verde_team ji
Just my two cents. Your own point of view is interesting and your opinion should be respected. Tattoos do not stand in the way of spiritual progress as a Sikh.
But...Tattoos in a strict sense are not consistent with Sikh identity. The reasons have been explained at length by some thoughtful and reflective members writing on the thread, amidst a lot of emotionalism, which is unfortunate. For some reason, any discussion of tattoos are a lightening rod that attract almost as many sparks as the debate whether Sikhs may eat meat. I am always baffled by the intensity aimed at both topics.
Just my two cents. Your own point of view is interesting and your opinion should be respected. Tattoos do not stand in the way of spiritual progress as a Sikh.
... Gurbani does not even mention the word tattoo. So the argument against tattoos cannot be Gurbani based, but rather based on our understanding of the connection between ego and loss of spiritual center. Not on tattoos. And false spirituality can be just as damaging to finding a one's spiritual center as tattoos. Of course discussions of the dangers of ego ...are Gurbani based.
But...Tattoos in a strict sense are not consistent with Sikh identity. The reasons have been explained at length by some thoughtful and reflective members writing on the thread, amidst a lot of emotionalism, which is unfortunate. For some reason, any discussion of tattoos are a lightening rod that attract almost as many sparks as the debate whether Sikhs may eat meat. I am always baffled by the intensity aimed at both topics.