Respected SPN Sangat Ji
Sri Guru Granth Sahib is complied in a way that no one could insert something displaying one’s own illusions ,same way, Guru Nanak doesn’t stop on “Ik Onkar” expressed in Mool Mantra, he keeps expressing Him in numerous shabadas to make sure his followers don’t get stuck only with one thing. If that Mool Mantra was enough, why would Guru Keeps trying to express Him further as Nirgun(formless ) and Sargun(with form)? There is absolutely no Guru Vaak that supports God as a principle or a spiritual metaphysical energy, even in the Mool Mantra that is not expressed.
No one can claim that only he or she is right in understanding Gurbani perfectly, any claim in this regards will be laughable; however, when a fact is repeatedly interpreted by Gurus themselves and other revered contributors of Sri Guru Granth Sahib, why then people’s own thinking should be accepted as Gurbani defined fact. If repeated fact is ignored by adamant minds, the one, who believe in only Guru ji’s version instead of believing in floating around knowledge, must challenge that with evidence from Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, same thing I have been trying to do for almost a year.; and I challenge all (who see a problem in it), to interpret the same Guru Vakas under discussion otherwise (different way) with proofs from Sri Guru Granth Sahib. Laughable are the limitations we measure up to the perfection.
With regards
G Singh
Sri Guru Granth Sahib is complied in a way that no one could insert something displaying one’s own illusions ,same way, Guru Nanak doesn’t stop on “Ik Onkar” expressed in Mool Mantra, he keeps expressing Him in numerous shabadas to make sure his followers don’t get stuck only with one thing. If that Mool Mantra was enough, why would Guru Keeps trying to express Him further as Nirgun(formless ) and Sargun(with form)? There is absolutely no Guru Vaak that supports God as a principle or a spiritual metaphysical energy, even in the Mool Mantra that is not expressed.
No one can claim that only he or she is right in understanding Gurbani perfectly, any claim in this regards will be laughable; however, when a fact is repeatedly interpreted by Gurus themselves and other revered contributors of Sri Guru Granth Sahib, why then people’s own thinking should be accepted as Gurbani defined fact. If repeated fact is ignored by adamant minds, the one, who believe in only Guru ji’s version instead of believing in floating around knowledge, must challenge that with evidence from Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, same thing I have been trying to do for almost a year.; and I challenge all (who see a problem in it), to interpret the same Guru Vakas under discussion otherwise (different way) with proofs from Sri Guru Granth Sahib. Laughable are the limitations we measure up to the perfection.
With regards
G Singh