Thank you Gyani ji for that kind explanation.
This was the reason that I had started the 'kach bani' thread, because there seems to be a few misconceptions as to what constitutes it.
I have learned that what I myself have done is NOT kachi bani as I've not including or eliminated any parts of shabads. - BUT, some of the scholars and qualified will simply NOT accept my personal versions.
I am now aware myself that I have done no such tampering and it is actually all fine, but it's trying to make these others aware of what 'kachi' really is.
Also Kanwaljit Ji, I don't find that catchy tunes take your focus off the gurbani.
But you may be right that with some people it may do just that.
But on the whole, I don't think it has a greater influence to do that. Personally, I have found that I have learnt much more gurbani with this personal approach.
It helps me, but that doesn't mean for everyone. It all depends on how we actually all listen to music, as this does vary between individuals as some will focus on certain elements only.
This was the reason that I had started the 'kach bani' thread, because there seems to be a few misconceptions as to what constitutes it.
I have learned that what I myself have done is NOT kachi bani as I've not including or eliminated any parts of shabads. - BUT, some of the scholars and qualified will simply NOT accept my personal versions.
I am now aware myself that I have done no such tampering and it is actually all fine, but it's trying to make these others aware of what 'kachi' really is.
Also Kanwaljit Ji, I don't find that catchy tunes take your focus off the gurbani.
But you may be right that with some people it may do just that.
But on the whole, I don't think it has a greater influence to do that. Personally, I have found that I have learnt much more gurbani with this personal approach.
It helps me, but that doesn't mean for everyone. It all depends on how we actually all listen to music, as this does vary between individuals as some will focus on certain elements only.