines before these ten lines and read may read these two lines as continuation omitting these ten lines as if these ten lines are not the part of this verse, Is this again not shameful and deceptive)
Etc. after listening the words of Guru.
Likewise all Sikhs stayed silent.(the reaming lines are gain omitted)
Kept reading from above the pothis.
Having beer/bravery ras, killing the foes.
Year Seventeen Hundred Seventy Eight .
Panth (in) large happened (to) gather.
Daily in front of Akal Takhat.(As far stooges of spokesman term Akal Takhat never existed before 1920 AD but this work is done much before that year 1931 Vikrami )
Heavy court of Panth stuck.
Of Gurbani, Mani Singh.
A lot of Kath/explanation ,use to let other listen.
Making many testimonies ,use to let other listen.
From that Singhs have mind/views (at) strong place.19.
So all thing was that Tenth Master did not wanted to give equal status to his text as to Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.
Today some time before Das was discussing this thing with S. T. P. Singh ji about why did Tenth Master did not added his verses in Shri Guru Granth Sahib.
Das said that it may have increased the volume double so unfit to carry or to study and even one verse just for sake of included would have included in Shri Guru Granth sahib Ji, then people would have said that this verse only is from him and outside verse are invalid.
But then one new idea was given as per that Tenth Master due to respect did not added his verse. Das said that Fifth Master did include his verses in Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, but then an idea stuck that Fifth Master were actually maker of this text while Tenth Master as per popular perception only brought out the new version in which verses of Ninth Master were included. While when das talked with Gyani Surjeet Singh Ji Sikh Missionary we had a common thought that Ninth Master may himself have included his verse and at Guru Ki Kashi, Guru made more copies of this new version of Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji. In that case logic of this paragraph fails.
But from above we get another clue which talks about theme of Guru Granth Sahib Ji is based upon spirituality while in verse by Tenth Master we have war, political expansion which may need diplomacy also.
So let us talk if at all we have any work of Tenth Master doubted by writer mentioned in this book by Gyani Gyan Singh Ji?
If we find that then who should be believed Gyani Gyan Singh Ji or writer ? If writer then why did writer gave reference from the book which itself is opposed to the hypothesis of the writer ? and why not writer did not inform the reader about this ?
So here we go.
Chapter 19 Verse third from last.
We have Hai Hai Sabh Jag Mahi Sabad Bh Jai Jai Sur Lokain
ਹੈ ਹੈ ਹੈ ਸਭ ਜਗ ਭਯੋ ਜੈ ਜੈ ਜੈ ਸੁਰ ਲੋਕ ॥੧੬॥
Hai hai hai sabh jag bhayo jai jai jai sur lok||16||
Whit the world Iamented, the gods hailed his arrival in heavens.16.
Line 12
(5.16 Vachitar Natak)
Lines 1-4, verse 11 Chapter 19
We have
Dohira
After bathing in Tribeni descended at Prayag.
Giving donation and honor to Vipras set afloat/ salvaged very fortunate people.
..10..
Chaupayee
With the order of Akal Purakh.
Tenth Guru ,Master of Panth.
There only in womb of Mata Gujari.
Came, Rembering whom people are salvaged.
Page 142, Line 12
ਚੌਪਈ ॥
Chaupaoo||
CHAUPAI
Page 142, Line 13
ਮੁਰ ਪਿਤ ਪੂਰਬ ਕੀਯਸਿ ਪਯਾਨਾ ॥ ਭਾਂਤਿ ਭਾਂਤਿ ਕੇ ਤੀਰਥਿ ਨਾਨਾ ॥
Mur pit poorab kooyas(i) payaanaa|| Bhaant(i) bhaant(i) ke toorah(i) naanaa||
My father proceeded towards the east and visited several places of pilgrimage.
Page 142, Line 14
ਜਬ ਹੀ ਜਾਤ ਤ੍ਰਿਬੇਣੀ ਭਏ ॥ ਪੁੰਨ ਦਾਨ ਦਿਨ ਕਰਤ ਬਿਤਏ ॥੧॥
Jab hoo jaat tribaanoo bhae|| Punn daan din karat bitae||1||
When he went to Triveni (Prayag), he passed his days in act of charity.1.
Page 143, Line 1
ਤਹੀ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ ਹਮਾਰਾ ਭਯੋ ॥ ਪਟਨਾ ਸਹਰ ਬਿਖੈ ਭਵ ਲਯੋ ॥
Tahoo prakaas hamaaraa bhayo|| Patnaa sahar bikhai bhav layo||
I was conceived there and took birth at Patna.
(Vachitar Natak)
Then se the verse starting from 14 of chapter 24.
It has the story of Anup Kaur being told as related to Tenth Master and a few verse from Charitropakhyan 21 are reproduced
Last two lines of this verse.
Guru wrote Purakh Charitra which is in Granth Dasham.
From it knowing the detachment from the wife of other was made strong/fixed in Sikhs.
(There is a footnote in a line of 12 the verse of chapter 24. Where we have work done by poets of Guru and lost work named Maha Bharat, Budh Baradh,Gobind Gita and Hitupdesh while none is part of Shri Dasham Granth Sahib Ji).
Then in verse 2 of chapter 25.
The Bani/verse of Dasham Granth oh! Brother.
Self created(by) Guru, some which Guru got created.
Eighteen Parab or Bharat.
Many Upnishads and Puranas.
Gobind Gita, Hit Updesh.
Etc. books special.
Sanskrit and Hindi Language.
Were created by Guru,(these creation) create pleasure.
The story of Bharat near Guru.
Pandit did staying daily specially.
In chapter 26 we have in verse 8 about 4 type of devotion to Akal.
In next verse
Dohira
Thad Bhayo Mai Jor Kar Bachan Kaha Sir Naee.(I happened to stay joining/folding hands, saying words bowing head.
In this rank of master and slave given a glimpse..9..The line with transliteration is in Vachitar Natak also.So below also all the lines with transliteration will be from Vachitar Natak).(Verse 10)Chaupyee
Mai Apana Sut Tohi Nivaja.(I glorified you as my son)
Father, son likes wise see long/large.
Dvai Te Eik Roop Hui Gai.(gone to have form from two to one)
These saying of wife and husband were shown.
Sanu Sathar Yar Da Changa(here it is from Mitr Piare Nu..”We have open good of the helper/friend)
The emotion of friend was kept in body like this.
…..
In the very same verse further we have.
Chandi Charitra Chadni Var.
Which Guru did pronounced.
It is like wars of other.
Guru described in many forms.
That’s way war of goddess was described.
To fill pleasure of bravery within Sikhs.
In chapter 27 verse 3.
And in self verses/writing Guru described like this Oh Brave!
Saif, Sarohi, Saihathi Eihee Hamare Peer.(this is from Shaster Naam Mala Puran saying Saif, Sarohi and Saihathi, these are our peer/comforting holy personalities )
Verse 16 also has verse ending with Jai Teghan which is at start of Vachitar Natak.
Gyani Ji also talk of some Bhagouti Stotra for which he says
This Stotra is from within the Tenth Master.
Specially written in self Granth.
I Saw it in Abchal Nagar and good Patna.
Wrote it in 1752.
The glory of that saber this way.
Is there in Akal Ustat that way.
(here gyani ji tried to prove too his best that Guru did not worship goddess but sword. But what writer concealed this thing ?
Verse 5 chapter 39
Swwayya
Singhs read somewhere Chandi Charitar
Bachitar Natak Chandi Ki Varain.
(this is after Tenth Guru arrival at Nanded).
These are the example given in the book from where writer took the reference to prove that Sri Dasham Granth Sahib Ji is not the work of Tenth Guru.
Then next chapter is that Shri Dasham Granth Sahib is not authanitc due to difference in various copies of it pertaining to content.
Well das is here by giving three different version of copies of Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.
So they are
Content of three of them is not the same.
Again writer takes a clever step.
He gives translation in one lines about two versions of Shri Dasham Granth Sahib Ji and says these two Beerhs are been told to be by Bhai Mani Singh Ji and Baba Deep Singh Ji with time and then gives some quotes from Gyani Gyan Singh Ji’s Naveen Panth Prakash and does totally wrong interpretation.
If we believe the wording of writer copies by two great Sikhs mention above are doubtfully from them. Then he should also agree to doubt about other two Singhs mentioned here,who are from Patna Sahib. Then writer should have also casted the doubt over the fact that weather the work is of Bhai Sukha Singh or Bhai Chart Singh at all or not.
So here comes the translation
So we have verse 20 chapter 36.
Dohara
One day order of Panth Mani Singh Ji got.
Brother collect the Bani/verse of Tenth Master.20.
Chaupayee
Did in one bound/volume.
Bhog/end of it is at Hiqayat.
Second Beerh is happened to be at Damdama.
Deep Singh Shaheed created.
Samvat 1804.
In/during that he did this kindness.
Its bhog is at Phutak Kabittan(Asphotak Kabya).
That is the rcoganistaion done by learned.
(these lines were not given by writer while the rest are given)
Another Granthi Sukha Singh.
Created Beerh at Patna with ghaur/ deliberation.
In 1832 Samvat.
He kept/placed Sukhmana Chhakai.
Till Ankpali, many a context.
He placed in his way.
That’s bhog happened at Chhakyes.
This way there are three versions.
Again Charhat Singh ,his son.
Writing/letters like Tenth Master (as)source.
Made/did (add) for more pages.
Got with delibration, written from Guru.
Made another Granth like that.
Which was taken by Bawa Hakin Singh.
That is in Gurudwara Motibagh.
That I have now seen with attachement.
He wrote many other Granths.
I have seen letters like Guru.
After saying then a signature of Tenth Master.
Took the cost four time intending.(the last two lines are not given by the writer while this will disapprove his theory to call Damdami Beerh as Shri Dasham Granth Sahib).
By this way, Granth of Tenth Master.
Three ways/type of Beerh became famous..21..
Then he talks that some parts at end of Krishna Avtar are missing in one copy which is at Delhi and said to be by Bhai Mani Singh Ji. Yet writer himself has used the verse he claims to be missing here as been told by writer himself that there is some other person who is called Syam.
So where should we believe the writer in here or in poet Ram and Shyam chapter ? If writer believes that in spite of some verse missing in one copy still make a proof from being in another copy then by logic of writer himself thses verse are authentic.
Then he cribs that end of Ram avtar has some final verse written in margin with other hand writing. Even if we believe this then as writer did believe in last part of Krishan Avtar missing here, yet as part of whole composition then even it may not be there like Tetes Swayye or Mitar Piare nu is not here, they are still authentic.
He says that there is not a single copy which could be treated as standard for Shri Dasham Granth Sahib. But das has a counter question.
We have Kartarpuri Beerh for standard version of large part of Shri Guru granth Sahib Ji yet Guruship was bestowed to Damdami Beerh. So which Beerh is the standard version for the verse unto the Ninth Master. In Ram Gayo Ravan(u) Gayo there is failure of Aunkrh Logic when Ram has no Aunkadh, in most of the beerhs having Verse unto Ninth Master included ,why is so ?
Opposition to Dasam Granth Sahib.
Writer says that opposition to it started even when it was in form of Vachitar Natak(while fact is that name was Granth of Tenth Master and Vachitar natak is only a part of it as in holy Bible we have three books(example of one is Angeel/new testament) which may have some books composed within like book of Job in Jabur).
Then writer cooks up a story quoting Panth Prakash as blatant lie as such thing does not figure at all over there.
He says that after Bhai Mani Singh created one volume there as a grave opposition within faith and at Budha Johar, after Bhai Mahitaab Singh’s intervention it was delayed but after the martyrdom of Bhai Mani Singh Ji. People cooked up the story of Massa Rangher. Then uselessly he talks of lottery perhaps some old habit of gambling and thence he proves that there has been doubt about the verses.
Well as per Bhai Kahan Singh Nabha’s Mahan Kosh, definition of Dasham Granth. We find that Bhai Sahib talk of Bhai Mani Singh Ji compiling the work of Tenth Master. After his going to Sachkhand, it is send to Damdam Sahib (not Budha johar) and there is debate on weather to keeps parts of it separated or should the form as per Bhai Mani Singh Ji be maintained. Bhai Mahitab Singh Ji en route to kill Massa Rangher say that if he kills Mass then let the form as per Bhai Mani Singh Ji stay else it should be separated. The former thing happens.
So this is lie of the writer and an attempt to misguide us.
Real Dasham Granth is Damdami copy of Shri Guru Granth Sahib.
Here with a few lines from Gyani Gyan Singh writer tries to twist the meaning and at end says that any thing other then authentic verse of Tenth Master in Shri Dasham granth Sahib and Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji any intelligent Sikh consider rest as showing back to Guru. Who the hell is this writer to decide that which Sikh is intelligent ? Has writer himself done any intelligent things ? Is deception not an intelligence ? Yes it is part of intelligence which enemy use to weaken the enemy. Writer is part of such game plan of Anti panthic forces.
So well within the 18th verse of Chapter 36 we have term. After that a version/beerh of Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji is made at Damdama Sahib we have.
That secret is known by intelligent Sikhs.
That is described as Beerh/Version of Tenth Master.Dasham Guru Ki Beerh Bakhanat.
Four more happened from that..
Deep Singh Shaheed made them to be written.
One at Akal Bunga, one at Patna.
Third given to Hajur(Sahib) for reading.
Forth kept at Damdama with intent.
Big Baba/father these four are called.(well in Bihar Bada Baba means Shri Guru Granth Sahib ji,while Chote Baba are Shri Dasham Granth Sahib Ji).
(now the lines given below are quoted by writer to prove his false theory).
Real/original Tenth Master’s Granth/version/copy.
Within old party(Budha Dal) stayed.
When great/big holocaust occurred.
That Granth was taken away by Shah Durani.
That now is beautifully located in Kabul.
Believe it in big dharamshala /largest Gurudwara(of Kabul)..18..
(till these line writer gives quotes yet he does not provide proof either of the fact that did writer or any of his aides did authentication of that original Beerh at Kabul ? Did it stay during the time of Gyani Ji ? If yes then what are the proof ? If no proof the Gyani Ji’s statement could not be agreed upon.Likewise we see writer playing another game that by some that version is at Burj Baba Ala Singh Patiala as per some. Well here it self he himself castes the shadow over what Gyani Ji, say, then why is he quoting something not belied by himself. As we see above that Damdami Beerh or version was related to Tenth Master. And in the next verse clear name of Damdami Beerh is there which exposes the concealing of Truth by writer. So we see.
Dohira
I sang the true story of Adi Granth of Tenth Master.Ad Granth Guru Dasham Ki Katha Jathrath gayee.
Listen, by which emotion did Beerh/version of Granth/text of Tenth Master happened.19.
Then we have details of Shri Dasham Granth Sahib Ji. So we find term Adi used for Damdami Beerh while Granth Dasham Guru ka is different. Yet it does exists.
Das is touching the part one at last only.
Well first of all das will talk about few
Sikh writings which talks of contents of Shri Dasham Granth Sahib Ji.
- Kesar Singh’s Bansavali Nammah talks of a book by Tenth Master or Dasham Patshah Ju Ka Granth.
- Rahit Namah Bhai Desa Singh has talk of second Granth or two granths.
- Bhatt Vahis based Guru Kia Sakhian has name of Vachitar Natak Granth and Charitropahyan
- Rahit Nammah Bhai Chaupa Singh has mention of Avtar Leela and Chatritras along side some lines quoted from Shri Dasham Granth Sahib Ji.
But here writer uses all the more stuff fromo Gyani Gyan Singh Ji.
There are four chapters dealing with.
- This is not the book of Tenth Master.
- This text is not authentic
- Opposition of this text.
- Real Dasham Granth Sahib are Damdami copy of Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.
In most chapters writer has taken the help of Gyani Gyan Singh’s Naveen PAnth Prakash.
Well he did not mention those parts of the same book mention above which say that text which are put in question by writer are by Guru only.
If writer says that these statement of Gyani Ji are false or not authentic then other statement which writer himself uses, taking them from the same book also loose authenticity .
Then by concealing and wrong interpretation writer has also done a forgery, and thought that Sikhs are fool who will not verify the truth of these statement.
So this fact that there was no such text by Tenth Master false as there are two copies called Ananadpuri copies and one is of Patna ,which are dated even before the creation of Khalsa, while the one at Aurangabad, written by Bhai Daya Singh is during the life of Guru, after he left Anandpur Sahib perhaps. It is written about Bhai Mani Singh Ji compiling the Dasham Granth. That Dasham Granth Sahib is not the Dasham Patshah Ju ka Granth as it has text of Tenth Master included within the rearranged version (based upon Gurus and Bhagats and not Ragas) of Guru Granth Sahib. That’s what Bhai Mani Singh did and testimony of killing of Massa Rangher is more to do with that copy.
So as we see that writer does forgery when he talks of the 36.19 verse of Naveen Panth Prakash
It starts as
Which is now the book of the Tenth Master.
Brought in panth/faith calling it indestructible/undividable. (Kahi Lavant Madh Panth Achera while writer writes Kahilavat Madh Panth Vadhera ie called a lot in panth. So either page 319 from Bhasha Vibhag of Punjab is wrong or writer has done a forgery.)
There was not a copy of it at the time of Guru. Happened (that) verse stayed alone. Many places within pothis/booklets . Stayed this Bani/verse of Tenth Guru. (Again Here writer convert yaya into vava ie writes Vahi ie that. Gyani Gyan Singh talks of present day this Dasham Granth Sahib was in booklets while by changing the word writer tries to prove that those pothis only had bani ,what a shame full act. Bani Rahi Dasam Guru yahi while writer replaces yahi with vahi,Shame on those pseudo Sikhs who call Bhag Singh Ambala a scholar)
Instead once Singhs said.
To Guru did request this way.
O ! Guru the verses which are your.
There is need to make a (single) volume at a place.
A Granth equal to Adi Granth.This should also be made and panth with worship/believe in it.
Listening this Tenth Guru said.
Guru Arjan happened big comforter/benefiter /upkari.
I do not want equality to him.
I will not do or you say again.( the remaining verse below are not given by the writer but some verses coming after the following are given by the writer,why is this done ?)
Worth worship is form of Guru Granth.
That only may stay always unique.
In that devotion and knowledge is filled.
That experience is said by Guru in that(text).
I have taken shadow of no one.
Sanskrit , I took Bhakha(I have used Bhakha/Braj instead of Sanskrit).
Reading that the Rasa/pleasure of bravery mounts(the mind).
Towards Sikhs very fearlessness.
Doing that force enemies and agents of them are killed.
(With that they may) Expand their glory and empire.
(these ten lines are omitted and next two lines below are added after the lines before these ten lines and read may read these two lines as continuation omitting these ten lines as if these ten lines are not the part of this verse, Is this again not shameful and deceptive)
Etc. after listening the words of Guru.
Likewise all Sikhs stayed silent.(the reaming lines are gain omitted)
Kept reading from above the pothis.
Having beer/bravery ras, killing the foes.
Year Seventeen Hundred Seventy Eight .
Panth (in) large happened (to) gather.
Daily in front of Akal Takhat.(As far stooges of spokesman term Akal Takhat never existed before 1920 AD but this work is done much before that year 1931 Vikrami )
Heavy court of Panth stuck.
Of Gurbani, Mani Singh.
A lot of Kath/explanation ,use to let other listen.
Making many testimonies ,use to let other listen.
From that Singhs have mind/views (at) strong place.19.
So all thing was that Tenth Master did not wanted to give equal status to his text as to Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.
Today some time before Das was discussing this thing with S. T. P. Singh ji about why did Tenth Master did not added his verses in Shri Guru Granth Sahib.
Das said that it may have increased the volume double so unfit to carry or to study and even one verse just for sake of included would have included in Shri Guru Granth sahib Ji, then people would have said that this verse only is from him and outside verse are invalid.
But then one new idea was given as per that Tenth Master due to respect did not added his verse. Das said that Fifth Master did include his verses in Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, but then an idea stuck that Fifth Master were actually maker of this text while Tenth Master as per popular perception only brought out the new version in which verses of Ninth Master were included. While when das talked with Gyani Surjeet Singh Ji Sikh Missionary we had a common thought that Ninth Master may himself have included his verse and at Guru Ki Kashi, Guru made more copies of this new version of Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji. In that case logic of this paragraph fails.
But from above we get another clue which talks about theme of Guru Granth Sahib Ji is based upon spirituality while in verse by Tenth Master we have war, political expansion which may need diplomacy also.
So let us talk if at all we have any work of Tenth Master doubted by writer mentioned in this book by Gyani Gyan Singh Ji?
If we find that then who should be believed Gyani Gyan Singh Ji or writer ? If writer then why did writer gave reference from the book which itself is opposed to the hypothesis of the writer ? and why not writer did not inform the reader about this ?
So here we go.
Chapter 19 Verse third from last.
We have Hai Hai Sabh Jag Mahi Sabad Bh Jai Jai Sur Lokain
ਹੈ ਹੈ ਹੈ ਸਭ ਜਗ ਭਯੋ ਜੈ ਜੈ ਜੈ ਸੁਰ ਲੋਕ ॥੧੬॥
Hai hai hai sabh jag bhayo jai jai jai sur lok||16||
Whit the world Iamented, the gods hailed his arrival in heavens.16.
Line 12
(5.16 Vachitar Natak)
Lines 1-4, verse 11 Chapter 19
We have
Dohira
After bathing in Tribeni descended at Prayag.
Giving donation and honor to Vipras set afloat/ salvaged very fortunate people.
..10..
Chaupayee
With the order of Akal Purakh.
Tenth Guru ,Master of Panth.
There only in womb of Mata Gujari.
Came, Rembering whom people are salvaged.
Page 142, Line 12
ਚੌਪਈ ॥
Chaupaoo||
CHAUPAI
Page 142, Line 13
ਮੁਰ ਪਿਤ ਪੂਰਬ ਕੀਯਸਿ ਪਯਾਨਾ ॥ ਭਾਂਤਿ ਭਾਂਤਿ ਕੇ ਤੀਰਥਿ ਨਾਨਾ ॥
Mur pit poorab kooyas(i) payaanaa|| Bhaant(i) bhaant(i) ke toorah(i) naanaa||
My father proceeded towards the east and visited several places of pilgrimage.
Page 142, Line 14
ਜਬ ਹੀ ਜਾਤ ਤ੍ਰਿਬੇਣੀ ਭਏ ॥ ਪੁੰਨ ਦਾਨ ਦਿਨ ਕਰਤ ਬਿਤਏ ॥੧॥
Jab hoo jaat tribaanoo bhae|| Punn daan din karat bitae||1||
When he went to Triveni (Prayag), he passed his days in act of charity.1.
Page 143, Line 1
ਤਹੀ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ ਹਮਾਰਾ ਭਯੋ ॥ ਪਟਨਾ ਸਹਰ ਬਿਖੈ ਭਵ ਲਯੋ ॥
Tahoo prakaas hamaaraa bhayo|| Patnaa sahar bikhai bhav layo||
I was conceived there and took birth at Patna.
(Vachitar Natak)
Then se the verse starting from 14 of chapter 24.
It has the story of Anup Kaur being told as related to Tenth Master and a few verse from Charitropakhyan 21 are reproduced
Last two lines of this verse.
Guru wrote Purakh Charitra which is in Granth Dasham.
From it knowing the detachment from the wife of other was made strong/fixed in Sikhs.
(There is a footnote in a line of 12 the verse of chapter 24. Where we have work done by poets of Guru and lost work named Maha Bharat, Budh Baradh,Gobind Gita and Hitupdesh while none is part of Shri Dasham Granth Sahib Ji).
Then in verse 2 of chapter 25.
The Bani/verse of Dasham Granth oh! Brother.
Self created(by) Guru, some which Guru got created.
Eighteen Parab or Bharat.
Many Upnishads and Puranas.
Gobind Gita, Hit Updesh.
Etc. books special.
Sanskrit and Hindi Language.
Were created by Guru,(these creation) create pleasure.
The story of Bharat near Guru.
Pandit did staying daily specially.
In chapter 26 we have in verse 8 about 4 type of devotion to Akal.
In next verse
Dohira
Thad Bhayo Mai Jor Kar Bachan Kaha Sir Naee.(I happened to stay joining/folding hands, saying words bowing head.
In this rank of master and slave given a glimpse..9..The line with transliteration is in Vachitar Natak also.So below also all the lines with transliteration will be from Vachitar Natak).(Verse 10)Chaupyee
Mai Apana Sut Tohi Nivaja.(I glorified you as my son)
Father, son likes wise see long/large.
Dvai Te Eik Roop Hui Gai.(gone to have form from two to one)
These saying of wife and husband were shown.
Sanu Sathar Yar Da Changa(here it is from Mitr Piare Nu..”We have open good of the helper/friend)
The emotion of friend was kept in body like this.
…..
In the very same verse further we have.
Chandi Charitra Chadni Var.
Which Guru did pronounced.
It is like wars of other.
Guru described in many forms.
That’s way war of goddess was described.
To fill pleasure of bravery within Sikhs.
In chapter 27 verse 3.
And in self verses/writing Guru described like this Oh Brave!
Saif, Sarohi, Saihathi Eihee Hamare Peer.(this is from Shaster Naam Mala Puran saying Saif, Sarohi and Saihathi, these are our peer/comforting holy personalities )
Verse 16 also has verse ending with Jai Teghan which is at start of Vachitar Natak.
Gyani Ji also talk of some Bhagouti Stotra for which he says
This Stotra is from within the Tenth Master.
Specially written in self Granth.
I Saw it in Abchal Nagar and good Patna.
Wrote it in 1752.
The glory of that saber this way.
Is there in Akal Ustat that way.
(here gyani ji tried to prove too his best that Guru did not worship goddess but sword. But what writer concealed this thing ?
Verse 5 chapter 39
Swwayya
Singhs read somewhere Chandi Charitar
Bachitar Natak Chandi Ki Varain.
(this is after Tenth Guru arrival at Nanded).
These are the example given in the book from where writer took the reference to prove that Sri Dasham Granth Sahib Ji is not the work of Tenth Guru.
Then next chapter is that Shri Dasham Granth Sahib is not authanitc due to difference in various copies of it pertaining to content.
Well das is here by giving three different version of copies of Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.
So they are
- Kartarpuri Beerh.
- Bhai Banno Wali Beerh
- Damdami Beerh.
Content of three of them is not the same.
Again writer takes a clever step.
He gives translation in one lines about two versions of Shri Dasham Granth Sahib Ji and says these two Beerhs are been told to be by Bhai Mani Singh Ji and Baba Deep Singh Ji with time and then gives some quotes from Gyani Gyan Singh Ji’s Naveen Panth Prakash and does totally wrong interpretation.
If we believe the wording of writer copies by two great Sikhs mention above are doubtfully from them. Then he should also agree to doubt about other two Singhs mentioned here,who are from Patna Sahib. Then writer should have also casted the doubt over the fact that weather the work is of Bhai Sukha Singh or Bhai Chart Singh at all or not.
So here comes the translation
So we have verse 20 chapter 36.
Dohara
One day order of Panth Mani Singh Ji got.
Brother collect the Bani/verse of Tenth Master.20.
Chaupayee
Did in one bound/volume.
Bhog/end of it is at Hiqayat.
Second Beerh is happened to be at Damdama.
Deep Singh Shaheed created.
Samvat 1804.
In/during that he did this kindness.
Its bhog is at Phutak Kabittan(Asphotak Kabya).
That is the rcoganistaion done by learned.
(these lines were not given by writer while the rest are given)
Another Granthi Sukha Singh.
Created Beerh at Patna with ghaur/ deliberation.
In 1832 Samvat.
He kept/placed Sukhmana Chhakai.
Till Ankpali, many a context.
He placed in his way.
That’s bhog happened at Chhakyes.
This way there are three versions.
Again Charhat Singh ,his son.
Writing/letters like Tenth Master (as)source.
Made/did (add) for more pages.
Got with delibration, written from Guru.
Made another Granth like that.
Which was taken by Bawa Hakin Singh.
That is in Gurudwara Motibagh.
That I have now seen with attachement.
He wrote many other Granths.
I have seen letters like Guru.
After saying then a signature of Tenth Master.
Took the cost four time intending.(the last two lines are not given by the writer while this will disapprove his theory to call Damdami Beerh as Shri Dasham Granth Sahib).
By this way, Granth of Tenth Master.
Three ways/type of Beerh became famous..21..
Then he talks that some parts at end of Krishna Avtar are missing in one copy which is at Delhi and said to be by Bhai Mani Singh Ji. Yet writer himself has used the verse he claims to be missing here as been told by writer himself that there is some other person who is called Syam.
So where should we believe the writer in here or in poet Ram and Shyam chapter ? If writer believes that in spite of some verse missing in one copy still make a proof from being in another copy then by logic of writer himself thses verse are authentic.
Then he cribs that end of Ram avtar has some final verse written in margin with other hand writing. Even if we believe this then as writer did believe in last part of Krishan Avtar missing here, yet as part of whole composition then even it may not be there like Tetes Swayye or Mitar Piare nu is not here, they are still authentic.
He says that there is not a single copy which could be treated as standard for Shri Dasham Granth Sahib. But das has a counter question.
We have Kartarpuri Beerh for standard version of large part of Shri Guru granth Sahib Ji yet Guruship was bestowed to Damdami Beerh. So which Beerh is the standard version for the verse unto the Ninth Master. In Ram Gayo Ravan(u) Gayo there is failure of Aunkrh Logic when Ram has no Aunkadh, in most of the beerhs having Verse unto Ninth Master included ,why is so ?
Opposition to Dasam Granth Sahib.
Writer says that opposition to it started even when it was in form of Vachitar Natak(while fact is that name was Granth of Tenth Master and Vachitar natak is only a part of it as in holy Bible we have three books(example of one is Angeel/new testament) which may have some books composed within like book of Job in Jabur).
Then writer cooks up a story quoting Panth Prakash as blatant lie as such thing does not figure at all over there.
He says that after Bhai Mani Singh created one volume there as a grave opposition within faith and at Budha Johar, after Bhai Mahitaab Singh’s intervention it was delayed but after the martyrdom of Bhai Mani Singh Ji. People cooked up the story of Massa Rangher. Then uselessly he talks of lottery perhaps some old habit of gambling and thence he proves that there has been doubt about the verses.
Well as per Bhai Kahan Singh Nabha’s Mahan Kosh, definition of Dasham Granth. We find that Bhai Sahib talk of Bhai Mani Singh Ji compiling the work of Tenth Master. After his going to Sachkhand, it is send to Damdam Sahib (not Budha johar) and there is debate on weather to keeps parts of it separated or should the form as per Bhai Mani Singh Ji be maintained. Bhai Mahitab Singh Ji en route to kill Massa Rangher say that if he kills Mass then let the form as per Bhai Mani Singh Ji stay else it should be separated. The former thing happens.
So this is lie of the writer and an attempt to misguide us.
Real Dasham Granth is Damdami copy of Shri Guru Granth Sahib.
Here with a few lines from Gyani Gyan Singh writer tries to twist the meaning and at end says that any thing other then authentic verse of Tenth Master in Shri Dasham granth Sahib and Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji any intelligent Sikh consider rest as showing back to Guru. Who the hell is this writer to decide that which Sikh is intelligent ? Has writer himself done any intelligent things ? Is deception not an intelligence ? Yes it is part of intelligence which enemy use to weaken the enemy. Writer is part of such game plan of Anti panthic forces.
So well within the 18th verse of Chapter 36 we have term. After that a version/beerh of Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji is made at Damdama Sahib we have.
That secret is known by intelligent Sikhs.
That is described as Beerh/Version of Tenth Master.Dasham Guru Ki Beerh Bakhanat.
Four more happened from that..
Deep Singh Shaheed made them to be written.
One at Akal Bunga, one at Patna.
Third given to Hajur(Sahib) for reading.
Forth kept at Damdama with intent.
Big Baba/father these four are called.(well in Bihar Bada Baba means Shri Guru Granth Sahib ji,while Chote Baba are Shri Dasham Granth Sahib Ji).
(now the lines given below are quoted by writer to prove his false theory).
Real/original Tenth Master’s Granth/version/copy.
Within old party(Budha Dal) stayed.
When great/big holocaust occurred.
That Granth was taken away by Shah Durani.
That now is beautifully located in Kabul.
Believe it in big dharamshala /largest Gurudwara(of Kabul)..18..
(till these line writer gives quotes yet he does not provide proof either of the fact that did writer or any of his aides did authentication of that original Beerh at Kabul ? Did it stay during the time of Gyani Ji ? If yes then what are the proof ? If no proof the Gyani Ji’s statement could not be agreed upon.Likewise we see writer playing another game that by some that version is at Burj Baba Ala Singh Patiala as per some. Well here it self he himself castes the shadow over what Gyani Ji, say, then why is he quoting something not belied by himself. As we see above that Damdami Beerh or version was related to Tenth Master. And in the next verse clear name of Damdami Beerh is there which exposes the concealing of Truth by writer. So we see.
Dohira
I sang the true story of Adi Granth of Tenth Master.Ad Granth Guru Dasham Ki Katha Jathrath gayee.
Listen, by which emotion did Beerh/version of Granth/text of Tenth Master happened.19.
Then we have details of Shri Dasham Granth Sahib Ji. So we find term Adi used for Damdami Beerh while Granth Dasham Guru ka is different. Yet it does exists.