Meditation..renunciation..bathing at sacred places, recitations of mantars, jaaps, pilgrimages, etc etc etc had been going on since ages before Guru nanak ji..the question to consider is whether we believe that Guru Nanak ji.s Divine Message is simply OLD wine in a ew bottle or recycled Message already revealed in the Vedas Puranas Kitabs...??
OR do we believe that Guru nanak ji and His Divine Message is a Complete NEW Gyaan of the Creator..a Brand New way of doing things..new ways, new language, new meanings to old words..new paathways...new thoughts...new METHODS of KNOWING the CREATOR. Why did the GURU go to Kailash Parbatt, Mecca Medina, Benares, hardwaar, Kanshi, Mathura..and what did the Guru discuss with the assembled Yogis, mahapurahs, maha Gyanis Pirs and Sanyaisees etc etc ? These people were WELL versed..in fact the MASTERS of the OLD WAYS..established and founded with deep roots...Did the GURU hold the dialogue - IMPORTANT ENOUGH for Guru Ji to write it down as Siddh Ghosht. Is Siddh Ghosht ENDORSING what the Yogis saadhs holy men were doing ? Guru Ji saw them sitting cross legged, eyes closed, chanting, etc etc etc...is there even ONE TUK in the entire SGGS ENDORSING those ways and methods of "meditation" renunciation jaaps mantars etc etc ?? IF NOT then we ahve to consider why didnt Guru Ji endorse them....but TUKS condemning these unnecessary methods etc are many...
Did Guru Ji just Change from Har har mahadev to vaheguru ?? Har har Mahadev and many other chants were being used for Meditation etc....did GURU ji say Waheguru is better ?? IN fact the earlier Names of the Creator are many and used in the GURUbani..much more than Waheguru which is used only by the Bhatts and the word is NOT a "name" per se but an EXCLAMATION !!! ( WONDROUS GURU Wah-Guru).
So are we so buys Counting the TREES that we forget to Taste the Fruit..when the GURU clearly directs us..EAT and DIGEST...Khaveh Bhuncheh tis ka hoyeh udharoh..ONLY those who eat, chew.. and digest food get its benefits.. same for Mann Food !!
Guru Nanak ji STRESSED ACTION...KARAM....Karmee aveh Kapprrah....YOUR ACTIONS RESULT in HONOUR /dishonour !! The GURU WORKED..He married..He travelled..he preached..He sweated..he earned and He SHARED. The Very Same things that the CREATOR DOES...HE ACTS via His laws and Nature etc..He is a DOER..and He distributes..DENDA DEH laindeh thaak paiyeh...
The SIKH is an ACTION fellow..he works..he earns honest labour..he shares..he has discipline..he takes RESPONSIBILITES ( the sadhus and Yoguis shirked responsibility)..he is a Benefit to society, the samaaj..he is social (not recluse sitting in underground caves or in jungles)..
2. SIKHS have "Darshan" of the Jagdee JYOT of Das Patshahs SGGS DAILY on doing parkash and Paath. This is merely looking..REAL DARSHAN is FOLLOWING and adopting the Gurus HUKMNAMAH after it has been taken or lsitened to...
With the Jagdee Jyot of 10 Gurus present before us..SOME stubbornly continue to claim their Waddeh baba Ji had a "glimpse" of Guru nanak Ji..others claim they saw Guru gobind Singh Ji on a Horse in Hemkunt..blah blah blah. Whatever for ?? There is NOT a single claim in our History that Sikhs contineud to pine for a "glimpse" of Guru nanak ji when the Guru was Guru Angad Sahib Ji...No one had any glimpses of Guru Angad Sahib Ji when Guru Amardass Ji was GURU..and so on...ARE we SIKHS of the post 1708 era...been bitten by RABID DOGS that we HALLUCINATE ?? we have "glimpses" of GURUS that are no longer around BUT CANNOT SEE the GURU PRESENT as SGGS..a GURU that was commanded to be accepted as SOLE GURU by the Predecessor Guru gobind Singh Ji ?? Are we admitting that we DONT actually have Full FAITH in the SGGS as GURU..we still "need to hallucinate" that we saw this Guru and that Guru ??And we then put those "hallucinations" on to a Canvas Via a THIRD Party (portrait painter) and claim that the hallucination is the REAL GURU NANAK ?? I think thats really a case for Anti-Rabies injections. Didnt the GURUS have the Very BEST painters, portrait artists who would have painted the most authentic portraits like the ones we have of the Mughal Emperors ?? WHY didnt the GURS ALLOW such paintings and have their PERSONAL histories RECORDED ?? They wrote their Gurbani themselves..BUT didnt do all that stuff ???? Are we better than Guru nanak ji to imagine "the real" Guru nanak ?? and install that photo in Sikh homes as authentic ??
Part two to follow...