Concept Of Guru and naam
An article "The Guru In Gaudiya Vaisnava And Sikh Traditions", by J.S. Narula (Canada), was published in the journal. The following are the extracts of the Article
**********************************************************************
Introduction
-----------------
The guru is one of the oldest institutions in the Indian religious traditions. Gurus are still attracting a large number of followers from the east and the west, which is the evidence of the continuing interest in this institution. All Indian religions acknowledge that ultimate Truth transcends intellectual comprehension. The institution of guru is, a result of this acknowledgement. Religious truth itself is manifested through the continuing presence of the guru, he (or she) a paragon of wisdom, good character and purity, who shows the right way and unfolds the meaning of life. For the community, the guru is a teacher, guide, father (or mother), leader and in a sense, divine personality. For an individual he or she is personal mentor, a guide to the development of one's spiritual life.
This article deals with the concept of guru as set forth in the scriptures of two major religious traditions of India, Gaudiya Vaisnava (Hindu) and the Sikh. Focus will be on certain theological and doctrinal emphasis which are central to the concept of guru. Both traditions have given the guru extreme importance and believe that for self-realization help of the guru is imperative. However, the two traditions differ in one major respect. The Vaisnavas emphasize the individual personal character of guru, whereas the Sikh emphasize a more universal, non-personal (or transcendent) character of guru. Vaisnavas tend to identify the human gurus with God, Krisna. The Sikhs give guruship a more impersonal character. For them, Guru encompasses a single spiritual being displaying itself in a succession of ten different historical personalities but not identifying itself with these. This depersonalisation of the guru has been a major factor in the evolution of Sikhism as a distinct and separate religion. This parting of
the ways in the evolution of the guru tradition derives from both differing interpretations of the sacred writings as well as differing historical developments of the Hindu and Sikh religions.
Guru In Sikhism
----------------
Guru Nanak the founder of the Sikh tradition laid much emphasis on the central position of the Guru in Sikh theology. For him, the Guru is the ladder, Guru the boat, Guru the raft[1] by means of which one reaches God. Nanak said:
"Take him as Guru who shows the path of truth, who tells you of the one of whom nothing is known; who tells you of the Divine Word."[2]
Sikhism made a major modification to the traditional doctrine of the Guru. Guru Nanak did not believe in 'human Guru'. Nanak used the word Guru for God, the Enlightener in the sense of divine Word. He regarded the Guru as an essential medium for spreading divine Truth. The nine successors of Nanak fully agreed with Nanak by reiterating the same doctrines. It was Nanak and his nine successors who crystalized guruship as an institution. In doing so, they added a new dimension to the concept of the Guru in the Indian tradition.
W.Owen Cole explains the concept of guruship of Guru Nanak and his followers in this manner:
"They considered themselves Gurus, but only as messengers of God whom they frequently called Sat Guru (The True Guru)."[3]
They also saw themselves as God's servants. "Me, the worthless bard, the Lord has blest with (His) service."[4] "We are but beggers at Thy door. O God, bless us with Thy bounty."[5] Thus was Guru Nanak's description of himself. The tenth Guru, Gobind Singh, commanded: "Recognise me as God's servant only."[6] Nanak believed that serving Guru in all lowliness was the road to wisdom. He stated: "I am sacrifice to my Guru a myriad times a day."[7] This attitude was accepted by all Sikh Gurus. The avatara of the Hindu tradition was replaced by a new definition of the role of a guru.
Further, the term guru was given a considerable range of meaning than in Hindu theology. For example, Guru refers to the manifest form of which God takes as a preceptor of mankind so that he can be described as Sat-Guru. It also applies to the ten human Gurus through whom the Sat-Guru communicates. It refers also to the book in which the message ("Bani") has been recorded, the Guru Granth Sahib. Finally, Guru may also refer to the "Panth"[8] (community of the enlightened) which grew up in response to these teachings.
In the Guru Granth Sahib, the term Guru stands for God Himself. In the Mulmantra, the Supreme Being is given the attribute of Guru. The formula is "Ek Onkar, Satguru Prasad[9] (by the Grace of the one individual Supreme Being, the Eternal Reality). The scriptural word here translated as Reality is Guru.
Guru Nanak himself did not have a human guru as an instructor. As Bhai Jodh Singh says: All of the human gurus who roam about now-a-days have taken instruction from som person or other. Guru Nanak's Guru, however, was not a person.[10] One Sakhi (i.e. hagiographic testimony) that deals with the Vein river incident clearly mentioned that Guru Nanak received the cup of Name ("Naam") from the True Court (of God). Nanak himself wrote:
The Immaculate Lord, the essence of all things, pervades all,
and he is not separate from me.
And it is Him I have met, the transcendent Lord, our infinite
and Supreme God, who is our only Guru.[11]
Guru Arjan declared:
"For my Guru is God, my Guru is the Transcendent Lord; He is the God of Glory. The Guru is God, unknowable and mysterious."[12]
These traditional Sikh statements make clear that Nanak and his successors considered God as their Supreme Guru. This concept is reinforced in the hymns of the Gurus. Guru Gobind Singh's clearl warnings[13] against the popular belief of human gurus being identified with God, shows that Sikh Gurus were opposed to the deification of the human guru.
However, to define the concept of Sikh Guru, it is necessary to examine the nature of this identification of Guru and God. Many verses in the Adi-Granth[14] show a clear distinction between God and the Guru. As, for instance:
And Him, whom we sought in all the three worlds, we saw.
Yea, Nanak, it is Guru through whom we attain to our
union with the Lord.[15]
The God is All-too-near, but seems not so:
It is through the True Guru that I see Him thus.[16]
These excerpts make clear the contrast between God the object of Revelation and Guru the agent. This conclusion suggests that our initial identification of the Guru and God needs some qualification. A strict definition requires us to identify the Guru not with God Himself, but with the voice or message of God. The Sikh Gurus laid much emphasis upon the message, the Bani[17]. Nanak used the word bani for the words he received from God, words which he transcribed in the form of hymns. Perhaps a strict definition requires us to identify Guru not with God Himself, but with the Voice of God, with the means whereby God imparts His message to human kind. Nanak, however, taught that Nirgun[18] Brahman, self-manifested as Word and became Guru. The Guru is in fact the Shabad (Word). Hence, when the Nath yogis asked Nanak to name his Guru, he replied:
The Word is the Guru;
and the mind attuned (to the Word) the disciple.
I remain detached, being attached to the ineffable Gospel
(of the Word).
Yea, my God is the Guru, age after age.
It is the Guru's word through which one reflects
on the Gospel of the Lord.[19]
These excerpts from the Adi Granth suggest that the Word (Sabad)[20] in Nanak's connotation means Revelation as well as the vehicle of Revelation of God which is regarded as the only proper object of man's contemplation. The Word's function is to provide the only means whereby man may secure salvation and attain union with god. By the Guru's guidance an aspirant is no longer bound to the wheel of transmigration. By meditating on the Word, by repeating the Name of God, he is saved.[21]
In the Sikh theology, the 'Word' (Shabad) is the intermediary between God and creation, between Guru and disciple. According to Tarlochan Singh:
"On the metaphysical plane Shabad is the only pervading and illuminating principle of the Transcendent God, the only active principle of Creation. It is the doctrine of Will ("Hukam") and 'Word' which completely eliminates the metaphysical separation and distinction between the Transcendent God and Immanent Shabad is also called the essence of knowledge (Shabad brahmjnan) through which man comprehends and becomes one with the Truth."[22]
Nanak used the term 'Guru' clearly in three senses. The Guru is God; the Guru is the Voice of God; and the Guru is the Word, the Truth of God.[23] These three senses (God, Guru and Guru's Word) are ultimately inseparable.
Clearly related to the notion of Word (Sabda) is the notion of 'Name' ("Naam").[24] Naam indeed is the pivot around which the Sikh faith revolves. That word Naam occurs 5999 times in the Adi Granth shows the importance of this word in Sikh theology. For all practical purposes, Naam would seem equivalent to Shabad (Word). As the Adi Granth mentions:
Yea, without the Lord's Name you are emancipated not
and through ignorance waste yourself away......
But where is emancipation without the Guru's Word:
For without the Lord's Name, one is involved to death.[25]
'Name' and 'Word' are here used almost interchangeably. In some cases the identity of the two is even more striking.
How is one to be ferried across the sea of existence
without the Guru's word?
For without the (Lord's) Name, the world is afflicted
by the malady of duality and this sinks the fortunes of all men.[26]
Though functionally equivalent as the means of revelation and salvation, Word and Name seem to be related as whole to part, or general to specific and essential. Word may be considered the totality of Divine Revelation, with Name being a part. But Divine Name is not partial in any negative sense, for it is the most essential, most crucial part, that which most immediately reveals the divine and most directly affects salvation.
In a few cases a certain distinction is made? If one dwells on True Name, through the Guru's word:
(i) Then one is a true Gurmukh, abjudged True at the Lord's court.[27]
(ii) By means of the Word one enshrines the Name in one's heart.[28]
In such cases, truth as communicated by Guru is referred to as Word, whereas Truth received and meditated upon by the believer tends to be expressed in terms of name. The distinction is very delicate and normally determined by the context. Adi Granth Kosa mentions no difference in these two terms. Wherever the meaning of Naam is encountered in the Adi Granth, there is the meaning of the Shabad.[29] However, both 'Name' and 'Word' are expressions of the total being of God. Both are objects of contemplation, the standard to which the individual life must conform. As the Adi Granth says:
And make the Lord's Name thy conduct and works.[30]
In Sikh teachings, the concept of Guru also plays a major role in interpreting "Gurprasadi" (by the grace of the Guru he is known)[31] The meaning of grace ("Nadar")[32] in Guru Nanak's teachings is to be determined by examining his own personal experience. For Nanak, grace meant something peculiar as a result of his own experience and is to be regarded as God's sovereign act of self-disclosure. God, the only source and totality of power and grace expresses Himself in Word and He Himself as Guru bestows the gift of grace. (
Sikhism - " Concept Of Divine Grace ".....3(end))
It should be noted that in Nanak's teachings, human guru, though considered as messenger to communicate the message (Word) of God to the Sikh (disciple) is not a least participant directly or indirectly in the power of grace. Whereas in Vaisnava tradition, guru being the instrument, is partially participant in the power of grace. Evidently the spiritual master in Vaisnava tradition (being a media) has been magnified to the point that he had become an object of devotion, and without his grace a devotee cannot make even an approach to Krsna. Human guru in the Vasnava tradition is the vital link, the essential mediator of God. But Nanak did not accept any human mediator.
Prior to the gift of grace, a Sikh must need a gift of perception, which comes by God's grace. If He gives it, then the Word may be perceived, and if He does not, there is nothing a man can do. But if a man accepts this proffered gift, this does not mean automatic salvation. For salvation is not which is given, this must be attained through the individual's own efforts. This gift of perception is the prerequisite for salvation and the means to be followed to attain it. As the Adi Granth mentions:
Yea, on whosoever is Thy Grace, he dwells upon Thy Name.[33]
Thus, salvation depends both upon God's Grace, which is expressed by the Guru in the Word, and upon the individual's own effort to conform to the Truth.
Like Vaisnava, Sikh tradition also believes that God communicates himself through his chosen, but in the Sikh teachings the chosen ones (human Gurus) are neither the incarnations nor manifestations of God. They (historically the ten masters) were the instruments through whom the Guru's Word ("Gurbani") became audible. It is through Gurbani that man knows His mystery:
Through the (Guru's) Word, wells up the Lord's Name within us;
through the Word is our union with the Lord....
and through the Guru is it received.[34]
God, in His self-manifestation as Guru remains the essential mediator, but no longer a human link. Sikh teachings insist that Word (Gurbani) and not the body is the Guru. The light of the Word within their (Gurus) heart was their real personality. W.O. Cole says that
"the Word is so much that the position of the Guru in Sikhism might seem, to the casual observer to be one in which complete reverence has given way to complete indifference."[35]
In fact, the Sikh Gurus were quite conscious about the human deification in Hinduism and totally repudiated any human link between God and man. Despite such efforts of the Sikh Gurus, Sikhism succumbed to the influence of deification as in the Hindu tradition. However, this should be viewed as an intense emotional reaction to the strong impression made by the powerful religious personality. It does not actually mean the ritual worship of a human being identified with God.
According to Taran Singh, God is consciousness or "jnana"[36] (knowledge). The Sikh (human) Guru is the communicator of the jnana. He is like a prophet, who, for the reconstruction of the personality and of society, inspires humanity. He is the leader of his community and helps the community according to its spiritual and mundane needs.
Sikh Guruship, in contrast to Vaisnava, displays an impersonal or non-personal character. The idea is stressed repeatedly in the Sikh writings. For example, Bhai Gurdas describes the succession of the second Guru, Guru Angad[37], as lighting one lamp from another. Same is the expression by Rai Balwand and Satta.[38] Guru Gobind Singh himself said:
The holy Nanak was revered as Angad,
Angad was revered as Amar Das....,
The pious saw this, but not the fools...[39]
'They were all one', the Guru added, 'as one lamp is lit from another', so also the light of one Guru blended at his death with that of his successor. The underlying principle was that 'the personality of the Guru was detached from the Guruship which was to be regarded as one, indivisible and continuous.'
The institution of human Guruship in Sikhism is to be interpreted as an institution of 'Divine Light'. This institution lasted for more than two hundred years but the "jot" (light) was the same, from one human Guru to the next. Ultimately, the light was transformed into Guru Granth Sahib.
The institution of Guruship took a new direction under the leadership of Guru Gobind Singh. On the eve of his death he declared to his disciples that they should regard Guru Granth Sahib as their own Guru (alongwith the panth). He therefore placed the spiritual leadership atleast beyond the grasp of any human being. However, even this move was not completely new. It had been anticipated by Guru Arjan Dev when he installed the Adi Granth at Harminder Sahib at Amritsar. Guru Arjan compiled it, bowed before it and instructed the Sikhs to follow his example. He declared:
"The Book is the abode of God."[40]
So, the institution of human Guru came to an end. The institution of Guru Granth as a Guru, while in one sense originating at the time of his death, continued the belief that Guru is symbolically embodied within the Sikh community.
There were several reasons for Guru Arjan to take this step. First, Sikhism is essentially a religion of Naam (Name). A Sikh, in the religious context is to sing Lord's name, excluding all other rituals. In order to standardize the Gurus recitations Guru Arjan recorded their exact words in a single volume. Second, Guru Arjan wanted to establish a clear distinction between the human Gurus and God's message that they imparted. Third, historically perhaps, Sikhs needed a separate religious book to assure their identity as distinctive from Hindus and Muslims as well.
However, eventually Guru Gobind Singh was responsible for confering Guruship on the Adi Granth which came to be regarded as a spiritual guru. This development could be effected given the impersonal character of Guruship and mystic identification of the Guru with the Word (Shabad), the core belief of Sikhism since its inception.
Under the direction of Guru Gobind Singh the institution of Guruship acquired qualitatively a new character. As all the major institutional developments of Sikhism took place in the reign of Guru Gobind Singh, which is considered an evolutionary course of the Sikh movement, inherent in Nanak's doctrine of "bhakti" and "shakti".[41] In 1699 Guru Gobind Singh established the foundation of Sikhism by declaring that henceforth the "khalsa"[42] were his form, limb of his limb and breath of his breath. He received baptism from the five worthy Sikhs called "panj Pyaras" (the beloved five). He asserted:
The Khalsa is the Gurua and the Guru is the Khalsa. There is no difference between you and me. As Guru Nanak seated Angad on the throne, so have I made you also the Guru.[43]
To the khalsa he imparted Guruship because the Sikhs had already been exalted equal to the Guru. Thus the Guru Granth became the spiritual Guru and the Khalsa treated as the inheritor of the Guruship in its temporal aspect. As Guru Gobind Singh stated:
I have infused my mental and bodily spirit into the Guru Granth and the Khalsa.[44]
In the Sikh context the unity of the temporal ("miri") and spiritual ("piri") aspect refers to a new concept of religion as a state symbolising a unique correlation of the temporal and spiritual authority.
The brief survey makes it quite evident that the concept of Guruship lies at the heart of Sikhism. The human gurus, the Guru Panth and finally the Guru Granth Sahib forged the present religion. However, in the scriptural teachings, Guru refers to Guru shabad (Word). God in His manifestation as Word becomes the essential Guru-mediator through whom he can be realized. God's message (word) is communicated to and through the human Gurus (the ten teachers), but they are not a 'link' in any sense. God is the source of everything, material and spiritual, of wisdom and of the universe. He is the one who as Guru takes the initiative without which there can be nothing but the darkness of ignorance. The Guru thus plays a central role in the Granthian conception of bhakti (devotion) to the supreme. The disciple was asked to walk in the path of God, to remain ever content with his will and to obey His commands. But in these matters, as in every thing else, Guru was to point out the right path.
To the Sikh (disciple), the Guru is everything. While Guru Arjan in his hymns called "Bawan Akhari", literally - fifty two letters, sums up Guru as the
Transcendent Lord; the God of gods.[45]
A comparison of the Guru concept in the Vaisnava (Hindu) and the Sikh tradition leads to several conclusions. In the first place, to Sikhs the term Guru ultimately refers to the supreme being in His revelatory and saving relationship to human beings. Human individuals, the Scripture, and the whole community may function as Guru but do so as media for transmitting the Gurus teachings of the divine, rather than, as distinct teaching/saying entities themselves. For Vaisnavas, the term guru may refer to the divine in the avatara form or to a devotee who is considered a manifestation of God.
The second and most distictive feature of Sikhism is that it stressed that Gurbani, Word or Shabad, a well established doctrine in Indian tradition be venerated as a part of Brahman. This doctrine holds that probably not the only embodiment but the most fundamental of an essentially formless, incomprehensible Reality is the holy 'Word'. The continuity of the Word is unbroken to the Sikhs:
There is but one Word, uttered by the only Guru; so reflect thou on His Word.[46]
The Word is the Voice and the Will of the Supreme.
Another important and distinctive feature of Sikhism is that the Sikh Gurus made 'Guruship' an institution which ultimately ensured unity and strengthened the solidarity of Sikhism. Thus, indeed 'Guruship' in Sikhism became a highly centralised institution.
Further, the Sikh Guru concept became unique within the bhakti tradition in that it raised the dignity of the Guru by elevating the 'Book' to the status of Guruhip and abolished temporal Guruship. The abolition of temporal Guruship ended all possibilities of human worship. In Vaisnavism human worship prevailed. There is a great theoretical difference between the Brahmanical man-worship as guru worship and Sikh ideal of Guru-worship through God-worship.
Although, in theory and ideal, the Sikh concept of Guru is quite impersonal, in practice a personal element emerged. Indeed the Guru in Sikhism became a central figure not only in religious affairs but in the daily life of the Sikh as well. Sikh tradition is very eloquent on this point, for instance, Bhai Gurdas writes:
"The Sikh who receiveth the Guru's instruction is really a Sikh. To become a disciple one must be like a purchased servant, fit to be yoked to any work which may serve his Guru."[47]
Love for the Guru became superior to all other relations. As it is said:
Love none but the Guru; all other love is false.[48]
The result of such teachings raised the unquestioning devotion of the Sikhs to their human Gurus. But A.C. Baneerjee argues that this development did not create a community depending upon autocratic leadership. The ideal of brotherhood was an active principle from the very begining of the Sikh community. The Gurus usually respected the wishes of their disciples in most matters. In fact, the individual Sikh was elevated to a position almost equal to Guru himself, as Guru Ram Das explains:
To those who obey the will of the Guru, I am ever a sacrifice...
I am ever a sacrifice to those who serve the Guru.[49]
Historical developments also affected the change in the Sikh Guru-disciple relationship. The establishment of the Khalsa by Guru Gobind Singh was the culmination of the Guru-Sikh relationship. Undoubtedly the Guru always had high regard for his Sikh but thereafter with a difference. Henceforth the Guru was ready to make great sacrifices for his Sikhs. Guru Gobind Singh's strong sense of obligation to do his best for his Sikhs is significantly expressed in one of his "Hazare-Shabads", which proves that the common Sikh was raised almost to the dignity of the Guru.
All the battles I have won against tyranny
I have fought with the devoted backing of these people;
Through them only have I been able to bestow gifts,
Through their help I have escaped from harm;
The love and generosity of these Sikhs
Has enriched my heart and my home.
Through their grace I have attained all learning,
Through their help, in battle, I have slain all my enemies;
I was born to serve them, through them I reached eminence.
What would I have been without their kind and ready help?
There are millions of insignificant people like me?
True service is the service of these people:
I am not inclined to serve others of higher castes;
Charity will bear fruit, in this and the next world,
If given to such worthy people as these.
All other sacrifices and charities are profitless,
From top to toe, whatever I call my own,
All possessions, I dedicate to these people.[50]
The guru-disciple relationship is the essential feature in the structure of some, if not all, religious traditions. This relationship is a matter of feeling and inner emotion; at some level of experience, a complete surrender to the guru.
Yet, the guru-disciple relation can also be impersonal in its fusion of the mind with the sacred 'Word', a fusion creating mystic unity between the two through which the disciple could discover his own inner identity. Discipleship not only fosters the discovery of deeper truth, but calls for transformation of character. The experience of revelation is the goal of the devotee in his relation with the guru. The tunnel through which the devotee receives revelation in his constant devotion to the guru. This submission opens the channel along which the guru can pass his own conviction, if guru be understood in personal terms, or along which the principle of divine self-manifestation, the Word, can effect religious transformation of the disciple, if guru be considered of, in less personal terms.
Finally, in comparison with gurus in Vaisnavism and Indian religious traditions in general, the Sikh Gurus were generally much more socially and politically active. They were keenly aware of the impact of social ills and politics on the common man's life, and took active roles in these areas. Hence, they became not only spiritual preceptors but social reformers, soldiers, philosophers and scholars as well.
NOTES & REFERENCES
[1] SGGS p.17
[2] A.C. Bannerjee, "Guru Nanak to Guru Gobind Singh", Rajesh Publications, New Delhi.
[3] W.O.Cole and Piara Singh Sambhi, "The Sikhs"
[4] SGGS p.150
[5] SGGS p.982
[6] Macauliffe, "The Sikh Religion", Vols.4-5
[7] Asa-di-Var, Sloka 1, SGGS p.463
[8] The concept of the (Guru) Panth somehow described the belief that Guru is symbolically embodied within the community. Tradition says that it was conferred upon the panth by Guru Gobind Singh in 1699 when he created the Order of the Khalsa. But there had been extremely early evidence for the doctrine of Guru Panth in the hymns of Guru Nanak and his successors. For instance, Guru Nanak says: "My salvation is the Lord, my only God, the True One, the Infinite..."; "When one meets with the Guru-saint, one attains to Truth and then spontaneously one is blest with glory."(Siddha Ghosti); "In the society of the saints one gathers the Lord's Essence."(SGGS p.598)
[9] Japji, AG p.1
[10] Jodh Singh, "Gurmati Nirnay".
[11] SGGS p.599
[12] SGGS p.864
[13] Macauliffe, "The Sikhs", Vols4-5
[14] Adi Granth: Literally, "First Book".
[15] SGGS p.20
[16] SGGS p.1274
[17] Literally: Speech. It signifies the word of self-expression (used synonymously with Word ("Shabad") spoken by God. Guru nanak preferred to use the term "Gurbani". "Gur" and "Bani" are inseparable, otherwise the Bani would become lifeless. Today, the term Gurbani is synonymous with 'scripture' being used by the Sikhs and refers to Guru Granth Sahib.
[18] Nirguna: Without attributes or qualities. Used to say that God is ultimately incomprehensible and beyond description.
[19] SGGS p.943
[20] Shabad: Word, the divine self-expression; often the Word Shabad stands by itself and often it is linked with the word Guru. Guru may be considered as the characteristic form, and the shabad by itself normally assumes its relation with the Guru. The form may be Guru-ka-shabad, Guru's Word, or it may be Guru-Shabad, the Guru's Word(Dhanasari Ast I(8) AG p.686; Ramkali 10 AG p.879). Sabad: Word; in Sikh usage a hymn of the Adi Granth.
[21] Siddha Goshti, AG p.944-45
[22] "Sikhism", Ed. Punjabi University, patiala. 1969, p.66
[23] God is identified with the Word. "Thou art the Word and Thou art the expression." (Bilavalu 3, AG p.795)
[24] Naam: Literally Name. The Divine Name; the expression of the nature and being of God in terms comprehensible to the human understanding.
[25] SGGS p.1127
[26] Bhairau 2. AG p.1125)
[27] Asa-di-Var, AG p.355
[28] Prahabati Ast I(7), AG p.1242
[29] Adi Granth Kosa, Vol.3 (Amritsar 1950)
[30] Asa-di-Var, MI, AG p.355
[31] Japji, AG p.1
[32] Nadar: Literally the gracious glance.
[33] Var Majah, Sloka 1 Pauri 19, AG p.147
[34] SGGS p.644
[35] W.O.Cole and Piara Singh Sambhi, "The Sikhs"
[36] Taran Singh, "The Nature of Guruship in Guru Granth", ed. McMullen, Delhi 1976
[37] Angad: Guru Givenn name was Lehna. By givinf Lehna the name Angad, Guru Nanak was designating him as his successor and asserting that his teachings will live on in him. The meaning of the renaming of Lehna is well given by Bhai Gurdas: Before he died he installed Lehna as his successor and set the Guru's canopy over his head merging light in Guru Angad's light, the sat Guru changed his form. None could comprehend the mystery. A wonder of wonders he revealed: changing his body he made Guru Angad's body his own. (Var 1)
[38] Macauliffe, "The Sikh Religion", Vol.5
[39] I.B. Banerjee, "Evolution of the Khalsa", Calcutta, 1936, Vol.1, pp.211-214
[40] SGGS p.1226
[41] The implication of Nanak's concept of bhakti and shakti can be realised in Babur-vani.
[42] The Khalsa symbolically meant the transferring of temporal Guruship to the Panth.
[43] W.Owen Cole, "The Guru In Sikhism".
[44] M.A. Macauliffe, "The Sikh Religion", Vol.5
[45] SGGS p.250
[46] SGGS p.646
[47] S.S. Gandhi, "History of the Sikh Gurus".
[48] Macauliffe, "The Sikh Religion", Vol.4
[49] Macauliffe, "The Sikh Religion", Vol.2
[50] "Selections from the Sacred Writings of the Sikhs", George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London, 1960.