gurprit_gujral
SPNer
- Sep 24, 2004
- 8
- 17
- 77
Dear members,
We all claim to know and discuss history of Sikhs. In this context I am sure all must know about Sikh sovereign rule by Maharaja Ranjit Singh. But, how many of us know that the Sikhs had initiated the rule over Punjab several years before Ranjit Singh was even born?
The Sikhs were in control of Lahore, the symbol of Moghul/Durrani rule, in 1765AD, which is almost 36 years before Ranjit Singh was proclaimed the Maharaja of Punjab in 1801AD. This is evidenced by the coins of the Sikhs, then considered the symbols of Sikh sovereignty, minted and circulated by the Sikh Misls between 1765AD and 1801AD.
This very significant glorious aspect of Sikh history is rarely highlighted by Sikh historians. Could the reason be that they are not certain about the fact and want to play safe lest they termed be over zealous? To such skeptics I would submit that Nanakshahi coins of the years 1765AD to 1801AD from Lahore are very much in evidence.
Gurprit
We all claim to know and discuss history of Sikhs. In this context I am sure all must know about Sikh sovereign rule by Maharaja Ranjit Singh. But, how many of us know that the Sikhs had initiated the rule over Punjab several years before Ranjit Singh was even born?
The Sikhs were in control of Lahore, the symbol of Moghul/Durrani rule, in 1765AD, which is almost 36 years before Ranjit Singh was proclaimed the Maharaja of Punjab in 1801AD. This is evidenced by the coins of the Sikhs, then considered the symbols of Sikh sovereignty, minted and circulated by the Sikh Misls between 1765AD and 1801AD.
This very significant glorious aspect of Sikh history is rarely highlighted by Sikh historians. Could the reason be that they are not certain about the fact and want to play safe lest they termed be over zealous? To such skeptics I would submit that Nanakshahi coins of the years 1765AD to 1801AD from Lahore are very much in evidence.
Gurprit