This was an interesting discussion I had the other night. Several facts were pointed out to me (note I don't necessarily agree with these views).
1) He left his own family and went wandering, in effect leaving his sons to their own devices?
2) He seemed to be more concerned about the welfare of everyone else then his own children?
3) He did not seem to be a good provider for his family?
what are everyone else's views?
1) He left his own family and went wandering, in effect leaving his sons to their own devices?
2) He seemed to be more concerned about the welfare of everyone else then his own children?
3) He did not seem to be a good provider for his family?
what are everyone else's views?