The SikhWiki is not the most reliable source but still ..the very first para tells the entire story..Quote:
Bhai Gurdas Singh is said to be a contemporary of Sri
Guru Gobind Singh Ji. He is not to be confused with
Bhai Gurdas Ji, who was the scribe of the
Adi Granth under
Guru Arjan Dev Ji. Bhai Gurdas Singh's work was added as a
"supplement" to Bhai Gurdas Ji's 40 Vaars, and is known as the "41st Vaar." Bhai Gurdas Singh Ji's work contains the famous
Shabad:
<dl><dd>'
ਵਾਹ ਵਾਹ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਆਪੇ ਗਰ ਚੇਲਾ' </dd><dd>
Vah Vah Gobind Singh Ape Gur Chela </dd><dd> Wow! Wow! Gobind Singh, himself the
Guru and the disciple. </dd><dt>
</dt><dt>1. Bhai Gurdas the ORIGINAL uses his name correctly...BUT the SECOND decides to DROP the "SINGH"....why ??? SINGH is a recent title bestowed by Guru Gobind Singh ji ..and ALL those hwo became SINGH carry this name with the HONOUR it deserves..BUT not this unknown fellow...</dt></dl>2. Not only does he drop the SINGH to "merge" with an EARLIER FAMOUS Bhai gurdass Ji..he also "supplements" or adds his Vaar to the 40 Vaar POTHI of Bhai Gurdass Ji.
3. He Only wrote this Just ONE VAAR...found as you said in the
Sarb LOH Granth (the THIRD GRANTH held in great esteem by the Nihungs and parkash and read by them as much as the DG and SGGS equally. The SARB LOH GRANTH is NOT written by Bhai Gurdass SINGH....yet his vaar is found there and also "supplemented" to Bhai Gurdass Jis Vaars..and No. 41 FOLLOWS as NORMALLY as Vaar 40 ends..Giving absolutely NO INDICATION whatsoever that the AUTHOR has CHANGED and is NOT the same as those of the previous 40 Vaars.
Now what does this TELL YOU ??
Exactly the Same TRICK ha s been employed by the miscreants who "Supplemented" the SGGS with the fake RAAGMAALA. Interestingly the Raagmala author is secret and not revealed..people are meant to ASSUME its a GURU/Bhagta just as the 41st vaar is meant to be ASSUMED as authored by the Most RESPECTABLE and well known Sikh historian Bhai gurdass whose Vaars are sanctioned to be READ as Kirtan !! Interestingly the Exact same Raagmala is word for word in another Granth as well...and over there its NUMBERED CORRECTLY and NOT simply [1] as in SGGS !!! The fake author has to numebr all the lines [1] because he doenst know what to do...ha ha..IF he numbers them according to original source it will be found out..so he took the easy way out..and even more INTERESTINGLY the Benti KABIOBACH Chaupaii taken from the END of Charitro Pakhyaans has been RENUMBERED when added to Rehrass !! So this "Pick and choose" add supplement' and renumber trick has been widely used...to confuse/hide/mingle truth with Fiction and conceal.
Just show me just ONE EXAMPLE from any book/literature in the world where such "tricks" are done...its like ME writing a shitty play and Supplementing it to the Works of Shakespeare...and when caught declare my name to be Shakespeare SINGH !! Who will BUY this and swallow the story hook line and sinker.. ??? Answer: ...The SIKHS..who might begin to regard Works of Shakespeare + Singh as Holy Plays !!!
Its Plain..first the trick was used with bhai Gurdass jis vaars being
supplemented..then sggs was also supplemented..then one whole granth dg was made supplementary reading. The fake supplementary author uses the name GURDASS ONLY..its the Singhs trying to be so apologetic that invented the SINGH...no proof of him ever using the name SINGH anywhere. No amount of Twist and Turn can make this leaky story stick...
READ the paras 15 , 16 etc of the Supplementary vaar...Clear LIES, almost Vulgar and clearly ANTI MUSLIM and Anti Islam to point being racist. Under the New Laws passed in India this can be easily brought under "HURTING RELIGIOUS SENTIMENTS" of Muslims.
Sikhs are so gullible..the enemy says a few wonderful words..WAHO WAHO Gobind Singh and uses this SUGAR to coat the POISON later on..no one bothers...they just keep on singing waho waho..
mundaviolin:
