Vijaydeep ji
I have no intention of contradicting any of the Guru Shabads you have quoted. They ring true. Problem for me is that you have not explained how they are a refutation of remarks by Tejwant ji or Khalsa Fauj. Here are your personal reflections on the conversation,
So when we reach the state of salvation of being alive, our mind wth ego is destroyed. Mind of God or universal intellect takes over.
That is a profound observation which Guru Nanak repeats throughout Sri Guru Granth Sahib. No one is arguing about that.
That was the state of mind of Tenth Master. Unlike sending some angels, it was mind of God, who assumed the poet's work.
Again, the Tenth Master was in communication with what you call "universal intellect" when he composed his poetry, or any other thing that he created, for that matter, and no one is arguing with that.
Is not our God omnipotant? Can do any thing. Yes ...Akaal is ominipotent and can do anything. That is not the question under review. The question is not whether he can do anyting, but rather Did and Would he do something -- for example take a pen to paper and write a poem? The idea that Akaal would or did, or that Akaal even told Guru Gobind Snngh what to write, gives us a vision of Akaal that is consistent with a very primitive view of God. Except for fundamentalists, even Jews and Christians today do not believe that Moses, in a personal conversation with God, actually wrote down what God said were the 10 Commandments in seclusion on Mount Sinai. That particular vision of God leads away from devotion to the Niraankar.
Some quotes more for Singh Tejwant Singh Ji for is question regarding the who said the capability of God to destroy or not. Read last two quote carefully from Sukhmani Sahib and Dakhani Oankar.
Tejwant Singh ji is fully aware of the meaning of Sukhmani Sahib and Dakhani Oankar.
The explanation you have given is more mystifying than ever. What do you mean by emanating and manifesting. There is a danger in suggesting that Ik Oankaar who is also Akaal muratth somehow emanates and projects His thoughts. Why would Akaal do that? I think my question is a fair question. Why would Akaal project His thoughts? And if Akaal has done so then how is it that the authorship of disputed sections of Dasam Granth are in dispute?
The only answer to the last question would be -- "Oh, but only a few enlightened people can get it because they have overcome their ego and duality." Meaning that the meaning of Dasam Granth is open only to an elite and exclusive club of insiders who understand what is going on. The Dasam Granth controversy has to open itself up to common sense so that common people like me can understand if some of the Brahmgianis are making sense. Or no?
