We are making this thread into a bad Khaljagan or as they say in New Orleans a tastelss Gumbo. Allow me to point out somethings so we can unweave this tangled, knotted hairy thread. Pun intended.
First of all, I want to thank Virinder ji for posting this essay. The reason for my thanks is that we are talking about something that is near and dear to us and is part of Sikhi.
Then started the angry arrow lancing about Hair which had nothing to do with the insightful essay based on SGGS by Virinder ji. Yes, we all have different ways to interpret Gurbani, that is the beauty of this gorgeous poetry in SGGS. Sikhs are famous for having opinions which would make any good teacher proud of his/her students.
Dalbirk mentioned Jatts and how they do not keep hair. One wonders why he did not mention any Bhapas or Ramgahrias who have the same appearance as the Jatts and also have or look for the same kind fo power in the Gurdwaras! I have no idea what caste Dalbirk or anyone else is. We all know Sikhi is not about caste yet when something negative is mentioned about some Sikh, caste arrow is the first to be thrown as a derrogatory shot. We should consider each other Sikhs irrespective of the last names we use it or not. Most of the times people use their last names not to flaunt their castes or tribes but just to distinguish from other people who have the same names.
Singh first mentioned in one of his posts:
Once again, Khalsa is not in Sri
Guru Granth Sahib ji so does this mean Khalsa has nothing to do with spirituality? And do not say this is a sentive issue because when you claim that hair is not apart of spirituality then also you are claiming that Khalsa is not apart of spirituality for the same reason.
Then in his other post, Singh said:
Its not all about hair, but hair keeping of the hair for a
Sikh is a must. Once again im stressthe word
Sikh. When will we get away from this petty agruement and accept the Tenth Nanak Hukam for what it is. If you want to be the Sikh of the Guru then you give your head not a broken finger nail.
It seems the above 2 posts are self conflicting a bit. Hair and turban, if I am not mistaken have been part and parcel of Sikhi since Guru Nanak. I have never seen a picture depicted of our first Guru with a cap or with short hair. The same goes for all our Gurus. So one can draw the inference that hair and turban have been part of Sikhi since its inception.
The other interesting part of the creation of Khalsa by our 10th Guru Guru Gobind Singh is that in 5 Kakaars, he bestowed on us, all can be removed,changed, swapped except hair, which again shows that in fact Guru Sahib added only 4 kakaars, Kesh- the first one already existed.
So I would like to know from Sadh Sangat, how many Sikhs do they know who keep their hair but have not taken Khandei de Pahul and act more as true Sikhs than the ones with all the kakaars?
I know lots of them and I also know lots of others wearing long kirpans and all the baana and plus some but act totally against the behaviourial tenets of Sikhi.
I am sure we all know both kinds of people.
Below is the comment I posted regarding I J Singh's excellent essay:Sikhi & Sikhism: A Distinction Without a Difference, which is worth posting here too.
sikhchic.com | The Art and Culture of the Diaspora | Article Detail
Sikhi has a very unique situation. We have the Guru Granth and then we have our history, especially the one that took place on Vaiskahi Day, 1699. Sometimes the two run parallel, sometimes they overlap, and at other times the latter supercedes the former. I took Khandei di pahul on Vaisakhi in 1988 and considered myself a blessed to be able to do so.
However, as we are all instructed to follow the Guru Granth, there is no mention of the adherence of the 5 kakaars or keeping our hair unshorn. The reason could be because Guru Granth is not about 'cans' and 'can-nots', but it instills 'wills' and 'will-nots'. I see Sikhi in this way. Mool Mantar is the blueprint and Japji is the foundation and the rest of the Gurbani is the design to map our own buildings. Now it depends on our inner quest what kind of building the individual wants to erect while having the two basic and vital components.
Our Kakaars are daily reminders of our duties as Sikhs and the goal is to etch their values on our character by breeding goodness which will in turn result in good deeds. To know Ik Ong Kaar, The Infinite, is to measure one's actions and deeds when no one is looking. These are the building blocks that Gurbani teaches us to build our character on.
Once the Kakaars become dogmas of cans and can-nots, decided by a few, then we embark on a slippery slope. Having said that, the most essential ingredient in this recipe of the survival of Sikhi as an institution should be that we all follow the discipline of the faith - such as keeping our hair unshorn - as a prerequiste and the stepping stone for the person to eventually take Khadei de Pahul.
But in order for that to happen, we need educated people holding and leading the Sikhi flag who can guide the rest of us to the next step, not some ego-filled, uneducated honchos at the Takhts, burdened with pot-bellies. They forget that when the Guru Granth says, "Tunn bhi teraa, munn bhi teraa", it means that mental health is tied to physical fitness. Once again, education is a must to walk this tight-rope of Sikhi, as we read in Anand Sahib daily that Sikhi is not a mere event of walking on a tight rope, but a way of life.
Tejwant Singh