Dal Singh ji,
Guru Fateh.
It is possible and there is nothing ill about it as long as we do not contradict the Gurmat values given to us in the SGGS, our only Guru.
Disagreements are parts of the learning process. That is why our Gurus named us Sikhs. I do not find anything wrong with it but rather some thing invigorating to learn from them,
I am not arguing for the sake of arguing. If you are then it is your own choice. I am discussing the matter in order to learn through it even if there are disagreements.
For me Sikhi is not a faith. Not even a religion laced with dogmas. SGGS shows us that all over. In fact you may be interested in reading Why Religion? which is posted here.
Faith when used for religions is absence or lack of truth. Sikhi is to the contrary. It is meant for the truth seekers. Therefore, blind faiths which normally religions are called can not be explored but to the contrary.
The SGGS, our only Guru is the mine of knowledge and the ultimate authority. No one can claim what you claim above provided he/she accepts SGGS as their only Guru.
As mentioned above, Sikhi has nothing to do with any faith which requires blind, mechanical rituals (pilgrimage to Hemkunt for example which has nothing to do with the Gurmat values given in the SGGS.)
Pardon my ignorance. Please elaborate the above with concrete examples because I have no idea what you are talking about and based on what kind of presumed notions.
Let's agree to disagree. I do not find any harm in it.
That is the exact essence of being a Sikh.
Wow! That is a bold statement. Should I take this a threat of some kind?
The above is nothing but your imagination. Only SGGS, our only Guru is the custodian of truth. I thought you knew that.
I totally agree with that. It is the journey of the individual and each of us carry our own Gurmat torch. Only Ik Ong Kaar knows which milestone we are at. Neither myself, nor yourself or anyone else can find that out no matter how much one pretends to claim to know.
I only take my guidance from SGGS. No other book or person. Please be factual when you claim something about others.
There seems to be a contradiction in the above. Either something is nailed in a specific manner or there are no hard and fast rules. It can not be both. So which is it?
I totally agree with that too because as mentioned before and is worth repeating that Sikhi is the journey of the individual and it is up to the individual Sikh to carve the path based on the Gurmat values.
As a Sikh one can only talk about oneself because it is one's own journey. It is a bit presumptuous to talk about others and then mention haumei under the same breath in my opinion.
Interesting interaction I must add.
Regards
Tejwant Singh
Guru Fateh.
dalsingh1zero1;186964]Tejwant ji, I think we differ on our whole perspective of exploring and interpreting our heritage to the extent that we will probably never agree on certain things. Take that as given.
It is possible and there is nothing ill about it as long as we do not contradict the Gurmat values given to us in the SGGS, our only Guru.
Disagreements are parts of the learning process. That is why our Gurus named us Sikhs. I do not find anything wrong with it but rather some thing invigorating to learn from them,
I think we are both old and experienced enough to know where this almost invariably leads. Arguing for the sake of arguing.
I am not arguing for the sake of arguing. If you are then it is your own choice. I am discussing the matter in order to learn through it even if there are disagreements.
You talk of my own speculation. I suggest that given our limited human intellectual capacities, most of what we do when we try and explore the faith in any real depth becomes this.
For me Sikhi is not a faith. Not even a religion laced with dogmas. SGGS shows us that all over. In fact you may be interested in reading Why Religion? which is posted here.
Faith when used for religions is absence or lack of truth. Sikhi is to the contrary. It is meant for the truth seekers. Therefore, blind faiths which normally religions are called can not be explored but to the contrary.
I'm never going to try and throw the stance of being any sort of authority and I'm certainly wary of those who claim some sort of superior knowledge.
The SGGS, our only Guru is the mine of knowledge and the ultimate authority. No one can claim what you claim above provided he/she accepts SGGS as their only Guru.
What I do endeavor to do, is to explore the faith and make sense of it, as honestly as I can (to myself - not the world).
As mentioned above, Sikhi has nothing to do with any faith which requires blind, mechanical rituals (pilgrimage to Hemkunt for example which has nothing to do with the Gurmat values given in the SGGS.)
Occasionally it is nice to share perceptions with others, but in our community this frequently becomes a 'theological kabbadi match' which defeats the whole purpose and just degrades everyone involved.
Pardon my ignorance. Please elaborate the above with concrete examples because I have no idea what you are talking about and based on what kind of presumed notions.
It's not double speak. It is simply a case of my own conception of the matter. I personally do not feel this particular use of the word 'enemy' refers to the 'panj chors'. And you are right it is speculation, but then so is the opposite view that it does refer to the 5 thieves.
Let's agree to disagree. I do not find any harm in it.
All that being said, my own experience has taught me that inflexibility on a position is foolishness, and understandings can change over time.
That is why I do not totally discount the above possibility although I do not subscribe to it. Development is a continual process and DOES involve changing ones thoughts on various matters over time. That is whole point of development in my eyes - it's really not too complicated. Seen in this way, there should be no confusion.
That is the exact essence of being a Sikh.
And you are on dangerous grounds when you discount hordes of other people and start to feel you are some custodian of 'the truth' and they misled fools.
Wow! That is a bold statement. Should I take this a threat of some kind?
The above is nothing but your imagination. Only SGGS, our only Guru is the custodian of truth. I thought you knew that.
It's something we must all fight. It's just another manifestation of haumai that keeps cropping up when people try to find the truth (in my opinion). This journey of trying to find the truth appears to be a unique one for each of us.
I totally agree with that. It is the journey of the individual and each of us carry our own Gurmat torch. Only Ik Ong Kaar knows which milestone we are at. Neither myself, nor yourself or anyone else can find that out no matter how much one pretends to claim to know.
Do you honestly believe you speculate any less than another seeker?
I only take my guidance from SGGS. No other book or person. Please be factual when you claim something about others.
But for this thread, I think the matter regarding meal time prayers has been nailed. There are no hard and fast rules, and people are free to use what resonates with them as it is not a prescribed act - unless we consider the Amrit vela banis are precursors to breakfast and Rehraas to the evening meal.
There seems to be a contradiction in the above. Either something is nailed in a specific manner or there are no hard and fast rules. It can not be both. So which is it?
I hope this clarifies my own position to some extent. And it is my own, I'm not expecting/ forcing others to subscribe to it. And just so people know, it isn't based solely on other people's opinions but my own research, which I've tried to conduct as honestly as I can looking at a wide breadth of opinions on the matter before forming my personal opinion and most crucially, trying to read and experience the texts under scrutiny themselves.
I totally agree with that too because as mentioned before and is worth repeating that Sikhi is the journey of the individual and it is up to the individual Sikh to carve the path based on the Gurmat values.
Oh yeah, a final point, life is a mystical experience for me - that's how I subjectively experience it (and I know many don't) - so it shouldn't be surprise that I see a significant amount of grey inbetween the black and white. It's the questions that pertain to this grey area that are most interesting to me and the most difficult to answer conclusively - I guess it boils down to that plain, old fashioned thing called 'faith' in the end.
As a Sikh one can only talk about oneself because it is one's own journey. It is a bit presumptuous to talk about others and then mention haumei under the same breath in my opinion.
Interesting interaction I must add.
Regards
Tejwant Singh