• Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
    Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
    Sign up Log in

Controversy Surrounding Prof Darshan Singh Ji

Hardip Singh

SPNer
Jan 14, 2009
323
503
Five SINGH SAHIBS..Under the Signature of Akal Takhat Jathedar Sadhu Singh Bhaura met on Akal Takhata nd Issued a Hukmnamah that Charitrapkhoyan in dsm granth is NOT the writings of Guru Gobind Singh Ji...in 1973.

Thus the Present Jathedar is CONTRAVENING a Hukmnamha issued by his predecessor !! in 1973.
This issue is raised in one of the Nine resolutions passed by a HUge turnout of Sangats in NEW YORK GURDWARA. Rabinder singh BHAMRA, GS Lamba and Harvinder singh RIYARR are named conspirators behind this anti-darshan singh episode. Bhamra writes on Forums regularly and is a strong supporter of reincarnation, etc etc etc...

Gyanni jee,
I have just recived an e-mail from Lamba's camp on the subject matter. I am just pasting the mail as such. You can relise from this that how much efforts they are putting up to misinform the Sikh sangat regarding Proffessor Sahib. Here it is

From: SANT SIPAHI [Estd.1945] <gslamba@santsipahi.org>
Sent: Mon, November 23, 2009 4:50:59 PM
Subject: ਰਾਗੀ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਵਲੋਂ ਗੁਰੂ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੀ ਘੋਰ ਨਿੰਦਾ - ਕੁਝ ਆਡੀਉ ਕਲਿਪ
http://co105w.col105.mail.live.com/mail/InboxLight.aspx?n=1756830430#playhttp://co105w.col105.mail.live.com/mail/InboxLight.aspx?n=1756830430#stophttp://co105w.col105.mail.live.com/mail/InboxLight.aspx?n=1756830430#mute


http://co105w.col105.mail.live.com/mail/InboxLight.aspx?n=1756830430#volume




AUDIO FILES:

01 DS - 050107 ANKOOLRAKABGANJ SAHIB
ਗੁਰਮਤਿ ਕੀ ਹੈ ? ਜੋ ਗੁਰੂ ਕਹੇ। ਪਰ ਪ੍ਰੋ. ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਦਾ ਇਹ ਕਹਿਣਾ ਕਿ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਮਹਾਰਾਜ ਦੀਆਂ ਜੋ ਰਚਨਾਵਾਂ ਗੁਰਮਤਿ ਦੇ ਅਨਕੂਲ ਗੁਰਮਤਿ ਦੇ ਅਨਕੂਲ ਹਨ ਉਹ ਸੰਭਾਲ ਲੈਣੀਆਂ ਚਾਹੀਦੀਆਂ ਹਨ। ਕੀ ਹੁਣ ਸਿਖ ਇਹ ਨਿਸਚਤ ਕਰੇਗਾ ਕਿ ਗੁਰੂ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੀ ਕਿਹਡੀ ਰਚਨਾ ਗੁਰਮਤਿ ਦੇ ਅਨਕੂਲ ਹੈ? ਕੀ ਇਸ ਤੋਂ ਵੱਧ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਿੰਦਾ ਹੋਰ ਹੋ ਸਕਦੀ ਹੈ?


02 DS -WARNING TO HAZUR SAHIB
ਪ੍ਰੋ. ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਤਖ਼ਤ ਸਚਿਖੰਡ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਹਰਿਮੰਦਿਰ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਬੰਧਕਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਬੇਨਤੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਬਲਕਿ ਚੇਤਾਵਨੀ ਦੇ ਰਹੇ ਹਨ ਕਿ ਉਥੋਂ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦਾ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ ਉਠਾ ਦੇਣ।


03 DS - MESSAGE ABOUT HAZOOR SAHIB AND PATNA SAHIB
ਪੰਜਾ ਤਖ਼ਤਾਂ ਦੀ ਅਰਦਾਸ ਹਰ ਸਿਖ ਨਿਤਾਪ੍ਰਤਿ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ। ਪਰ ਤਖ਼ਤ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਪਟਨਾ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਅਤੇ ਸਚਿਖੰਡ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਹਰਿਮੰਦਰ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੀ ਸਪਸ਼ਟ ਨਿਰਾਦਰੀ ਕਰਦੇ ਹੋਏ ਰਾਗੀ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਦਾ ਕਹਿਣਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਜਿਸ ਸਥਾਨ ਤੇ ਵੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦਾ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੋਵੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਕਾ ਕੋਈ ਸਿਖ ਐਸੇ ਸਥਾਨ ਤੇ ਨਾ ਜਾਵੇ।


04 DS - ATTACK BHAI SUKHA SINGH BHAI MEHTAB SINGH AND BHAI MANI SINGH.
ਭਾਈ ਕਾਹਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਨੇ ਮਹਾਨ ਕੋਸ਼ ਅਤੇ ਸ਼ਰੋਮਣੀ ਗੁਰਦੁਆਰਾ ਪ੍ਰਬੰਧਕ ਕਮੇਟੀ ਵਲੋ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ਿਤ ਗੁਰਮਤਿ ਮਾਰਤੰਡ ਵਿਚ ਅੰਕਤ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਭਾਈ ਮਨੀ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਲੋਂ ਸੰਪਾਦਤ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੀ ਬੀਡ਼ ਬਾਰੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਪੰਥ ਵਿਚ ਇਹ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਚਲ ਰਹੀ ਸੀ ਕਿ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਦੀ ਇਹ ਬੀਡ਼ ਨਿਰੋਲ ਇਕ ਜਿਲਦ ਵਿਚ ਰਹੇ ਜਾਂ ਵਖ ਵਖ ਗ੍ਰੰਥਾ ਦੀਆਂ ਵਖਰੀਆਂ ਪੋਥੀਆਂ ਬਣਾ ਦਿਤੀਆਂ ਜਾਣ ਤਾਂ ਕਿ ਅਧਿਕਾਰ ਮੁਤਾਬਿਕ ਸਿਖ ਇਸ ਦਾ ਪਠਨ ਪਾਠਨ ਕਰ ਸਕਣ। ਭਾਈ ਕਾਹਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਮੁਤਾਬਕ ਇਹ ਇਕ ਜਿਲਦ ਵਿਚ ਸੀ । ਭਾਈ ਸੁਖਾ ਸਿੰਘ ਮਹਿਤਾਬ ਸਿੰਘ ਨੇ ਖਾਲਸੇ ਨੂੰ ਬੇਨਤੀ ਕੀਤੀ ਕਿ ਉਹ ਪਾਮਰ ਮਸੇ ਨੂੰ ਸੋਧਣ ਜਾ ਰਹੇ ਹਨ ਤੇ ਜੇਕਰ ਉਸਨੂੰ ਸੋਧ ਕੇ ਸ਼ਹੀਦ ਹੋ ਗਏ ਤਾਂ ਇਸ ਦੀਆਂ ਵਖ ਪੋਥੀਆਂ ਕਰ ਦਿਤੀਆਂ ਜਾਣ ਨਹੀਂ ਤਾਂ ਇਹ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਇਕ ਜਿਲਦ ਵਿਚ ਹੀ ਰਹਿਣ ਦਿਤਾ ਜਾਏ। ਭਾਈ ਸੁਖਾ ਸਿੰਘ ਮਹਿਤਾਬ ਸਿੰਘ ਪਾਮਰ ਨੂੰ ਸੋਧ ਕੇ ਵਾਪਸ ਆ ਗਏ ਤੇ ਇਹ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਇਕ ਜਿਲਦ ਵਿਚ ਹੀ ਰਿਹਾ। ਪਰ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਨਿਰੇ ਝੂਠ ਅਤੇ ਕੁਫ਼ਰ ਦਾ ਸਹਾਰਾ ਲੈਂਦਿਆਂ ਕਹਿ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਭਾਈ ਮਨੀ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਦੀ ਸ਼ਹਾਦਤ ਦੇ ਦੋ ਸਾਲ ਬਾਅਦ ਤਕ ਇਸ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਦੀਆਂ ਵਖ ਵਖ ਪੋਥੀਆਂ ਸਨ ਤੇ ਭਾਈ ਸੁਖਾ ਸਿੰਘ ਮਹਿਤਾਬ ਸਿੰਘ ਨੇ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਜੇਕਰ ਉਹ ਮੱਸੇ ਨੂੰ ਸੋਧ ਕੇ ਵਾਪਸ ਆ ਗਏ ਤਾਂ ਇਹਨਾਂ ਪੋਥੀਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਇਕ ਕਰ ਦੇਣਾ। ਭਾਈ ਸੁਖਾ ਸਿੰਘ ਮਹਿਤਾਬ ਸਿੰਘ ਦੇ ਸੁਰਖਰੂ ਵਾਪਸ ਆ ਜਾਣ ਉਪਰੰਥ ਇਸ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਦੀਆਂ ਜੁਦਾ ਜੁਦਾ ਪੋਥੀਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਇਕ ਕੀਤਾ ਗਿਆ।

ਇਹ ਨਾ ਕੇਵਲ ਸ਼ਰਾਰਤ ਅਤੇ ਅਕਾਦਮਿਕ ਬੇਈਮਾਨੀ ਹੀ ਹੈ ਬਲਕਿ ਮਹਾਨ ਸ਼ਹੀਦ ਭਾਈ ਮਨੀ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਅਤੇ ਭਾਈ ਸੁਖਾ ਸਿੰਘ ਮਹਿਤਾਬ ਸਿੰਘ ਦੀ ਵੀ ਘੋਰ ਨਿਰਾਦਰੀ ਹੈ।

06 DS – TWENTY GRANTHS IN THE NAME OF GURU GOBIND SINGH JI.
ਬਿਨਾ ਕਿਸੇ ਅਧਾਰ ਜਾਂ ਹਵਾਲੇ ਦੇ ਰਾਗੀ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੀ ਸਿੱਧੀ ਨਿਰਾਦਰੀ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਕਹਿ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਹੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਦੇ ਨਾਮ ਤੇ ਵੀਹ ਜਾਂ ਪੱਚੀ ਪੁਸਤਕਾਂ ਹਨ। ਕੀ ਇਹ ਲਿਸਟ ਦੇਣ ਦੀ ਖੇਚਲ ਕਰਨ ਗੇ?

07 DS- DURGANDH 250508 BALA SAHIB
ਗੁਰੂ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਅਤੇ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਦੀ ਸਿੱਧੀ ਨਿਰਾਦਰੀ। ਕੀ ਕਦੇ ਕੋਈ ਸਿਖ ਗੁਰੂ ਨੂੰ ਵੀ ਸਵਾਲ ਜਵਾਬ ਕਰ ਸਕਦਾ ਹੈ ਜਾਂ ਗੁਰੂ ਦੀ ਵੀ ਜਵਾਬ ਤਲਬੀ ਕਰ ਸਕਦਾ ਹੈ? ਹਾਂ ਪ੍ਰੋ. ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਇਹ ਕਰ ਸਕਦੇ ਹਨ। ਆਪ ਕਹਿ ਰਹੇ ਹਨ ਕਿ ਗੁਰੂ ਕੋਲੋਂ ਵੀ ਇਕ ਸਵਾਲ ਪੈਦਾ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਕੀ ਇਹਨਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਵਿਚ ਪਈ ਹੋਈ ਬਦਬੂ ਨਹੀਂ ਨਜ਼ਰ ਨਹੀਂ ਆਉਂਦੀ।

08 DS - NO MENTION OF AMRIT IN DASAM GRANTH
ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਵਲੋਂ ਗੁਰੂ ਦੀ ਸਿੱਧੀ ਨਿੰਦਾ। ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੀ ਸਾਰੀ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਿਵਇ ਜ਼ਫ਼ਰਨਾਮਾ ਦੀ ਰਚਨਾ ਖਾਲਸੇ ਦੀ ਸਿਰਜਨਾ ਤੋਂ ਤਿੰਨ ਸਾਲ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਤਕ ਮੁਕੰਮਲ ਹੋ ਚੁਕੀ ਸੀ। ਸੋ ਇਸ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਦੀਆਂ ਘਟਨਾਵਾਂ ਦਾ ਜਿਕਰ ਪ੍ਰੋ. ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਬਹੁਤ ਹੀ ਕੋਝੇ ਢੰਗ ਨਾਲ ਕਰ ਕੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਦੀ ਨਿੰਦਾ ਕਰ ਰਹੇ ਹਨ।

09 DS - 15 POTHIS IN THE NAME OF BHAI MANI SINGH
ਬਿਨਾ ਕਿਸੇ ਅਧਾਰ ਜਾਂ ਹਵਾਲੇ ਦੇ ਰਾਗੀ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਬਾਈ ਮਨੀ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਦੀ ਸਿੱਧੀ ਨਿਰਾਦਰੀ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਕਹਿ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਭਾਈ ਮਨੀ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਦੇ ਨਾਮ ਤੇ ਗੁਰਮਤਿ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੁੱਧ ਪੰਦਰਾਂ ਪੋਥੀਆਂ ਹਨ। ਕੀ ਰਾਗੀ ਜੀ ਇਹ ਲਿਸਟ ਦੇਣ ਦੀ ਖੇਚਲ ਕਰਨ ਗੇ?


10 DS - DASAM GRANTH IS A BRAHMIN
ਰਾਗੀ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਦਾ ਕਹਿਣਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਆਪਣੇ ਆਪ ਵਿਚ ਹੀ ਇਕ ਬ੍ਰਾਹਮਣ ਹੈ। ਖਾਲਸੇ ਨੂੰ ਨਿਆਰਾ ਪਨ ਬਖਸ਼ਿਸ਼ ਕਰਨ ਵਾਲੀ ਦਸਮ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹ ਦੀ ਬਾਣੀ ਅਤੇ ਨਿਤਨੇਮ ਅਤੇ ਅੰਮ੍ਰਿਤ ਸੰਚਾਰ ਦੀ ਬਾਣੀ ਦੇ ਸ੍ਰੋਤ ਪ੍ਰਤੀ ਇਹ ਕਹਿ ਕੇ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਗੁਰੂ ਕਲਗੀਧਰ ਪਿਤਾ ਦੀ ਸਿੱਧੀ ਨਿਰਾਦਰੀ ਕਰ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ।

11 DS - ATTACKS ARDAS
ਰਾਗੀ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਇੱਥੇ ਅਰਦਾਸ ਪ੍ਰਤੀ ਭੰਬਲ ਭੂਸਾ ਪਾਉਣ ਦੀ ਕੋਸ਼ਿਸ਼ ਕਰ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ।

12 DS - DASAM GRANTH AFTER 100 YEARS
ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੀ ਸਾਰੀ ਦੀ ਸਾਰੀ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਿਵਾਇ ਜ਼ਫ਼ਰਨਾਮਾ ਦੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਨੇ ਖਾਲਸੇ ਦੀ ਸਿਰਜਨਾ ਤੋਂ ਤਿੰਨ ਸਾਲ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਤਕ ਮੁਕੰਮਲ ਕਰ ਲਿਆ ਸੀ। ਇਸ ਗਲ ਦੀ ਗਵਾਹੀ ਕੇਸਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਛਿਬਰ ਨੇ ਵੀ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਹੈ। ਪਰ ਰਾਗੀ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਦਾ ਇਹ ਕਹਿਣਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਗੁਰੂ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੇ ਜੋਤੀ ਜੋਤਿ ਸਮਾਉਣ ਤੋਂ ਇਕ ਸੌ ਸਾਲ ਬਾਅਦ ਹੋਂਦ ਆਇਆ ਹੈ।

15 DS - HAZUR SAHIB GOLAK
ਸਿਖ ਰਹਿਤ ਮਰਯਾਦਾ ਵਿਚ ਵਰਣਤ ਪੰਜਾਂ ਤਖਤਾਂ ਦੀ ਅਰਦਾਸ ਦੀ ਨਿਰਾਦਰੀ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਸਿਖ ਰਾਇ ਦੇ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਸਿਖ ਹਜੂਰ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜਾਣਾ ਬੰਦ ਕਰ ਦੇਣ। ਗੋਲਕਾਂ ਬੰਦ ਹੋ ਜਾਣ। ਉਹਨਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਪਤਾ ਲਗ ਜਾਏ ਗਾ।


16 DS - HAZUR SAHIB A SHOP
ਕਿਸੇ ਸਮੇਂ ਜਹਾਂਗੀਰ ਨੇ ਵੀ ਸਚਿਖੰਡ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਹਰਿਮੰਦਰ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਨੂੰ ਦੁਕਾਨੇ ਬਾਤਿਲ, ਇਕ ਦੁਕਾਨ ਕਿਹਾ ਸੀ। ਅਜ ਜਹਾਂਗੀਰ ਦੀ ਰੂਹ ਨੂੰ ਪ੍ਰਤਿਮਾਨ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਰਾਗੀ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਸਚਿਖੰਡ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਹਜੂਰ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਨੂੰ ਇਕ ਦੁਕਾਨ ਦਸਦਿਆਂ ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਬੰਦ ਕਰਾਣ ਦੀ ਵਕਾਲਤ ਅਤੇ ਤਰੀਕਾ ਦਸ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ । ਰਾਗੀ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਕਹਿ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਸਿਖ ਉਥੇ ਜਾਣਾ ਬੰਦ ਕਰ ਦੇਣ, ਸਵੇਰੇ ਇਹ ਦੁਕਾਨਾਂ ਬੰਦ ਹੋ ਜਾਣਗੀਆਂ।


17 DS - HAMBURG DOUBT ON NITNEM
ਰਾਗੀ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਗੁਰੂ ਕਲਗੀਧਰ ਪਿਤਾ ਦੀ ਨਾਸਤਿਕਤਾ ਭਰਪੂਰ ਸਪਸ਼ਟ ਨਿਰਾਦਰੀ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਕਹਿ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਮਹਾਰਾਜ ਵਲੋਂ ਅੰਮ੍ਰਿਤ ਸੰਚਾਰ ਦੀਆ ਇਹਨਾਂ ਪੰਜ ਬਾਣੀਆਂ ਦਾ ਕੋਈ ਸਬੂਤ ਨਹੀਂ ਮਿਲਦਾ।

22 DS - 250508 BALA SAHIB DUJA GURU
ਰਾਗੀ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ ਤੀਸਰੀ ਸ਼ਤਾਬਦੀ ਦੀ ਸਿੱਧੀ ਨਿਰਾਦਰੀ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਕਹਿ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਇਹ ਸਮਾਗਮ ਕੇਵਲ ਇਕ ਬਹਾਨਾ ਹੀ ਹੈ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ



ਗੁਰਚਰਨਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ ਲਾਂਬਾ

GURCHARANJIT SINGH LAMBA, Advocate
Editor - Sant Sipahi [Estd.1945]

Camp Office: USA
Phone: M - 001-973-699-0950
R- 001-201-998-3978

www.santsipahi.org, www.patshahi10.org
 

Hardip Singh

SPNer
Jan 14, 2009
323
503
No doubt they have chosen a Advocate to run their show, The Brahmans!! He is very cunnings instigating emotions to derive home a event that will split Sikh Panth... this is what the Brahmans want... split another split and another one... end of the story... :welcome:

An appeal to Dhan Guru Teg Bhadur jeo,
Pl come back to this earth and see to yourself. These people have forgotten your sacrifice. Pl forgive them and educate us what to do ????????
 

ssira

SPNer
Oct 1, 2006
15
8
Brahmgyani@ appears..I will continue to BELIEVE IN Prof Darshan Singh as he has the Best CREDENTIALS...he knows what he is talking about without being a fake brahmgyani...
Regarding your above comment I think you are mixing about real Brehmgiani and a preacher. If someone talks truth once or few times in his life doesn't become a Brehgiani. You want to believe him, no problem. He is still not a Brehmgiani for many many sikh sangat. Our concern here is to talk against any Sikh historic writings, few examples are (Sri Guru Granth Sahib, Dasam Granth Sahib, Sarbloh Granth, Sakhian, 100 sakhi, Bh balaji Sahi and many more) You need to be a Brehmgiani. That all I am asking for. Please do not talk against any Sikh preaching if you are not a Brehgiani.<?"urn::eek:ffice:eek:ffice" />
Now whatever example in Sri Dasamgranth Sahib so called not dicussable in family is all awareness to a sikh sangat. Just like in Chandi Di War Guru is just presenting Chadi di Devi's real character that she was a good warrior. That doesn't mean He is accepting her as God. Don't label these kind of awareness’s in Sri Dasam Granth Sahib as this is Guru Gobind Sing is Saying (As translated by Prof Darshan Singh in that Video Recording). These are just examples some to follow (Good one) and some not to follow (Bad one).
WGJKK WGJKF
 
Last edited by a moderator:

spnadmin

1947-2014 (Archived)
SPNer
Jun 17, 2004
14,500
19,219
ssira ji

Don't you believe that Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji Maharaj is different from the other works that you listed. They are historic works. But Sri Guru Granth Sahib is not an historic work. It is the Guru's word -- the Guru itself. It is different. No?
 

spnadmin

1947-2014 (Archived)
SPNer
Jun 17, 2004
14,500
19,219
ssira ji

Forgive me, bu your response was an exact duplicate of post 45. I have posed to you a question about your statement in post 45. Let me rephrase my question regarding the post 45. Do you consider Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji Maharaj as only one granth on a list of several historic books, or as something that is the revealed Satguru's banee?

You have not clarified anything by repeating your previous comments. Thanks
 

spnadmin

1947-2014 (Archived)
SPNer
Jun 17, 2004
14,500
19,219
ssira ji

This is the third time you have posted the same comment. At this point your posts are considered spam and you are considered a spammer. This is a warning and an infraction will be issued.
 

bsbasan

SPNer
Dec 6, 2009
2
0
THE FACTS

Professor Darshan Singh, a former Jathedar of The Akal Takht, has for several decades dazzled Sikhs around the world with his inspiring kirtan and erudite discourses on gurbani.

He has also been quite courageous, forthright and outspoken about the anti-Sikh and anti-Sikhi goings-on in India and Punjab since 1984.

Through the last two decades, his integrity has been attacked by a handful over and over again. Through time, the allegations have been found to be wild and baseless.

The most recent one is over his views on the Dasam Granth. He is now being accused of making derogatory remarks about Guru Gobind Singh!
 
QUESTIONS TO PONDER -


To those who have known him these past few decades through his kirtan and discourse, do you think it is reasonable to believe, or at all feasible, that Prof. Darshan Singh would make derogatory remarks about Guru Gobind Singh or say anything which could in anyway be designed to be hurtful to his memory?


- Why has he been the focal point of repeated and relentless attacks?

- Even if we disagree with his views on any subject, is it right for any of us to attack him personally and accuse him of being an "enemy of Sikhi"?


- How should the community deal with such allegations against its highly respected Elders?



http://www.sikhchic.com


Dear Aman Singh Ji,

I have seen the 80's and 90's with very young eyes. I was into an age group at that point of time, where people make their first choices as to how they will lead their life.

I was mesmerized by Ragi's Kirtan then. He was the Jathedar of Sri Akal Takhat Sahib then. Me and my friends use to follow his car on our motorcycles and would always be in the front rows or by his side whenever he performed in Delhi. Quietly, we had submitted ourselves to him. His Kirtan then was always in "Bir Ras" and 98 out of 100 times, the Shabads were from "Sri Dasham Granth Sahib" (SDGS).

We used to look upon him a saviour of the Panth.

in 1989 in Rakab Ganj Sahib, he sang "Harmandir Soyee Aakhiye, Jitho Har Jaata".

We cried, We wept, We touched his feet.

What was so special about him ??

He used to create magic out of Kirtan. His quotes out of SGGS and SDGS were so powerful and he used to beautifully intermingle quotes from 500 angs apart and yet deliver the same message out each and every quote.

He seemed so full and ultimate in interpretation and understanding of Gurbani of both the Granths.

Now everybody please please take out some time and listen to following
http://www.mediafire.com/file/myk1nm12nzz/correct-your-mistake.mp3

Professar Sahib is now explaining why he performed Kirtan from SDGS before. his explanation is that he is a Ragi and it is difficult to extract Shabads out of SGGS.

He says, When Amrit pothi came he depended upon Amrit Pothi and took Shabads out of Amrit Pothi and performed Kirtan.

He says, it was not possible to him to ascertain that the Shabads, quoted from SDGS, were according to Gurmat or not.

According to him, This was the reason, as to why he performed Kirtan from SGDS before.

Sadh Sangat, I have an MP3 CD of Professor Sahib wherein he has done complete Vyakhya of "Twa Prasad Sawaiye".

Now a Ragi, whose Hallmark is his knowledge and his ability to interlink Bani out of various scriptures (He quotes liberally from Bhai Gurdas Vaars, SGDS), says he was unable throughout his life to ascertain that in what context a Bani was written in SGDS.

This is something impossible to comprehend and Digest.

I have lost complete faith in him and in my opinion, he is not able to digest the fact that now he is not the focal point of the Panth (As he used to be in 80's and 90's) and he is desperate to comeback to limelight.

I think that the decision to excommunicate him is justified.

I have full recording of the Rochester programme.

He has really stooped low this time.

WGJKK, WGJKF
 

Tejwant Singh

Mentor
Writer
SPNer
Jun 30, 2004
5,024
7,183
Henderson, NV.
<o:smarttagtype namespaceuri="urn:<img src=" http:="" www.sikhphilosophy.net="" images="" smilies="" redface.gif="" border="0" alt="" title="Embarrassment" smilieid="2" class="inlineimg"></o:smarttagtype>
Dear Aman Singh Ji,

I have seen the 80's and 90's with very young eyes. I was into an age group at that point of time, where people make their first choices as to how they will lead their life.

I was mesmerized by Ragi's Kirtan then. He was the Jathedar of Sri Akal Takhat Sahib then. Me and my friends use to follow his car on our motorcycles and would always be in the front rows or by his side whenever he performed in <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Delhi</st1:city>. Quietly, we had submitted ourselves to him. His Kirtan then was always in "Bir Ras" and 98 out of 100 times, the Shabads were from "Sri Dasham Granth Sahib" (SDGS).

We used to look upon him a saviour of the Panth.

in 1989 in Rakab Ganj Sahib, he sang "Harmandir Soyee Aakhiye, Jitho Har Jaata".

We cried, We wept, We touched his feet.

What was so special about him ??

He used to create magic out of Kirtan. His quotes out of SGGS and SDGS were so powerful and he used to beautifully intermingle quotes from 500 angs apart and yet deliver the same message out each and every quote.

He seemed so full and ultimate in interpretation and understanding of Gurbani of both the Granths.

Now everybody please please take out some time and listen to following
http://www.mediafire.com/file/myk1nm12nzz/correct-your-mistake.mp3

Professar Sahib is now explaining why he performed Kirtan from SDGS before. his explanation is that he is a Ragi and it is difficult to extract Shabads out of SGGS.

He says, When Amrit pothi came he depended upon Amrit Pothi and took Shabads out of Amrit Pothi and performed Kirtan.

He says, it was not possible to him to ascertain that the Shabads, quoted from SDGS, were according to Gurmat or not.

According to him, This was the reason, as to why he performed Kirtan from SGDS before.

Sadh Sangat, I have an MP3 CD of Professor Sahib wherein he has done complete Vyakhya of "Twa Prasad Sawaiye".

Now a Ragi, whose Hallmark is his knowledge and his ability to interlink Bani out of various scriptures (He quotes liberally from Bhai Gurdas Vaars, SGDS), says he was unable throughout his life to ascertain that in what context a Bani was written in SGDS.

This is something impossible to comprehend and Digest.

I have lost complete faith in him and in my opinion, he is not able to digest the fact that now he is not the focal point of the Panth (As he used to be in 80's and 90's) and he is desperate to comeback to limelight.

I think that the decision to excommunicate him is justified.

I have full recording of the <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Rochester</st1:city> programme.

He has really stooped low this time.

WGJKK, WGJKF
Bsbasan ji,
Guru Fateh.

1.What does ex-communication mean according to Sikh values?

2.Can someone explain what kind of Gurmat values it is based on which are prescribed by our Gurus in SGGS, our only Guru?

3. How can one stop someone from being a Learner- a Sikh- a Seeker?

Ex- communication also defies and shows its disregard for Gurbani, which says, " Sabh Gobind hein, Gobind bin nahin koi".

4.How and who can ex-communicate "Gobind"?

Perhaps only those who are drenched in the pool of Me-ism rather than the Amrit pool of One-ism.

Something to ponder about!

Last but not the least ex-communication, whatever it means in the mind of those who exert their own power unto others in the name of Sikhi contradicts the concept of 4 doors of Harmander sahib.

As they say when people make Sikhi into a blind faith, they themselves become blind to the Gurmat ideals of SGGS.

Let us never forget that SGGS is our only and ultimate GURU and all decisions should be based on our only Guru’s teachings.

Tejwant Singh
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Gyani Jarnail Singh

Sawa lakh se EK larraoan
Mentor
Writer
SPNer
Jul 4, 2004
7,708
14,381
75
KUALA LUMPUR MALAYSIA
Bhai Lehnna Ji..was a DEVI Bhgat for DECADES of his life...going to Naina Devi to worship year in..year out...one fien day he CHANGED..and a Hindu devi bhagat, idol worshipper..became GURU ANGAD JI....Did i LOSE RESPECT For Bhai Lehnna Ji because of this CHANGE ??

Bhai Amardass Ji was a Devi Bhagat for even LONGER..well INTO his OLD AGE....and then one fine day eh too CHANGED...from a Idol worshipping Hindu into GURU AMARDASS JI..who gave us the Shahakaar ANAND SAHIB....do i lose my respect for Bhai amrdass ji for CHANGING his LIFE LONG beliefs....???

And yet some ask me to "lose my respect" for Singh Sahib darsahn Singh Ji..simply becasue he too CHANGED and stopped singing dg poems when he REALISED the TRUTH about them...??? NO Siree..I will NOT lose any respect...I respect HIM MORE because he ahs shown the COURAGE..just like Bhai lehnna Ji..and Bhai Amardass Ji before him..that a SIKH is one who NEVER stops LEARNING....a "sikh" who has stopped learning is liek the stagnant pool !!:wah::wah::happysingh:
 

bsbasan

SPNer
Dec 6, 2009
2
0
Sat Sri Akal Ji,

Your reply has really hit me hard. Especially when you say - who can ex-communicate "Gobind".

It is true, who are we to pass any judgement on anybody.

So I take back my words that "The decision to Ex-communicate him was justified".

But I, as an individual, has no faith in Professor Sahib anymore. Especially after hearing the media fire link.

The link has been taken from Professor Sahib's websire only. So he cannot say, as he has been saying regarding Rochester Video that "It is doctored".

WGJKK, WGJKF
 

Hardip Singh

SPNer
Jan 14, 2009
323
503
Bhai Lehnna Ji..was a DEVI Bhgat for DECADES of his life...going to Naina Devi to worship year in..year out...one fien day he CHANGED..and a Hindu devi bhagat, idol worshipper..became GURU ANGAD JI....Did i LOSE RESPECT For Bhai Lehnna Ji because of this CHANGE ??

Bhai Amardass Ji was a Devi Bhagat for even LONGER..well INTO his OLD AGE....and then one fine day eh too CHANGED...from a Idol worshipping Hindu into GURU AMARDASS JI..who gave us the Shahakaar ANAND SAHIB....do i lose my respect for Bhai amrdass ji for CHANGING his LIFE LONG beliefs....???

And yet some ask me to "lose my respect" for Singh Sahib darsahn Singh Ji..simply becasue he too CHANGED and stopped singing dg poems when he REALISED the TRUTH about them...??? NO Siree..I will NOT lose any respect...I respect HIM MORE because he ahs shown the COURAGE..just like Bhai lehnna Ji..and Bhai Amardass Ji before him..that a SIKH is one who NEVER stops LEARNING....a "sikh" who has stopped learning is liek the stagnant pool !!:wah::wah::happysingh:
Three CHEERS for the Proffesor. Waheguru jee Bless his courage. They were shy of him and didnot have courage to face him thats why they didnt turn up at the AT turmac and keep on hiding in the safe heavens of their AC rooms in the so called AT secretirate.
 

spnadmin

1947-2014 (Archived)
SPNer
Jun 17, 2004
14,500
19,219
Sat Sri Akal Ji,

Your reply has really hit me hard. Especially when you say - who can ex-communicate "Gobind".

It is true, who are we to pass any judgement on anybody.

So I take back my words that "The decision to Ex-communicate him was justified".

But I, as an individual, has no faith in Professor Sahib anymore. Especially after hearing the media fire link.

The link has been taken from Professor Sahib's websire only. So he cannot say, as he has been saying regarding Rochester Video that "It is doctored".

WGJKK, WGJKF


With all due respect, the author of the original video file said it was doctored, and that a complete version was offered and refused by JUS Punjabi TV. This was in the news for an entire week and reported here.

The Akal Takht refused to view it. To do so would have meant a pubic humiliation for Mr. Lamba, who took the original CD, has his own programming on JUS Punjabi TV (privately owned) and is a stalwart adviser to SGPC and the camp of Badal.
 

Hardip Singh

SPNer
Jan 14, 2009
323
503
With all due respect, the author of the original video file said it was doctored, and that a complete version was offered and refused by JUS Punjabi TV. This was in the news for an entire week and reported here.

The Akal Takht refused to view it. To do so would have meant a pubic humiliation for Mr. Lamba, who took the original CD, has his own programming on JUS Punjabi TV (privately owned) and is a stalwart adviser to SGPC and the camp of Badal.

Hard fact. They cant refute this. Pl wait, I am trying to get one of the origional copies from my source in NY.
 

spnadmin

1947-2014 (Archived)
SPNer
Jun 17, 2004
14,500
19,219
Hardip Singh ji

I really appreciate your diligence in this matter of the CD. At this point, I am reminded of how difficult it is to seat a jury at a trial in the US. Honestly I cannot say what happens in India.

If someone wants to believe that the CD proffered by Lamba to Akal Takht is the real thing, there is no way he/she will be convinced to the contrary. If someone wants to believe that Professor Darshan Singh years ago performed kirtan of Dasam Pita, and "changed his mind," there is no way to convince that person that changing your mind is not a bad act. If someone wants to believe that the Professor said that Chariters 21-23 are by Dasam Pita, even though he has spent years saying that they are not, again the idea is fixed in mind. It will not be shaken loose like nuts from a tree.

SPN has put out literally reams of information from international media sources on these points.

It is probably time to move on to a different question. What is the real game plan? What is the hidden agenda? Excommunication of Professor Darshan is not the goal. Demeaning him is the means to the end of something much bigger and more serious.
 

spnadmin

1947-2014 (Archived)
SPNer
Jun 17, 2004
14,500
19,219
BTW - I and others have said this on this and other Internet venues.

The goal is to change the Sikh Rehat Maryada in such a way that the Diaspora can do nothing about it.


This is the big strategy in the game-book of Badal. And this has been reported several times here at SPN even before the Professor Darshan controversy started, months before it started. Professor Darshan is only one movable piece in a chess-game.
 

Gyani Jarnail Singh

Sawa lakh se EK larraoan
Mentor
Writer
SPNer
Jul 4, 2004
7,708
14,381
75
KUALA LUMPUR MALAYSIA
Here is a little background i just wrote about this game plan....as alluded by Narayan Ji above...Mail posted to ANZ_SIKHS @Yahoogroups.com ( a good sikhi/gurmatt based yahoo group that one should join )...
Guru Piayario Jios,
Gurfateh.

It is precisley that all this "fort of fakery" has been built brick by brick. It was written..PEEVOH PAHUL KHANDEYDHAAR..hoevh Janam suhela...and this was subtly and so slyly transformed into something it is NOT..over the past few decades..

Similarly our "history" is being adulterated and falsified right under our noses...Huge signboards proclaim this and that Beri has this and that "power"...this and that dead stock of an old tree was used by so and so Guru to tie His Horse..so its HOLY...so and so sat under this tree..its holy...poojan yog.....such and such Guru drank milk out of a vessel with a hundred or so holes..so water in it is "Amrit"..in Fact everything is AMRIT these days..water kept in Bottles under the Plaki Sahib is "amrit"..water from this sarovar or that sarovar or this Baoli and that baoli is "Amrit"..aandh vishwaash and more andh vishwaash is being promoted right inside Historical Gurdwaras..Ghee Jyots burn beside SGGS in Gurdwars under the SGPC when its SRM the Sikh Rehat Maryada clearly PROHIBITS such...Model Aeroplanes are being matha teked in front of SGGS to make the dream migration to Canada/USA/Germany/France....<wbr>anywhere except India..come true...samadhs are being used for Akhand Paaths...Amrtidharees wearing kirpans and all are matha teking and chharraying chadrs at Muslim Pir Graves..marrhees...sikh women are daily visiting DERAS of all types in search of instant cures such as domestic violence/alcoholism/drug adicts/as husbands/sons/daughters in law who always give birth to gilrs...maortgages, karza..suicides...and the Babas and their chelas there then carry out even more horrendous Mental and Physical Torture of these helpless women, raping them and looting them of their wealth..these fools "donate" all their milk supplies and best Ghee to these saadhs and worthless parasites and their children drink weak chah or watered down lassee..scores of the ebst milker cows and buffaloes are donated to saadh deras instead of producing milk for their children...milk is being used to wash Gurdawra floors and Nishan Sahibs...Has every child in Punjab been fed enough Milk that we cna afford to waste this precious resource to wash floors..is this sanctioned in Gurbani ? Gurbani says Greeb da Moohn is Gurus Golak..BUT today OUR GOLAK is for the Rich and Powerful to control the Gurdwaras and pay Goondas to whack Gursikhs..our Langgars feed the over fed sikhs and NOT greebs who are not even allowed to sit near the Gurdwara langgar halls..
And now this last straw that breaks the camels back...an undisguised attempt to even "take the Guru down"..by promoting a book as equal and Gurbani when Guur Gobind Singh Ji Himself clearly established the Gurgadee of Nanak is passed down to One and Only SGGS for eternity.

For more than 60 years, the SGPC by using only the three takhat jathedars in Punjab under their control and adding two more mere GRANTHIS/Head Granthis employed at Harmandir sahib to make up the 5 Takhat jathedars (technically only 3 Takhat Jathedars) and EXCLUDING the Takhat Patna and Hazoor Sahib Jathedars, managed to pass all Hukmnamahs to their liking. That was becasue the two outside Jathedars were follwoing a Maryada entirley OUT OF SYNC with the SRM of Akal Takhat/SGPC...But over the past decade or so the SGPC Maryada has been so much corrupted that it is now almost identical to the Brahminically inspired Hazoor shaib/Patna Sahib Maryadas..and thus the two OUTSIDE Jathedars began to be invited to Amritsar..even though ocassionally the Patna Jathedar made ridiculous statements that His Takhat was actually superior to Akal takhat etc etc.. So as they say the AAVAA is OOT GIYAH...all are now One and the same..and since the Bachitar natak Granth is paraksh equal to SGGS at these two outside takhats...the emphssis now is to do the same in Punjab as well as demolish the Nanaksahi Calendar and reintroduce the BikriMi Calendar as per RSS/BJP lobby wishes to make Sikhism a branch/offshoot of Hinduism.With the Badals in power in Punjab Govt as well as SGPC all he cares about is the Vote of the deras, ashutoshs, radhasoamis, namdharees and etc etc..Sikhs and Sikhi doesnt matter at all in his equation- to him the END justifies the Means..and its whats HIS END that matters....and the Pliable jathedars sgpc are all at his beck and call.....they are so low down they will do his every bidding without question....or be prepared to go at the drop of a badal hat !! The Emphasis now is to CHANGE the SRM..Sikh Rehat maryada into a mixture of Hazoor shaib/nanaksar/damdami taksaal/brahminised maryada of Patna sahib/Derawadee Maryadas.....and get it sanctioned as Akal takhat maryada....without the Diaspora Sikhs being able to do anything about it.

It is up to us Diaspora Sikhs to save Sikhi...or our coming generations will never forgive us....

Jarnail Singh
2. Guru Piayario Jios,
Gurfateh.

It is precisley that all this "fort of fakery" has been built brick by brick. It was written..PEEVOH PAHUL KHANDEYDHAAR..hoevh Janam suhela...and this was subtly and so slyly transformed into something it is NOT..over the past few decades..

Similarly our "history" is being adulterated and falsified right under our noses...Huge signboards proclaim this and that Beri has this and that "power"...this and that dead stock of an old tree was used by so and so Guru to tie His Horse..so its HOLY...so and so sat under this tree..its holy...poojan yog.....such and such Guru drank milk out of a vessel with a hundred or so holes..so water in it is "Amrit"..in Fact everything is AMRIT these days..water kept in Bottles under the Plaki Sahib is "amrit"..water from this sarovar or that sarovar or this Baoli and that baoli is "Amrit"..aandh vishwaash and more andh vishwaash is being promoted right inside Historical Gurdwaras..Ghee Jyots burn beside SGGS in Gurdwars under the SGPC when its SRM the Sikh Rehat Maryada clearly PROHIBITS such...Model Aeroplanes are being matha teked in front of SGGS to make the dream migration to Canada/USA/Germany/France....<wbr>anywhere except India..come true...samadhs are being used for Akhand Paaths...Amrtidharees wearing kirpans and all are matha teking and chharraying chadrs at Muslim Pir Graves..marrhees...sikh women are daily visiting DERAS of all types in search of instant cures such as domestic violence/alcoholism/drug adicts/as husbands/sons/daughters in law who always give birth to gilrs...maortgages, karza..suicides...and the Babas and their chelas there then carry out even more horrendous Mental and Physical Torture of these helpless women, raping them and looting them of their wealth..these fools "donate" all their milk supplies and best Ghee to these saadhs and worthless parasites and their children drink weak chah or watered down lassee..scores of the ebst milker cows and buffaloes are donated to saadh deras instead of producing milk for their children...milk is being used to wash Gurdawra floors and Nishan Sahibs...Has every child in Punjab been fed enough Milk that we cna afford to waste this precious resource to wash floors..is this sanctioned in Gurbani ? Gurbani says Greeb da Moohn is Gurus Golak..BUT today OUR GOLAK is for the Rich and Powerful to control the Gurdwaras and pay Goondas to whack Gursikhs..our Langgars feed the over fed sikhs and NOT greebs who are not even allowed to sit near the Gurdwara langgar halls..
And now this last straw that breaks the camels back...an undisguised attempt to even "take the Guru down"..by promoting a book as equal and Gurbani when Guur Gobind Singh Ji Himself clearly established the Gurgadee of Nanak is passed down to One and Only SGGS for eternity.

For more than 60 years, the SGPC by using only the three takhat jathedars in Punjab under their control and adding two more mere GRANTHIS/Head Granthis employed at Harmandir sahib to make up the 5 Takhat jathedars (technically only 3 Takhat Jathedars) and EXCLUDING the Takhat Patna and Hazoor Sahib Jathedars, managed to pass all Hukmnamahs to their liking. That was becasue the two outside Jathedars were follwoing a Maryada entirley OUT OF SYNC with the SRM of Akal Takhat/SGPC...But over the past decade or so the SGPC Maryada has been so much corrupted that it is now almost identical to the Brahminically inspired Hazoor shaib/Patna Sahib Maryadas..and thus the two OUTSIDE Jathedars began to be invited to Amritsar..even though ocassionally the Patna Jathedar made ridiculous statements that His Takhat was actually superior to Akal takhat etc etc.. So as they say the AAVAA is OOT GIYAH...all are now One and the same..and since the Bachitar natak Granth is paraksh equal to SGGS at these two outside takhats...the emphssis now is to do the same in Punjab as well as demolish the Nanaksahi Calendar and reintroduce the BikriMi Calendar as per RSS/BJP lobby wishes to make Sikhism a branch/offshoot of Hinduism.With the Badals in power in Punjab Govt as well as SGPC all he cares about is the Vote of the deras, ashutoshs, radhasoamis, namdharees and etc etc..Sikhs and Sikhi doesnt matter at all in his equation- to him the END justifies the Means..and its whats HIS END that matters....and the Pliable jathedars sgpc are all at his beck and call.....they are so low down they will do his every bidding without question....or be prepared to go at the drop of a badal hat !! The Emphasis now is to CHANGE the SRM..Sikh Rehat maryada into a mixture of Hazoor shaib/nanaksar/damdami taksaal/brahminised maryada of Patna sahib/Derawadee Maryadas.....and get it sanctioned as Akal takhat maryada....without the Diaspora Sikhs being able to do anything about it.

It is up to us Diaspora Sikhs to save Sikhi...or our coming generations will never forgive us....

Jarnail Singh

2. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:47 PM, dmsingh65 <dmsingh65@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
Kirpal Singh ji,


As you wrote:

"Guru Gobind Singh Ji gave us a HUKAM to accept Guru Granth Sahib as our Guru. So it is clear that no other Granth or Book or Writing can be equated with Grur Granth Sahib"


That's very well said.

So if we accept Guru Granth Sahib as our Guru as ordained by Guru Gobind Singh ji, then let's explore our Shabad Guru and see what it says about Amrit?

'rasna naam japoo thab mathia ein bidh amrit pavoo' M:1, pg 728
'amrit naam parmesar teraa joo simrae soo jivee' M:5, pg 616
'thaal vich tin ......., amrit naam thakur ka paeoo jis ka sabs adaroo' M:5, pg 1429
'amrit naam nidhan hae mil pevoo bhai' M:5, pg 318

Other references of the word amrit are related to Bani and satguru.

'jinaa gurbani maan bhaea amrit chaak chakee' M:4, pg 449
'amrit bachan satgur ki bani joo bolee soo mukh amrit pavee' M4, pg494

My question is how and when we started to call/name the Initiation/Khandee ke pahul as Amrit?

We need to apply the same rational to Nitnem banis. On what basis (whether historical evidence/Guru Granth Sahib) the present day Nitnem banis were decided by the Sikh leaders in 1930/40s? Does reading the same banis every day - some of which are not even part of Guru Granth sahib reflect the thought of Guru Granth sahib?? ('Gur satgur ka joo sikh akhae soo bhal ke udh har naam dhiae')

Regards,

GurFateh!

Devinder Singh

3. In ANZ_SIKHS@yahoogroups.com, kirpal singh <kirpal2singh@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Members of the International Sikh Community,
>
> Wahegru Ji Ka Khalsa
> Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh
>
> I wish to draw your attention to the following:
>
> 1. The current controversy between Jathedars of Akal Takhat Sahib and Prof. Darshan Singh is unnecessary dragging the entire community into it. If Prof. Darshan Singh was clear in his mind that he has not said anything against Guru Gobind Singh Ji, then he should not have accepted to appear at all infront of the Jathedars. He should have ignored a call from misguided Jathedars. The whole drama is nothing but a mockery of Sikh Community at large.
> .
> It is actually a fight between the current Jathedars of Akal Takhat and a former Jathedar, Prof. Darshan Singh Khalsa - at the cost of humiliating the Sikh Community.
>
> 2. Guru Gobind Singh Ji gave us a HUKAM to accept Guru Granth Sahib as our Guru. So it is clear that no other Granth or Book or Writing can be equated with Grur Granth Sahib. Is the Guru's Hukam not enough to resolve this Dasam Granth issue?
>
> The Dasam Granth issue is a deep rooted controversy - If we accept that the Dasam Granth is not attributed to Guru Granth Sahib the the Nitmem Banis and the Amrit are sidelined. If we accept that Guru Gobind Singh Ji is the author of the Dasam Granth the it discredits Guru Ji. It is deep rooted conspiracy to discredit the the Insitution of the Sikhism and Khalsa Panth. We need more careful and serious thinking about this issue. The Community should allow a status quo without a parallel prakash of Dasam Granth with The GURU GRANTH SAHIB till the matter is resolved by a group of ANBHAVI SIKHS.
>
> 3. A title "Khalsa" is used by Prof. Darshan Singh - Could any body tell me that who awards this title to individuals or how do individual qualify to get this title. As far history goes Guru Gobind used the word to denote Khalsa Panth. ( It is a querry and not to disregard those who have just chosen to add this title after their names). I asked many people about the origin of prefix "Professor" added to Prof. Darshan Singh's name but no one has been able to give a satisfactory answer (ag ain a querry please?). The best answer was that he was teahing musi and their he got this title with reverence and not that he was professor in a unversity. In India.
>
> 4.A lot has been circulated about recent unrest in Punjab and killing of a Sikh and brutalitly of Punjab Police. No one has questioned those sikh looking-hooligans carrying swords and lathis on the street. I think that such elements who take law in their hands shoud be severaly dealt with.
>
> Every sect or Dera has a civil right with due permission from authorities to hold their functions whether or not another group like it or not.As a Community we should learn to debate effectively rather than running on streets with naked swords. I am sure that our Gurus will disapprove of such a senseless demonstration. We should tke lead fro Guru Granth Sahib and live with others with respect and diginity.
>
> If the Sikh of Bombay hold a religious function and Bal or Raj Takheray say that we shall not allow the Sikh Community to go ahead with their function. I am sure we shallall feel hurt.
>
> As a Community we should learn not play in hands of a few who have their vested interests rather than in the larger interest of the Sikh Community.
>
> May Waheguru bless you all.
>
> Kirpal Singh
>
>:happysingh: These are some of the issues that are at the back of all this....Darshan Singh ji is definitley NOT the sole target..he is just a small cog in the chain...
 

Hardip Singh

SPNer
Jan 14, 2009
323
503
S Davinder Singh wrote this in above post :-
[My question is how and when we started to call/name the Initiation/Khandee ke pahul as Amrit?

We need to apply the same rational to Nitnem banis. On what basis (whether historical evidence/Guru Granth Sahib) the present day Nitnem banis were decided by the Sikh leaders in 1930/40s? Does reading the same banis every day - some of which are not even part of Guru Granth sahib reflect the thought of Guru Granth sahib?? ('Gur satgur ka joo sikh akhae soo bhal ke udh har naam dhiae')]

Another undecided/unknown factor till date. Since, nowhere it has been confirmed which of the particular five banis were their at the time of Khande kee pahul By GGS jee. Once, I had visited a gurudwara Sahib in Bhatinda distt. this place is controlled by Bhai Ghaniya jees generations (Sewa Panthi). I was able to join for the Nitnem there in the morning which starts at 2 am. The strange thing was Jaap Sahib was replaced by Sukhmani Sahib in the nitnem. Upon checking with Sant Kahan Singh, the dera cheif there, he confirmed it was their since Bhai Ghaniya jees time and before.
 

ssira

SPNer
Oct 1, 2006
15
8
Why posting three time?ffice:eek:ffice" />
Each time after posting my comment I checked back immediately, it is there. I checked after an hour it was missing. So I posted again. Same thing happened again. Today when I posted my comment with similar topic but different thread with a complaint that this will be deleted too, All the posting and reply started coming within 20 min to 30 Min period. What does that explain you figure out now?
I will reply your question later as it is getting late for me.

ssira ji This is an admin note. I have been online for about an hour now, after logging back on. Before that this evening, I was online for short periods of time. As far as I can tell, tonight, nothing that you have posted has been deleted. When there is a deletion, the proper thing is for the admin or moderator to leave a note in the thread stating the reasons for the deletion. There is nothing here about that. I will check other threads for you. In the past few days, I have myself deleted your posts because they were duplicate/triplicate comments. Please see Posts 46, 47 and 48 in this thread. But each time I did leave a note. What happened this evening. I cannot say. But I will get back to you. Narayanjot Kaur.

OK - I am getting back to you with an update. I have checked all of your posts. There have been 3 deletions, all in this thread, because they were duplicate and triplicate comments. In other words you posted identical comments each time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
📌 For all latest updates, follow the Official Sikh Philosophy Network Whatsapp Channel:

Latest Activity

Top