LOL
shaheediyan
this man's posts reeks of contempt for other religions and hence is getting his worth back.
<<I don't see much Gurmat influenced discussion going on here, rather just a lot of offensive and disrespectful talk, not representative of Sikhi at all.>>
omeone makes illogical assertions to back and validate religious ststements and questions validity of SGGS, hence is getting back my ANALYSIS and not mud slinging
my apologies if i have crossed the line, but he wanted cold blooded ANALYSIS and i bl**dy well can do, if he wants, and he asked for it...
he wanted examples..i gave him examples...
he refuses to read those examples...his tough luck..
<<Exactly, so why is it pursuing atomic bombs? Huh?>>
i think you are going way beyond tangent...can you answers the basic Qn....why did Quran miss out on one of the most IMPORTANT science points(as stressed by Iran)...Atomic Science and Bomb?
you stress that Quran answered most "important" sciences, i donot find this one, but see most islamic states abosessed with it.
why is india making atomic bomb?
to exterminate any "crazy headed" threats. here's the answer in your face!!
<<Yes but did they know that only a tiny portion of that liquid was required? That is the point that is being made which u r not recognizing. The web page link is too long. Can u pick out the point u r making.>>
your assertion that Quran gave scientific REVELATIONS is wrong...it just put in facts already known
do you know, not even tiny portion is required...why didn't Quran be spot on abt
"one sperm" ?
it just stated knwn fact... and did anywhere the egyptian and greek texts say that "a tumbler full" of fluid is required?
no!!
<<You consistently go at a tangent and avoid the discussion.>>
why is it not linked...so do you think contraceptives are not "important" when Quran was showering us with scientific wisdom?
<<Students usually tackle the subjects head while u r avoiding them. U can’t succeed in your exams in that way. Ur professors will c thru that like I’m doin’.
The other link u gave was to do with eclipses. I didn’t discuss that! If there is something there that u want 2 point out, plz repost.>>
Aryabhatta and other indian astrologers could predict eclipse timings
this is not a new revelation
<
Quote:
egyptian papyrus scrolls have better and detailed medical info.
Plz tells us.>>
plz read it
these are old records, latest science books interest me more...
i am more happy listening to science from a 5 year old book rather than 1500 years old book.
<<So far u have said it all vague and proves nothing yet u now use the word plagiarize? There seems to be a contradiction here. Is it not a huge coincidence to pick and get ALL the sciences right in the Qur’an.>>
why not?
anyone making concerted effort can publish huge scientific reports...pretty accurate ones too
<<What evidence do u have that Salman al-Farsi wrote the Qur’an? Muhammad (peace be upon him) was poor and humble most of his life. Any wealth he had he gave to help the poor. There were many nights when he had hardly anything to eat and his family. His first wife was rich.>>
what evidence you have that God told Quran to Muhammed?
---------------
here is my simple line of discussion
i saw someone make a statement and deduction
quran is a perfect guide
quran tells us all that is required as important
quran has scientific facts which were unknown earlier
quran has other statements too
if quran's scientific "revelations", then other statements too are God's given and "absolute truth"
----------
what i have tried to present is
example how the scientific facts are vague and "already" knnown
expose the wrong deductive implication of a few scientific statements being used to validate a text.
---------
i might have sounded rude, but this is only way to cut through the hard headed.