Re: Allegation of sexual abuse by S. Gurbax Singh Ji Kala Afghana Ji.
Ok.
Is anyone here actually willing to debate the issues?
The point here in the quotation above is why is there such a disparity between Panthic Weekly and The Sikh Times.
As a neutral I see The Sikh Times coverage far more balanced.
Please lets debate issues in a civilised manner.
A great example of Pulizer Prize Journalism from Panthic Weekly or not?
Panthic Weekly: Inder Ghagga loses debates to Panthic Singhs in Toronto
According to several eyewitnesses interviewed by Panthic Weekly, Ghagga became so uneasy that he asked for drinking water three times. Witnesses stated that his hands were trembling and he was perspiring heavily throughout the debate. It was clear that the fierce 'debater' Ghagga had lost his bearing.
Who were these eyewitnesses? Dam I should stop drinking water, when I lecture for an hour I need at least two glasses of water? I would be trembling if I knew their were nutcases present who had tried to attack me before present? (actually I wouldn't tremble probably because I am nuttier than the nutcases).
Ghagga lost the entire debate on all subjects and afterwards some neutral Singhs insisted that another debate be set at a public venue. The date was set for October 1, 2006 at 9am, but Ghagga never showed up. Via third parties, and with great difficulty, he was persuaded to debate and finally the debate was set up for about 4 hours later at 1pm.
Who says he lost the deabte? Who were these neutral 3rd parties? I watched the Ghagga debate video and he doesn't seem to have lost his nerve, if anything he's quite defiant?
It is interesting to note that the Panthic Singhs led by Kulbir Singh did not have any prior public debating experience, yet they were successful in defeating someone such as Ghagga who has spent his entire life in such controversies. Instead of debating on the contentious issues, Ghagga kept digressing and changing subjects. This further proved that he could no longer defend himself or his philosophy.
Who says Kulbir Singh was sucessful? Who says he kept digressing? Maybe he was talking about the backround to issues? My experience leads me to believe that most Sikhs (many Panthic ones), are not even aware of the basics of Sikh History.
According to eyewitnesses, having lost twice on all subjects, Ghagga left as a very upset man. He has declined to debate any further. His skills seems more fitted for an arguer than a true debater.
Who are these eyewitnesses that keep appearing? Werer they holding the camera? Who are these mysterious eyewitness people?
Subsequent to this debate, the Panthic Singhs had challenged him for another debate and the challenge was published in the Punjabi Post, a Toronto based newspaper. However, the man who boasted so much on the radio waves that not a single Singh in Toronto can debate him, had now become silent. Publicly it is now clear that these so-called scholars are merely paper tigers.
Maybe he has gone silent because he didn't want to be physically assaulted?
Now lets see the same debate in Sikh Times:
The Sikh Times - News and Analysis - Inder Singh Ghagga Excommunicated
Makes me think.....hmmm?
Panthic Weekly or Sikh Times.....I would rather read the latter.
some more views:
Tuhady Pattar (Your view)
Ok.
Is anyone here actually willing to debate the issues?
The point here in the quotation above is why is there such a disparity between Panthic Weekly and The Sikh Times.
As a neutral I see The Sikh Times coverage far more balanced.
Please lets debate issues in a civilised manner.