Parma
This topic is a very complicated issue. All religions and moral philosophy in both western and eastern traditions have grappled with it for thousands of years. My suspicion is that you will get some responses but people need time to think. A breezy response doesn't do the topic justice. Good of you to keep it going.
Perhaps I will say more once I think more carefully.
For now consider this. When you assume there is a free will you must also assume that there is an independent person, a rational agent (a doer who acts according to choices before him). This means the "doer" is acting according to his/her personal understanding "self" or "personal identity". Without a personal construction of MY SELF there is no one to make choices or moral decisions.
So what happens when you say this? There no personal MY SELF. Self is a mental contruction (EGO). And furthermore, the personal construction of self inteferes with making a connection with the Divine.
Then what happens when you say this? On making a connection with the Divine, the personal construction of self ends because it is not real any longer. At this point, free will no longer makes sense.
Then ask this. When MYSELF ends because of MY connection with Waheguru, do I continue to be a moral being making moral choices?
(Folks I am not talking about the person of antoniaji. Please do not send me advice.)
That gives you an idea of how complicated this topic is. Understanding free will is not a simple matter of choosing between karma and enlightenment, or between saying that all behavior is determined by God's will versus all behavior is freely chosen.
A working example from Guru Angad (on sikiwiki)
Sewa
Guru Angad believed in the service and well-being of all mankind and not just of his own followers. He laid stress on character building rather than observance of rituals and formalities. The path which Guru Angad pointed out to his Sikhs for achieving enlightenment was through service and good actions and devotion and worship of one God. He asked his followers to win Divine grace by prayer, singing His praises, cultivating humility, a spirit of service and submitting at all time to His will. Paying a fine under pressure, does not bring either merit or goodness. That alone is a good deed, O Nanak, which is done by one’s own free will. Sewa has to be done selflessly.
Eliminate your conceit and then perform service to humanity, Only then you will get honor - Guru Angad Dev
Not easy is it? Some personal choice is defnitely at work here. Some work by Waheguru is also at work here.
People will respond. It just takes some time.
This topic is a very complicated issue. All religions and moral philosophy in both western and eastern traditions have grappled with it for thousands of years. My suspicion is that you will get some responses but people need time to think. A breezy response doesn't do the topic justice. Good of you to keep it going.
Perhaps I will say more once I think more carefully.
For now consider this. When you assume there is a free will you must also assume that there is an independent person, a rational agent (a doer who acts according to choices before him). This means the "doer" is acting according to his/her personal understanding "self" or "personal identity". Without a personal construction of MY SELF there is no one to make choices or moral decisions.
So what happens when you say this? There no personal MY SELF. Self is a mental contruction (EGO). And furthermore, the personal construction of self inteferes with making a connection with the Divine.
Then what happens when you say this? On making a connection with the Divine, the personal construction of self ends because it is not real any longer. At this point, free will no longer makes sense.
Then ask this. When MYSELF ends because of MY connection with Waheguru, do I continue to be a moral being making moral choices?
(Folks I am not talking about the person of antoniaji. Please do not send me advice.)
That gives you an idea of how complicated this topic is. Understanding free will is not a simple matter of choosing between karma and enlightenment, or between saying that all behavior is determined by God's will versus all behavior is freely chosen.
A working example from Guru Angad (on sikiwiki)
Sewa
Guru Angad believed in the service and well-being of all mankind and not just of his own followers. He laid stress on character building rather than observance of rituals and formalities. The path which Guru Angad pointed out to his Sikhs for achieving enlightenment was through service and good actions and devotion and worship of one God. He asked his followers to win Divine grace by prayer, singing His praises, cultivating humility, a spirit of service and submitting at all time to His will. Paying a fine under pressure, does not bring either merit or goodness. That alone is a good deed, O Nanak, which is done by one’s own free will. Sewa has to be done selflessly.
Eliminate your conceit and then perform service to humanity, Only then you will get honor - Guru Angad Dev
Not easy is it? Some personal choice is defnitely at work here. Some work by Waheguru is also at work here.
People will respond. It just takes some time.