Where Is Sikh-philosophy ?

[Ambarsaria]

Sikh should never consider Gurabani a philosophy. don't even evaluate it on scale of western philosophy.:blueturban:

BSCheema ji totally useless sentence. Who is evaluating? Here people share their thoughts and knowledge. If you want to package it into your own bundle that is your prerogative. Philosophy as defined by Harry Haller ji other English dictionaries is exactly what is meant at SPN and it is pretty lame to start making sentences like you have done.

If Sikhism teaches one nothing else it is an open mind to learn for all life. Kind of artificial rules implied in your sentence go against such fundamental values in Sikhism. Perhaps you can elaborate on your background or context of making such statements.

Sat Sri Akal.

 

[bscheema]

to you it may b useless for me its not http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Trumpp's_Translation_Of_Portions_Of_The_Guru_Granth_Sahib

 

[Ambarsaria]

to you it may b useless for me its not ***********

Veer play with dirt you will get dirty. Look for junk and you will find junk. Your thread is not specific to this citation.

Let us not look for non-Sikhs damaging Sikhi. There are enough of our own and perhaps focus there. Many such have come and gone here at spn. Some have persisted in the so called shadow of postulating pure Gurbani understanding with their own grammar books, interpretations, linkages to Sanskrit, and other dubious tools.

Spend time on something positive. mundahug

Sat Sri Akal.

 

[bscheema]

these things are sikhi damaging.and they are still working we use there references to translate gurbani .our so called intellects here at spn . i am showing u link that how come it become a part of sikhi its on sikhiwiki .its ok for but nt for me.
yea spend some time brother on positive thats wat im saying

 

[Ishna]

I'm confused again, bscheema do you have a problem that that page being on SikhiWiki? It is by no way singing praise of Trumpp... In fact it serves as a caution that his translation is of poor quality.

What do you think of Macauliffe? Is his work as corrupt in your opinion (keeping in mind Macauliffe was western, too)?