Maybe someone can set a page up on facebook from here where we can get people to join?
Sikh News Former Jathedar Of Akal Takht Excommunicated From Sikh Community
- Thread starter Admin
- Start date
- Replies 48
- Reads 13K
Randip Singh Ji,
Gurfateh, Yes I am with you and with the TRUTH we should send our Strong Communication for the Former Jathedar Prof: Darshan Singh JI Khalsa. This is UNJUSTIS by Jathedar of AKAAL TAKHT's
<FONT color=black><FONT face=Verdana><U><?"urn::happykaur:
Gurfateh, Yes I am with you and with the TRUTH we should send our Strong Communication for the Former Jathedar Prof: Darshan Singh JI Khalsa. This is UNJUSTIS by Jathedar of AKAAL TAKHT's
<FONT color=black><FONT face=Verdana><U><?"urn::happykaur:
Last edited by a moderator:
One more wound by the traitors of Sikh Kaum and enemies of Guru Nanak Dev.Don't they feel ashamed of themselves,when they see their facas in the mirror.
Hold on Bmandur bibi ji
I have an account on facebook and will check to see what it is all about. Have had to go out today to buy tile for the bathroom floor which is damaged by a bad bath-tub leak and have not been able to catch up. Will return with info.
I have an account on facebook and will check to see what it is all about. Have had to go out today to buy tile for the bathroom floor which is damaged by a bad bath-tub leak and have not been able to catch up. Will return with info.
Have it:
The exact link is Prof. Darshan Singh Khalsa | Facebook
However if you don't have a facebook account, then you will go automatically to the log-in page. There you have to set up an account in order to see the page.
Let me know what happens.
But this is Professor Darshan's page -- and I think you are thinking of something different. If so, I can help you with that.
The exact link is Prof. Darshan Singh Khalsa | Facebook
However if you don't have a facebook account, then you will go automatically to the log-in page. There you have to set up an account in order to see the page.
Let me know what happens.
But this is Professor Darshan's page -- and I think you are thinking of something different. If so, I can help you with that.
WGJKK WGJKF! dear brothers and sisters,
I am sorry, but I fail to understand the tension within the other posts above, unless I have missed something, this below is my view of the situvation:
Although I don't know much about Professor Darshan, I have seen some Utube discussions where it became absolutely clear, what he quoted from the Dasam Granth was in fact incorrect. My understanding is; only after he refused to offer an apology, the Akal Takht passed judgement and than asked him to attend for passing of sentence, he then further compounded the issue by not attending more than once.
So if you think of this in court terms, if you didn't attend court when called, they would no doubt pass a much severer sentence.
The Akal Takht rather than sitting on the fence has IMHO correctly taken a decision.
Please bear in mind that for Sikhs there can / should not be a physical higher authority than the Akal Takht and for Prof. Darshan to state he would only come if there was a live broadcast is not the done thing.
If I have missed something, I would be most thankful if you could point this out to me.
Gurfateh!!:happysingh:
I am sorry, but I fail to understand the tension within the other posts above, unless I have missed something, this below is my view of the situvation:
Although I don't know much about Professor Darshan, I have seen some Utube discussions where it became absolutely clear, what he quoted from the Dasam Granth was in fact incorrect. My understanding is; only after he refused to offer an apology, the Akal Takht passed judgement and than asked him to attend for passing of sentence, he then further compounded the issue by not attending more than once.
So if you think of this in court terms, if you didn't attend court when called, they would no doubt pass a much severer sentence.
The Akal Takht rather than sitting on the fence has IMHO correctly taken a decision.
Please bear in mind that for Sikhs there can / should not be a physical higher authority than the Akal Takht and for Prof. Darshan to state he would only come if there was a live broadcast is not the done thing.
If I have missed something, I would be most thankful if you could point this out to me.
Gurfateh!!:happysingh:
Be patient and open minded to read this.
I am not a person who is in favour of Prof: Darshan Singh at this time who speaks against my Guru’s Word. He created pain among the lot of Sadh Sangat. I stopped writing on this website because you don’t discus the question that is put here but pick one word and start stretching it like a rubber band ( Example is who is Brahmgiani). If you don’t know what Brehgiani is then close this website and go to gurudwara’s and learn? Then come back here and start suggesting. It feels like that I am talking to people where Guru Sahib says Moorkhe naal na lujhiey.
<?"urn:fficeffice" /><o> </o>
I can feel the pain you guys are going through as I went through this when I was reading here against the Akal Takhat. I will talk about this later if Akal Takhat is wrong.
<o> </o>
This was not such a big deal to solve. Now in reply to post # 9. Reposting it again as under.
Tejwant Singh JI Aman Singh and Others
Is there anything we as Sadh Sangat can do. This is so shameful for every one.
Read More:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=29080 (Former Jathedar of Akal Takht excommunicated from Sikh community)
Can we do something about it please do let us know!
<o> </o>
I totally agree it is shameful.
This is what could have been done. Prof Darshan Singh should have appeared unconditionally. (Secrete suggestion he should have taken a recording device in side just in case something goes wrong). If they (Akal Takhat) did something wrong then Professor Sahib should have brought it out and explained to Sangat. The Culprit can not tell the court how he is going to appear. The court decides what to do and where to come. I know lot of you will disagree with my comment as I know it’s your way or no way. Special advice: Don’t stretch this again.
<o> </o>
Still I would say don’t do something stupid that heart all of us. Talk like professionals do. <?xml::ffice:smarttags" /><st1lace w:st="on">Lot of open time was give to clarify this issue. Although that time is over but Guru always forgives. It’s never too late. Go with NIMRTA not like a KING.
Sangat who respect Dasam Granth still respect and treat Sri Guru Granth sahib as their only GURU. So stop telling Sangat, Wake up Khalsa JI. Let me tell you here. Khalsa and Sangat is always awake. You don’t have to tell them. It is insulting to the Khalsa as well as Sikh Sangat. As this is quoted by Narayn jot Kaur #2
<o> </o>
Now coming to if Akal Takhat is wrong. This also include the above listed question can we do something as Sadh Sangat.
Yes whenever the leader is wrong take his chair away. Sangat has the power to do that. Just pointing out, look what they are doing is not enough. You have to go there in <st1lace w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">India</st1:country-region> to Akal takhat and talk personally.
Stop insulting Sikh jagat on web sites. If Sikh does something wrong you should hide it not blasts it. If you do, you are making Guru’s SIKHI bad not just a Sikh look bad. Sikhi is not bad, a Sikh can be. As one Saakhi teaches us how a Sikh stole jewellery from Sikh’s home and host Sikh came to know about it when it fell from the thieves hand. The host Sikh pick it up and give back to him saying this is yours. Because the host Sikh worried if he shout thief to the other Sikh then what people will think that Guru Nanak’s Sikh is a thief.
That’s it for now. If any of you as a pure Sikh got heart I beg you pardon me. For others I wish God bless them to understand what I am trying to say here.
WGJKK WGJKF
I am not a person who is in favour of Prof: Darshan Singh at this time who speaks against my Guru’s Word. He created pain among the lot of Sadh Sangat. I stopped writing on this website because you don’t discus the question that is put here but pick one word and start stretching it like a rubber band ( Example is who is Brahmgiani). If you don’t know what Brehgiani is then close this website and go to gurudwara’s and learn? Then come back here and start suggesting. It feels like that I am talking to people where Guru Sahib says Moorkhe naal na lujhiey.
<?"urn:
fficeffice" /><o> </o>I can feel the pain you guys are going through as I went through this when I was reading here against the Akal Takhat. I will talk about this later if Akal Takhat is wrong.
<o
> </o>This was not such a big deal to solve. Now in reply to post # 9. Reposting it again as under.
Tejwant Singh JI Aman Singh and Others
Is there anything we as Sadh Sangat can do. This is so shameful for every one.
Read More:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=29080 (Former Jathedar of Akal Takht excommunicated from Sikh community)
Can we do something about it please do let us know!
<o
> </o>I totally agree it is shameful.
This is what could have been done. Prof Darshan Singh should have appeared unconditionally. (Secrete suggestion he should have taken a recording device in side just in case something goes wrong). If they (Akal Takhat) did something wrong then Professor Sahib should have brought it out and explained to Sangat. The Culprit can not tell the court how he is going to appear. The court decides what to do and where to come. I know lot of you will disagree with my comment as I know it’s your way or no way. Special advice: Don’t stretch this again.
<o
> </o>Still I would say don’t do something stupid that heart all of us. Talk like professionals do. <?xml::
ffice:smarttags" /><st1lace w:st="on">Lot of open time was give to clarify this issue. Although that time is over but Guru always forgives. It’s never too late. Go with NIMRTA not like a KING.Sangat who respect Dasam Granth still respect and treat Sri Guru Granth sahib as their only GURU. So stop telling Sangat, Wake up Khalsa JI. Let me tell you here. Khalsa and Sangat is always awake. You don’t have to tell them. It is insulting to the Khalsa as well as Sikh Sangat. As this is quoted by Narayn jot Kaur #2
<o
> </o>Now coming to if Akal Takhat is wrong. This also include the above listed question can we do something as Sadh Sangat.
Yes whenever the leader is wrong take his chair away. Sangat has the power to do that. Just pointing out, look what they are doing is not enough. You have to go there in <st1
lace w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">India</st1:country-region> to Akal takhat and talk personally. Stop insulting Sikh jagat on web sites. If Sikh does something wrong you should hide it not blasts it. If you do, you are making Guru’s SIKHI bad not just a Sikh look bad. Sikhi is not bad, a Sikh can be. As one Saakhi teaches us how a Sikh stole jewellery from Sikh’s home and host Sikh came to know about it when it fell from the thieves hand. The host Sikh pick it up and give back to him saying this is yours. Because the host Sikh worried if he shout thief to the other Sikh then what people will think that Guru Nanak’s Sikh is a thief.
That’s it for now. If any of you as a pure Sikh got heart I beg you pardon me. For others I wish God bless them to understand what I am trying to say here.
WGJKK WGJKF
Last edited by a moderator:
Gurfateh to you all
SSIRA & SDAD JI Please be open mind with me too
In Court we have lawyer, crown attorney, Jury & Judge
<FONT color=black>You are not guilty until you are proven guilty.<?"urn:
But Prof. Darshan Singh was not even given a chance also Custom of Akal Takhat Sahib you have to understand before we go any further:
Both of you need to read this than ask a question I will try to reply my level best::
<o>The institution of Akal Takht was started by Guru Hargobind Ji as a political wing of Sikh religion to defend his followers from the tyranny of the rulers of the time. Since its inception in 1606, it has a glorious history and its Jathedar has guided the Sikhs during critical times in the past.
The position of the Jathedar has evolved since the first quarter of the 17th century when Bhai Gurdas was appointed as the first custodian of Akal Takht called Akal Bunga. Guru Hargobind ji used this to take political decisions, issue Hukmanamas and invite his followers to come to the place with arms and horses .The first Hukamnama was issued by the Guru ji on June 12, 1606 in this context. However, Guru Hargobind ji had to leave the place in 1634 due to the hostilities of the Mughal rulers and it came in the possession of the Minas, descendants of Prithi Chand. In 1721 Bhai Mani Singh took Harmandir Sahib and Akal Takhat under his control at the behest of Mata Sundri. During the misl period, Sarbat Khalsa used to meet at Akal Takht twice a year on Baisakhi and Diwali days. Historic decisions were taken and strategy was discussed to fight against the Mughal forces and invaders from North-West. Nawab Kapur Singh, Jassa Singh Ahluwalia and later Akali Phula Singh were the Jathedars of Akal Takht and guided the panth in the critical times.
According to H S Dilgeer, "In April 1759 a Hukamnama was issued in the name of the Sarbat Khalsa to all Sikhs to make generous offering for the rebuilding of Darbar Sahib. The seal of Akal Takht was used on the Hukamnama."
By 1799 Ranjit Singh had captured Lahore and established his rule over central Punjab, yet he was not free from the authority of Akal Takhat. In 1800, Akali Phula Singh took charge of Akal Takhat and conducted its affairs according to Sikh traditions. He even summoned the powerful Maharaja at Akal Takht for having an affair with Moran, a Muslim nautch girl. Ranjit Singh was again punished by Akal Takht Jathedar when he donated a beautiful canopy to Akal Takht after himself using it for some time. In 1805, when Maratha chief Jaswant Rao Holkar came to Punjab to get Ranjit Singh's support against the British, the Sikh Maharaja summoned a meeting of Sarbat Khalsa at the Akal Takht to take a collective decision. This was perhaps the last time when he sought the advice of Sarbat Khalsa. After that he started making his own decisions by consulting his Sikh, Hindu and Muslim ministers and advisors. We don't find much activity at Akal Takht till British took over Punjab in mid 19th century.
Under the British, Akal Takht Jathedar or custodian gradually started asserting his authority. To start with, Sanatani Sikhs who believed that Sikhism was part of Hinduism were in control of Darbar Sahib. They, however, came in clash with radical reformers of Lahore Singh Sabha who were determined to free Sikhism from Hindu influence. Since the Sanatani Sikhs had control of Akal Takht and other Takhts, they issued a Hukamnama on 14 March, 1887 excommunicating Prof. Gurmukh Singh, Secretary of Lahore Singh Sabha. Though it was issued by pro Hindu Sanatani Sikhs, it still had some force and sanctity and it affected Gurmukh Singh’s standing in Sikh community. Despite this Gurmukh Singh did not look back or apologized. However, after 108 years, the hukamnama against Prof. Gurmukh Singh was specifically withdrawn by the World Sikh Convention held in Amritsar in 1995, presided over by acting Akal Takht Jathedar, Manjit Singh.
Sikhs need a strong central authority
that, however, does not mean that the institution of Akal Takht Jathedar is beyond repair and redemption. Sikhs need a strong central authority to resolve so many contentious issues that keep dogging and dividing the community. There should be a procedure to elect a non-partisan Jathedar of Akal Takht.Jathedar should be a man of high integrity and character, deeply knowledgeable about Sikh religion, history and its traditions and could not be easily removed from his position. He should be able to communicate in Gurmukhi,& English.
Role of Jathedat Akal Takht after 1920
Strictly a manager or a custodian in charge of Akal Takht was not called Jathedar before 20th century. Actually, the title of Jathedar of Akal Takht came into being in 1920. The Khalsa Biradari of lower caste Sikhs held a conference at Jalianwala Bagh on October 10- 12, 1920 where they resolved to offer Parshad at Harimandir Sahib. When they went there the priests refused to accept their Parshad. At this Jathedar Kartar Singh Jhabbar reacted sharply and threatened to throw them out if they did not accept their Parshad, did not offer ardas and took the Vaak. The priests acquiesced and with Guru’s grace Vaak came in favor of the lower caste Sikhs. After this Sangat led by Jathedar Jhabbar marched to Akal Takht to do the same. Priests in charge of Akal Takht slipped away leaving the holy place vacant. Sangat took over Akal Takht at Jathedar Jhabbar’s command. He then advised Sangat to appoint Jathedar Teja Singh Bhuchar in charge of Akal Takht. A jatha of 25 Sikhs was put at his command to help him to look after Akal Takht. After that he was called Jathedar Akal Takht.
SGPC founded
On November 15, 1920 Jathedar Teja Singh Bhuchar called a meeting of all Sikh bodies and organizations at Akal Takhat. Here Sikhs decided to oust the pro-Government priests from other Gurdwaras and formed a committee of 175 members to run their management. This is how S.G.P.C. was formed. Next month on December 14, 1920 Shiromani Akali Dal, a political wing of the SGPC was launched. Jathedar Teja Singh Bhuchar was elected secretary of the new Akali Dal. This further added strength to his position and standing in the community.
Jathedar Buhchar did not just sit there as a custodian of the place; he provided strong and sterling leadership to the community. He led a jatha to Taran Taran Gurdwara to oust the priests forcefully. He succeeded in his mission after some clashes with the government agents. He appointed a committee of 15 members to look after the Gurdwara management. He also led jathas to take control of Gurdwara Panja Sahib and a Gurdwara in Pashawar. Since such actions were contrary to law, he was arrested and put in jail for quite for sometime.
During the Jaito Morcha (1923-25), three Jathedars of Akal Takhat- Teja Singh Akarpuri on 13 October, 1923, Udham Singh Nagoke on 8 Februrary 1924, Achhar Singh on 7 May, 1924- courted arrests. After his release in 1926, Jathedar Akarpuri was elected as member of SGPC and was also appointed as Jathedar of Akal Takht for the second time and remained in this position till 1931.
In 1925, Jathedar Didar Singh was the Akal Takhat jathedar. Akali leaders had come into agreement with the government and the agitation was withdrawn. Sikhs started coming out of jails, but some in Nabha Jail refused to leave the prison and adopted quite an unreasonable attitude. Jathedar Didar Singh went to Nabha and advised them to come out, "since you have come here at the orders of Akal Takhat, I now in the capacity of Akal Takht jathedar order you to leave the jails and get out". This had the desired effect and they agreed to obey his order. Such was the position of the Akal Takht jathedar in the Sikh world.
Sikh Rahit Maryada
Teja Singh Akarpuri, Jathedar Akal Takhat, felt and stressed the need of a prescribed Rahit for the Sikhs, though unsuccessful attempts had been made earlier by Panch Khalsa Diwan and Chief Khalsa Diwan. It was on his suggestion that a committee of 28 Sikh scholars was appointed to work on the draft of Sikh Rahit Maryada on 15 March 1927. The committee with Prof. Teja Singh as its convener prepared a draft which was thoroughly discussed, amended and changed according to the wishes of the members at various meetings of the committee held at Akal Takht. In all meetings Jathedar of Akal Takht was present. Even Jathedars of Kesgarh and Patna were also invited. From 1931 to 1934 Gurmukh Singh Musafir, Jathedar of Akal Takht, attended the meetings and then from 1935 till the SRM was finally passed in 1945, Mohan Singh Nagoke, Jathedar Akal Takht, played an important role. He also served as President of SGPC from 1944 to 1948 which put him in much better position to bring the Sikh scholars to an agreement on SRM.
Jathedar Mohan Singh Nagoke was widely respected for his character, integrity and sacrifices. He served as the Jathedar Akal Takht for 17 years(1935-52), maximum time any Jathedar held this office. His personality added much power and prestige to this august office. Many historic decisions were taken in his time. In 1936 when Govt. banned the wearing of Kirpan by Sikhs, Jathedar Mohan Singh led the first jatha of 100 Sikhs in this morcha against the ban. The ban was withdrawn by the govt.
Ragmala
Should Ragmala be read while reciting the whole of Guru Granth sahib at Akhand Paths ?. The issue had split the community since the beginning of the 20th century. There were well established scholars and religious leaders on both sides. In favor of Ragmala were Bhai Vir Singh, Bhai Jodh Singh, Sant Gurbachan Singh Bhinderanwale, Akali Kaur Singh and some Sants. Those opposing Ragmala were Bhai Kahn Singh Nabha, Bhai Randhir Singh Narangwal, Giani Gurdit Singh, Piara Singh Padam and others
In 1945 Mohan Singh called a meeting of Sikh religious leaders and scholars at Akal Takht to resolve the issue. The anti-Ragmala group carried their point with his support. But to keep unity in the panth, Jathedar issued instructions that reading of Ragmala was optional, though he stopped its reading at Akal Takhat. This practice is still in force. Baba Gurbachan Singh Bhinderanwala was staunch supporter of Ragmala. SGPC sent Giani Lal Singh to Bhinderawala to find out if he would abide by the decree of Akal Takht Jathedar. Baba Gurbachan Singh gave in writing that he would honor the decree of Akal Takht.
During Mohan Singh's time as Jathedar, Ardas was amended to include that Sikhs should have unhindered access to Nankana Sahib and other holy shrines which were left in Pakistan after partition of Punjab in 1947.
Punishment to Master Tara Singh
Master Tara Singh was the most powerful and well recognized leader of the Sikhs in mid-twentieth century. He was president of SGPC when Akal Takht Jathedar Achhar Singh punished him for breaking his fast without fulfilling the terms of his solemn pledge in 1961.
Then there is the historic edict of the Akal Takhat Jathedar, Sadhu Singh Bhaura, against the Sant Nirankaris in June 1978. Nirankaris had killed 13 Sikhs on the Baisakhi day of 1978. This edict was widely welcomed by Sikhs all over the world.
Such has been the authority, moral force and veneration of Akal Takht that powerful men like Maharaja Ranjt Singh, President Zial Singh and Chief Minister Surjit Singh Barnala had to appear before it when summoned by its Jathedar. Even Bhim Sen Sachar, a Hindu Chief Minister, appeared before Akal Takht and apologized for sending police in Darbar Sahib in 1955. Among the important people who were excommunicated from Panth were Teja Singh Bhasur (1928), Buta Singh (1984), Nihang Santa Singh (1984). Buta Singh and Santa Singh later apologized and underwent punishment.
1984 developments damaged the institution
Akal Takhat Jathedars became controversial after the turbulent developments of 1984.
So many Jathedars - Jasbir Singh Rode, Ragi Darshan Singh, acting Jathedar Manjit Singh, Bhai Ranjit Singh, Giani Puran Singh- were appointed and removed before the turn of Jathedar Vedanti came this year. All this has affected the credibility and prestige of the Jathedar. One Jathedar would issue an edict, his successor would cancel that. So many edicts were issued that they lost their sanctity and force. One such edict ex-communicating Joginder Singh, editor Spokesman, was even challenged in high court.
Sikhs need a strong central authority
That, however, does not mean that the institution of Akal Takht Jathedar is beyond repair and redemption. Sikhs need a strong central authority to resolve so many contentious issues that keep dogging and dividing the community. There should be a procedure to elect a non-partisan Jathedar of Akal Takht. He should be a man of high integrity and character, deeply knowledgeable about Sikh religion, history and its traditions and could not be easily removed from his position. He should be able to communicate in English. All India Gurdwara Act as demanded by Akalis should have such provisions.
References:
H. S. Dilgeer : Akal Takht Sahib, 1986
Harbans Singh: The Heritage of the Sikhs, 1994
J. S. Grewal : The Akalis, a Short History, 1996
Kartar Singh Jhabbar : Akali Morche te Jhabbar, 1998
Kirpal Singh (Jathedar): Sri Akal Takht Sahib ate Jathedar Sahiba, 1999
Please kake sure to read it all
Thank you Bhul Chuk Maaf
Gurfateh
Binder Mandur:happykaur:
</o>
SSIRA & SDAD JI Please be open mind with me too
In Court we have lawyer, crown attorney, Jury & Judge
<FONT color=black>You are not guilty until you are proven guilty.<?"urn:
Both of you need to read this than ask a question I will try to reply my level best::
<o
>The institution of Akal Takht was started by Guru Hargobind Ji as a political wing of Sikh religion to defend his followers from the tyranny of the rulers of the time. Since its inception in 1606, it has a glorious history and its Jathedar has guided the Sikhs during critical times in the past.The position of the Jathedar has evolved since the first quarter of the 17th century when Bhai Gurdas was appointed as the first custodian of Akal Takht called Akal Bunga. Guru Hargobind ji used this to take political decisions, issue Hukmanamas and invite his followers to come to the place with arms and horses .The first Hukamnama was issued by the Guru ji on June 12, 1606 in this context. However, Guru Hargobind ji had to leave the place in 1634 due to the hostilities of the Mughal rulers and it came in the possession of the Minas, descendants of Prithi Chand. In 1721 Bhai Mani Singh took Harmandir Sahib and Akal Takhat under his control at the behest of Mata Sundri. During the misl period, Sarbat Khalsa used to meet at Akal Takht twice a year on Baisakhi and Diwali days. Historic decisions were taken and strategy was discussed to fight against the Mughal forces and invaders from North-West. Nawab Kapur Singh, Jassa Singh Ahluwalia and later Akali Phula Singh were the Jathedars of Akal Takht and guided the panth in the critical times.
According to H S Dilgeer, "In April 1759 a Hukamnama was issued in the name of the Sarbat Khalsa to all Sikhs to make generous offering for the rebuilding of Darbar Sahib. The seal of Akal Takht was used on the Hukamnama."
By 1799 Ranjit Singh had captured Lahore and established his rule over central Punjab, yet he was not free from the authority of Akal Takhat. In 1800, Akali Phula Singh took charge of Akal Takhat and conducted its affairs according to Sikh traditions. He even summoned the powerful Maharaja at Akal Takht for having an affair with Moran, a Muslim nautch girl. Ranjit Singh was again punished by Akal Takht Jathedar when he donated a beautiful canopy to Akal Takht after himself using it for some time. In 1805, when Maratha chief Jaswant Rao Holkar came to Punjab to get Ranjit Singh's support against the British, the Sikh Maharaja summoned a meeting of Sarbat Khalsa at the Akal Takht to take a collective decision. This was perhaps the last time when he sought the advice of Sarbat Khalsa. After that he started making his own decisions by consulting his Sikh, Hindu and Muslim ministers and advisors. We don't find much activity at Akal Takht till British took over Punjab in mid 19th century.
Under the British, Akal Takht Jathedar or custodian gradually started asserting his authority. To start with, Sanatani Sikhs who believed that Sikhism was part of Hinduism were in control of Darbar Sahib. They, however, came in clash with radical reformers of Lahore Singh Sabha who were determined to free Sikhism from Hindu influence. Since the Sanatani Sikhs had control of Akal Takht and other Takhts, they issued a Hukamnama on 14 March, 1887 excommunicating Prof. Gurmukh Singh, Secretary of Lahore Singh Sabha. Though it was issued by pro Hindu Sanatani Sikhs, it still had some force and sanctity and it affected Gurmukh Singh’s standing in Sikh community. Despite this Gurmukh Singh did not look back or apologized. However, after 108 years, the hukamnama against Prof. Gurmukh Singh was specifically withdrawn by the World Sikh Convention held in Amritsar in 1995, presided over by acting Akal Takht Jathedar, Manjit Singh.
Sikhs need a strong central authority
that, however, does not mean that the institution of Akal Takht Jathedar is beyond repair and redemption. Sikhs need a strong central authority to resolve so many contentious issues that keep dogging and dividing the community. There should be a procedure to elect a non-partisan Jathedar of Akal Takht.Jathedar should be a man of high integrity and character, deeply knowledgeable about Sikh religion, history and its traditions and could not be easily removed from his position. He should be able to communicate in Gurmukhi,& English.
Role of Jathedat Akal Takht after 1920
Strictly a manager or a custodian in charge of Akal Takht was not called Jathedar before 20th century. Actually, the title of Jathedar of Akal Takht came into being in 1920. The Khalsa Biradari of lower caste Sikhs held a conference at Jalianwala Bagh on October 10- 12, 1920 where they resolved to offer Parshad at Harimandir Sahib. When they went there the priests refused to accept their Parshad. At this Jathedar Kartar Singh Jhabbar reacted sharply and threatened to throw them out if they did not accept their Parshad, did not offer ardas and took the Vaak. The priests acquiesced and with Guru’s grace Vaak came in favor of the lower caste Sikhs. After this Sangat led by Jathedar Jhabbar marched to Akal Takht to do the same. Priests in charge of Akal Takht slipped away leaving the holy place vacant. Sangat took over Akal Takht at Jathedar Jhabbar’s command. He then advised Sangat to appoint Jathedar Teja Singh Bhuchar in charge of Akal Takht. A jatha of 25 Sikhs was put at his command to help him to look after Akal Takht. After that he was called Jathedar Akal Takht.
SGPC founded
On November 15, 1920 Jathedar Teja Singh Bhuchar called a meeting of all Sikh bodies and organizations at Akal Takhat. Here Sikhs decided to oust the pro-Government priests from other Gurdwaras and formed a committee of 175 members to run their management. This is how S.G.P.C. was formed. Next month on December 14, 1920 Shiromani Akali Dal, a political wing of the SGPC was launched. Jathedar Teja Singh Bhuchar was elected secretary of the new Akali Dal. This further added strength to his position and standing in the community.
Jathedar Buhchar did not just sit there as a custodian of the place; he provided strong and sterling leadership to the community. He led a jatha to Taran Taran Gurdwara to oust the priests forcefully. He succeeded in his mission after some clashes with the government agents. He appointed a committee of 15 members to look after the Gurdwara management. He also led jathas to take control of Gurdwara Panja Sahib and a Gurdwara in Pashawar. Since such actions were contrary to law, he was arrested and put in jail for quite for sometime.
During the Jaito Morcha (1923-25), three Jathedars of Akal Takhat- Teja Singh Akarpuri on 13 October, 1923, Udham Singh Nagoke on 8 Februrary 1924, Achhar Singh on 7 May, 1924- courted arrests. After his release in 1926, Jathedar Akarpuri was elected as member of SGPC and was also appointed as Jathedar of Akal Takht for the second time and remained in this position till 1931.
In 1925, Jathedar Didar Singh was the Akal Takhat jathedar. Akali leaders had come into agreement with the government and the agitation was withdrawn. Sikhs started coming out of jails, but some in Nabha Jail refused to leave the prison and adopted quite an unreasonable attitude. Jathedar Didar Singh went to Nabha and advised them to come out, "since you have come here at the orders of Akal Takhat, I now in the capacity of Akal Takht jathedar order you to leave the jails and get out". This had the desired effect and they agreed to obey his order. Such was the position of the Akal Takht jathedar in the Sikh world.
Sikh Rahit Maryada
Teja Singh Akarpuri, Jathedar Akal Takhat, felt and stressed the need of a prescribed Rahit for the Sikhs, though unsuccessful attempts had been made earlier by Panch Khalsa Diwan and Chief Khalsa Diwan. It was on his suggestion that a committee of 28 Sikh scholars was appointed to work on the draft of Sikh Rahit Maryada on 15 March 1927. The committee with Prof. Teja Singh as its convener prepared a draft which was thoroughly discussed, amended and changed according to the wishes of the members at various meetings of the committee held at Akal Takht. In all meetings Jathedar of Akal Takht was present. Even Jathedars of Kesgarh and Patna were also invited. From 1931 to 1934 Gurmukh Singh Musafir, Jathedar of Akal Takht, attended the meetings and then from 1935 till the SRM was finally passed in 1945, Mohan Singh Nagoke, Jathedar Akal Takht, played an important role. He also served as President of SGPC from 1944 to 1948 which put him in much better position to bring the Sikh scholars to an agreement on SRM.
Jathedar Mohan Singh Nagoke was widely respected for his character, integrity and sacrifices. He served as the Jathedar Akal Takht for 17 years(1935-52), maximum time any Jathedar held this office. His personality added much power and prestige to this august office. Many historic decisions were taken in his time. In 1936 when Govt. banned the wearing of Kirpan by Sikhs, Jathedar Mohan Singh led the first jatha of 100 Sikhs in this morcha against the ban. The ban was withdrawn by the govt.
Ragmala
Should Ragmala be read while reciting the whole of Guru Granth sahib at Akhand Paths ?. The issue had split the community since the beginning of the 20th century. There were well established scholars and religious leaders on both sides. In favor of Ragmala were Bhai Vir Singh, Bhai Jodh Singh, Sant Gurbachan Singh Bhinderanwale, Akali Kaur Singh and some Sants. Those opposing Ragmala were Bhai Kahn Singh Nabha, Bhai Randhir Singh Narangwal, Giani Gurdit Singh, Piara Singh Padam and others
In 1945 Mohan Singh called a meeting of Sikh religious leaders and scholars at Akal Takht to resolve the issue. The anti-Ragmala group carried their point with his support. But to keep unity in the panth, Jathedar issued instructions that reading of Ragmala was optional, though he stopped its reading at Akal Takhat. This practice is still in force. Baba Gurbachan Singh Bhinderanwala was staunch supporter of Ragmala. SGPC sent Giani Lal Singh to Bhinderawala to find out if he would abide by the decree of Akal Takht Jathedar. Baba Gurbachan Singh gave in writing that he would honor the decree of Akal Takht.
During Mohan Singh's time as Jathedar, Ardas was amended to include that Sikhs should have unhindered access to Nankana Sahib and other holy shrines which were left in Pakistan after partition of Punjab in 1947.
Punishment to Master Tara Singh
Master Tara Singh was the most powerful and well recognized leader of the Sikhs in mid-twentieth century. He was president of SGPC when Akal Takht Jathedar Achhar Singh punished him for breaking his fast without fulfilling the terms of his solemn pledge in 1961.
Then there is the historic edict of the Akal Takhat Jathedar, Sadhu Singh Bhaura, against the Sant Nirankaris in June 1978. Nirankaris had killed 13 Sikhs on the Baisakhi day of 1978. This edict was widely welcomed by Sikhs all over the world.
Such has been the authority, moral force and veneration of Akal Takht that powerful men like Maharaja Ranjt Singh, President Zial Singh and Chief Minister Surjit Singh Barnala had to appear before it when summoned by its Jathedar. Even Bhim Sen Sachar, a Hindu Chief Minister, appeared before Akal Takht and apologized for sending police in Darbar Sahib in 1955. Among the important people who were excommunicated from Panth were Teja Singh Bhasur (1928), Buta Singh (1984), Nihang Santa Singh (1984). Buta Singh and Santa Singh later apologized and underwent punishment.
1984 developments damaged the institution
Akal Takhat Jathedars became controversial after the turbulent developments of 1984.
So many Jathedars - Jasbir Singh Rode, Ragi Darshan Singh, acting Jathedar Manjit Singh, Bhai Ranjit Singh, Giani Puran Singh- were appointed and removed before the turn of Jathedar Vedanti came this year. All this has affected the credibility and prestige of the Jathedar. One Jathedar would issue an edict, his successor would cancel that. So many edicts were issued that they lost their sanctity and force. One such edict ex-communicating Joginder Singh, editor Spokesman, was even challenged in high court.
Sikhs need a strong central authority
That, however, does not mean that the institution of Akal Takht Jathedar is beyond repair and redemption. Sikhs need a strong central authority to resolve so many contentious issues that keep dogging and dividing the community. There should be a procedure to elect a non-partisan Jathedar of Akal Takht. He should be a man of high integrity and character, deeply knowledgeable about Sikh religion, history and its traditions and could not be easily removed from his position. He should be able to communicate in English. All India Gurdwara Act as demanded by Akalis should have such provisions.
References:
H. S. Dilgeer : Akal Takht Sahib, 1986
Harbans Singh: The Heritage of the Sikhs, 1994
J. S. Grewal : The Akalis, a Short History, 1996
Kartar Singh Jhabbar : Akali Morche te Jhabbar, 1998
Kirpal Singh (Jathedar): Sri Akal Takht Sahib ate Jathedar Sahiba, 1999
Please kake sure to read it all
Thank you Bhul Chuk Maaf
Gurfateh
Binder Mandur:happykaur:
</o
>
Last edited by a moderator:
WGJKK WGJKF! dear Binder-ji,<?"urn:fficeffice" />
Although I thank you for the really well detailed history you have presented, I fail to see how this effects what has happened in this case, and surely rather than the weak decisions previously as supported by what you have detailed, this time the Akal Takht has taken a decision which they will stand on?
Like I said, when he was proven wrong (and please note here I am not saying he really was guilty or not), surely that was the time he should have put his case before the sangat, not going to the Akal Takht when being summoned for sentence is not at all correct.
When I have served on Jury service, I have seen how not appearing is viewed by courts here in the UK, so I somewhat understand the harsh sentence here. If this was okay, no criminal would every want to appear for being sentence. In addition, had a sentence not been passed, it would have perhaps added to list of weakness to the historical list provided.
All I know is IF the Akal Takht is weak, it is only because people like me, you and others have not changed it and most importantly because WE have not held accepted its decisions.
This very discussion shows how divided we are, certainly openly saying the Akal Takht is wrong is certainly a big "No No" certainly in my book. We do need to stand on things that take us away from Sikhi, and certainly, on Government politics etc, however, I do not believe this is the case here, where arrogance is perhaps the real issue.
Moreover, the main reason for my post was to share my view, this is obviously only one of many.....
Baul Chuk Maaf Kerni
Gurfateh!!:happysingh:
fficeffice" />Although I thank you for the really well detailed history you have presented, I fail to see how this effects what has happened in this case, and surely rather than the weak decisions previously as supported by what you have detailed, this time the Akal Takht has taken a decision which they will stand on?
Like I said, when he was proven wrong (and please note here I am not saying he really was guilty or not), surely that was the time he should have put his case before the sangat, not going to the Akal Takht when being summoned for sentence is not at all correct.
When I have served on Jury service, I have seen how not appearing is viewed by courts here in the UK, so I somewhat understand the harsh sentence here. If this was okay, no criminal would every want to appear for being sentence. In addition, had a sentence not been passed, it would have perhaps added to list of weakness to the historical list provided.
All I know is IF the Akal Takht is weak, it is only because people like me, you and others have not changed it and most importantly because WE have not held accepted its decisions.
This very discussion shows how divided we are, certainly openly saying the Akal Takht is wrong is certainly a big "No No" certainly in my book. We do need to stand on things that take us away from Sikhi, and certainly, on Government politics etc, however, I do not believe this is the case here, where arrogance is perhaps the real issue.
Moreover, the main reason for my post was to share my view, this is obviously only one of many.....
Baul Chuk Maaf Kerni
Gurfateh!!:happysingh:
Last edited by a moderator:
Sdad ji,
Guru Fateh.
You write:
What kind of Gurmat ideals given to us in the SGGS, our only Guru is your assumption based upon?
Thanks & regards
Tejwant Singh
Guru Fateh.
You write:
Can you please list the crimes committed by Prof. Darshan Singh or is it one of those kangaroo courts where one has to prove one's innocence because he has been declared guilty?
What kind of Gurmat ideals given to us in the SGGS, our only Guru is your assumption based upon?
Thanks & regards
Tejwant Singh
Last edited by a moderator:
WGJKK WGJKF! dear Tejwant Singh-ji,<?"urn:fficeffice" />
I did say on my post that my point of contention was; he was not even willing to turn up.
As I understand it:
On November 17th, the Ragi was directed by Sri Akal Takht Sahib to appear before the five Singh Sahibans and provide an explanation for what they termed as "offending remarks made about Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji". I believe this took place at a Rochester, New York gurdwara. He failed to turn up.
The video that I watched on Utube showed he was unable to point to where his reference came from and it pointed to his mis-interpretation of it.
Gurmat ideals absolutely include due respect for siri Akal Takht and if you are calling it a kangaroo court than I for one would take offence. Indeed, it may have been called a Kangaroo court if they sat by and did nothing when something said against our beloved Guru-ji's.
All human beings make mistakes, hence, gurgadhi was given to SGGS-ji, it is the arrogance of not accepting ones mistakes that is the real mistake IMHO for any human being.
IMHO, what this forum may benefit from is the view of someone who was in attendance of the events, than a better opinion can be formed.
Baul Chuk Maaf Kerna
Gurfateh!!<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn::vml" /><v:shape style="WIDTH: 22.2pt; HEIGHT: 39.6pt; VISIBILITY: visible; mso-wrap-style: square" id=Picture_x0020_6 alt="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/images/smilies/singh.gif" type="#_x0000_t75" o:spid="_x0000_i1025"><v:imagedata o:title="singh" src="file:///C:\DOCUME~1\SATVIN~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image001.gif"></v:imagedata></v:shape>
:happysingh:
fficeffice" />I did say on my post that my point of contention was; he was not even willing to turn up.
As I understand it:
On November 17th, the Ragi was directed by Sri Akal Takht Sahib to appear before the five Singh Sahibans and provide an explanation for what they termed as "offending remarks made about Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji". I believe this took place at a Rochester, New York gurdwara. He failed to turn up.
The video that I watched on Utube showed he was unable to point to where his reference came from and it pointed to his mis-interpretation of it.
Gurmat ideals absolutely include due respect for siri Akal Takht and if you are calling it a kangaroo court than I for one would take offence. Indeed, it may have been called a Kangaroo court if they sat by and did nothing when something said against our beloved Guru-ji's.
All human beings make mistakes, hence, gurgadhi was given to SGGS-ji, it is the arrogance of not accepting ones mistakes that is the real mistake IMHO for any human being.
IMHO, what this forum may benefit from is the view of someone who was in attendance of the events, than a better opinion can be formed.
Baul Chuk Maaf Kerna
Gurfateh!!<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn::vml" /><v:shape style="WIDTH: 22.2pt; HEIGHT: 39.6pt; VISIBILITY: visible; mso-wrap-style: square" id=Picture_x0020_6 alt="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/images/smilies/singh.gif" type="#_x0000_t75" o:spid="_x0000_i1025"><v:imagedata o:title="singh" src="file:///C:\DOCUME~1\SATVIN~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image001.gif"></v:imagedata></v:shape>
:happysingh:
Last edited by a moderator:
This link may clarify the position of Akal Takht from by looking at its history, and its entanglement in politics.
Hukamnama and Sarbat Khalsa when, why, how and by whom? - Sikhism Articles - Gateway to Sikhism
Hukamnama and Sarbat Khalsa when, why, how and by whom? - Sikhism Articles - Gateway to Sikhism
Gurfateh to you all
SSIRA & SDAD JI Please be open mind with me too
In Court we have lawyer, crown attorney, Jury & Judge
<FONT color=black>You are not guilty until you are proven guilty.<?"urn:But Prof. Darshan Singh was not even given a chance also Custom of Akal Takhat Sahib you have to understand before we go any further:
Both of you need to read this than ask a question I will try to reply my level best::
<o
The position of the Jathedar has evolved since the first quarter of the 17th century when Bhai Gurdas was appointed as the first custodian of Akal Takht called Akal Bunga. Guru Hargobind ji used this to take political decisions, issue Hukmanamas and invite his followers to come to the place with arms and horses .The first Hukamnama was issued by the Guru ji on June 12, 1606 in this context. However, Guru Hargobind ji had to leave the place in 1634 due to the hostilities of the Mughal rulers and it came in the possession of the Minas, descendants of Prithi Chand. In 1721 Bhai Mani Singh took Harmandir Sahib and Akal Takhat under his control at the behest of Mata Sundri. During the misl period, Sarbat Khalsa used to meet at Akal Takht twice a year on Baisakhi and Diwali days. Historic decisions were taken and strategy was discussed to fight against the Mughal forces and invaders from North-West. Nawab Kapur Singh, Jassa Singh Ahluwalia and later Akali Phula Singh were the Jathedars of Akal Takht and guided the panth in the critical times.
According to H S Dilgeer, "In April 1759 a Hukamnama was issued in the name of the Sarbat Khalsa to all Sikhs to make generous offering for the rebuilding of Darbar Sahib. The seal of Akal Takht was used on the Hukamnama."
By 1799 Ranjit Singh had captured Lahore and established his rule over central Punjab, yet he was not free from the authority of Akal Takhat. In 1800, Akali Phula Singh took charge of Akal Takhat and conducted its affairs according to Sikh traditions. He even summoned the powerful Maharaja at Akal Takht for having an affair with Moran, a Muslim nautch girl. Ranjit Singh was again punished by Akal Takht Jathedar when he donated a beautiful canopy to Akal Takht after himself using it for some time. In 1805, when Maratha chief Jaswant Rao Holkar came to Punjab to get Ranjit Singh's support against the British, the Sikh Maharaja summoned a meeting of Sarbat Khalsa at the Akal Takht to take a collective decision. This was perhaps the last time when he sought the advice of Sarbat Khalsa. After that he started making his own decisions by consulting his Sikh, Hindu and Muslim ministers and advisors. We don't find much activity at Akal Takht till British took over Punjab in mid 19th century.
Under the British, Akal Takht Jathedar or custodian gradually started asserting his authority. To start with, Sanatani Sikhs who believed that Sikhism was part of Hinduism were in control of Darbar Sahib. They, however, came in clash with radical reformers of Lahore Singh Sabha who were determined to free Sikhism from Hindu influence. Since the Sanatani Sikhs had control of Akal Takht and other Takhts, they issued a Hukamnama on 14 March, 1887 excommunicating Prof. Gurmukh Singh, Secretary of Lahore Singh Sabha. Though it was issued by pro Hindu Sanatani Sikhs, it still had some force and sanctity and it affected Gurmukh Singh’s standing in Sikh community. Despite this Gurmukh Singh did not look back or apologized. However, after 108 years, the hukamnama against Prof. Gurmukh Singh was specifically withdrawn by the World Sikh Convention held in Amritsar in 1995, presided over by acting Akal Takht Jathedar, Manjit Singh.
Sikhs need a strong central authority
that, however, does not mean that the institution of Akal Takht Jathedar is beyond repair and redemption. Sikhs need a strong central authority to resolve so many contentious issues that keep dogging and dividing the community. There should be a procedure to elect a non-partisan Jathedar of Akal Takht.Jathedar should be a man of high integrity and character, deeply knowledgeable about Sikh religion, history and its traditions and could not be easily removed from his position. He should be able to communicate in Gurmukhi,& English.
Role of Jathedat Akal Takht after 1920
Strictly a manager or a custodian in charge of Akal Takht was not called Jathedar before 20th century. Actually, the title of Jathedar of Akal Takht came into being in 1920. The Khalsa Biradari of lower caste Sikhs held a conference at Jalianwala Bagh on October 10- 12, 1920 where they resolved to offer Parshad at Harimandir Sahib. When they went there the priests refused to accept their Parshad. At this Jathedar Kartar Singh Jhabbar reacted sharply and threatened to throw them out if they did not accept their Parshad, did not offer ardas and took the Vaak. The priests acquiesced and with Guru’s grace Vaak came in favor of the lower caste Sikhs. After this Sangat led by Jathedar Jhabbar marched to Akal Takht to do the same. Priests in charge of Akal Takht slipped away leaving the holy place vacant. Sangat took over Akal Takht at Jathedar Jhabbar’s command. He then advised Sangat to appoint Jathedar Teja Singh Bhuchar in charge of Akal Takht. A jatha of 25 Sikhs was put at his command to help him to look after Akal Takht. After that he was called Jathedar Akal Takht.
SGPC founded
On November 15, 1920 Jathedar Teja Singh Bhuchar called a meeting of all Sikh bodies and organizations at Akal Takhat. Here Sikhs decided to oust the pro-Government priests from other Gurdwaras and formed a committee of 175 members to run their management. This is how S.G.P.C. was formed. Next month on December 14, 1920 Shiromani Akali Dal, a political wing of the SGPC was launched. Jathedar Teja Singh Bhuchar was elected secretary of the new Akali Dal. This further added strength to his position and standing in the community.
Jathedar Buhchar did not just sit there as a custodian of the place; he provided strong and sterling leadership to the community. He led a jatha to Taran Taran Gurdwara to oust the priests forcefully. He succeeded in his mission after some clashes with the government agents. He appointed a committee of 15 members to look after the Gurdwara management. He also led jathas to take control of Gurdwara Panja Sahib and a Gurdwara in Pashawar. Since such actions were contrary to law, he was arrested and put in jail for quite for sometime.
During the Jaito Morcha (1923-25), three Jathedars of Akal Takhat- Teja Singh Akarpuri on 13 October, 1923, Udham Singh Nagoke on 8 Februrary 1924, Achhar Singh on 7 May, 1924- courted arrests. After his release in 1926, Jathedar Akarpuri was elected as member of SGPC and was also appointed as Jathedar of Akal Takht for the second time and remained in this position till 1931.
In 1925, Jathedar Didar Singh was the Akal Takhat jathedar. Akali leaders had come into agreement with the government and the agitation was withdrawn. Sikhs started coming out of jails, but some in Nabha Jail refused to leave the prison and adopted quite an unreasonable attitude. Jathedar Didar Singh went to Nabha and advised them to come out, "since you have come here at the orders of Akal Takhat, I now in the capacity of Akal Takht jathedar order you to leave the jails and get out". This had the desired effect and they agreed to obey his order. Such was the position of the Akal Takht jathedar in the Sikh world.
Sikh Rahit Maryada
Teja Singh Akarpuri, Jathedar Akal Takhat, felt and stressed the need of a prescribed Rahit for the Sikhs, though unsuccessful attempts had been made earlier by Panch Khalsa Diwan and Chief Khalsa Diwan. It was on his suggestion that a committee of 28 Sikh scholars was appointed to work on the draft of Sikh Rahit Maryada on 15 March 1927. The committee with Prof. Teja Singh as its convener prepared a draft which was thoroughly discussed, amended and changed according to the wishes of the members at various meetings of the committee held at Akal Takht. In all meetings Jathedar of Akal Takht was present. Even Jathedars of Kesgarh and Patna were also invited. From 1931 to 1934 Gurmukh Singh Musafir, Jathedar of Akal Takht, attended the meetings and then from 1935 till the SRM was finally passed in 1945, Mohan Singh Nagoke, Jathedar Akal Takht, played an important role. He also served as President of SGPC from 1944 to 1948 which put him in much better position to bring the Sikh scholars to an agreement on SRM.
Jathedar Mohan Singh Nagoke was widely respected for his character, integrity and sacrifices. He served as the Jathedar Akal Takht for 17 years(1935-52), maximum time any Jathedar held this office. His personality added much power and prestige to this august office. Many historic decisions were taken in his time. In 1936 when Govt. banned the wearing of Kirpan by Sikhs, Jathedar Mohan Singh led the first jatha of 100 Sikhs in this morcha against the ban. The ban was withdrawn by the govt.
Ragmala
Should Ragmala be read while reciting the whole of Guru Granth sahib at Akhand Paths ?. The issue had split the community since the beginning of the 20th century. There were well established scholars and religious leaders on both sides. In favor of Ragmala were Bhai Vir Singh, Bhai Jodh Singh, Sant Gurbachan Singh Bhinderanwale, Akali Kaur Singh and some Sants. Those opposing Ragmala were Bhai Kahn Singh Nabha, Bhai Randhir Singh Narangwal, Giani Gurdit Singh, Piara Singh Padam and others
In 1945 Mohan Singh called a meeting of Sikh religious leaders and scholars at Akal Takht to resolve the issue. The anti-Ragmala group carried their point with his support. But to keep unity in the panth, Jathedar issued instructions that reading of Ragmala was optional, though he stopped its reading at Akal Takhat. This practice is still in force. Baba Gurbachan Singh Bhinderanwala was staunch supporter of Ragmala. SGPC sent Giani Lal Singh to Bhinderawala to find out if he would abide by the decree of Akal Takht Jathedar. Baba Gurbachan Singh gave in writing that he would honor the decree of Akal Takht.
During Mohan Singh's time as Jathedar, Ardas was amended to include that Sikhs should have unhindered access to Nankana Sahib and other holy shrines which were left in Pakistan after partition of Punjab in 1947.
Punishment to Master Tara Singh
Master Tara Singh was the most powerful and well recognized leader of the Sikhs in mid-twentieth century. He was president of SGPC when Akal Takht Jathedar Achhar Singh punished him for breaking his fast without fulfilling the terms of his solemn pledge in 1961.
Then there is the historic edict of the Akal Takhat Jathedar, Sadhu Singh Bhaura, against the Sant Nirankaris in June 1978. Nirankaris had killed 13 Sikhs on the Baisakhi day of 1978. This edict was widely welcomed by Sikhs all over the world.
Such has been the authority, moral force and veneration of Akal Takht that powerful men like Maharaja Ranjt Singh, President Zial Singh and Chief Minister Surjit Singh Barnala had to appear before it when summoned by its Jathedar. Even Bhim Sen Sachar, a Hindu Chief Minister, appeared before Akal Takht and apologized for sending police in Darbar Sahib in 1955. Among the important people who were excommunicated from Panth were Teja Singh Bhasur (1928), Buta Singh (1984), Nihang Santa Singh (1984). Buta Singh and Santa Singh later apologized and underwent punishment.
1984 developments damaged the institution
Akal Takhat Jathedars became controversial after the turbulent developments of 1984.
So many Jathedars - Jasbir Singh Rode, Ragi Darshan Singh, acting Jathedar Manjit Singh, Bhai Ranjit Singh, Giani Puran Singh- were appointed and removed before the turn of Jathedar Vedanti came this year. All this has affected the credibility and prestige of the Jathedar. One Jathedar would issue an edict, his successor would cancel that. So many edicts were issued that they lost their sanctity and force. One such edict ex-communicating Joginder Singh, editor Spokesman, was even challenged in high court.
Sikhs need a strong central authority
That, however, does not mean that the institution of Akal Takht Jathedar is beyond repair and redemption. Sikhs need a strong central authority to resolve so many contentious issues that keep dogging and dividing the community. There should be a procedure to elect a non-partisan Jathedar of Akal Takht. He should be a man of high integrity and character, deeply knowledgeable about Sikh religion, history and its traditions and could not be easily removed from his position. He should be able to communicate in English. All India Gurdwara Act as demanded by Akalis should have such provisions.
References:
H. S. Dilgeer : Akal Takht Sahib, 1986
Harbans Singh: The Heritage of the Sikhs, 1994
J. S. Grewal : The Akalis, a Short History, 1996
Kartar Singh Jhabbar : Akali Morche te Jhabbar, 1998
Kirpal Singh (Jathedar): Sri Akal Takht Sahib ate Jathedar Sahiba, 1999
Please kake sure to read it all
Thank you Bhul Chuk Maaf
Gurfateh
Binder Mandur:happykaur:
</o
As I said above look what they are doing is not enough. you can point out hundred of mistake done by these jathedars. What practically you have done to fix it about Bad Jathedars? First there should not be bad jatherdars. If we have someone then they can appear in front of Punj Pyarey for forgiveness. Can court do this after even minor crime is committed? They may reduce it only if you do community work.
You can have lawyer, crown attorney, Jury & Judge and whatever, is not same as Akal Takhat. Courts are blind. To confirm this statement you can check <?xml::
Last edited by a moderator:
ਖਾਲ੍ਸਾਜੀ, ਜੋ ਗ੍ਲ੍ਤੀ ਪ੍ਰੋਫ਼ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਨੇ ਕੀਤੀ ਹੈ ਓਸਦੀ ਸਜਾ ਤਾਂ ਮਿਲਣੀ ਹੀ ਸੀ. ਪ੍ਰੋਫ਼ ਜੀ ਨੂ ਪਤਾ ਹੋਣਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ ਕੀ SGPC ਅਜਕਲ ਆਰ ਐਸ ਐਸ ਦੇ ਅਧੀਨ ਹੈ. ਨਾਨਕਸ਼ਾਹੀ ਕੈਲੇੰਡਰ ਕੈਂਸਲ ਹੋ ਗਿਆ . ਚਾਰਿਤ੍ਰੋਪਾਖਯਾਨ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੋਧ ਦਾ ਵਿਰੋਧ ਹੋ ਗਯਾ. ਬਦਲ ਸਾਹਬ ਭੀ RSS ਦੀ ਮਦਦ ਤੋਂ ਬਗੈਰ ਚਲ ਨਹੀਂ ਸਕਦੇ. ਪੰਥ ਅਤੇ ਪੰਜਾਬ, ਦੇਸ਼ ਅਤੇ ਪਰਿਵਾਰ ਦੀ ਸੇਵਾ ਵਾਸਤੇ ਕੁਰਸੀ ਬਹੁਤ ਜਰੂਰੀ ਹੈ. ਕੁਰਸੀ RSSਅਤੇ BJP ਦੀ ਮਦਦ ਤੋਂ ਬਗੈਰ ਮਿਲ ਜਾਂ ਚਲ ਨਹੀ ਸਕਦੀ.ਅਕਾਲ ਤਖ਼ਤ ਨੂ ਬਾਦਲ ਤਖ਼ਤ ਬਨਾਯਾ ਜਾ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ .
ਖਾਲਸਾ ਜੀ ਜਾਗੋ,
ਖਾਲਸਾ ਜੀ ਜਾਗੋ,
ਖਾਲ੍ਸਾਜੀ, ਜੋ ਗ੍ਲ੍ਤੀ ਪ੍ਰੋਫ਼ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਨੇ ਕੀਤੀ ਹੈ ਓਸਦੀ ਸਜਾ ਤਾਂ ਮਿਲਣੀ ਹੀ ਸੀ. ਪ੍ਰੋਫ਼ ਜੀ ਨੂ ਪਤਾ ਹੋਣਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ ਕੀ SGPC ਅਜਕਲ ਆਰ ਐਸ ਐਸ ਦੇ ਅਧੀਨ ਹੈ. ਨਾਨਕਸ਼ਾਹੀ ਕੈਲੇੰਡਰ ਕੈਂਸਲ ਹੋ ਗਿਆ . ਚਾਰਿਤ੍ਰੋਪਾਖਯਾਨ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੋਧ ਦਾ ਵਿਰੋਧ ਹੋ ਗਯਾ. ਬਦਲ ਸਾਹਬ ਭੀ RSS ਦੀ ਮਦਦ ਤੋਂ ਬਗੈਰ ਚਲ ਨਹੀਂ ਸਕਦੇ. ਪੰਥ ਅਤੇ ਪੰਜਾਬ, ਦੇਸ਼ ਅਤੇ ਪਰਿਵਾਰ ਦੀ ਸੇਵਾ ਵਾਸਤੇ ਕੁਰਸੀ ਬਹੁਤ ਜਰੂਰੀ ਹੈ. ਕੁਰਸੀ RSSਅਤੇ BJP ਦੀ ਮਦਦ ਤੋਂ ਬਗੈਰ ਮਿਲ ਜਾਂ ਚਲ ਨਹੀ ਸਕਦੀ.ਅਕਾਲ ਤਖ਼ਤ ਨੂ ਬਾਦਲ ਤਖ਼ਤ ਬਨਾਯਾ ਜਾ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ .
ਖਾਲਸਾ ਜੀ ਜਾਗੋ,
Welcome to SPN! :welcome:
Translated by Admin:
(Kindly note that the official language of SPN is English for a wider worldwide audience.)
Khalsa Ji, the path (to righteousness) that Prof Darshan Singh has chosen, he would have had to face the consequences in any case. Prof Darshan should have been aware that SGPC is a slave to RSS. Nanakshahi Calendar has been canceled. People criticizing Charitropakhyan have been criticized. Badal also cannot run his rule without begging infront of RSS. To server the Panth and Punjab, country and family to be in power is of pivotal importance. Without RSS/BJP's help he can not retain his chair of power. Akal Takht has been converted to Badal Takht.
Wake up Khalsa ji!!
ਖਾਲ੍ਸਾਜੀ, ਜੋ ਗ੍ਲ੍ਤੀ ਪ੍ਰੋਫ਼ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਨੇ ਕੀਤੀ ਹੈ ਓਸਦੀ ਸਜਾ ਤਾਂ ਮਿਲਣੀ ਹੀ ਸੀ. ਪ੍ਰੋਫ਼ ਜੀ ਨੂ ਪਤਾ ਹੋਣਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ ਕੀ SGPC ਅਜਕਲ ਆਰ ਐਸ ਐਸ ਦੇ ਅਧੀਨ ਹੈ. ਨਾਨਕਸ਼ਾਹੀ ਕੈਲੇੰਡਰ ਕੈਂਸਲ ਹੋ ਗਿਆ . ਚਾਰਿਤ੍ਰੋਪਾਖਯਾਨ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੋਧ ਦਾ ਵਿਰੋਧ ਹੋ ਗਯਾ. ਬਦਲ ਸਾਹਬ ਭੀ RSS ਦੀ ਮਦਦ ਤੋਂ ਬਗੈਰ ਚਲ ਨਹੀਂ ਸਕਦੇ. ਪੰਥ ਅਤੇ ਪੰਜਾਬ, ਦੇਸ਼ ਅਤੇ ਪਰਿਵਾਰ ਦੀ ਸੇਵਾ ਵਾਸਤੇ ਕੁਰਸੀ ਬਹੁਤ ਜਰੂਰੀ ਹੈ. ਕੁਰਸੀ RSSਅਤੇ BJP ਦੀ ਮਦਦ ਤੋਂ ਬਗੈਰ ਮਿਲ ਜਾਂ ਚਲ ਨਹੀ ਸਕਦੀ.ਅਕਾਲ ਤਖ਼ਤ ਨੂ ਬਾਦਲ ਤਖ਼ਤ ਬਨਾਯਾ ਜਾ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ .
ਖਾਲਸਾ ਜੀ ਜਾਗੋ,
sachbol ji
I agree with your assessment for the most part. But here is where I disagree. Professor Darshan Singh knew that SGPC was hopelessly the servant of RSS/BJP. He had to have known this. Why did he step down voluntarily as jathedar, when no one since him has done so? Each jathedar to follow him was either fired or forced out. Why did he move to Canada and start the Ggsacademy - a school for the study of Gurmat according to the teachings of Guru Nanak Dev ji?
His resignation and his move are a mystery. Or did Professor Darshan Singh know then what we are only recently finding out? His conscience led him to make a fresh start so that some portion of the panth would receive a message that was clean.
I believe he knew he would one day have to face this court of fools> He had the courage to do it no matter how things would turn out.
📌 For all latest updates, follow the Official Sikh Philosophy Network Whatsapp Channel:
