• Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
    Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
    Sign up Log in

Guru Nanak Never Questioned The Creator

Status
Not open for further replies.

Randip Singh

Writer
Historian
SPNer
May 25, 2005
2,935
2,950
56
United Kingdom
This is my opinion based on studying the concepts and philosophical system in Gurbani itself. It is not my decision to say to Guru, "Pick these concepts instead of those."

As to why not another faith, I think it's beyond obvious that Guruji lived in a certain geographical region at a particular time in history. Guruji belongs to the traditions of India, and not the Western countries. And undeniably the Vaishnava influence is so strong, even to the same philosophical positions which differs from other schools of Vedanta. For example Gurbani completely subordinates every deva to the nirgun Parabrahm. And in particular says this about Shiva:

ਬ੍ਰਹਮ ਗਿਆਨੀ ਕਉ ਖੋਜਹਿ ਮਹੇਸੁਰ ॥
breham giaanee ko khojehi mehaesur ||
The God-conscious being is sought by the great god Shiva.

~SGGS Ji p. 273
The Shaivite sampradyas and the Vaishnav sampradyas are always having conflicts because the Vaishnav tradition always subordinates Shiv below even a God-conscious human being. The argument that Bramalok and Shivalok are marginal because still in materiality is also a Vaishnav teaching which annoys most other schools of Hinduism.


ਸਿਵ ਪੁਰੀ ਬ੍ਰਹਮ ਇੰਦ੍ਰ ਪੁਰੀ ਨਿਹਚਲੁ ਕੋ ਥਾਉ ਨਾਹਿ ॥
siv puree breham eindhr puree nihachal ko thhaao naahi ||
The realm of Shiva, the realms of Brahma and Indra as well - no place anywhere is permanent.

~SGGS Ji p. 214
So these kind of concepts in Gurbani just point to close relationship of Vaishnav philosophy in Gurbani, more so than evidence of Guruji correcting faults in Hindu teaching in general. Because Gurbani is nearly identical to Vaishnav Vedantic theology on several points, how could it be correcting faults of Hinduism and reject validity of Vaishnav Vedanta? Just to generalize that all Hindus worship Shiva as Mahadeva, and then read Gurbani subordinating Shiva and Brahma is not correct to infer a contrary teaching. It is Gaudiya Vaishnava school of philosophy to teach this, and also subordination of Vishnu to Krsna. Only Har Krishan is equated as the Supreme nirgun Parabrahm.



ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਸੰਗੀ ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨ ਮੁਰਾਰੇ ॥
guramukh sangee kirasan muraarae ||
The Lord Krishna becomes the Gurmukh's Companion.

ਦਇਆਲ ਦਮੋਦਰੁ ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਪਾਈਐ ਹੋਰਤੁ ਕਿਤੈ ਨ ਭਾਤੀ ਜੀਉ ॥੨॥
dhaeiaal dhamodhar guramukh paaeeai horath kithai n bhaathee jeeo ||2||
The Gurmukh finds the Merciful Lord. He is not found any other way. ||2||

ਨਿਰਹਾਰੀ ਕੇਸਵ ਨਿਰਵੈਰਾ ॥
nirehaaree kaesav niravairaa ||
He does not need to eat; His Hair is Wondrous and Beautiful; He is free of hate.

ਕੋਟਿ ਜਨਾ ਜਾ ਕੇ ਪੂਜਹਿ ਪੈਰਾ ॥
kott janaa jaa kae poojehi pairaa ||
Millions of people worship His Feet.

ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਹਿਰਦੈ ਜਾ ਕੈ ਹਰਿ ਹਰਿ ਸੋਈ ਭਗਤੁ ਇਕਾਤੀ ਜੀਉ ॥੩॥
guramukh hiradhai jaa kai har har soee bhagath eikaathee jeeo ||3||
He alone is a devotee, who becomes Gurmukh, whose heart is filled with the Lord, Har, Har. ||3||

ਅਮੋਘ ਦਰਸਨ ਬੇਅੰਤ ਅਪਾਰਾ ॥
amogh dharasan baeanth apaaraa ||
Forever fruitful is the Blessed Vision of His Darshan; He is Infinite and Incomparable.

ਵਡ ਸਮਰਥੁ ਸਦਾ ਦਾਤਾਰਾ ॥
vadd samarathh sadhaa dhaathaaraa ||
He is Awesome and All-powerful; He is forever the Great Giver.

ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਜਪੀਐ ਤਿਤੁ ਤਰੀਐ ਗਤਿ ਨਾਨਕ ਵਿਰਲੀ ਜਾਤੀ ਜੀਉ ॥੪॥੬॥੧੩॥
guramukh naam japeeai thith thareeai gath naanak viralee jaathee jeeo ||4||6||13||
As Gurmukh, chant the Naam, the Name of the Lord, and you shall be carried across. O Nanak, rare are those who know this state! ||4||6||13||
~SGGS Ji p. 98

In Gurbani it seems the nirgun Parabrahm is Supreme and not specifically sargun Har Krishan although certain pauris do elevate Har Krishan. And this is no contradiction to Gaudiya Vaishnava teachings either because the nondual nirgun is held to be the highest Supreme knowledge of the God. Most of the names for God in Gurbani come directly from Vaishnava bhakti school. For example, "Govinda, Gopala." These are titles of Har Krishan. "Go" is the root meaning "cow." We know gopis as cow maids. Govinda means "herder of cows." Gopala means "protector of cows." The meanings don't vanish or change suddenly.
ਲੋਚਨ ਹੈ ਜਿਨ ਕੇ ਸੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾ ਧਰ ਆਨਨ ਹੈ ਜਿਨ ਕੋ ਸਮ ਮੈਨਾ ॥ ਕੈਕੈ ਕਟਾਛ ਚੁਰਾਇ ਲਯੋ ਮਨ ਪੈ ਤਿਨ ਕੋ ਜੋਊ ਰੱਛਕ ਧੈਨਾ
Lochan hai jin ke su prabhaa dhar aanan hai jin ko sam mainaa|| Kai-kai kataachh churaae layo man pai tin ko jooo rachchhak dhaeenaa||
They, whose eyes are like lotus and the remaining body like the god of love, their mind has been stolen by Krishna the protector of cows, with signs;
~Shri Dasam Granth Sahib Ji p. 763

ਸਤਿਜੁਗਿ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਵਾਸਦੇਵ ਵਵਾ ਵਿਸਨਾ ਨਾਮੁ ਜਪਾਵੈ ।
satijugi satigur vaasadayv vavaa visanaa naamu japaavai|
In Satyug, Visnu in the form of Vasudev is said to have incarnated and ‘V’ Of Vahiguru reminds of Visnu.

ਦੁਆਪਰਿ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਰੀ ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨ ਹਾਹਾ ਹਰਿ ਹਰਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਜਪਾਵੈ ।
duaapari satigur haree krisan haahaa hari hari naamu japaavai|
The true Guru of dvapar is said to be Harikrsna and ‘H’ of Vahiguru reminds of Hari.

ਤੇਤੇ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਰਾਮ ਜੀ ਰਾਰਾ ਰਾਮ ਜਪੇ ਸੁਖੁ ਪਾਵੈ ।
taytay satigur raam jee raaraa raam japay sukhu paavai|
In the the treta was Ram and ‘R’ of Vahiguru tells that rembering Ram will produce joy and happiness.

ਕਲਿਜੁਗਿ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਗਗਾ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਨਾਮੁ ਅਲਾਵੈ ।
kalijugi naanak gur gobind gagaa gobind naamu alaavai|
In kalijug, Gobind is in the form of Nanak and ‘G’ of Vahiguru gets Govind recited.

ਚਾਰੇ ਜਾਗੇ ਚਹੁ ਜੁਗੀ ਪੰਚਾਇਣ ਵਿਚਿ ਜਾਇ ਸਮਾਵੈ ।
chaaray jaagay chahu jugee panchaain vichi jaai samaavai|
The recitations o f all the four ages subsume in Panchayan i.e. in the soul of the common man.

ਚਾਰੋ ਅਛਰ ਇਕੁ ਕਰਿ ਵਾਹਗੁਰੂ ਜਪੁ ਮੰਤ੍ਰ ਜਪਾਵੈ ।
chaaro achhar iku kari vaahaguroo japu mantr japaavai|
When joining four letters Vahiguru is remembered,

ਜਹਾ ਤੇ ਉਪਜਿਆ ਫਿਰਿ ਤਹਾ ਸਮਾਵੈ ॥੪੯॥੧॥
jahaa tay upajiaa dhiri tahaa samaavai ॥49॥1॥
The jiv merges again in its origin.

~Displaying Vaar 1 Pauri 49 of Vaaran Bhai Gurdas Ji


Regardless of someone's personal attitude about validity of Bhai Gurdas vaaran, he did live during time of 4 forms of Guru and was personal scribe of Adi Granth. So, it's not so easy to dismiss his interpretation of Gurbani because it clashes with our own opinions. But listen to what Bhai Gurdas Ji is saying the beej Gurmantar coming from letters that stand for Krishna in particular:

Vishnu. Vasudeyva. Harikrishna. Raam. Govinda.

All names of Bhagavan Krishna in Vaishnava bhakti sampradyas. How can the relationship be ignored? Not one name, title, avtaara for any other deva. If you are going to do any kind of credible analysis of this relationship it can't be overlooked.





As to Sufi Islam, the fact is they were influenced by Vaishnava Vedanta, which is why they are persecuted to this day in Muslim countries. Sufi schools practice forms of pranayama, intensive meditation and trance ("wajd" related to mastallah or mastana, same as the yogic "God-intoxicated."), some get siddhias and pierce or burn themselves and remain unharmed, they believe in a form of chakra system, samaadhi, and are considered an Advaita religion and not a dualistic monotheism. They practice dhikr which is quite similar to pranayam Naam abhiyaas while japping the name Allah. It's fair to say Sufism is already a synthesis of Islam and bhakti yoga, more than Sikhism is a true synthesis of bhakti Islam and Vaishnav bhakti. It seems to me Sikh religion is influenced by teachings from Sufi Vaishnavism as well as Vaishnav Vedanta more than any true form of Islam.

wd63.jpg

Chaitanya Mahaprabhu

If you watch the video below, you can see how the Muslims have been influenced by Vaishnava Vedanta sants to create the sect of Sufism with it's intense emphasis on kirtan and Gurmantra as spiritual practices. There is even a Shaivite siddha yoga type influence as well. I don't believe there is any literature whatsoever within Islam which is anything like the yoga and bhakti sutras to explain the mysticism within Sufism. Sufism is heavily influenced by Hindu religion. And my guess is that's because the influences were "true" philosophically, and "worked" yogically as to creating trance states and alterations of consciousness with clear signs of Kundalini awakening, kriyas, etc. Almost everyone would agree, Sufi's have very little in common with orthodox Islam. And some Sufi practices are indistinguishable from a yoga ashram.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_ACMyqDDDg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mWvv8PSntk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Yjt7PSZTg8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63WGG1r9s9U



ਅਚੁਤ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮ ਪਰਮੇਸੁਰ ਅੰਤਰਜਾਮੀ ॥
achuth paarabreham paramaesur antharajaamee ||
The Supreme Lord God is imperishable, the Transcendent Lord, the Inner-knower, the Searcher of hearts.

ਮਧੁਸੂਦਨ ਦਾਮੋਦਰ ਸੁਆਮੀ ॥
madhhusoodhan dhaamodhar suaamee ||
He is the Slayer of demons, our Supreme Lord and Master.

ਰਿਖੀਕੇਸ ਗੋਵਰਧਨ ਧਾਰੀ ਮੁਰਲੀ ਮਨੋਹਰ ਹਰਿ ਰੰਗਾ ॥੧॥
rikheekaes govaradhhan dhhaaree muralee manohar har rangaa ||1||
The Supreme Rishi, the Master of the sensory organs, the uplifter of mountains, the joyful Lord playing His enticing flute. ||1||

ਮੋਹਨ ਮਾਧਵ ਕ੍ਰਿਸ੍ਨ ਮੁਰਾਰੇ ॥
mohan maadhhav kirasa muraarae ||
The Enticer of Hearts, the Lord of wealth, Krishna, the Enemy of ego.

ਜਗਦੀਸੁਰ ਹਰਿ ਜੀਉ ਅਸੁਰ ਸੰਘਾਰੇ ॥
jagadheesur har jeeo asur sanghaarae ||
The Lord of the Universe, the Dear Lord, the Destroyer of demons.

ਜਗਜੀਵਨ ਅਬਿਨਾਸੀ ਠਾਕੁਰ ਘਟ ਘਟ ਵਾਸੀ ਹੈ ਸੰਗਾ ॥੨॥
jagajeevan abinaasee thaakur ghatt ghatt vaasee hai sangaa ||2||
The Life of the World, our eternal and ever-stable Lord and Master dwells within each and every heart, and is always with us. ||2||

ਧਰਣੀਧਰ ਈਸ ਨਰਸਿੰਘ ਨਾਰਾਇਣ ॥
dhharaneedhhar ees narasingh naaraaein ||
The Support of the Earth, the man-lion, the Supreme Lord God.

ਦਾੜਾ ਅਗ੍ਰੇ ਪ੍ਰਿਥਮਿ ਧਰਾਇਣ ॥
dhaarraa agrae prithham dhharaaein ||
The Protector who tears apart demons with His teeth, the Upholder of the earth.

ਬਾਵਨ ਰੂਪੁ ਕੀਆ ਤੁਧੁ ਕਰਤੇ ਸਭ ਹੀ ਸੇਤੀ ਹੈ ਚੰਗਾ ॥੩॥
baavan roop keeaa thudhh karathae sabh hee saethee hai changaa ||3||
O Creator, You assumed the form of the pygmy to humble the demons; You are the Lord God of all. ||3||

ਸ੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਚੰਦ ਜਿਸੁ ਰੂਪੁ ਨ ਰੇਖਿਆ ॥
sree raamachandh jis roop n raekhiaa ||
You are the Great Raam Chand, who has no form or feature.

ਬਨਵਾਲੀ ਚਕ੍ਰਪਾਣਿ ਦਰਸਿ ਅਨੂਪਿਆ ॥
banavaalee chakrapaan dharas anoopiaa ||
Adorned with flowers, holding the chakra in Your hand, Your form is incomparably beautiful.

ਸਹਸ ਨੇਤ੍ਰ ਮੂਰਤਿ ਹੈ ਸਹਸਾ ਇਕੁ ਦਾਤਾ ਸਭ ਹੈ ਮੰਗਾ ॥੪॥
sehas naethr moorath hai sehasaa eik dhaathaa sabh hai mangaa ||4||
You have thousands of eyes, and thousands of forms. You alone are the Giver, and all are beggars of You. ||4||

ਭਗਤਿ ਵਛਲੁ ਅਨਾਥਹ ਨਾਥੇ ॥
bhagath vashhal anaathheh naathhae ||
You are the Lover of Your devotees, the Master of the masterless.

ਗੋਪੀ ਨਾਥੁ ਸਗਲ ਹੈ ਸਾਥੇ ॥
gopee naathh sagal hai saathhae ||
The Lord and Master of the milk-maids, You are the companion of all.

ਬਾਸੁਦੇਵ ਨਿਰੰਜਨ ਦਾਤੇ ਬਰਨਿ ਨ ਸਾਕਉ ਗੁਣ ਅੰਗਾ ॥੫॥
baasudhaev niranjan dhaathae baran n saako gun angaa ||5||
O Lord, Immacuate Great Giver, I cannot describe even an iota of Your Glorious Virtues. ||5

ਮੁਕੰਦ ਮਨੋਹਰ ਲਖਮੀ ਨਾਰਾਇਣ ॥
mukandh manohar lakhamee naaraaein ||
Liberator, Enticing Lord, Lord of Lakshmi, Supreme Lord God.

ਦ੍ਰੋਪਤੀ ਲਜਾ ਨਿਵਾਰਿ ਉਧਾਰਣ ॥
dhropathee lajaa nivaar oudhhaaran ||
Savior of Dropadi's honor.

ਕਮਲਾਕੰਤ ਕਰਹਿ ਕੰਤੂਹਲ ਅਨਦ ਬਿਨੋਦੀ ਨਿਹਸੰਗਾ ॥੬॥
kamalaakanth karehi kanthoohal anadh binodhee nihasangaa ||6||
Lord of Maya, miracle-worker, absorbed in delightful play, unattached. ||6||

ਅਮੋਘ ਦਰਸਨ ਆਜੂਨੀ ਸੰਭਉ ॥
amogh dharasan aajoonee sanbho ||
The Blessed Vision of His Darshan is fruitful and rewarding; He is not born, He is self-existent.

ਅਕਾਲ ਮੂਰਤਿ ਜਿਸੁ ਕਦੇ ਨਾਹੀ ਖਉ ॥
akaal moorath jis kadhae naahee kho ||
His form is undying; it is never destroyed.

ਅਬਿਨਾਸੀ ਅਬਿਗਤ ਅਗੋਚਰ ਸਭੁ ਕਿਛੁ ਤੁਝ ਹੀ ਹੈ ਲਗਾ ॥੭॥
abinaasee abigath agochar sabh kishh thujh hee hai lagaa ||7||
O imperishable, eternal, unfathomable Lord, everything is attached to You. ||7||

ਸ੍ਰੀਰੰਗ ਬੈਕੁੰਠ ਕੇ ਵਾਸੀ ॥
sreerang baikunth kae vaasee ||
The Lover of greatness, who dwells in heaven.

ਮਛੁ ਕਛੁ ਕੂਰਮੁ ਆਗਿਆ ਅਉਤਰਾਸੀ ॥
mashh kashh kooram aagiaa aoutharaasee ||
By the Pleasure of His Will, He took incarnation as the great fish and the tortoise.

ਕੇਸਵ ਚਲਤ ਕਰਹਿ ਨਿਰਾਲੇ ਕੀਤਾ ਲੋੜਹਿ ਸੋ ਹੋਇਗਾ ॥੮॥
kaesav chalath karehi niraalae keethaa lorrehi so hoeigaa ||8||
The Lord of beauteous hair, the Worker of miraculous deeds, whatever He wishes, comes to pass. ||8||

ਨਿਰਾਹਾਰੀ ਨਿਰਵੈਰੁ ਸਮਾਇਆ ॥
niraahaaree niravair samaaeiaa ||
He is beyond need of any sustenance, free of hate and all-pervading.

ਧਾਰਿ ਖੇਲੁ ਚਤੁਰਭੁਜੁ ਕਹਾਇਆ ॥
dhhaar khael chathurabhuj kehaaeiaa ||
He has staged His play; He is called the four-armed Lord.

ਸਾਵਲ ਸੁੰਦਰ ਰੂਪ ਬਣਾਵਹਿ ਬੇਣੁ ਸੁਨਤ ਸਭ ਮੋਹੈਗਾ ॥੯॥
saaval sundhar roop banaavehi baen sunath sabh mohaigaa ||9||
He assumed the beautiful form of the blue-skinned Krishna; hearing His flute, all are fascinated and enticed. ||9||

ਬਨਮਾਲਾ ਬਿਭੂਖਨ ਕਮਲ ਨੈਨ ॥
banamaalaa bibhookhan kamal nain ||
He is adorned with garlands of flowers, with lotus eyes.

ਸੁੰਦਰ ਕੁੰਡਲ ਮੁਕਟ ਬੈਨ ॥
sundhar kunddal mukatt bain ||
His ear-rings, crown and flute are so beautiful.

ਸੰਖ ਚਕ੍ਰ ਗਦਾ ਹੈ ਧਾਰੀ ਮਹਾ ਸਾਰਥੀ ਸਤਸੰਗਾ ॥੧੦॥
sankh chakr gadhaa hai dhhaaree mehaa saarathhee sathasangaa ||10||
He carries the conch, the chakra and the war club; He is the Great Charioteer, who stays with His Saints. ||10||

ਪੀਤ ਪੀਤੰਬਰ ਤ੍ਰਿਭਵਣ ਧਣੀ ॥
peeth peethanbar thribhavan dhhanee ||
The Lord of yellow robes, the Master of the three worlds.

ਜਗੰਨਾਥੁ ਗੋਪਾਲੁ ਮੁਖਿ ਭਣੀ ॥
jagannaathh gopaal mukh bhanee ||
The Lord of the Universe, the Lord of the world; with my mouth, I chant His Name.

ਸਾਰਿੰਗਧਰ ਭਗਵਾਨ ਬੀਠੁਲਾ ਮੈ ਗਣਤ ਨ ਆਵੈ ਸਰਬੰਗਾ ॥੧੧॥
saaringadhhar bhagavaan beethulaa mai ganath n aavai sarabangaa ||11||
The Archer who draws the bow, the Beloved Lord God; I cannot count all His limbs. ||11||

~SGGS Ji p. 1082

ਨ ਸੰਖੰ ਨ ਚਕ੍ਰੰ ਨ ਗਦਾ ਨ ਸਿਆਮੰ ॥
n sankhan n chakran n gadhaa n siaaman ||
God has no conch-shell, no religious mark, no paraphernalia; he does not have blue skin.

ਅਸ੍ਚਰਜ ਰੂਪੰ ਰਹੰਤ ਜਨਮੰ ॥
ascharaj roopan rehanth janaman ||
His Form is Wondrous and Amazing. He is beyond incarnation.

ਨੇਤ ਨੇਤ ਕਥੰਤਿ ਬੇਦਾ ॥
naeth naeth kathhanth baedhaa ||
The Vedas say that He is not this, and not that.

~SGGS Ji p. 1359




Rather than reading into two apparently contradictory pauris of Gurbani, by Shri Guru Arjun Dev Ji. I think it will make more sense and be closer to the correct interpretation if people realize Guruji is not praising one thing and then negating it later as if He couldn't make up His mind. Guruji is defining the God as formed and formless, having sarguna (perceivable attributes due to manifestation in the materiality and including all consequent shortcomings of being subject to the material world of pakrti which forms the three gunas: essential nature of being: rajo guna, tamo guna and satva guna. Gunas by the way are defined as "string" and also as "tendencies." Guna - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The teaching of the Three Gunas is found in the Vaishnava scriptures: Mahabharata, Bhagavad Gita, and Śrīmad Bhāgavatam. Those writings which elevate Bhagavan Krishna as the Supreme Godhead.




So just reflect for a moment how long ago this teaching was revealed to mankind and only within the last 20 years has modern day physics discovered that "strings" were the basic building blocks of all matter. And Quantum Mechanical theory shows that all matter has a relationship to consciousness at the particle level. This relationship to a perceiver has been described as "tendancies to exist" from the writings of physicist Fritjof Capra based on the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Complex. This is whether Quantum Entanglement and Non-Locality have implications which cause physicists to take a leap into the realm of spirituality and metaphysics to explain, at least theoretically. Quantum Physics with regard to spirituality

I think this shows very clearly that there is a kind of infallibly revealed truth from the God in these teachings. And Guruji was also able to recognize this because He is a God-realized Satguru. I'm completely convinced that Gurbani is absolute truth with no mythology or fake thing in it, except that which is explicitly stated to be mythological by Guruji.





The Vaishnava Vedanta sampradya is primarily a Dvaitic monotheistic philosophy and contrasts with the strictly Advaitist schools in that it makes perfect sense, "Why is Guru praying to God if Guru is God?" Because that is the element of Vaishnav Bhakti teaching which is Dvaitic. However, it is a modified philosophy because of the inclusion of the Advaitist definition of the God in the teaching of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, Achintya Bheda Abheda ("inconceivable oneness and difference"). So because of the expanded definition the Supreme God is defined in terms of dualism, sarguna as well as non-dualism, nirguna. So he will have describable attribures such as:


ਸ੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਚੰਦ ਜਿਸੁ ਰੂਪੁ ਨ ਰੇਖਿਆ ॥
sree raamachandh jis roop n raekhiaa ||
You are the Great Raam Chand, who has no form or feature.

ਬਨਵਾਲੀ ਚਕ੍ਰਪਾਣਿ ਦਰਸਿ ਅਨੂਪਿਆ ॥
banavaalee chakrapaan dharas anoopiaa ||
Adorned with flowers, holding the chakra in Your hand, Your form is incomparably beautiful. ~SGGS Ji p. 1082

So contrary to being a negation of the validity of the sargun saroop of Raam Chandra, a Krishan avataar, Gurbani is actually confirming the Gaudiya Vaishnav theology that He is formless and also has a form. God as the Supreme aspect is nirguna, but Gurbani also has a Dvaitist teaching, in that the formless God also takes on a sargun saroop to manifest in sansaara. Advaita means "not two," and refers to the nirgun, attributeless, formless, highest reality of the God.


ਅੰਤਰਿ ਬਾਹਰਿ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਏਕੋ ਦੂਜਾ ਅਵਰੁ ਨ ਕੋਈ ॥
anthar baahar har prabh eaeko dhoojaa avar n koee ||
Inwardly and outwardly, they saw only the One Lord God; for them there was no other second. ~SGGS Ji p. 445


And it is clear that this exactly principle is the very definition of Gaudiya Vaishnava school of Vedanta which teaches Dvaita and Advaita and emphasizes devotional kirtan and chanting of Har Krishan and his avataars.






~Bhul chak maaf


A great post and a lot too take in.:thumbup:

I am not sure about the connection between Sufism and Vaishnavism. Read "The Sufi's" and "The Way of The Sufi" both by Idries Shah. The forward is very interesting.

My own opinion is that the Guru's did not adhere to any one school of thinking. Have you noticed that all school's of thought i.e. Hindu based , Islamic and Christian based are criticised in Bani for losing their way. Even Jains are described as "corrupt". Bani seems not to make a criticism of Buddism, something I find interesting (I maybe mistaken).

The Guru's background as Kshatriya's would have possibly "Shivite" in nature...again I maybe mistaken.

I will do a deeper analysis of what you have written when I have time.
 

spnadmin

1947-2014 (Archived)
SPNer
Jun 17, 2004
14,500
19,219
A great post and a lot too take in.:thumbup:

I am not sure about the connection between Sufism and Vaishnavism. Read "The Sufi's" and "The Way of The Sufi" both by Idries Shah. The forward is very interesting.

My own opinion is that the Guru's did not adhere to any one school of thinking. Have you noticed that all school's of thought i.e. Hindu based , Islamic and Christian based are criticised in Bani for losing their way. Even Jains are described as "corrupt". Bani seems not to make a criticism of Buddism, something I find interesting (I maybe mistaken).

The Guru's background as Kshatriya's would have possibly "Shivite" in nature...again I maybe mistaken.

I will do a deeper analysis of what you have written when I have time.

Randip ji

Let me join you in thanking Harjas ji for what has been a sustained and careful analysis and review of Gurbani in relation to Vaishnavism. These essays on this and other threads truly dignify our study.

Harjas ji, there is a kind of heroic effort in your writing to date and, yes, a lot to take in.

On the question of Guru Nanak and Buddhism: I have been pondering this point for weeks now. There is a key similarity that surfaces in relation to each branch of Buddhism that I have looked into. Again, not sure, but the answer may lie in this idea. In Gurbani and in Buddhism, samadhi is not the end of the road for spiritual development while still alive on the plane of earth. There is something after samadhi that has an active moral and ethical component that appears missing in the later Vedantic traditions.

Buddhism seems to say that samadhi is not where one stops, savoring the bliss of one's personal encounter with God. In fact there are Buddhist scholars who are even suspicious of samadhi as a goal. They see it as a path to something else. And the question is asked vigorously -- And, after samadhi?

:)
 
Feb 14, 2006
512
31
ਮੁਕੰਦ ਮਨੋਹਰ ਲਖਮੀ ਨਾਰਾਇਣ ॥ ਦ੍ਰੋਪਤੀ ਲਜਾ ਨਿਵਾਰਿ ਉਧਾਰਣ ॥ ਕਮਲਾਕੰਤ ਕਰਹਿ ਕੰਤੂਹਲ ਅਨਦ ਬਿਨੋਦੀ ਨਿਹਸੰਗਾ ॥੬॥
Mukanḏ manohar lakẖmī nārā*iṇ. Ḏaropaṯī lajā nivār uḏẖāraṇ. Kamlākanṯ karahi kanṯūhal anaḏ binoḏī nihsangā. ||6||
My Beauteous Lord is the Giver of salvation and the spouse of wealth. He, the Lord, is the Saviour of Daropadi, from the clutches of the destroyers of her honour. The Detached Lord of mammon does the wondrous deeds, sports and makes merry.

Here be advised, saving of Dropati is not credited to Krishana but to the Lord Himself, sticking on a story will not do just what Guru ji is promoting. When Devtas are called beggars what importance they have left before His Mighty power? Even in Gurbani Guru ji declares all credit to Him when Guru ji is revered in high esteem.

Veer ji, the story of the saving of Draupadi's honor is taken from the Mahabharata, Bhagavad-Gita. And in the story it is indeed Bhagavan Krishna who she prays to, and who saves her. When Gurbani is mentioning story of Draupadi, how can anyone NOT credit to Krishan? Moreover, the whole pauri of Gurbani is praising the One Parabrahm as manifest in the Krishan avtaaras.

"O Krishna, son of Devaki,
Lord of the universe, of inexhaustible powers,
Krishna of the blue-lotus skin,
Krishna of the white-lily eyes,
Saffron-robed Krishna,
Help me now!"
-Draupadi's cry to Krishna in Book Three

It is part of Vaishnava sampradya to consider Bhagavan Krishan and this lineage of Vishnu avtaaras as the sargun saroop of the One Supreme Uncreated nirgun God and to subordinate every other deva as demi-god, including Vishnu. So to see in Gurbani a subordination of every demi-god to the One Supreme is not itself contradicting Vaishnavism at all. The fact that Gurbani subordinates every deva, including Vishnu, but does NOT subordinate the das avtaaras is pure Vaishnavism. Can you explain why this whole pauri is praising the One Supreme Lord in the form of das avtaaras?

(18) At the coming of day, all manifested things come forth from the unmanifested and at the coming of night they merge in that same, called the unmanifested.
(19) This very same multitude of existences arising again and again merges helplessly at the coming of night, O Partha (Arjuna), and streams forth into being at the coming of day.
(20) But beyond this unmanifested, there is yet another Unmanifested Eternal Being who does not perish even when all existences perish.
(21) This Unmanifested is called the Imperishable. Him they speak of as the Supreme Status. Those who attain to Him return not. That is My supreme abode.
~Bhagavad-Gita ch. 8


Belief of Vaishnavism is that the nirguna manifests as the das avtaaras, and while all-pervading exists within every deva and every being, only the das avtaaras are the sargun saroop of the nirgun Supreme Parabrahm. And it should be noted that Vaishnavism often contradicts Brahmanism, with the exception of the school of Ramanuja and Goswami Tulsidas who tried to Brahminize Vaishnavism. So we see Guruji contradicting Brahminism and casteism, yet elevating the One Supreme nirguna and praising the sarguna of the lineage of Krishan avataars, and explaining the all-pervading nature of the Oneness of Advaita. Can this association of Vaishnavism in Gurbani be accidental? I would dare say nearly every major teaching in Gurbani has an origin which can be directly traced, and in some places almost word for word conformity with Vaishnava Upanishads.



ਏਕ ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨੰ ਸਰਬ ਦੇਵਾ ਦੇਵ ਦੇਵਾ ਤ ਆਤਮਾ ॥
eaek kirasanan sarab dhaevaa dhaev dhaevaa th aathamaa ||
The One Lord Krishna is the Divine Lord of all; He is the Divinity of the individual soul.

ਆਤਮਾ ਬਾਸੁਦੇਵਸ੍ਯ੍ਯਿ ਜੇ ਕੋ ਜਾਣੈ ਭੇਉ ॥ਨਾਨਕੁ ਤਾ ਕਾ ਦਾਸੁ ਹੈ ਸੋਈ ਨਿਰੰਜਨ ਦੇਉ ॥੪॥
aathamaa baasudhaevasiy jae ko jaanai bhaeo || naanak thaa kaa dhaas hai soee niranjan dhaeo ||4||
Nanak is a slave to anyone who understands this mystery of the all-pervading Lord; he himself is the Immaculate Divine Lord. ||4||
~SGGS Ji p. 469




ਕ੍ਰਿਸ੍ਨਾ ਤੇ ਜਾਨਊ ਹਰਿ ਹਰਿ ਨਾਚੰਤੀ ਨਾਚਨਾ ॥੧॥
kirasaa thae jaanoo har har naachanthee naachanaa ||1||
Know that, through Krishna, the Lord, Har, Har, the dance of creation dances. ||1||

ਪਹਿਲ ਪੁਰਸਾਬਿਰਾ ॥
pehil purasaabiraa ||
First of all, there was only the Primal Being.

ਅਥੋਨ ਪੁਰਸਾਦਮਰਾ ॥
athhon purasaadhamaraa ||
From that Primal Being, Maya was produced.

ਅਸਗਾ ਅਸ ਉਸਗਾ ॥
asagaa as ousagaa ||
All that is, is His.
~SGGS Ji p. 693




ਧਰਣੀਧਰ ਈਸ ਨਰਸਿੰਘ ਨਾਰਾਇਣ ॥ ਦਾੜਾ ਅਗ੍ਰੇ ਪ੍ਰਿਥਮਿ ਧਰਾਇਣ ॥ ਬਾਵਨ ਰੂਪੁ ਕੀਆ ਤੁਧੁ ਕਰਤੇ ਸਭ ਹੀ ਸੇਤੀਹੈਚੰਗਾ॥੩॥
Ḏẖarṇīḏẖar īs narsingẖ nārā*iṇ. Ḏāṛā agrė paritham ḏẖarā*iṇ. Bāvan rūp kī*ā ṯuḏẖ karṯė sabẖ hī sėṯī hai cẖanga. ||3||
The Lord is the support of the earth, the man-lion and Primal being.Thou, O Lord, are the Upholder of the earth with Thine for teeth.Thou, O creator, assumed the form of a pigmy and are the sublime Lord of all.

Look at the Vaak” seti hai changa, means still only you are sublime of all, that is what Guru ji is preaching here.

Narasingh Narayana? The dwarf? All in the same sentence as the Supreme Lord who subsumes (pervades within) all? Veerji, this Guru vaak is praising the Krishan avtaaras as the One Supreme Lord. The Lord Himself is manifesting through these avtaaras is what Gurbani is saying.

narasimha.jpg


Narasiṃha ("man-lion") (also spelt as Narasingh, Narasinga) (नरसिंह in Devanagari) is described as an incarnation (avatara) of Vishnu within the Puranic texts of Hinduism who takes the form of half-man / half-lion, having a human torso and lower body, but with a lion-like face and claws. He is worshipped in deity form by a significant number of Vaishnava groups throughout India (especially in the South) and is primarily known as the 'Great Protector', being a form of Vishnu who specifically defends and protects his devotees in times of need.
Narasimha: Information and Much More from Answers.com

Even with a very superficial reading of this pauri, how can one negate or ignore the distinct mention of das avtaaras as manifesting as the One Supreme? Seeing praise of das avtaara in Gurbani, and of Narasingh, how can anyone overlook association of Order of Singhs with this warrior avtaar whose duty is to destroy tyranny and protect devotees?



ਬਬਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਜਾਨਤ ਤੇ ਬ੍ਰਹਮਾ ॥
babaa breham jaanath thae brehamaa ||
BABBA: One who knows God is a Brahmin.

ਬੈਸਨੋ ਤੇ ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਸੁਚ ਧਰਮਾ ॥
baisano thae guramukh such dhharamaa ||
A Vaishnaav is one who, as Gurmukh, lives the righteous life of Dharma.
~SGGS Ji p. 258


It is Vaishnava teaching against the corruption of caste and varna system to say the real Brahmin is the one who worships the God, irrespective of birth caste, be he brahmin or shudra. And so we find this tuuk also in Gurbani. Strange for Guruji to associate a Vaishnav with a Gurumukh.

Saint Narsi Mehta, true Vaishnaav:
"A few days later, a Brahmin was giving a feast. He wanted to invite Narsi but did not. When guests started arriving, he saw a Harijan with every Brahmin coming in. He realized his mistake and begged Narsi’s pardon. Narsi taught them that a true Brahmin accepted the universal brotherhood of all men and treated them equally."


In the trinity of Vishnu, Shiva, and Brahma, Vishnu is the sattva quality of a centripetal tendency towards light and truth, which holds the universe together by pervading all existence. Vishnu comes from a root meaning "to pervade," and he is known as the Pervader. Thus Vishnu dwells in everything and defeats the power of destruction...

The Vaishnavas distinguish five forms of God: in his transcendent form; the avataras, which are incarnations of God sent to save the dharma, cosmic law, and mankind, with Vishnu as an essentially human character; the vyuha, emanations of his power, as Vasudeva-Krishna, Samkarsana, Pradyumna, and Aniruddha, who play a part in Vishnu's creation, preservation, and absorption of the universe; the immanent God; and the image or statue...

A tribe of ksatriyas, warriors, called the Satvata, were bhagavatas and were seen by the Greek writer Megasthenes at the end of the fourth century BCE. This sect then combined with the cult of Narayana, a demiurge god-creator who later became one of the names of Vishnu. Soon after the start of the Common Era, the Abhiras or cowherds of a foreign tribe, contributed Gopala Krishna, the young Krishna, who was adopted by the Abhiras and worked as a cowherd and flirted with the cowherdesses. Only as a mature young man did he return to Mathura and slay Kamsa.

The Vasudeva, Krishna, and Gopala cults became integrated through new legends into Greater Krishnaism, the second and most outstanding phase of Vaishnavism.
Being non-Vedic, Krishnaism then started to affiliate with Vedism so that the orthodox would find it acceptable. Vishnu of the Rg Veda was assimilated into Krishnaism and became the supreme God who incarnates whenever necessary to save the world. Krishna became one of the avataras of Vishnu.

In the eighth century CE the bhakti of Vaishnavism came into contact with Shankara's Advaita doctrine of spiritual monism and world-illusion. This philosophy was considered destructive of bhakti and important opposition in South India came from Ramanuja in the eleventh century and Madhva in the fifteenth century. Ramanuja stressed Vishnu as Narayana and built on the bhakti tradition of the Alvars, poet-saints of South India from the sixth to the ninth centuries (see Shri Vaishnavas).

In North India there were new Vaishnava movements: Nimbarka in the fourteenth century with the cult of Radha, Krishna's favourite cowgirl (see Nimavats); Ramananda and the cult of Rama in the same century (see Ramanandis); Kabir in the fifteenth century, whose god is Rama (see Kabirpanthis); Vallabha in the sixteenth century with the worship of the boy Krishna and Radha (see Vallabhas); and Caitanya in the same century with his worship of the grown-up Krishna and Radha (see Gaudiya Vaishnavas). In the Maratha country poet-saints such as Namdev and Tukaram from the fourteenth to the seventeenth centuries worshipped Vishnu in the form of Vithoba of Pandharpur (see Vitthalas).
Vaishnava


ਸ੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਚੰਦ ਜਿਸੁ ਰੂਪੁ ਨ ਰੇਖਿਆ ॥ ਬਨਵਾਲੀ ਚਕ੍ਰਪਾਣਿ ਦਰਸਿ ਅਨੂਪਿਆ ॥ ਸਹਸ ਨੇਤ੍ਰ ਮੂਰਤਿ ਹੈ ਸਹਸਾ ਇਕੁ ਦਾਤਾ ਸਭ ਹੈ ਮੰਗਾ ॥੪॥
Sarī rāmcẖanḏ jis rūp na rėkẖ*i*ā. Banvālī cẖakarpāṇ ḏaras anūpi*ā. Sahas nėṯar mūraṯ hai sahsā ik ḏāṯā sabẖ hai mangā. ||4||
Thou alone are Ramchand, who has no form and outline. Thou, O flower-gift God, of fascinating sight, has a quoit in Thy hand. Thou has thousands of forms. Thou alone are the Giver and all others are beggars.

Again here Guru’s surat( attention) is not on His created devtas but on HIM, look at” sehas netr moorat” it is definition of His sargun Sroop. Who are called great, they are beggars in Guru’s views when compared to HIM. What a Sikh learns from it, to contemplate on HIM not to propagate old theories about Devtas because they are beggars at His court. Your translator uses the word” Great Ram Chand” where is a word” great in Guru Vaak”? Imagination rather nostalgia! Alone stands is HIM the GIVER to all, rest are the beggars, period, that is what Guru ji is promoting through these reference.

An Indian reader will immediately recognize the famous king of Avodya, an English reader may be helped by translating as great or famous Raam Chand without changing the essential meaning.


yatah khyatim yatam katham u sahate tad vigarham
To think that the devatas are equal to Krishna.
~One of the ten offenses against the Name, Padma Purana


Ramachandra isn't considered to be a deva by Vaishnav tradition. He is an avtaara of the One Supreme Lord, exactly as in Guruji's description. Moreover there are different types of avtaaras, and Ramachandra is considered a "complete" avtaar. You cannot keep ignoring Raam Chand, Narasingh, the dwarf, Har Krishan all in the same pauri being equated with the formless Supreme nirguna and think it is accidental. Where in "this particular pauri" is Guruji subordinating das avtaara? He is not. He is equating them as sarguna.

So just to read that Gurbani subordinates devas is no proof at all, since that is Vaishnav philosophy. Remember also that Vaishnavism is famous for path to God through devotional bhakti, kirtan and japping Naam Gurmantras. Isn't this also the essence of Sikh path while even using the same Naams for Gurmantra? Raam, Govind, Gopala, Vasudeyv?


"Arjuna said: You are the Supreme Brahman, the ultimate, the supreme abode and purifier, the Absolute Truth and the eternal Divine Person. You are the primal God, transcendental and original, and you are the unborn and all-pervading beauty. All the great sages like Narada, Asita, Devala, and Vyasa proclaim this of You, and now You Yourself are declaring it to me. O Krsna, I totally accept as truth all that You have told me. Neither the gods nor the demons, O Lord, know Thy personality." (Bg. 10.12-14).


ਊਤਮੁ ਊਚੌ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਣ ਅੰਤੁ ਨ ਜਾਣਹਿ ਸੇਖ ॥
ootham oocha paarabreham gun anth n jaanehi saekh ||
that the Supreme Lord God is the most sublime and lofty. Even the thousand-tongued serpent does not know the limits of His Glories.

ਨਾਰਦ ਮੁਨਿ ਜਨ ਸੁਕ ਬਿਆਸ ਜਸੁ ਗਾਵਤ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ॥
naaradh mun jan suk biaas jas gaavath gobindh ||
Naarad, the humble beings, Suk and Vyaasa sing the Praises of the Lord of the Universe.

ਰਸ ਗੀਧੇ ਹਰਿ ਸਿਉ ਬੀਧੇ ਭਗਤ ਰਚੇ ਭਗਵੰਤ ॥
ras geedhhae har sio beedhhae bhagath rachae bhagavanth ||
They are imbued with the Lord's essence; united with Him; they are absorbed in devotional worship of the Lord God.
~SGGS Ji p. 298



randip singh writes: "I am not sure about the connection between Sufism and Vaishnavism. Read "The Sufi's" and "The Way of The Sufi" both by Idries Shah. The forward is very interesting.

My own opinion is that the Guru's did not adhere to any one school of thinking. Have you noticed that all school's of thought i.e. Hindu based , Islamic and Christian based are criticised in Bani for losing their way. Even Jains are described as "corrupt". Bani seems not to make a criticism of Buddism, something I find interesting (I maybe mistaken).

The Guru's background as Kshatriya's would have possibly "Shivite" in nature...again I maybe mistaken."

There are different schools of Sufism. Just like there is no single kind of Vaishnavism, there is no single school of Sufism. I find it interesting that everyone equates Kabir ji as a Muslim, when his own Kabir-panthis call themselves Vaishnav because he was a great devotee of Lord Raam. So when we read again this baghat bani of Kabir ji, it's difficult to reconcile how these could be taken as words of a Muslim and not a Vaishnav.


ਬਿੰਦ੍ਰਾਬਨ ਮਨ ਹਰਨ ਮਨੋਹਰ ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨ ਚਰਾਵਤ ਗਾਊ ਰੇ ॥
bindhraaban man haran manohar kirasan charaavath gaaoo rae ||
In Brindaaban, where Krishna grazes his cows, he entices and fascinates my mind.
6 Gaurhee Saint Kabir

ਜਾ ਕਾ ਠਾਕੁਰੁ ਤੁਹੀ ਸਾਰਿੰਗਧਰ ਮੋਹਿ ਕਬੀਰਾ ਨਾਊ ਰੇ ॥੨॥੨॥੧੫॥੬੬॥
jaa kaa thaakur thuhee saaringadhhar mohi kabeeraa naaoo rae ||2||2||15||66||
You are my Lord Master, the Archer of the Universe; my name is Kabeer. ||2||2||15||66||
6 Gaurhee Saint Kabir
~SGGS Ji p. 338



So I think in this way, because Kabir Ji was born a Muslim, people continue to identify him this way, when his primary spiritual teaching was clearly not Islam, but an Islam influenced by Vaishnava bhakti. I think people have tended to make this kind of misidentification of Sufism precisely because of the understanding that Guru of Sikhism was cosmopolitan uniting people of all faiths. While this is true, it can be shown the umbrella uniting them all was Vaishnavism. Where in all of Islam do you find japping Naam of God as a spiritual practice? In Vaishnav influenced Sufism, because it is the essence of Vaishnava bhakti.

What purist Muslims think about Sufism:
Sufism is marred by un-Islamic beliefs and is an Ideology in itself:
1. The belief of Wahdat al-Wajood, which implies that the Creator (Allah) and the creation are one, and the creation is just the manifestation of the Creator.
2. The belief that the Prophets and the Sufi saints are alive in their graves, just as they were alive in this world. They are fully aware of the outside world; they can communicate with the living and help those who call upon them.
3. The spirits (Ruh) of the righteous comes back from the Barzakh.
4. Gross exaggeration in praising the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu alaihi wa-sallam) whilst neglecting his (sallallahu alaihi wa-sallam) teachings in understanding the religion.
5. Total and complete obedience to a Sufi Shaikh.
6. Penance and living the lives of hermits are ways to get closer to Allah.
7. Some Majzoobs, who have reached the goal of Sufism, run the affairs of the creation.

Like many other Sufi doctrines, pantheism is adopted from man-made religions and philosophies, as confirmed by S. R. Sharda in his book, Sufi Thought

"Sufi literature of the post-Timur period shows a significant change in thought content. It is pantheistic. After the fall of Muslim orthodoxy from power at the centre of India for about a century, due to the invasion of Timur, the Sufi became free from the control of the Muslim orthodoxy and consorted with Hindu saints, who influenced them to an amazing extent. The Sufi adopted Monism and wifely devotion from the Vaishnava Vedantic school and Bhakti and Yogic practices. By that time, the popularity of the Vedantic pantheism among the Sufis had reached its zenith."

What Sufism has to do with Islam? Discover the True Religion of Muslim - MANIFEST AND HIDDEN KNOWLEDGE, SAINT WORSHIP, Akhyaar (chosen), Abdaal (substitutes), Abraar (pious), Awtaad (pegs), Nuqabaa (watchmen), Qutb (pole), Ghawth (Succor), Bayazid Ta


Drawing from Qur'anic verses, virtually all Sufis distinguish Lataif-e-Sitta (The Six Subtleties), Nafs, Qalb, Ruh, Sirr, Khafi & Akhfa. These lataif (singular : latifa) designate various psychospiritual "organs", or faculties of sensory perception.[16] Sufic development involves the awakening of these spiritual centers of perception that lie dormant in an individual. Each center is associated with a particular color and general area of the body, often with a particular prophet, and varies from order to order. The help of a guide is considered necessary to help activate these centers. After undergoing this process, the dervish is said to reach a certain type of "completion."

These six "organs" or faculties: Nafs, Qalb, Ruh, Sirr, Khafi and Akhfa, and the purificative activities applied to them, contain the basic orthodox Sufi philosophy. The purification of the elementary passionate nature (Tazkiya-I-Nafs), followed by cleansing of the spiritual heart so that it may acquire a mirror-like purity of reflection (Tazkiya-I-Qalb) and become the receptacle of God's love (Ishq) and illumination of the spirit (Tajjali-I-Ruh). This process is fortified by emptying of egoic drives (Taqliyya-I-Sirr) and remembrance of God's attributes (Dhikr), and completion of journey by purification of the last two faculties, Khafi and Akhfa.

The person gets acquainted with the lataif one by one by Muraqaba (Sufi meditation), Dhikr (Remembrance of God) and purification of one's psyche of negative thoughts, emotions, and actions. Loving God and one's fellow, irrespective of his or her race, religion or nationality, and without consideration for any possible reward, is the key to ascension according to Sufis.
Wikipedia search result
Six chakras. Purification of the ego by meditation and Naam jap (dhikr: reciting name of Allah). Islam indeed. Sufism is definitely a form of Islamicized Vaishnavism, and not an independant form of Islamic mysticism. How can it be said Guruji borrowed from Islam and Vaishnavism equally? What Islamic teachings appear in Shri Guru Granth Sahib? That which appears is Vaishnav-influenced. And the central theme of Vaishnava bhakti? Mukti through devotional practice of Naam jap.

Both of Sheikh Chand's books were written in the form of questions and answers and contain discussions on identical philosophical thoughts. The dialogue in Hargauri-Sambad is between Shiva and Durga and that in Talibnama between the poet himself and his pir, Shah Doulah. The principal themes of the discussions are faith in the guru, mystery about the Creator, cosmology and yoga. It also has a description of Shiva's imparting secret wisdom to Durga. Here the influence of Nath religion is discernible...

A Sufi's ultimate aim is to attain union with God. The devotee is shown this path by the pir or murshid (spiritual guide or teacher). Guided by the pir, the Sufi tries to free himself from the senses and purify his soul. Through spiritual rites, he frees himself from all worldly attachments and attractions and then surrenders unconditionally to Allah...

The poets expressed their sentiments and feelings in unambiguous language. At times they used metaphors to give indirect vent to their feelings, often using the love of radha and krishna symbolically. Extensive use of this symbolism has led many contemporary critics to describe the poets of this stream as 'Muslim Vaishnava poets', 'pro-Vaishnava Muslim poets' etc.
BANGLAPEDIA: Sufi Literature


Indries Shah combined teaching of Mevlana Sufism with Theosophy and Gurdjieff's writings to a largely western audience. It is more correct to say he was "new age" rather than imparting an authentic Sufi tradition. He has been much criticized in the Islamic world for teaching Sufism without Islam. His western followers are not taken seriously by any authentic Sufi lineage, including Mevlana Order. So while he may have wise things to say as a teacher from Sufi background, his writings will not be authoritative for purposes of tracing historical bhakti Vaishnav or even yogic Shaivite Nath influence in Sufism.


My own opinion is that the Guru's did not adhere to any one school of thinking. Have you noticed that all school's of thought i.e. Hindu based , Islamic and Christian based are criticised in Bani for losing their way.
Really analyzing Gurbani of both Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji and Shri Dasam Granth Sahib Ji you find a unifying theme... Vaishnavism. Guruji criticized Braministic ritualized Hinduism. But His teaching is nearly identical to Vaishnavism. I find that interesting.

Take for example a quick look at Guru ji's message.

1. teaching of reincarnation
2. teaching of heaven and hell and devalokas.
3. teaching of Mahadeva Trimurti in association with creation.
4. criticism and correction of caste system, janeo, pandits, yogis, brahmins and even devas as not being able to find the limits of the nirguna.
5. teaching Dharma Bull of the 4 yugs.
6. teaching that Naam jap is the boat of mukti for the Kaliyug.
7. teaching dhyaan and gyaan.
8. teaching of chakrs and dasm duar, closing the nine bodily gates
9. teaching of jeevanmukti
10. teaching salvation is found in human body and even devas long for it.
11. teaching spiritual lessons from Hindu classic scriptures, i.e. Draupadi's honor.
12. teaching to keep amrit vela with practice of Naam jap.
13. Naam jap is taught using Gurmantra
14. Guru-shishya relationship is taught.
15. Gur-deekhya through charan-pahul which is subsumed into Khande Ki pahul of Dasam Pita ji.
16. merging into God-consciousness Brahm-jnana/gyaan, samaadhi is the ultimate.


Where is there any teaching of Guruji which is completely opposed to Vaishnava Vedanta? Rather, almost every single major teaching can be traced to Vaishnava Upanishads.

Can any be traced to Islam or Christianity?

wall_thumb.jpg

Vaishnav initiation (diksha) with charan pahul. Lotus feet of the guru.



ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਣ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੀਵਾ ॥੧॥
gur kae charan dhhoe dhhoe peevaa ||1||
I wash the Guru's Feet, and drink in this water. ||1||

ਗੁਰ ਕੀ ਰੇਣੁ ਨਿਤ ਮਜਨੁ ਕਰਉ ॥
gur kee raen nith majan karo ||
I take my daily bath in the dust of the Guru's Feet.
~SGGS Ji p. 239


Tilak mark of Vaishnav tradition is taking the dust of the feet of the holy on one's head for auspisciousness of opening third eye agni chakra.

"when in the world the sinful ways will be on the rise and noble behavior will vanish, as the disappearance of the moon when on its wane on the darkest night, there will appear Vishnu as a prominent Prophet from the Keshatra Clan and will manifest in consecutive form through 10 Prophets to bring back the ways of virtue to the ailing world."
~Mandala 7, Ush 5, Mantra 5 and Chapter 6 Rig Veda




ਜਿਨਿ ਜਿਨਿ ਨਾਮ ਤਿਹਾਰੋ ਧਿਆਇਆ ॥ ਦੂਖ ਪਾਪ ਤਿਨ ਨਿਕਟ ਨ ਆਇਆ ॥
जिनि जिनि नाम तिहारो धिआइआ ॥ दूख पाप तिन निकट न आइआ ॥
Those who mediated on the Name of the Lord, none of the sorrows and sins came near them.

ਜੇ ਜੇ ਅਉਰ ਧਿਆਨ ਕੋ ਧਰਹੀਂ ॥ ਬਹਿਸ ਬਹਿਸ ਬਾਦਨ ਤੇ ਮਰਹੀਂ ॥੪੧॥
जे जे अउर धिआन को धरहीं ॥ बहिस बहिस बादन ते मरहीं ॥४१॥
Those who meditated on any other Entity, they ended themselves in futile discussions and quarrels.

ਹਮ ਇਹ ਕਾਜ ਜਗਤ ਮੋ ਆਏ ॥ ਧਰਮ ਹੇਤ ਗੁਰਦੇਵਿ ਪਠਾਏ ॥
हम इह काज जगत मो आए ॥ धरम हेत गुरदेवि पठाए ॥
I have been sent into this world by the Preceptor-Lord to propagate Dharma (righteousness).

ਜਹਾਂ ਤਹਾਂ ਤੁਮ ਧਰਮ ਬਿਥਾਰੋ ॥ ਦੁਸਟ ਦੋਖੀਅਨਿ ਪਕਰਿ ਪਛਾਰੋ ॥੪੨॥
जहां तहां तुम धरम बिथारो ॥ दुसट दोखीअनि पकरि पछारो ॥४२॥
The Lord asked me to spread Dharma, and vanquish the tyrants and evil-minded persons.

ਯਾਹੀ ਕਾਜ ਧਰਾ ਹਮ ਜਨਮੰ ॥ ਸਮਝ ਲੇਹੁ ਸਾਧੂ ਸਭ ਮਨਮੰ ॥
याही काज धरा हम जनमं ॥ समझ लेहु साधू सभ मनमं ॥
I have taken birth of this purpose, the saints should comprehend this in their minds.

ਧਰਮ ਚਲਾਵਨ ਸੰਤ ਉਬਾਰਨ ॥ ਦੁਸਟ ਸਭਨ ਕੋ ਮੂਲ ਉਪਾਰਨ ॥੪੩॥
धरम चलावन संत उबारन ॥ दुसट सभन को मूल उपारन ॥४३॥
(I have been born) to spread Dharma, and protect saints, and root out tyrants and evil-minded persons.

ਜੇ ਜੇ ਭਏ ਪਹਿਲ ਅਵਤਾਰਾ ॥ ਆਪੁ ਆਪੁ ਤਿਨ ਜਾਪੁ ਉਚਾਰਾ ॥
जे जे भए पहिल अवतारा ॥ आपु आपु तिन जापु उचारा ॥
All the earlier incarnations caused only their names to be remembered.

ਪ੍ਰਭ ਦੋਖੀ ਕੋਈ ਨ ਬਿਦਾਰਾ ॥ ਧਰਮ ਕਰਨ ਕੋ ਰਾਹੁ ਨ ਡਾਰਾ ॥੪੪॥
प्रभ दोखी कोई न बिदारा ॥ धरम करन को राहु न डारा ॥४४॥
They did not strike the tyrants and did not make them follow th path of Dharma.
~Sri Dasam Granth Sahib p. 138


The Guru's background as Kshatriya's would have possibly "Shivite" in nature...again I maybe mistaken.
You are correct. Some Shavaite Nath Yogi influence does exist within Sikhism, particularly Shri Chand Yogi and the Udasi Panth is a Shaivite Order. Nihangs have traditions such as sukha/bhang similar to Shaivite chillum. The wearing of jura and keeping uncut hair is traced to Shaivite yogic Nath sampradya. Sufi's also have blending of Vaishnav and Nath influences as well. Again, if it was just one, or even a few similarities between Vaishnava and Nath traditions and Sikh religion, it could be downplayed somewhat. But I find it unbelievable there is this parallel which is nearly exact on every major point of teaching (including yogic kechari mudra and amrit nectar trickling down after raising kundalini shakti) together with complete denial of any association whatsoever by almost every major Sikh authority. It's not the relationship that I find troubling, but the blanket denials which seem impossible to support.



ਮੁਦ੍ਰਾ ਮਦਕ ਸਹਜ ਧੁਨਿ ਲਾਗੀ ਸੁਖਮਨ ਪੋਚਨਹਾਰੀ ਰੇ ॥੨॥
mudhraa madhak sehaj dhhun laagee sukhaman pochanehaaree rae ||2||
My mudra - my hand-gesture, is the pipe; tuning into the celestial sound current within, the Shushmanaa - the central spinal channel, is my cooling pad. ||2||

ਤੀਰਥ ਬਰਤ ਨੇਮ ਸੁਚਿ ਸੰਜਮ ਰਵਿ ਸਸਿ ਗਹਨੈ ਦੇਉ ਰੇ ॥
theerathh barath naem such sanjam rav sas gehanai dhaeo rae ||
Pilgrimages, fasting, vows, purifications, self-discipline, austerities and breath control through the sun and moon channels - all these I pledge.

ਸੁਰਤਿ ਪਿਆਲ ਸੁਧਾ ਰਸੁ ਅੰਮ੍ਰਿਤੁ ਏਹੁ ਮਹਾ ਰਸੁ ਪੇਉ ਰੇ ॥੩॥
surath piaal sudhhaa ras anmrith eaehu mehaa ras paeo rae ||3||
My focused consciousness is the cup, and the Ambrosial Nectar is the pure juice. I drink in the supreme, sublime essence of this juice. ||3||

ਨਿਝਰ ਧਾਰ ਚੁਐ ਅਤਿ ਨਿਰਮਲ ਇਹ ਰਸ ਮਨੂਆ ਰਾਤੋ ਰੇ ॥
nijhar dhhaar chuai ath niramal eih ras manooaa raatho rae ||
The pure stream constantly trickles forth, and my mind is intoxicated by this sublime essence.
~SGGS Ji p. 969


344446601_1b7661b1d7.jpg
shivabeardzz6.jpg

Shiv saroop of Nihang Singh. The farla represents Ganges river flowing out. See Shiva icon.

2581338311_c7e64aa201.jpg

Shaivite babas packing chillum pipe with hashish, traditional Shivaite practice. Sikhism forbids smoking, yet Nihang Jatha retains tradition of Sukha/bhang protein drink.



ਸੁਰਗ ਪਇਆਲ ਮਿਰਤ ਭੂਅ ਮੰਡਲ ਸਰਬ ਸਮਾਨੋ ਏਕੈ ਓਹੀ ॥
surag paeiaal mirath bhooa manddal sarab samaano eaekai ouhee ||
In the heavenly paradise, in the nether regions of the underworld, on the planet earth and throughout the galaxies, the One Lord is pervading everywhere.

ਸਿਵ ਸਿਵ ਕਰਤ ਸਗਲ ਕਰ ਜੋਰਹਿ ਸਰਬ ਮਇਆ ਠਾਕੁਰ ਤੇਰੀ ਦੋਹੀ ॥੧॥
siv siv karath sagal kar jorehi sarab maeiaa thaakur thaeree dhohee ||1||
Everyone calls upon You with their palms pressed together, saying, ""Shiva, Shiva"". O Merciful Lord and Master, everyone cries out for Your Help. ||1||

ਪਤਿਤ ਪਾਵਨ ਠਾਕੁਰ ਨਾਮੁ ਤੁਮਰਾ ਸੁਖਦਾਈ ਨਿਰਮਲ ਸੀਤਲੋਹੀ ॥
pathith paavan thaakur naam thumaraa sukhadhaaee niramal seethalohee ||
Your Name, O Lord and Master, is the Purifier of sinners, the Giver of peace, immaculate, cooling and soothing.

ਗਿਆਨ ਧਿਆਨ ਨਾਨਕ ਵਡਿਆਈ ਸੰਤ ਤੇਰੇ ਸਿਉ ਗਾਲ ਗਲੋਹੀ ॥੨॥੮॥੧੨੯॥
giaan dhhiaan naanak vaddiaaee santh thaerae sio gaal galohee ||2||8||129||
O Nanak, spiritual wisdom, meditation and glorious greatness come from dialogue and discourse with Your Saints. ||2||8||129||
~SGGS Ji p. 207


~Bhul chak maaf karni ji
 
Feb 14, 2006
512
31
On the question of Guru Nanak and Buddhism: I have been pondering this point for weeks now. There is a key similarity that surfaces in relation to each branch of Buddhism that I have looked into. Again, not sure, but the answer may lie in this idea. In Gurbani and in Buddhism, samadhi is not the end of the road for spiritual development while still alive on the plane of earth. There is something after samadhi that has an active moral and ethical component that appears missing in the later Vedantic traditions.

Buddhism seems to say that samadhi is not where one stops, savoring the bliss of one's personal encounter with God. In fact there are Buddhist scholars who are even suspicious of samadhi as a goal. They see it as a path to something else. And the question is asked vigorously -- And, after samadhi?
Buddhism has fundamental differences in that they do not believe in an atman, an individual soul. They do not believe in a Paramatman, a Lord God in any Dvaitic or monotheistic sense. They do parallel Advaitic teachings about nirguna however.


Buddha taught that there is no permanent self in the conventional sense (anatta), what most people call self is a delusion or wrong view, not seeing things as they really are, (principally; lacking experiential insight of the five aggregates of clinging).

Buddhism teaches that all things are impermanent, in a constant state of flux; all is transient, and no abiding state exists by itself. This applies to humanity, as much as to anything else in the cosmos; thus, there is no unchanging and abiding self. Our sense of "I" or "me" is simply a sense, belonging to the ever-changing entity, that (conventionally speaking) is us, our body, and mind. This expresses in essence the Buddhist principle of anatta (Pāli; Sanskrit: anātman).
Anatta = Anatman. No atman.

Nanak means Na Anak. Not but one. Or One God only which is the same as exclaimed by Ek Onkar. Prophecies of Guru Nanak

To the Buddhist, there is no God in the personal sense. No sarguna. So I don't think Buddhist philosophy is reflected in Gurbani. Buddhists wouldn't make the association. Buddhists do however honor and revere Guru Nanak as a reincarnation of the bodhisatva Guru Bodhidharma, the founder of martial arts. Interestingly, Bodhidharma/Padmasambhava the monk is often shown with uncut hair and beard.

Bodhidharma.jpg
guru_rinpoche.jpg



In Bhutan and Tibet he is better known as Guru Rinpoche ("Precious Master") or Lopon Rinpoche,[1] where followers of the Nyingma school regard him as the second Buddha. He said: "My father is the intrinsic awareness, Samantabhadra. My mother is the ultimate sphere of reality, Samantrabhadri. I belong to the caste of non-duality of the sphere and awareness. My name is the Glorious Lotus Born. I am from the unborn sphere of all phenomena. I consume concepts of duality as my diet. I act in the way of the Buddhas of the three times."
So the incarnation the Buddhists believe associated with Guru Nanak Dev Ji was a Master martial artist, a master tantric yogi, and the person who converted the demonic heruka deities into dharma protectors, and the second incarnation of Lord Buddha, interestingly a Vishnu avataar.



ਗੁਰੁ ਜੋਗੀ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਮਿਲਿਆ ਰੰਗੁ ਮਾਣੀ ਜੀਉ ॥
gur jogee purakh miliaa rang maanee jeeo ||
I have met the Guru, the Yogi, the Primal Being; I am delighted with His Love.

ਗੁਰੁ ਹਰਿ ਰੰਗਿ ਰਤੜਾ ਸਦਾ ਨਿਰਬਾਣੀ ਜੀਉ ॥
gur har rang ratharraa sadhaa nirabaanee jeeo ||
The Guru is imbued with the Love of the Lord; He dwells forever in Nirvaanaa.
~SGGS Ji p. 173



In Gurbani and in Buddhism, samadhi is not the end of the road for spiritual development while still alive on the plane of earth. There is something after samadhi that has an active moral and ethical component that appears missing in the later Vedantic traditions.

Buddhism seems to say that samadhi is not where one stops, savoring the bliss of one's personal encounter with God. In fact there are Buddhist scholars who are even suspicious of samadhi as a goal. They see it as a path to something else.
There are different levels of samaadhi. And Vedanta has them all recorded. Buddhism borrows from Vedanta, as it preceeded it, and Siddhartha Buddha was born and raised Hindu. Buddhists have no path to God in any conventional sense because they don't believe in a personal being which could be called "God." They believe in Shunyata, essential emptiness, which Gelugspa tradition of the Dalai Lama teaches is also the calm-abiding of the Clear Light of mind.

"The lama prepares the dying person by reading from the Book of the Dead, that "swifter than lightning, the luminous splendor of the colorless light of emptiness... will surround you on all sides... If one is concentrated on shunyata (emptiness), then the Clear Light can be entered."​


Samadhi (samādhi समाधि, pronounced [sɑmadʰi]) is a Sanskrit term for the state of consciousness induced by complete meditation. Its etymology comes from sam (together or integrated), a (towards), and dha (to get, to hold). Thus the result might be seen to be to acquire integration or wholeness, or truth (samapatti)...

Samadhi is the main subject of the first part of the Yoga Sutras called Samadhi-pada. According to Vyasa, a major figure in Hinduism and one of the traditional authors of the Mahabharata, "yoga is samadhi." This is generally interpreted to mean that Samadhi is a state of complete control (samadhana) over the functions and distractions of consciousness.

Samadhi is described in different ways within Hinduism such as the state of being aware of one’s Existence without thinking, in a state of undifferentiated “Beingness" or as an altered state of consciousness that is characterized by bliss (ananda) and joy (sukha).

Furthermore samadhi has been categorised as:

Laya Samadhi
Savikalpa Samadhi
Nirvikalpa Samadhi
Sahaja Samadhi
Laya Samadhi is a latent ("laya"), potential level of samadhi. It begins in deep meditation or trance—even with movement, such as dancing. This kind of samadhi is a state of joy, deep and general well-being, and peaceful meditation.

Savikalpa Samadhi refers to the initial temporary state of full-valued samadhi. The conscious mind is still active, as is the kalpa, meaning imagination. One should compare this meaning to that of sankalpa, which is "wish." Kalpa takes on a different, but related, meaning to sankalpa because one must use imagination or consciousness (kalpa) to envision a wish or desire (sankalpa). Conversely, vikalpa means "against imagination." At this final level of samadhi, the mind has become quiet and given up its desires and attendant. Vikalpa leads to the Truth, releasing one from any binds of mind (which are mostly imaginations). In Savikalpa Samadhi, we get the taste of Bliss and Beingness, but are still attached to our erroneous identification with the body as well as to our numerous worldly attractions.

Nirvikalpa Samadhi is the end result. There are no more kalpas (imaginings, wishes or other products from work of the mind), because the mind is finally under control. Upon entering Nirvikalpa Samadhi, the differences we saw before have faded and we can see everything as one. In this condition nothing but pure Awareness remains and nothing is missing to take away from Wholeness and Perfection.

Entering samadhi in the beginning takes effort and holding on to a state of samadhi takes even more effort. The beginning stages of samadhi (Laya and Savikalpa Samadhi) are only temporary. By "effort" it is not meant that the mind has to work more. Instead, it means work to control the mind and release the self. Note that normal levels of meditation (mostly the lower levels) can be held automatically, as in "being in the state of meditation" rather than overtly "meditating." The ability to obtain positive results from meditation is much more difficult than simply meditating. It is recommended to find a qualified spiritual master (guru or yogi) who can teach a meditator about the workings of the mind.

Samadhi is the only stable unchanging reality; all else is ever-changing and does not bring everlasting peace or happiness.

Staying in Nirvikalpa Samadhi is effortless but even from this condition one must eventually return to ego-consciousness. Otherwise, this highest level of Samadhi leads to Nirvana, which means total Unity and the logical end of individual identity (and also death of the body). However, it is entirely possible to stay in Nirvikalpa Samadhi and yet be fully functional in this world. This condition is known as Sahaja Nirvikalpa Samadhi or Sahaja Samadhi. Only the truly Enlightened can be and remain spontaneously free...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam%C4%81dhi


ਜੋ ਕਿਛੁ ਕਰੈ ਭਲਾ ਕਰਿ ਮਾਨਉ ਸਹਜ ਜੋਗ ਨਿਧਿ ਪਾਵਉ ॥੧॥
jo kishh karai bhalaa kar maano sehaj jog nidhh paavo ||1||
Whatever the Lord does, look upon that as good; thus you shall obtain the treasure of Sehj Yoga. ||1||
~SGGS Ji p. 359​


~Bhul chak maaf
 

spnadmin

1947-2014 (Archived)
SPNer
Jun 17, 2004
14,500
19,219
Four Noble Truths

  1. This world is suffering.
  2. The cause of suffering is desire.
  3. The cessation of suffering is the cessation of desire.
  4. The cessation of desire is achieved through practicing the Noble Eight-fold Path, which includes right speech, right action, right livelihood, etc. (Path of True Living).

This is where where there may be a moral and ethical connection with Sikhism ;)
 
Feb 14, 2006
512
31
I believe there is a moral and ethical connection with all true spiritual systems of any religion, because Truth is One. So you are right on that note.
 

pk70

Writer
SPNer
Feb 25, 2008
1,582
627
USA
Four Noble Truths

  1. This world is suffering.
  2. The cause of suffering is desire.
  3. The cessation of suffering is the cessation of desire.
  4. The cessation of desire is achieved through practicing the Noble Eight-fold Path, which includes right speech, right action, right livelihood, etc. (Path of True Living).

This is where where there may be a moral and ethical connection with Sikhism ;)

It comes down to pleasing. 1. Pleasing to ourselves, pleasing others to please ourselves 2. Only pleasing HIM. First one is in practice in high gear, the later needs to be experimented by the seekers. Pleasing HIM only can negate all which become barrier between HIM and us, pleasing Him only will enable us to understand His Ordinance. Pleasing Him only also keeps soul in Harmony to His Laws. Tell me aad0002 ji, if I stated otherwise in context of your comments because I feel it is an extension to them.
 

spnadmin

1947-2014 (Archived)
SPNer
Jun 17, 2004
14,500
19,219
pk70 ji

Yes an extension if I understand you correctly. The question that follows for a Sikh is "What Pleases Him." The answer comes from Guru Nanak, walk on the path of truthful living: Nam Japna, Kirt Karna, Vand Chhakna. I am not saying that these duties are not valued in other religions, but rather Guruji says this explicitly, clearly, and exactly. In fact these take us to the highest spiritual development. And there is a very similar notion in Buddhism. Buddhists will argue that arrogance and pride can slip into spiritual practice and that samadhi is not a protection against this. Tibetan Buddhists use the term "spiritual materialism." We may use our spiritual practice to feed our egos. Truthful living is the ethical response to spiritual materialism: truthful living embraces the idea of gratitude which is love in action, an antidote to pride.

Just a thought since the question of Buddhism was raised. I won't say more because I am not really an expert but have had a passing interest in these issues.:)
 

pk70

Writer
SPNer
Feb 25, 2008
1,582
627
USA
Respected Harjas ji, please make a note of it that I am in smiles while responding to your post, of course totally in disgreement.:)
( Quote Harjas Kaur ji Khalsa)…. analyzing Gurbani of both Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji and Shri Dasam Granth Sahib Ji you find a unifying theme... Vaishnavism. Guruji criticized Braministic ritualized Hinduism
Dasam Granth has been in controversy since its inception so it is not advisable to question Sikhism’s originality by taking its references, we better stick to the original, Shree Guru Granth Sahib Ji
. But His teaching is nearly identical to Vaishnavism. I find that interesting.
Take for example a quick look at Guru ji's message.

1. teaching of reincarnation
2. teaching of heaven and hell and devalokas.
This is in question, as unlike other faiths, there is no description of Hell or Heaven in Gurbani save for consequences of not doing His Simran, so these are reduced to references only. Here is reaction about them.
ਜਬ ਲਗੁ ਮਨਿ ਬੈਕੁੰਠ ਕੀ ਆਸ
जब लगु मनि बैकुंठ की आस ॥
Jab lag man baikunṯẖ kī ās.
As long as there is desire for paradise in man's mind,
ਤਬ ਲਗੁ ਹੋਇ ਨਹੀ ਚਰਨ ਨਿਵਾਸੁ
तब लगु होइ नही चरन निवासु ॥३॥
Ŧab lag ho*ė nahī cẖaran nivās. ||3||
so long he abides not at the Lord's feet.
ਕਹੁ ਕਬੀਰ ਇਹ ਕਹੀਐ ਕਾਹਿ
कहु कबीर इह कहीऐ काहि ॥
Kaho Kabīr ih kahī*ai kāhi.
Says Kabir, to whom should I tell this,
ਸਾਧਸੰਗਤਿ ਬੈਕੁੰਠੈ ਆਹਿ ੧੦
साधसंगति बैकुंठै आहि ॥४॥१०॥
Sāḏẖsangaṯ baikunṯẖė āhi. ||4||10||
that in the society of saints is the Heaven

3. teaching of Mahadeva Trimurti in association with creation.
It was modified as only HIS act only[/FONT]ਏਕੋ ਸਾਹਿਬੁ ਏਕੁ ਵਜੀਰੁ
[/FONT]एको साहिबु एकु वजीरु ॥५॥
[/FONT]Ėko sāhib ėk vajīr. ||5||
[/FONT]The Lord Himself is the sole sovereign and the sole Minister.[/FONT]
[/FONT]ਸੁਆਮੀ ਖੁਦ ਹੀ ਕੱਲਮਕੱਲਾ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹ ਅਤੇ ਕੱਲਮਕੱਲਾ ਮੰਤਰੀ ਹੈ [/FONT]
4. criticism and correction of caste system, janeo, pandits, yogis, brahmins and even devas as not being able to find the limits of the nirguna.
As they came by, Guru ji reacted about them since he found them as big hindrance on the path of real spirituality.
5. teaching Dharma Bull of the 4 yugs.
Dharma Bull is questioned by stating Dharm and pity with passion are actually holding earth not that BULL.
6. teaching that Naam jap is the boat of mukti for the Kaliyug.
Mukti is questioned by Fifth Sroop specially in “Mukt n chaoo..”, that was quoted earlier. Kalyug turns better when His Name is sung( M-1, M-3, M-5).
7. teaching dhyaan and gyaan.
No spiritual experience is possible without these two, so it is not taken out of influence. You need flour to make bread.
8. teaching of chakrs and dasm duar, closing the nine bodily gates
That is sheer your own view, all these words are used as a state of mind as it is elevated to that level by NAME
9. teaching of jeevanmukti
I already said, jeevanmukti is not required even, it is hinted to be achieved while living.
10. teaching salvation is found in human body and even devas long for it.
To stress that even so called Devtas, couldn’t know HIM, alone this negates all concept of Devtas importance Bhagat Kabir ji questions concept of Muslims His being up there by saying how can their HE can listen to him. Even today, we ourselves quote all others just to insert our views,
11. teaching spiritual lessons from Hindu classic scriptures, i.e. Draupadi's honor.
Because before Guru ji only these stories were taught to exploit commoners. Their limitations and lessons were equally addressed
12. teaching to keep amrit vela with practice of Naam jap.
With “amritVela”, “athe pehr=all the time” is also stressed, five times of Nivaaj was also questioned to say why not to remember HIM all the time.
13. Naam jap is taught using Gurmantra
In Guru Granth Sahib, Jap is addressed as “ simran of all Gurbani,( Guru Guru Jap), remembering HIM with all Names as HE is praised with that Name. His Nam also as WAHEGURU is called mantra by Bhai Gurdaas ji, it is not limited only to mool mantra only
14. Guru-shishya relationship is taught.
That is initial need to proceed on a path, in other paths father, Kazi are considered Guru to show path, similarities are there because Guru ji believes people go stray quickly, to save that fall, Guru is vital. what does it prove otherwise?
15. Gur-deekhya through charan-pahul which is subsumed into Khande Ki pahul of Dasam Pita ji.
I answered it as I explained the message conveyed through metaphors read below.
16. merging into God-consciousness Brahm-jnana/gyaan, samaadhi is the ultimate.
There is a path introduced but still His grace is stressed unlike others.
Where is there any teaching of Guruji which is completely opposed to Vaishnava Vedanta? Rather, almost every single major teaching can be traced to Vaishnava Upanishads.
I have answered it in the end of this post, please read it slowly so that repetition is avoided.
Harjas Bhain ji lets discuss only following to see if all views are built up on distortion of Guru Message or it has any bearing.
ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਣ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੀਵਾ
gur kae charan dhhoe dhhoe peevaa ||1||
I wash the Guru's Feet, and drink in this water. ||1||
Charan= feet, dhoe= wash, washing, peevan= drink
Translator is translating simply words, he has no concern that “ Charan dho ke peene” is an idiom in Punjabi which implies enormous respect in humbleness, using this Gurvaak as proof of that sect’s practice is not justice to the Guru Vaak; fanatic Hindus tried to eliminate originality of Guru Nanak by doing so.
ਗੁਰ ਕੀ ਰੇਣੁ ਨਿਤ ਮਜਨੁ ਕਰਉ
gur kee raen nith majan karo ||
I take my daily bath in the dust of the Guru's Feet.

Ren= dust, manjan= bath, kro= do , nit= every day
Again taking bath in dust of Guru’s feet is an idiom conveying elimination of ego and follow Guru in humbleness. Both Guru Vaak you have quoted says nothing about “feet initiations you have used them. Personally I feel, due to respect, it is really not right to use Gurbani like this.
~SGGS Ji p. 239

when in the world the sinful ways will be on the rise and noble behavior will vanish, as the disappearance of the moon when on its wane on the darkest night, there will appear Vishnu as a prominent Prophet from the Keshatra Clan and will manifest in consecutive form through 10 Prophets to bring back the ways of virtue to the ailing world."
~Mandala 7, Ush 5, Mantra 5 and Chapter 6 Rig Veda

That is not prediction, it was a simple statement to advocate Krishna being the incarnation of God which we Sikhs refuse to accept as we say HE infests but do not take birth. If that is propagated in context of Ten Masters, what happened today, where are another series of Ten Masters because times now are worse than the time of Guru Nanak and his nine Sroop?
Nanak means Na Anak. Not but one. Or One God only which is the same as exclaimed by Ek Onkar. Prophecies of Guru Nanak
It is another effort of infusing illusion as a reality into Sikhs’ minds. I say this because the one who named him, Sree Mehta Kalu ji, father of Guru ji, didn’t appreciate what Guru ji had been doing , instead, his best happiness remained in Guru ji’s other son who followed Grand Pa( Maya Moh) instead of his own father Guru Nanak. You have recalled me your own good expression of splitting hair. How would he understand his son would be as per his name when he named him Nanak? Well if he [/FONT] named him with so powerful name, why he never got inkling of Divine Jot Guru had as Sister Bebe Nanaki acknowledged.
To the Buddhist, there is no God in the personal sense. No sarguna. So I don't think Buddhist philosophy is reflected in Gurbani. Buddhists wouldn't make the association. Buddhists do however honor and revere Guru Nanak as a reincarnation of the bodhisatva Guru Bodhidharma, the founder of martial arts. Interestingly, Bodhidharma/Padmasambhava the monk is often shown with uncut hair and beard.

From above statement it is clear people of different faiths are just dreaming to call Guru Nanak incarnation of different Avtaras. Surprisingly in Japji, Guru ji counts Bhuda among other numerous like Ram or Krishna proving there is one you see but there many like them you don’t even( Kete Budh.. Japji) see or know. You go to Guru Nanak and talk about your avtar, his answer is the same, HE created numerous like that. Guru ji never predicts about HIS future plans. Who got so high status in religious circles, Guru reacts to them as a play of His infinity. Guessing He was avtar of this and that is not what Gurbani says, as Guru ji was complimented and honored with that high status only; unfortunately some stuck with that advocating it as a perfect reality. One needs to go into depth of all these. Poetic form of Gurbani shouldn’t be interpreted as a statement but as a way of saying something to give priority to the idea Guru ji advocated through out Guru Granth Sahib Ji. One cannot accept one thing and then say all other was corrupt so Guru ji corrected them. I do not see any prevailed words used by sects, cults, groups Guru ji didn’t address and didnt imply truthful new meaning as acceptable to the CREATOR. I applaud your study of all these various sects or faiths but you’re sticking to referred words used as conveying truthful meaning, convinces me that you do not try to see what is authentic. Guru declares and says every thing he says is revealed by his GURU Akaal, how as a Sikh any one can play intellectual game by saying he has said nothing new or he is influenced by those so called Veda- wisdom or Vaishanava.
To your question about dependency of Guru Nanak on the sources you have been advocating and negating Guru’s claims that Gurbani was revealed to him and He Himself enlightened him and assigned a job to bring people to HIM by getting out of duality, my answer is that not once Guru ji ever says about that such and such sources are good to walk on his path but just refers them to insert his own views.
ਗੁਰੁ ਜੋਗੀ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਮਿਲਿਆ ਰੰਗੁ ਮਾਣੀ ਜੀਉ
gur jogee purakh miliaa rang maanee jeeo ||
I have met the Guru, the Yogi, the Primal Being; I am delighted with His Love.
ਗੁਰੁ ਹਰਿ ਰੰਗਿ ਰਤੜਾ ਸਦਾ ਨਿਰਬਾਣੀ ਜੀਉ
gur har rang ratharraa sadhaa nirabaanee jeeo ||
The Guru is imbued with the Love of the Lord; He dwells forever in Nirvaanaa.
~SGGS Ji p. 173

Again in this Guru vaak clears how Guru remains imbued in His love, nothing more, don’t get stuck with word” yogi: as yogi is defined who remains imbued in union with the God, that is the essence of these Guru Vaakas. Following Vaak clears it firther
ਜੋ ਕਿਛੁ ਕਰੈ ਭਲਾ ਕਰਿ ਮਾਨਉ ਸਹਜ ਜੋਗ ਨਿਧਿ ਪਾਵਉ
jo kishh karai bhalaa kar maano sehaj jog nidhh paavo ||1||
Whatever the Lord does, look upon that as good; thus you shall obtain the treasure of Sehj Yoga. ||1||
~SGGS Ji p. 359

It is not about so called SEHAJ Yoga but way of progress in achieving union with the Creator by understanding His hukm( Ordinance), reread the Vaak” Jo Kish krai bhla kar manu” accepting HIS Ordinance as “ better for well being. Deciphering Yoga tradition out if it by ignoring the stress on obeying His Ordinance proves that it cannot change the truth. I humbly urge you, before you use Guru bachan, settle down and try to figure out what in totality Guru ji has been trying to pass on to his followers then only you can do justification to Gurbani.
Here is an admission by known missionary controversial ( biased too)scholar Mcleod’s in context of originality of Guru Nanak in totality of Bhagati.
MCleod who totally depended on Hindu scholars who were significantly biased, whose work cannot be called scholarly due to his pick and choose approach though still couldn’t deny the fact about originality of Guru Nanak.
“ plainly there is much that is profoundly original in hymns we find recorded under his( Guru Nanak ) distinctive symbol in the Adi Granth…”( Sikh Spectrum March08 Ref.),
The reason of this reference is simple, whether you look it or ignore it, Guru Nanak’s totally stress on HUKAM and Grace Of God make him stand all alone from those sects or scriptures which are referred as influencing source of Guru Nanak. As I shared with my sister, talking about a Lotus, stressing on influences of dirt in which it blossoms in is a sheer ignorance. We are looking at thousands years of religious practices Guru Nanak inherited but he refused to inhale in that dust. If you question "what is new he said" is taken in consideration, I shall give you one example of a original chaff who prepares delicious dish, if any one says the sugar and other ingredients are found in his dish, usually used by many, you will never understand where originality lies. So please take a deep breath and see if you are doing justice to Guru by saying you don’t see any thing new. Decision is in your hands, I have expressed my concern with a request.
 
Feb 14, 2006
512
31
This is in question, as unlike other faiths, there is no description of Hell or Heaven in Gurbani save for consequences of not doing His Simran, so these are reduced to references only.
Heaven and hell as concepts do in fact appear several times in Gurbani in contexts related to sinners and reward, and not merely as a consequence of doing Simran or not which wouldn't invalidate them anyway. Although I recognize there is an interpretation which says they are only symbolic, hence, referring only to heaven of doing Naam Simran, and hell of not doing, and not related to some kind of lokas. I assure you, the point under debate had nothing to do with interpretation, but showing the dozen or so points of similarity between Gurbani teaching and Vaishnav doctrine. If Gurbani is repeating the same fundamental doctrine and structure of life, existence, spirituality and mukti as Vaishnavism, it deserves to be looked at.

If you don't agree with the interpretation of narak surag, fine. But don't say it isn't in Gurbani, or is invalidly there because it relates to something which disproves it's validity, because this can be shown not only relating to Naam Simran, but to sinners as well in traditional context. These concepts appear in Gurbani, regardless of anyone's interpretation is parallel with the spiritual philosophy of Vaishnav Upanishads.




ਹਰਿ ਭਗਤਾ ਨੋ ਦੇਇ ਅਨੰਦੁ ਥਿਰੁ ਘਰੀ ਬਹਾਲਿਅਨੁ ॥
har bhagathaa no dhaee anandh thhir gharee behaalian ||
The Lord bestows bliss upon His devotees, and gives them a seat in the eternal home.

ਪਾਪੀਆ ਨੋ ਨ ਦੇਈ ਥਿਰੁ ਰਹਣਿ ਚੁਣਿ ਨਰਕ ਘੋਰਿ ਚਾਲਿਅਨੁ ॥
paapeeaa no n dhaeee thhir rehan chun narak ghor chaalian ||
He does not give the sinners any stability or place of rest; He consigns them to the depths of hell.

ਹਰਿ ਭਗਤਾ ਨੋ ਦੇਇ ਪਿਆਰੁ ਕਰਿ ਅੰਗੁ ਨਿਸਤਾਰਿਅਨੁ ॥੧੯॥
har bhagathaa no dhaee piaar kar ang nisathaarian ||19||
The Lord blesses His devotees with His Love; He sides with them and saves them. ||19||
~SGGS Ji p. 91




ਰਾਹ ਦੋਵੈ ਇਕੁ ਜਾਣੈ ਸੋਈ ਸਿਝਸੀ ॥
raah dhovai eik jaanai soee sijhasee ||
One who recognizes that all spiritual paths lead to the One shall be emancipated.

ਕੁਫਰ ਗੋਅ ਕੁਫਰਾਣੈ ਪਇਆ ਦਝਸੀ ॥
kufar goa kufaraanai paeiaa dhajhasee ||
One who speaks lies shall fall into hell and burn.

ਸਭ ਦੁਨੀਆ ਸੁਬਹਾਨੁ ਸਚਿ ਸਮਾਈਐ ॥
sabh dhuneeaa subehaan sach samaaeeai ||
In all the world, the most blessed and sanctified are those who remain absorbed in Truth.

ਸਿਝੈ ਦਰਿ ਦੀਵਾਨਿ ਆਪੁ ਗਵਾਈਐ ॥੯॥
sijhai dhar dheevaan aap gavaaeeai ||9||
One who eliminates selfishness and conceit is redeemed in the Court of the Lord. ||9||
~SGGS Ji p. 142​




ਬਿਆਪਤ ਹਰਖ ਸੋਗ ਬਿਸਥਾਰ ॥
biaapath harakh sog bisathhaar ||
It torments us with the expression of pleasure and pain.

ਬਿਆਪਤ ਸੁਰਗ ਨਰਕ ਅਵਤਾਰ ॥
biaapath surag narak avathaar ||
It torments us through incarnations in heaven and hell.

ਬਿਆਪਤ ਧਨ ਨਿਰਧਨ ਪੇਖਿ ਸੋਭਾ ॥
biaapath dhhan niradhhan paekh sobhaa ||
It is seen to afflict the rich, the poor and the glorious.

ਮੂਲੁ ਬਿਆਧੀ ਬਿਆਪਸਿ ਲੋਭਾ ॥੧॥
mool biaadhhee biaapas lobhaa ||1||
The source of this illness which torments us is greed. ||1||

ਮਾਇਆ ਬਿਆਪਤ ਬਹੁ ਪਰਕਾਰੀ ॥
maaeiaa biaapath bahu parakaaree ||
Maya torments us in so many ways.

ਸੰਤ ਜੀਵਹਿ ਪ੍ਰਭ ਓਟ ਤੁਮਾਰੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥
santh jeevehi prabh outt thumaaree ||1|| rehaao ||
But the Saints live under Your Protection, God. ||1||Pause||
~SGGS Ji p. 182




To continue this analysis, it proves helpful to show not only the prevailing Hindu or Vaishnava school of thought, but also the thought of related sampradyas such as Kabir-panthis. We know a relationship exists between Kabir ji and Sikhism, so what do Kabir panthis think about concepts of narak surag? Do they even believe in them? And here is the answer:

The ordinary members of the Panth believe that the souls of Panthis after death enter Heaven (Baikanth) or Hell (NaraK) and there remain till they have been sufficiently rewarded or punished for deeds done in the body. They then return to earth, but always apparently clothed in a human body. This succession of lives continues till the soul freed from desire becomes absorbed in God. A member of the Panth quoted to me the following saying attributed to Nanak : "We want neither Baikanth nor Abra^, -but true life(fitir{ zindagrf), and that is obtained when there are no more links with this earth.
digilib.bu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2144/678/kabirandthekabir020544mbp.txt?sequence=1
So we can see in the Kabir panthis a cosmology which is accepting a literal narak surag within a context of reincarnation, just as appears in the Vaishnava Upanishads. So here is in fact, another link, that the blending of Sufism with Vaishnavism did not fundamentally change this context or modernize it in any way. Further there is allusion that Guru Nanak is saying, we don't want either heaven or hell, but mukti. This is entirely possible to be a true quotation because it doesn't violate any Sikh teaching and underscores that Guru Nanak Dev Ji was a supreme spiritual Master directing people to authentic mukti, rather then states below it, such as deva lokas.


The Veda knows not the extent of the Name. All declare, We know not, we know not'. The Pandit reads and gropes in the dark; he knows not the existence of the Adi Brahma. The acquisition of knowledge produces pride and is of no use in the hour of death. Eighteen Puranas have been written and of these the Bhdgawata is the best. It explains the glory of Brahma and establishes the efficacy of devotion. Foots read, but to no purpose; they think not of that which is obtainable through the intellect. Those only OuUiu sv^dora who fall in with the Sat Guru, Of what use is the boat without the boatman ?
digilib.bu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2144/678/kabirandthekabir020544mbp.txt?sequence=1
It's also interesting that Kabir panthis are able to articulate many concepts which are in line with Gurbani, while still retaining respect for the Puranas and elevating the Bhagavata Purana. So teachings which parallel those taught in Gurbani do in fact have association with Vaishnava Puranas, chiefly Bhagavata Purana (Srimad Bhagavatam) which extols the message of Bhagavan Krishna. While the translator here has written "It explains the glory of Brahma.." I believe English writers sometimes confuse terms. Because the Bhagavata Puranas don't extoll the glory of Brahma deva, but of the Supreme Brahman which is concept of the nirguna. The very message of Vaishnava Puranas, is that the sarguna is Bhagavan Krishna and his lineage of avtaaras. So we see in Kabir Panthis this interpretation that no one, no pandit, no deva knows the limits of the Adi Brahman. Yet devotion (bhagti), the Naam (chanting names of God), and following a Satguru (boatman of mukti) are all related to teachings from the Srimad Bhagavatam of how to obtain this devotion. And acknowledging as Shri Guru Granth Sahib that devotion is superior path to God than intellect and ego.

So here is an unmistakable association between what is clearly Vaishnava teaching directly from Vaishnav scriptures, and linking this particular interpretation with concepts found in Gurbani. But the interpretation is different from what the average Sikh is taught post Singh Sabha. The interpretation doesn't simplistically say, "pandits can't know the limits of the Adi Brahman, devas can't know the limits of the Adi Brahman, therefore Guruji was invalidating Hindu religion as a path to mukti." When in fact, the Kabir panthis are pointing out what is obvious, this very teaching comes from the Vaishnava Puranas. So how these concepts be interpreted as a correction of, or invalidation of Vaishnav Vedanta?




ਕੇਤੇ ਕਹਹਿ ਵਖਾਣ ਕਹਿ ਕਹਿ ਜਾਵਣਾ ॥
kaethae kehehi vakhaan kehi kehi jaavanaa ||
Some speak and expound, and while speaking and lecturing, they pass away.

ਵੇਦ ਕਹਹਿ ਵਖਿਆਣ ਅੰਤੁ ਨ ਪਾਵਣਾ ॥
vaedh kehehi vakhiaan anth n paavanaa ||
The Vedas speak and expound on the Lord, but they do not know His limits.

ਪੜਿਐ ਨਾਹੀ ਭੇਦੁ ਬੁਝਿਐ ਪਾਵਣਾ ॥
parriai naahee bhaedh bujhiai paavanaa ||
Not by studying, but through understanding, is the Lord's Mystery revealed.

ਖਟੁ ਦਰਸਨ ਕੈ ਭੇਖਿ ਕਿਸੈ ਸਚਿ ਸਮਾਵਣਾ ॥
khatt dharasan kai bhaekh kisai sach samaavanaa ||
There are six pathways in the Shaastras, but how rare are those who merge in the True Lord through them.

ਸਚਾ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਅਲਖੁ ਸਬਦਿ ਸੁਹਾਵਣਾ ॥
sachaa purakh alakh sabadh suhaavanaa ||
The True Lord is Unknowable; through the Word of His Shabad, we are embellished.

ਮੰਨੇ ਨਾਉ ਬਿਸੰਖ ਦਰਗਹ ਪਾਵਣਾ ॥
mannae naao bisankh dharageh paavanaa ||
One who believes in the Name of the Infinite Lord, attains the Court of the Lord.
~SGGS Ji p. 148



Naraka is the Sanskrit word for the underworld; literally, of man. According to Hinduism and Buddhism, Naraka is a place of torment, or Hell...

Naraka or Neraka in Hinduism, is compared to the Abrahamic concept of Hell. It is mentioned especially in dharmaśāstras, itihāsas and Purāṇas but also in Vedic samhitas[1][2], Aranyakas[3] and Upaniṣads.[4][5][6][7] Some Upanisads speak of 'darkness' instead of hell.[8] A summary of Upaniṣads, Bhagavad Gita, mentions hell several times.[9] Even Adi Sankara mentions it in his commentary on Vedanta sutra 4.3.14. Still, some people like members of Arya Samaj don't accept its existence or consider it metaphorical.

In Puranas like Bhagavata Purana, Garuda Purana and Visnu Purana there are elaborate descriptions of many hells. They are situated above Garbhodaka ocean.[10]

Yama, Lord of Justice, puts human beings after death for appropriate punishment, for example, in boiling oil. Even Mukti-yogyas (souls eligible for mukti or moksha, liberation), and Nitya-samsarins (forever transmigrating ones in Dvaita theology) can experience Naraka for expiation.[11] After the period of punishment is complete, they are reborn on earth[12] in human or animal bodies.[13] Therefore neither naraka nor svarga[14] are permanent abodes.

At the time of death, sinful souls are vulnerable for capture by Yamadutas, servants of Yama (who comes personally only in special cases). Yama ordered his servants to leave Vaishnavas alone.[15][16] The attributes of Vaishnavas are urdhva pundra tilaka (Tiruman and Sri Choornam for Sri Vaishnavas or Gopi Chandan for Gaudiya Vaishnavas), tapa samskara (shoulders branded with Sankha and Chakra), and tulasi mala (necklace/garland of tulasi beads).
Naraka - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So I am showing clearly, despite objections of personal or established interpretation, that the concepts of Narak Surag, Jambhootas, Yama or Dharamraj, are directly taken from Vaishnava Upanishads. The parallels between Guruji's teaching and Vaishnavism are too numerous to ignore.


Dasam Granth has been in controversy since its inception so it is not advisable to question Sikhism’s originality by taking its references, we better stick to the original, Shree Guru Granth Sahib Ji
Dasam Granth is a valid part of the history of the Sikh Panth. Recently Akal Takhat Sahib declared hukamnama that any discussion of Dasam Granth Sahib Ji must be conducted respectfully and not criticizing the bani. This year the Akal Takhat supported a Dasam Granth teaching seminar which came to my area and included dozens of scholars all validating the bani as belonging to Dasam Pita Ji. So simply because you have an opinion which is different, and I can respect that, does not mean any discussion of Dasam Granth bani is meaningless or not validly a part of Sikh history. Regardless of disputes, it is Panthically accepted at this time. And even if it weren't Panthically accepted, it would still be worthy of analysis because these concepts and interpretations do exist within the Panth, and this is clearly a source of them. So any relationship between Vaishnava Vedanta and Shri Dasam Granth bani, particularly when you can parallel side by side almost exact quotes from Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, it is evidentiary proof of some kind of "valid" relationship. An example would be mention of the das avtaara which occurs in both Granths.

Why would it be "inadvisable" to analyze what the bani is saying? From an impartial view, it is further supporting evidence that these are Guruji's views and correct interpretation. You don't have to accept that. You can write a long post about why you don't agree Shri Dasam Granth is Guruji's bani, and I'm sure you will share some good views. But to make wild claim that this bani is invalid simply because YOU don't accept it, when clearly the major Takhats of the Sikh Panth have publically accepted it, weakens your objection. For purposes of analyzing Vaishnavism in Sikh philosophy, it cannot be ignored. To ignore Dasam Granth bani is simply to pad the evidence in favor of a particular viewpoint and is no real anaysis at all. It exists! It has been generally accepted by Panthic authority. Major Jathas and Tahkats accept it. Dasam Granth bani explains certain teachings within sanatani Jathas which have been criticized with no knowledge of the basis of those teachings. What do it's teachings mean in relation to a broader context of reclaiming a heritage of Vaishnavism which has been negated, denied, and deliberately ignored by scholars of the Singh Sabha reform?

This genie will not go back into the bottle.



Teaching of Mahadeva Trimurti in association with creation.
It was modified as only HIS act only

ਏਕੋ ਸਾਹਿਬੁ ਏਕੁ ਵਜੀਰੁ ॥੫॥
एको साहिबु एकु वजीरु ॥५॥
Ėko sāhib ėk vajīr. ||5||
The Lord Himself is the sole sovereign and the sole Minister.



ਬ੍ਰਹਮਾ ਬਿਸਨੁ ਮਹੇਸ ਇਕ ਮੂਰਤਿ ਆਪੇ ਕਰਤਾ ਕਾਰੀ ॥੧੨॥
brehamaa bisan mehaes eik moorath aapae karathaa kaaree ||12||
Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva are manifestations of the One God. He Himself is the Doer of deeds. ||12||
~SGGS Ji p. 908


The worship of Lord Vishnu is very popular among Hindus,
especially among the followers of the Vaishanava tradition (Vaishnavism). He is
the second member of the Hindu Trimurti (trinity). He is also known by other
names , such as Vasudeva, Hari, Kesava, Purusottama and Narayana...

The worshippers of Vishnu, known as Vaishnavas, recognize in him the Supreme Being, out of whom emerge Brahma, the active creator, Vishnu himself the preserver, and Shiva or Rudra, the destructor. Vishnu's preserving, restoring and protecting powers have been manifest on earth in a variety of forms, called Avataras, in which one or more portions of his divine attributes were embodied in the shapes of a human being or an animal or a human-animal combined forms. He is bleu-skinned and in all images and relief he is seen in rich ornaments and regal garments.
Trimurti - (Lord Brahma, Lord Vishnu & Lord Shiva) - Audarya Fellowship

Veer ji, does your objection relate to the issue that mention of Trimurti and three gunas given in Shri Guru Granth is parallel to what is described in Vaishnav Upanishads? Does it really matter how it is interpreted, so much that it even appears? It is not even a point of interpretation I am giving, but a reference to all the concepts which appear in Gurbani which have an origin in Vaishnava Upanishads. Your objection isn't disproving anything at all. In fact, you only prove how close is the teaching of Guruji and Vaishnavism.

Guruji did not even modify Vaishnava philosophy at all, but actually teaches it. The fact that Guruji includes the Trimurti as subordinate sargun manifestations of the Supreme Brahman and three gunas as part of the creation, again, is taken directly from Vaishnava scriptures. No other sampradhya has this teaching. It is Vaishnavism.



We have a reference to the trimurti conception Brahma, Vishnu and Siva in IV. 5, which also indicates the late date of the Upanishad. The three forms are traced to the three gunas, rajas, sattva and tamas in V. 2. ~Maitreyaniya Upanishad



ਬ੍ਰਹਮਾ ਬਿਸਨੁ ਮਹਾਦੇਉ ਤ੍ਰੈ ਗੁਣ ਰੋਗੀ ਵਿਚਿ ਹਉਮੈ ਕਾਰ ਕਮਾਈ ॥
brehamaa bisan mehaadhaeo thrai gun rogee vich houmai kaar kamaaee ||
Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva suffer from the disease of the three gunas - the three qualities; they do their deeds in egotism.

ਜਿਨਿ ਕੀਏ ਤਿਸਹਿ ਨ ਚੇਤਹਿ ਬਪੁੜੇ ਹਰਿ ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਸੋਝੀ ਪਾਈ ॥੨॥
jin keeeae thisehi n chaethehi bapurrae har guramukh sojhee paaee ||2||
The poor fools do not remember the One who created them; this understanding of the Lord is only obtained by those who become Gurmukh. ||2||
~SGGS Ji p. 735



According to Advaitins, by analyzing the three states of experience -- waking, dreaming and deep sleep -- Shankara exposed the relative nature of the world and established the supreme truth of the Advaita: the non-dual reality of Brahman in which atman (the individual soul) and Brahman (the ultimate reality expressed in the trimurti) are identified absolutely. The three states of consciousness, in fact, are subsumed into a fourth transcendental state known in the Upanishads as 'turiya.' The manifold nature of the phenomenal world and their ultimate unity is symbolized by Aum, the most sacred of Hindu mantras.
Advaita - Vedantas - Vedas - Shankara - Sankara - Upanishads - Haryana Online - India



ਪੂਰੈ ਸਤਿਗੁਰਿ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਣਾਇਆ ॥
poorai sathigur sabadh sunaaeiaa ||
The Perfect True Guru has revealed the Shabad;

ਤ੍ਰੈ ਗੁਣ ਮੇਟੇ ਚਉਥੈ ਚਿਤੁ ਲਾਇਆ ॥
thrai gun maettae chouthhai chith laaeiaa ||
it eradicates the three qualities, and attunes the consciousness to the fourth state.

ਨਾਨਕ ਹਉਮੈ ਮਾਰਿ ਬ੍ਰਹਮ ਮਿਲਾਇਆ ॥੮॥੪॥
naanak houmai maar breham milaaeiaa ||8||4||
O Nanak, subduing egotism, one is absorbed into God. ||8||4||
~SGGS Ji p. 231



I do not see any teaching of Gurbani here which objects to or is fundamentally different from classical Vaishnavism. So the common objection that Guruji was correcting errors of Hinduism must be modified to state, Guruji was correcting errors of political Brahmanism and hypocrisy in general, and not Vaishnava Vedanta as a philosophic teaching.



ਨਿਰੰਕਾਰੁ ਆਕਾਰੁ ਹੋਇ ਏਕੰਕਾਰੁ ਅਪਾਰੁ ਸਦਾਇਆ ।
nirankaaru aakaaru hoi aykankaaru apaaru sadaaiaa|
The formless Lord has made His self known in the form of Ekaiikar, the one boundless Being.

ਏਕੰਕਾਰਹੁ ਸਬਦ ਧੁਨਿ ਓਅੰਕਾਰਿ ਅਕਾਰੁ ਬਣਾਇਆ ।
aykankaarahu sabad dhuni aoankaari akaaru banaaiaa|
From Ekanka came up Oankar, the Word vibration which further came to be known as the world, full of names and forms.

ਇਕਦੂ ਹੋਇ ਤਿਨਿ ਦੇਵ ਤਿਹੁ ਮਿਲਿ ਦਸ ਅਵਤਾਰ ਗਣਾਇਆ ।
ikadoo hoi tini dayv tihu mili das avataar ganaaiaa|
From the one Lord came out three gods (Brahma-, Visnu and Mahes'a) who further got themselves counted among the ten incarnations (of the supreme Being).

ਆਦਿ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਆਦੇਸੁ ਹੈ ਓਹੁ ਵੇਖੈ ਓਨ੍ਹਾ ਨਦਰਿ ਨ ਆਇਆ ।
aadi purakhu aadaysu hai aohu vaykhai aonhaa nadari n aaiaa|
I salute this primal Being who sees them all but is Himself invisible.
~SGGS Ji p. 26




If thou beest competent for it, O Bharata, do thou practise that religion duly. Even thus did the highly-blessed Narada explain to my preceptor,--the Island-born Krishna--the eternal and immutable course, called Ekanta, (ending in One) followed by the Whites 1 as also by the yellow-robed Yatis. Vyasa gratified with Dharma's son Yudhishthira, imparted this religion to king Yudhishthira the just who was possessed of great intelligence. Derived from my preceptor I have also communicated it to thee! O best of kings, this religion is for these reasons, exceedingly difficult of practice. Others, hearing it, become as much confounded as thou hast suffered thyself to be. It is Krishna who is the protector of the universe and its beguiler. It is He who is the destroyer and the cause, O monarch."

192:3 What is stated here is this the deities and Rishis are certainly endued with Sattwa. But then that Sattwa is of a great form. Hence, they cannot attain to Emancipation. It is only that Sattwa which is of subtile form that leads to Emancipation. The deities, without being able to attain to Emancipation, remain in a state that is mutable or fraught with change.

192:4 That is, the practices which constitute the religion of the Ekantins are not really different for those laid down in the scriptures adverted to above.

193:1 Who are the Whites referred to in this place? The commentator explains that the word has reference to persons leading the domestic mode of life. Yatis wear robes that are coloured yellow or yellowish red. Households, however, use cloth that is white.
~Mahabharata, Book 12: Santi Parva, Section CCCXLIX
The Mahabharata, Book 12: Santi Parva: Section CCCXLIX



Ekayāna is a Sanskrit word that can mean "one path" or "one vehicle". The word took on special significance as a metaphor for a spriritual journey in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (II.iv.11 and IV.v.12). Notably, in that text the phrase vedānāṃ vāk ekayānam translates approximately to "the one destination of the Vedas is the spirit of the word".
Ekay& - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


"I regard the destination of Ekantins (persons devoted to the One as their end) as superior to that of Brahmans who perfectly study the Vedas, including the Upanishads, according to rule, as well as those who follow the practices of ascetics (yatis)." ~ Commentator on Sandilya's Bhakti sutra, 83 p. 60, from the Mahabharata, Santiparvan, Moksha dharma verses 13, 551.
Original Sanskrit Texts On the Origin and History of the People of India


First let us clarify the Vaishnava doctrine of simultaneous oneness-and-difference in the Godhead. Both the Catholic teaching of the Trinity and the teachings of Gaudiya Vaishnavism affirm that there are real differences between the Persons of the Godhead. Still, “God is One”. In fact the Hebrew word for this mysterious Oneness of God is ECHAD and the Sanskrit Name of Sri Krishna-Baladeva-Vishnu-Paramatma is EKA. Hebrew ECHAD and Sanskrit EKA both mean ONE and are both Names of God. In fact, in ancient times the Vaishnavas were called EKANTINS because they worshiped the ONE GOD (were MONOTHEISTS). Their ONE GOD was called EKA-NATHA, EKA-DEVA and similar names. So despite the fact that this ONE / EKA God was worshiped with countless Names and in countless Forms (NAMA-RUPA) according to His countless loving relations with His devotees, the Supreme Mystery of His Oneness was well-grasped by His devotees. ~Bhaktananda gosvami Is Narad a complete incarnation? - Audarya Fellowship
So even here we see the Vaishnava tradition has always worshipped the (Eka) One God in many forms as part of the spiritual philosophy of Guru Nanak Dev Ji, and no proof that Guruji invalidated Vaishnava Vedanta at any point. A relationship can be inferred to the sect which pre-dated the ancient Vaishnavas who were known as the Ekantins who worshipped only the One Supreme All-pervading (Vishnu) of Bhagavan Krishna, with the very root definition of Ek Onkar.

Only superficial readings and negative inferences by politicized organizations within Sikhism have made these exaggerated claims and recklessly associated the worst excesses of hypocritical Brahminism with Viashnava Vedanta and created a void of misunderstanding and lack of knowledge as to the Vaishnavist origins in Nanakian philosophy.



4. criticism and correction of caste system, janeo, pandits, yogis, brahmins and even devas as not being able to find the limits of the nirguna.
As they came by, Guru ji reacted about them since he found them as big hindrance on the path of real spirituality.
Veer ji, if you do even a superficial study of Vaishnavism, you will see the same identical objections and corrections which they also found to be a "big hindrance on the path of spirituality." And it is clear, as these are far older documents, that Vaishnavism is the origination of the reform teaching found in Gurbani.


The big hearted Raamanuja fought against caste distinctions and gathered under his doctrine, people from all walks of life and caste and religion and occupation and said henceforth they shall be known as one community. Thus he created the Iyengar community, and told them to always work for reform of society. Some of the earlier vaishnava and bhagaavata adherents also merged into the iyengars. Later there was a large immigration of Ramaanandi vaishnavas from north India and another large migration from Gujarat. While they too merged, slight differences arose.

The great Raamanuja specifically included among his followers sc's, tribals, immigrant foreign soldiers, arabs and turks, destitutes women, jains, etc. Raamanuja's efforts are glossed over by modern pseudo-secular writers. Ramanuja and his later disciples running the movement, certainly saw to it that there was no more exclusivism of caste groups inside the community. All the same it appears they made sure that the brightest were selected as iyengars, evangelizers of vaishnavism, without any regard to their former caste or other origins. It is however true, after some centuries this reformist movement became just another caste, not quite sure about its place in the hierarchy.

The immense and lasting influence of Raamanuja is probably not realised by many Indians. Here are some direct and indirect descendants of his thought: ---the entire actual live vaishnava tradition of today, and including offshoots and modifications and the movements heavily influenced like those of Raamananda, Kabir, Ravidas, Nanak, Tulsidas, Vallabhacharya, Nimbaarka, Madhvacharya, Raghavendra, Chaitanya, Ramdas. ...even recent reformers like Phule and isckon and others. One characteristic method used by the gurus was community dinners, where everybody sat together without distinction. This went a long way towards reduction of old discriminations.

www.vedah.net/manasanskriti/Brahmins.html


5. teaching Dharma Bull of the 4 yugs.
Dharma Bull is questioned by stating Dharm and pity with passion are actually holding earth not that BULL.
This is a superficial overview of passages in Gurbani where Singh Sabha scholars have made an effort to distance Gurbani from Vedantic origins. Dharma Bull is not accepted literally, as Guruji refers to it as "mythical." But the teaching of the deteriorating spirituality of the cycle of yugs which the Dharma Bull represents, are cited repeatedly throughout Gurbani. The fact that compassion is holding up the bull, and not a literal bull is no negation whatsoever of this Vedantic teaching, which has always been symbolic. And it is Dharma (righteousness) which the Bull is upholding. To falsely attribute superstition of a real literal Bull holding up the earth to the wisdom teachings of the Bhagavata Puranas is the false view and deliberate distortion by Singh Sabha reformists.


Upon enquiry he came to know that the cow was mother earth who was lamenting her fate after the departure of her beloved Lord Krishna. The bull was Dharma whose three legs, which represent Austerity, Purity, and Compassion, were mutilated because of the conditions in the Kali yuga. Its fourth leg, the only one left, represents Truthfulness. The man hurting the animals represents the spirit of Kali. Moved and outraged at the pitiable plight of Dharma, King Pareekshit healed its condition by reestablishing the four pillars of Dharma... With the establishment of Dharma once again, mother earth was no longer anguished. This episode is a reminder to us that it is in our hands to establish righteousness in our own lives and unless we do so consciously, values in society will deteriorate very quickly.
http://www.chinmaya-sanjose.org/new/2007AprilYagna-BhagavatamCanto1.shtml


6. teaching that Naam jap is the boat of mukti for the Kaliyug.
Mukti is questioned by Fifth Sroop specially in “Mukt n chaoo..”, that was quoted earlier. Kalyug turns better when His Name is sung( M-1, M-3, M-5).
Mukti is questioned? You're trying to say Guruji doesn't believe in mukti? Can you please clarify this objection?



ਕਲ ਮੈ ਮੁਕਤਿ ਨਾਮ ਤੇ ਪਾਵਤ ਗੁਰੁ ਯਹ ਭੇਦੁ ਬਤਾਵੈ ॥
kal mai mukath naam thae paavath gur yeh bhaedh bathaavai ||
In this Dark Age of Kali Yuga, liberation comes from the Naam. The Guru has revealed this secret.
~SGGS ji p. 831



Although Kali-yuga is an ocean of faults, there is still one good quality about this age: Simply by chanting the Hare Krishna maha-mantra, one can become free from material bondage and be promoted to the transcendental kingdom. (Srimad-Bhagavatam 12.3.51)



Whatever result was obtained in Satya-yuga by meditating on Visnu, in Treta-yuga by performing sacrifices, and in Dvapara-yuga by serving the Lord's lotus feet can be obtained in Kali-yuga simply by chanting the Hare Krishna maha-mantra. (Srimad-Bhagavatam 12.3.52)




Those who are actually advanced in knowledge are able to appreciate the essential value of this age of Kali. Such enlightened persons worship Kali-yuga because in this fallen age all perfection of life can easily be achieved by the performance of sankirtana. (Srimad-Bhagavatam 11.5.36)




ਹਰਿ ਕੀਰਤਿ ਕਲਜੁਗਿ ਪਦੁ ਊਤਮੁ ਹਰਿ ਪਾਈਐ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਮਾਝਾ ॥
har keerath kalajug padh ootham har paaeeai sathigur maajhaa ||
In this Dark Age of Kali Yuga, the Kirtan of the Lord's Praise brings the most noble and exalted status; the Lord is found through the True Guru.
~SGGS Ji p. 697




Simply by chanting one holy name of Hari, a sinful man can counteract the reactions to more sins than he is able to commit. (Brhad-visnu Purana)




ਹਰਿ ਹਰਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਜਪਹੁ ਮਨ ਮੇਰੇ ਜਿਤੁ ਸਿਮਰਤ ਸਭਿ ਕਿਲਵਿਖ ਪਾਪ ਲਹਾਤੀ
har har naam japahu man maerae jith simarath sabh kilavikh paap lehaathee ||
Chant the Name of the Lord, Har, Har, O my mind; meditating on it, all sins and misdeeds shall be erased.
~SGGS Ji p. 88




During the first stage of Kali-Yuga, the Indian caste system breaks down and god-worship is forsaken by man. All through the second, third, and fourth stages, man forgets the name of god and no longer offers Yagya (offerings) to the Devas. It is at this point when Lord Vishnu reincarnates as Kalki in the name of the Devas and all of mankind to rid the cosmos of Kali's dark influence. ~From the Kalki Purana
Kali (demon) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia





ਸਤਗੁਰਿ ਮਿਲਿਐ ਤ੍ਰਿਕੁਟੀ ਛੂਟੈ ਚਉਥੈ ਪਦਿ ਮੁਕਤਿ ਦੁਆਰੁ ॥੨॥
sathagur miliai thrikuttee shhoottai chouthhai padh mukath dhuaar ||2||
Meeting the Guru, the bondage of the three qualities is cut away, and in the fourth state, the Door of Liberation is attained. ||2||

ਗੁਰ ਤੇ ਮਾਰਗੁ ਪਾਈਐ ਚੂਕੈ ਮੋਹੁ ਗੁਬਾਰੁ ॥
gur thae maarag paaeeai chookai mohu gubaar ||
Through the Guru, the Path is found, and the darkness of emotional attachment is dispelled.

ਸਬਦਿ ਮਰੈ ਤਾ ਉਧਰੈ ਪਾਏ ਮੋਖ ਦੁਆਰੁ ॥
sabadh marai thaa oudhharai paaeae mokh dhuaar ||
If one dies through the Shabad, then salvation is obtained, and one finds the Door of Liberation.
~SGGS Ji p. 33




Again, these are just voicing of objections to nothing. I made a list of teachings which appear in Gurbani which originate in Vaishnava Upanishads, and nothing more. No attempt was even given to interpret them one way or another. What is the point to say, "This isn't true, or Guruji didn't mean that?" The teachings are there, regardless of interpretation, and they do originate in the Upanishads and Puranas, most notably those referred to as Vaishnavist such as Bhagavata Purana and Mahabharata. So there is a unifying theme in all these teachings.


“All these evils of Kaliyuga will surely disappear at the very chanting [or recitation] of Srimad-Bhagavatam, even as wolves take to flight at the very roar of a lion. Then Bhakti (devotion) and Jnana (knowledge) and Vairagya (detachment) will dance in every heart and in every home.” ~Bhagavata Mahatmya


bhuta-matrendriya-dhiyam
janma sarga udahritah
"The elemental creation of sixteen principles of matter - namely the five gross elements (pancha-bhutas), the five objects of sense perception (tan-matras), the five knowledge acquiring senses (jnanendriyas) and the mind - is known as sarga."


The five gross elements (pancha-bhutas) are earth, water, fire, air and ether; the five objects of sensual perception (tan-matras) are sound, form, taste, smell, and touch; and the five knowledge acquiring senses (jnanendriyas) are the eyes, ears, nose, tongue and skin. Together with the mind, these sixteen principles are created by the first purusha incarnation, Maha-Vishnu. Within these sixteen principles eight other principles exist subtly, making there a total of twenty-four principles of material existence.
VEDA - Vedas and Vedic Knowledge Online - Vedic Encyclopedia, Bhakti-yoga in vedas, Library



ਪਾਂਚ ਪਚੀਸ ਮੋਹ ਮਦ ਮਤਸਰ ਆਡੀ ਪਰਬਲ ਮਾਇਆ ॥
paanch pachees moh madh mathasar aaddee parabal maaeiaa ||
It is defended by the five elements, the twenty-five categories, attachment, pride, jealousy and the awesomely powerful Maya.
~SGGS Ji p. 1161



ਨੈਨ ਸਲੋਨੀ ਸੁੰਦਰ ਨਾਰੀ ॥
nain salonee sundhar naaree ||
I may have a beautiful woman with fascinating eyes;

ਖੋੜ ਸੀਗਾਰ ਕਰੈ ਅਤਿ ਪਿਆਰੀ ॥
khorr seegaar karai ath piaaree ||
she may decorate herself with the sixteen adornments, and make herself appear gorgeous.

ਬਿਨੁ ਜਗਦੀਸ ਭਜੇ ਨਿਤ ਖੁਆਰੀ ॥੩॥
bin jagadhees bhajae nith khuaaree ||3||
But without meditating on the Lord of the Universe, there is only continual suffering. ||3||
~SGGS Ji p. 225




So Shrimad Bhagavatam is talking about 24 elements (tattvas), and Guru ji is talking about 25 elements. Why the difference?

According to the Sāńkhya system of philosophy, there are twenty-five elements. The twenty-four elements already described plus the time factor make twenty-five.
http://vedabase.net/sb/3/26/18/

As can be seen, this entire philosophical system is not new, but describing in Punjabi the pre-existing teachings of Vaishnavism.



sthitir vaikuntha-vijayah
"The true situation (sthanam) is the realm of Vaikuntha."

The entire creation by the Lord is to enable the conditioned souls to satisfy their material desire to lord over the material energy. As such, according to their desires, the Lord creates a suitable situation (sthanam) for them to dwell in. Within the universe, these situations can be divided into fourteen main categories, known technically as bhuvanas, or planetary systems, and 8,400,000 sub-categories, commonly known as species of life. From the topmost sthanam of Brahma-loka (the abode of Lord Brahma) down to the lowest sthanam of Patala-loka, all situations are destructible. In every situation the conditioned living entity is conquered by birth and death. Only by attaining to our eternal constitutional situation in the spiritual realm of Vaikuntha can we conquer the birth and death of this material world. Thus the true sthanam of the living entity is the realm of Vaikuntha. All other temporary situations within this material world cause one to become a victim of material suffering, simply shifting from one situation to the next.
http://www.veda.harekrsna.cz/encyclopedia/tensubjects.htm



ਲਖ ਚਉਰਾਸੀਹ ਜਿਨਿ ਸਿਰੀ ਸਭਸੈ ਦੇਇ ਅਧਾਰੁ ॥
lakh chouraaseeh jin siree sabhasai dhaee adhhaar ||
The One who created the 8.4 million species of beings gives sustenance to all.
~SGGS Ji p. 27




ਨਰਕੁ ਸੁਰਗੁ ਦੁਇ ਭੁੰਚਨਾ ਹੋਇ ਬਹੁਰਿ ਬਹੁਰਿ ਅਵਤਾਰ ॥੨॥
narak surag dhue bhunchanaa hoe bahur bahur avathaar ||2||
You are subject to both heaven and hell, and you are reincarnated over and over again. ||2||

ਸਿਵ ਪੁਰੀ ਬ੍ਰਹਮ ਇੰਦ੍ਰ ਪੁਰੀ ਨਿਹਚਲੁ ਕੋ ਥਾਉ ਨਾਹਿ ॥
siv puree breham eindhr puree nihachal ko thhaao naahi ||
The realm of Shiva, the realms of Brahma and Indra as well - no place anywhere is permanent.
~SGGS Ji p. 214


To stress that even so called Devtas, couldn’t know HIM, alone this negates all concept of Devtas importance Bhagat Kabir ji questions concept of Muslims His being up there by saying how can their HE can listen to him. Even today, we ourselves quote all others just to insert our views...
But veer ji, Vaishnavs don't worship the devas. They worship the One without form, Maha Vishnu, the All-pervading, and also the lineage of Vishnu avtaaras as sarguna. So you are wrong to draw this conclusion without having studied Vaishnav teachings and wrongly attribute brahminism or any other school of philosophy. Hinduism isn't one teaching, and it's incorrect to lump everything together as if it were. Because Guruji subordinated the devas proves His spiritual philosophy was taken from Vaishnava Vedanta, and doesn't prove any disconnection from Hinduism at all.

* Vishnu is accepted as the Supreme God in Vaishnavism, or Vishnu monotheism. Followers of Vishnu believe that he is the Supreme Being and distinguish him from Devas, or demigods, who are celestial beings similar to angels as discussed in Judeo-Christian traditions.

* It is considered that he manifested Himself as a living being in ten avatars. He is also worshiped in the form of these avatars.

It is not clearly known when or how the worship of Vishnu began. In the Vedas, and the information on Hindu beliefs, Vishnu is associated with Indra. However, Shukavak N. Dasa, a Vaishnavite scholar, in reference has commentated that Srivaishnavites would note that:

* The praise of Indra and other devas in the Vedas are not intended for the particular deity, but for the Supreme Being, Vishnu, who is the inner soul of devas and all other beings.
* The various deities addressed in the hymns are simply different forms of this one Supreme Being.
* Vaishnavas cite Rigveda 1.22.20, for the supremacy of Vishnu, "As the blazing sun pervades the entire sky like an eye fixed in the heavens, so the divine seers eternally perceive that supreme abode of Vishnu."
* The foreword of P. Sankaranarayan's translation of Vishnu sahasranama, Bhavan's Book University, cites Rig Veda V.I.15b.3, for the importance of chanting Vishnu's name, "O ye who wish to gain realization of the supreme truth, utter the name of Vishnu at least once in the steadfast faith that it will lead you to such realization."

Nevertheless, it was only later in Hindu history that Vishnu became a member of the Trimurti and hence is one of the most important forms of God in contemporary Hinduism.

* Om Namo Narayana, a mantra
* Om Namo Bhagwate Vaasudevaye - Mantra. Full Mantra: Dwadashaakshar
* Purusha Sukta, a Vedic hymn said to describe Vishnu.
* Vishnu sahasranama, a hymn describing the 1000 names of Vishnu.

Avatars

There are ten primary avatars of Vishnu (dashavatara), apart from other, less significant, incarnations.

They are (in order of avatar)

* Matsya (Fish)
* Kurma (Turtle)
* Varaha (Pig/Boar)
* Narasimha (Lion man / from the torso upwards lion, below, human)
* Vamana (First fully human form as a dwarf sage who has the ability to grow very tall)
* Parashurama (Fierce man / Hunter)
* Rama (Greatest Warrior/ Ideal man)
* Krishna (Mentally advanced man) and sometimes Balarama (Rama with the plough) is mentioned as an avatar, who appeared as the elder brother of Krishna
* Buddha (The all knowing one) who appeared in the 5th century BCE.
* Kalki (Prophesied, yet to take place)


Vishnu is always to be depicted holding the four attributes associated with him, being:

1. A conch shell or Shankhya, named "Panchajanya", held by the upper left hand, which represents creativity. The Panchajanya is the originator of the five elements or Panchabhoota - water, fire, air, earth and sky or space. The sound that evolves from blowing this conch is the primeval sound of creation.
2. The chakra, a sharp-spinning discus-like weapon, named "Sudarshana", held by the upper right hand, which symbolizes the mind. The name Sudarshana is derived from two words - Su, which means good, and Darshan, which means vision. The chakra as a weapon thus indicates the necessity of destroying one's ego and illusory self-existence and developing the vision to identify the eternal truth. The discus has six spokes and symbolizes a lotus with six petals, thus representing the power that controls all six seasons.
3. A mace or Gada, named "Kaumodaki", held by the lower left hand, which represents individual existence. The mace symbolizes the primeval force from which all mental and physical strength is derived.
4. A lotus flower or Padma, held by the lower right hand, which represents liberation or dispersion. The lotus symbolizes the power from which the universe emerges. It represents the concentration of truth or Satya, the originator of the rules of conduct or Dharma, and knowledge or Gyana in a single symbol.

Kathasaritsagara I,1,27 - 46



ਸੰਖ ਚਕ੍ਰ ਗਦਾ ਹੈ ਧਾਰੀ ਮਹਾ ਸਾਰਥੀ ਸਤਸੰਗਾ ॥੧੦॥
sankh chakr gadhaa hai dhhaaree mehaa saarathhee sathasangaa ||10||
He carries the conch, the chakra and the war club; He is the Great Charioteer, who stays with His Saints. ||10||

ਪੀਤ ਪੀਤੰਬਰ ਤ੍ਰਿਭਵਣ ਧਣੀ ॥
peeth peethanbar thribhavan dhhanee ||
The Lord of yellow robes, the Master of the three worlds.

ਜਗੰਨਾਥੁ ਗੋਪਾਲੁ ਮੁਖਿ ਭਣੀ ॥
jagannaathh gopaal mukh bhanee ||
The Lord of the Universe, the Lord of the world; with my mouth, I chant His Name.
~SGGS Ji p. 1082



13. Naam jap is taught using Gurmantra
In Guru Granth Sahib, Jap is addressed as “ simran of all Gurbani,( Guru Guru Jap), remembering HIM with all Names as HE is praised with that Name. His Nam also as WAHEGURU is called mantra by Bhai Gurdaas ji, it is not limited only to mool mantra only
I never made any reference to Moola Mantara, but was referring specifically to Naam jap, as in the practice of Naam abhiyaas, to jap Vaheguru Gurmantara which Bhai Gurdas Ji expressly states is Vishnu, Vasudeyva, Hari Krishan, Gobinda, Rama.

In Hinduism, Hari (Sanskrit: हरि) is another name of Viṣṇu and Kṛṣṇa, and appears as the 650th name in the Vishnu sahasranama of Mahabharata.
Hari - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


when in the world the sinful ways will be on the rise and noble behavior will vanish, as the disappearance of the moon when on its wane on the darkest night, there will appear Vishnu as a prominent Prophet from the Keshatra Clan and will manifest in consecutive form through 10 Prophets to bring back the ways of virtue to the ailing world." ~Mandala 7, Ush 5, Mantra 5 and Chapter 6 Rig Veda
That is not prediction, it was a simple statement to advocate Krishna being the incarnation of God which we Sikhs refuse to accept as we say HE infests but do not take birth. If that is propagated in context of Ten Masters, what happened today, where are another series of Ten Masters because times now are worse than the time of Guru Nanak and his nine Sroop?
Veer ji, it is a prophecy of Guru Nanak Dev Ji of which there are several in Vedic literature, referring to Him as a Vishnu avtaara in 10 forms, and ending in an 11th form which is silent except when you ask a question, Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.


"Eeth eethei Vishnu reinn chakramei threihaa nathathei patham"
"The Prophet in the Kali Yuga will manifest three attributes. As an Avtar propounding Truth, as a Householder establishing family life and at the same time be a Raja Yogi" ~Vedas, Mandala 1 Soothak 5 and in the 7th Mantra www.hinduweb.org/home/sikh/


"Vishnu bee chakrageih treithaa neikthei patham samudhseiaa paaeh serei swahaa"
"Vishnu will appear again, manifesting three main characteristics, Avtarhood, Householder family life and be a Rajah Yogi as well" ~Yujar Veda


"Guru thaa Brahma, Guru raa Vishnu, Guru raa dev maheshra saakhyaar Parbrehem Thasmei NANAK nameh"
"The Guru of the prophets, Brahma, Vishnu and Shiv ji is God almighty himself. This very Creator will manifest itself as a human, in the form of one whose name will be NANAK ~Bhavishya Purana




ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਗੁਬਿੰਦ ਜੀਉ ॥
sathiguroo sathiguroo sathigur gubindh jeeo ||
The True Guru, the True Guru, the True Guru is the Lord of the Universe Himself.

ਬਲਿਹਿ ਛਲਨ ਸਬਲ ਮਲਨ ਭਗ੍ਤਿ ਫਲਨ ਕਾਨ੍ਹ੍ਹ ਕੁਅਰ ਨਿਹਕਲੰਕ ਬਜੀ ਡੰਕ ਚੜ੍ਹੂ ਦਲ ਰਵਿੰਦ ਜੀਉ ॥
balihi shhalan sabal malan bhagio falan kaanh kuar nihakalank bajee ddank charrhoo dhal ravindh jeeo ||
Enticer of Baliraja, who smothers the mighty, and fulfills the devotees; the Prince Krishna, and Kalki; the thunder of His army and the beat of His drum echoes across the Universe.
~SGGS Ji p. 1403



If Gurbani doesn't mention prophecy (bhavekvani) why is Kalki avtaara mentioned in context with the Satguru who is God Himself?

we Sikhs refuse to accept as we say HE infests but do not take birth.
Don't say "we Sikhs" as if you only have a monopoly on correct interpretation, even when part of the recognized Panth accepts Vedanta as part of Sikhism. There have always been points of dispute. Are you suggesting Nihang Jatha is not part of the Panth and are "not Sikhs" because of different interpretations within Sikhism since modern Tat Khalsa reform and the time original janam sakhis were written?



ਤਨ ਤ੍ਰਿਭਵਣ ਮਹਿ ਰਹਿਓ ਸਮਾਈ ॥
than thribhavan mehi rehiou samaaee ||
the body remains embroiled in the three worlds.

ਜਉ ਤ੍ਰਿਭਵਣ ਤਨ ਮਾਹਿ ਸਮਾਵਾ ॥
jo thribhavan than maahi samaavaa ||
But when the Lord of the three worlds enters into the body,

ਤਉ ਤਤਹਿ ਤਤ ਮਿਲਿਆ ਸਚੁ ਪਾਵਾ ॥੨੨॥
tho thathehi thath miliaa sach paavaa ||22||
then one's essence merges with the essence of reality, and the True Lord is attained. ||22||
~SGGS Ji p. 341



ਜਰਮ ਕਰਮ ਮਛ ਕਛ ਹੁਅ ਬਰਾਹ ਜਮੁਨਾ ਕੈ ਕੂਲਿ ਖੇਲੁ ਖੇਲਿਓ ਜਿਨਿ ਗਿੰਦ ਜੀਉ
jaram karam mashh kashh hua baraah jamunaa kai kool khael khaeliou jin gindh jeeo ||
He took birth in the Incarnations of the Fish, Tortoise and Wild Boar, and played His part. He played games on the banks of the Jamunaa River.

ਨਾਮੁ ਸਾਰੁ ਹੀਏ ਧਾਰੁ ਤਜੁ ਬਿਕਾਰੁ ਮਨ ਗਯੰਦ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਗੁਬਿੰਦ ਜੀਉ ॥੪॥੯॥
naam saar heeeae dhhaar thaj bikaar man gayandh sathiguroo sathiguroo sathigur gubindh jeeo ||4||9||
Enshrine this most excellent Name within your heart, and renounce the wickedness of the mind, O Gayand the True Guru, the True Guru, the True Guru is the Lord of the Universe Himself. ||4||9||
~SGGS Ji p. 1403



ਨ ਸੰਖੰ ਨ ਚਕ੍ਰੰ ਨ ਗਦਾ ਨ ਸਿਆਮੰ ॥
n sankhan n chakran n gadhaa n siaaman ||
God has no conch-shell, no religious mark, no paraphernalia; he does not have blue skin.

ਅਸ੍ਚਰਜ ਰੂਪੰ ਰਹੰਤ ਜਨਮੰ ॥
ascharaj roopan rehanth janaman ||
His Form is Wondrous and Amazing. He is beyond incarnation.

ਨੇਤ ਨੇਤ ਕਥੰਤਿ ਬੇਦਾ ॥
naeth naeth kathhanth baedhaa ||
The Vedas say that He is not this, and not that.
~SGGS Ji p. 1359



It is characteristic of Vaishnavism to teach that the unknowlable, limitless and formless God can also be a personal God in His sargun saroop. So we will find in Gurbani different descriptions of the God which are nirguna and sarguna, without attributes, and with attributes. But the clarity of this teaching is in the Ek Onkar, the formless One has manifested in the Trimurti and the One has become the many. So the creation is ultimately the sargun face of the Creator. Because Maha-Vishnu, Parabrahm the All-pervading Oneness is beyond sarguna, even sarguna is subordinate to Him because His limitless true nature can't even be known. And hence, that is the purpose of having sargun saroop, that the sansaaric realm of His creation might know Him, as Creator, and as it's very own Self. This is the philosophy of Vaishnava Vedanta, and this is the philosophy of Shri Guru Granth Sahib ji. If you believe differently, why are the das avtaara even mentioned? Why the Naams of God are called after Vishnu avtaaras? Why jap Raam, Har? Why did Bhai Gurdas Ji explain Vaheguru Gurmantra as he did, in terms of das avtaaras? To make it easier for Hindus? Veer ji, you can't explain away why Gurbani expresses praise for the Vaishnav, or praise for Ramachandra and Har Krishan. You cannot, except by ignoring or calling it mythology to reach the masses (with a non-Hindu spirituality which is pretending to be Hindu) by using these names for God, referring to das avtaara as the Lord God Himself, but only meaning it as mythological stories. Not only would that be absurd, it would be manipulative fraud to the Hindu people who trusted such teachings. While Gurbani calls Allah also a Naam of God, where is there Islamic philosophy to manipulate the Islamic masses, who would be pushed away by japping Naams of Hindu avtaaras? There can be only one conclusion drawn by all this... Gurbani is a form of Vaishnavism. Guruji did not back down on names of Vishnu avtaaras to please the Muslims. He did not fraudulently pretend to believe in Hindu philosophy just to convert Hindu people. The whole message of Gurbani is filled with old, established Vaishnav spiritual teaching.



From above statement it is clear people of different faiths are just dreaming to call Guru Nanak incarnation of different Avtaras.
I mentioned the Buddhist view of Guru Nanak Dev Ji because Aad0007 ji had mentioned about Buddhist influences in Gurbani. As to the Buddhist opinion about Guruji's incarnation as Padmasambhava, I don't have enough information to have an opinion. There are certain similarities to make it interesting, such as uncut hair and martial arts. What interested me was Guruji is recognized as an avtaara of Vishnu by Hindus, Buddhists and is even called avtaara in Gurbani.



ਰਾਮਦਾਸਿ ਗੁਰੂ ਜਗ ਤਾਰਨ ਕਉ ਗੁਰ ਜੋਤਿ ਅਰਜੁਨ ਮਾਹਿ ਧਰੀ ॥੪॥
raamadhaas guroo jag thaaran ko gur joth arajun maahi dhharee ||4||
Guru Raam Daas, to save the world, enshrined the Guru's Light into Guru Arjun. ||4||

ਜਗ ਅਉਰੁ ਨ ਯਾਹਿ ਮਹਾ ਤਮ ਮੈ ਅਵਤਾਰੁ ਉਜਾਗਰੁ ਆਨਿ ਕੀਅਉ ॥
jag aour n yaahi mehaa tham mai avathaar oujaagar aan keeao ||
In the great darkness of this world, the Lord revealed Himself, incarnated as Guru Arjun.

ਤਿਨ ਕੇ ਦੁਖ ਕੋਟਿਕ ਦੂਰਿ ਗਏ ਮਥੁਰਾ ਜਿਨ੍ਹ੍ਹ ਅੰਮ੍ਰਿਤ ਨਾਮੁ ਪੀਅਉ ॥
thin kae dhukh kottik dhoor geae mathhuraa jinh anmrith naam peeao ||
Millions of pains are taken away, from those who drink in the Ambrosial Nectar of the Naam, says Mat'huraa.

ਇਹ ਪਧਤਿ ਤੇ ਮਤ ਚੂਕਹਿ ਰੇ ਮਨ ਭੇਦੁ ਬਿਭੇਦੁ ਨ ਜਾਨ ਬੀਅਉ ॥
eih padhhath thae math chookehi rae man bhaedh bibhaedh n jaan beeao ||
O mortal being, do not leave this path; do not think that there is any difference between God and Guru.

ਪਰਤਛਿ ਰਿਦੈ ਗੁਰ ਅਰਜੁਨ ਕੈ ਹਰਿ ਪੂਰਨ ਬ੍ਰਹਮਿ ਨਿਵਾਸੁ ਲੀਅਉ ॥੫॥
parathashh ridhai gur arajun kai har pooran breham nivaas leeao ||5||
The Perfect Lord God has manifested Himself; He dwells in the heart of Guru Arjun. ||5||

ਜਬ ਲਉ ਨਹੀ ਭਾਗ ਲਿਲਾਰ ਉਦੈ ਤਬ ਲਉ ਭ੍ਰਮਤੇ ਫਿਰਤੇ ਬਹੁ ਧਾਯਉ ॥
jab lo nehee bhaag lilaar oudhai thab lo bhramathae firathae bahu dhhaayo ||
As long as the destiny written upon my forehead was not activated, I wandered around lost, running in all directions.

ਕਲਿ ਘੋਰ ਸਮੁਦ੍ਰ ਮੈ ਬੂਡਤ ਥੇ ਕਬਹੂ ਮਿਟਿ ਹੈ ਨਹੀ ਰੇ ਪਛੁਤਾਯਉ ॥
kal ghor samudhr mai booddath thhae kabehoo mitt hai nehee rae pashhuthaayo ||
I was drowning in the horrible world-ocean of this Dark Age of Kali Yuga, and my remorse would never have ended.

ਤਤੁ ਬਿਚਾਰੁ ਯਹੈ ਮਥੁਰਾ ਜਗ ਤਾਰਨ ਕਉ ਅਵਤਾਰੁ ਬਨਾਯਉ ॥
thath bichaar yehai mathhuraa jag thaaran ko avathaar banaayo ||
O Mat'huraa, consider this essential truth: to save the world, the Lord incarnated Himself.

ਜਪ੍ਯ੍ਯਉ ਜਿਨ੍ਹ੍ਹ ਅਰਜੁਨ ਦੇਵ ਗੁਰੂ ਫਿਰਿ ਸੰਕਟ ਜੋਨਿ ਗਰਭ ਨ ਆਯਉ ॥੬॥
japyo jinh arajun dhaev guroo fir sankatt jon garabh n aayo ||6||
Whoever meditates on Guru Arjun Dayv, shall not have to pass through the painful womb of reincarnation ever again. ||6||

ਕਲਿ ਸਮੁਦ੍ਰ ਭਏ ਰੂਪ ਪ੍ਰਗਟਿ ਹਰਿ ਨਾਮ ਉਧਾਰਨੁ ॥
kal samudhr bheae roop pragatt har naam oudhhaaran ||
In the ocean of this Dark Age of Kali Yuga, the Lord's Name has been revealed in the Form of Guru Arjun, to save the world.
~SGGS Ji p. 1409


~Bhul chak maaf karni ji
 

pk70

Writer
SPNer
Feb 25, 2008
1,582
627
USA
Although I recognize there is an interpretation which says they are only symbolic, hence, referring only to heaven of doing Naam Simran, and hell of not doing, and not related to some kind of lokas. I assure you, the point under debate had nothing to do with interpretation, but showing the dozen or so points of similarity between Gurbani teaching and Vaishnav doctrine.
With all due respect Bhain ji, I have not find one reason to believe Sikhism is based or influenced by any one or ant doctrine as you advocate and in emotional tide, call Guru being preaching other sect. Similarities have their own limits.
If in Gurbani, at one point, unlike Vaishanav doctrine, “ Mukti” is said to be not required in the same sense, how will you claim that it is the same doctrine? Will you just look at the word and jump saying” aha, here is the word Mukti ! Any one who wants to understand Gurbani, must be well versed in knowledge of Poetic form and its application because in poetry statements are made through metaphors, words convey beyond their structure; you just cannot read and come to any narrow conclusion because in poetry application some times, exists so broad that untrained mind can never follow the conveyed meaning. Before I give you Gurbani quotes to prove my point that Mukti as per Sikhism is not the same as Vaishanavas. Lets analyze one simple line of a Urdu poem.
“ koee vajehai thee ke dharkta rahaa dil, yon hajaar vaar mre apnu hee ke haath” Translation:
There was a reason, that heart kept beating otherwise died thousand times at the hands of my own people “
Bhain ji in here” mare= died” doesn’t mean physical death, its about humiliation and breaking of heart. Literally when one once died, its over, no question of heart beat. To understand above line, reader has to walk with the poet into that emotional unbearable storm triggered by his/her own people . This is the nature of the poetic form. In religious scriptures the words play in the same sense.” Darshan dejai Khol ke Vaar”( means open the door I can see you” but there is no real door behind which Lord lives, all expressions are metaphoric Never ever get stuck to its appearance, go further deep into its application in the context. In Gurbani, words are restructured. Ignorant and fanatic Hindu Dayaa Nand Called Guru Nanak illiterate just by looking at a word “ bhao” So please do a justice to Gurbani, in stead of heavily depending on second hand knowledge; as you are intelligent, learn [/FONT] Gurmukhi and Punjabi, you will see the same words loaded with totally new meanings in original.
Here is direct negation on prevailed Mukti in any faith at Guru Nanak’s time. You will see, in Gurbani, still Mukti word is used but its meaning is not understood as in Vashnav or Hinduism.

ਪੰਨਾ 534, ਸਤਰ 4http://www.srigranth.org/servlet/gurbani.gurbani?Action=Page&Param=534&punjabi=t&id=23811#l23811
ਰਾਜੁ ਨ ਚਾਹਉ ਮੁਕਤਿ ਨ ਚਾਹਉ ਮਨਿ ਪ੍ਰੀਤਿ ਚਰਨ ਕਮਲਾਰੇ
राजु न चाहउ मुकति न चाहउ मनि प्रीति चरन कमलारे ॥
Rāj na cāha*o muka na cāha*o man parī caran kamlārė.
I do not seek power, and I do not seek liberation. My mind is in love with Your Lotus Feet.
ਮਃ 5
Why not Mukti is needed Bhain ji ? all Vashanav and Hindu etc ideology stress on it, here Guru ji says, no it not needed just one thing is important, that is HIS love
ਪੰਨਾ 294, ਸਤਰ 19http://www.srigranth.org/servlet/gurbani.gurbani?Action=Page&Param=294&punjabi=t&id=13523#l13523
ਜੀਵਨ ਮੁਕਤਿ ਜਿਸੁ ਰਿਦੈ ਭਗਵੰਤੁ
Jīvan muka jis riai bagvan.
He is Jivan Mukta - liberated while yet alive; the Lord God abides in his heart.
ਮਃ 5
Again those are liberated who are imbued with Him heartily.
ਨਾ 220, ਸਤਰ 3http://www.srigranth.org/servlet/gurbani.gurbani?Action=Page&Param=220&punjabi=t&id=9477#l9477
ਨਾਨਕ ਮੁਕਤਿ ਤਾਹਿ ਤੁਮ ਮਾਨਹੁ ਜਿਹ ਘਟਿ ਰਾਮੁ ਸਮਾਵੈ
Nānak muka āhi um mānhu jih gat rām samāvai. ||2||6||
O Nanak, know that those whose hearts are filled with the Lord are liberated. ||2||6||
ਮਃ 9
Same idea, state of mind when he is seen everywhere while alive
ਪ੍ਰਭ ਕੀ ਆਗਿਆ ਆਤਮ ਹਿਤਾਵੈ
He who in his heart loves Lord's ordinance,

ਜੀਵਨ ਮੁਕਤਿ ਸੋਊ ਕਹਾਵੈ
is said to be the man having salvation while alive. (275)
Here Understanding His love and live accordingly without having any effect is liberation. Remember” Mukti” is used to get it while alive. I think it is Namdev too who says” oh Lord what is the use of Mukti after death?” Why? The examples of [/FONT] Mukti quotes you give are meant to be freedom from Maya influences, to have a state of mind where His Ordinance is taken as ecstasy not that MUKTI pined for in other faiths.
IN your posts, regardless the explanations I gave with quotes, you repeat same things, You admit they are not specially interpreted as they are in other faiths or sects though. You just cannot get over with them. In Gurbani Mukti is used for different aim.


Many times I proved your quotations of Gurbani are absolutely incorrectly used, you are bent upon quoting. You never for a moment realize that your understanding of your embraced faith Sikhism has come through second hand source, it could be wrong. Had you had well expertise in poetic form and known Punjabi, you would have seen how totally new meanings are given to old terms by Guru ji. That truth has become hard to swallow.Third and last, I shall not waste my time on debate further if you still bent upon ignoring Guru ji’s own clarification about his enlightenment and getting revealed Gurbani through Creator himself. If you prefer to believe in the entire posted material on INTERNET and refuse to accept what Guru claims, I shall rather study something during that period I waste on telling you again and again that even unfavorable people also accepted Guru’s originality. Why then a Sikh refuses to believe in Guru, I wonder!
I am pretty much convinced on concept of Hukam, Grace of God, and Mukti, Guru Nanak stands alone a way above all. As usually, none of your quote proves otherwise.
If you don't agree with the interpretation of narak surag, fine. But don't say it isn't in Gurbani,
Twisting words wont change the truth, I said these words are not interpreted particularly and used in different context, never said, it is not Gurbani. Same old tactic is used to enforce your own views about Gurbani.
We know a relationship exists between Kabir ji and Sikhism, so what do Kabir panthis think about concepts of narak surag? Do they even believe in them?
I gave quote from Kabir ji himself why we need Kabir panthy now? It is also known as bouncing all over unnecessarily.
o here is an unmistakable association between what is clearly Vaishnava teaching directly from Vaishnav scriptures, and linking this particular interpretation with concepts found in Gurbani.
Guru Nanak was a like a Sun risen, as per Bhai Gurdas ji, who dispelled all mist, why he doesn’t say the Sun borrowed from another sun Vashanava? Answer is simple, he points out Guru Nanak to be enlightened. I am going to post an article” Guru Nanak’s story by Bhai Gurdas” based on his Vaaran. I shall also prove in there with his own words how quite often you distorted his views too in favor of your own views about Gurbani. You quote him as per your convenience but he doesn’t support you.

Your Quote from SGGS- 148, in here, Gurbani advocates only through His love, one can merge with the source. Nothing more. I wonder why you just keep posting it.
So I am showing clearly, despite objections of personal or established interpretation, that the concepts of Narak Surag, Jambhootas, Yama or Dharamraj, are directly taken from Vaishnava Upanishads. The parallels between Guruji's teaching and Vaishnavism are too numerous to ignore.
Guru ji keeps defining like Naam, Simran, Sehaj, Karm, bandhan but no importance is given to define those terms you are talking about.
To ignore Dasam Granth bani is simply to pad the evidence in favor of a particular viewpoint and is no real anaysis at all.
I obey my Guru, he said” Guru manio Granth” rest is immaterial for me personally. The reason I mention that, I just don’t want to talk about it as the issue of its being authentic, is associated with many lies on the part of both groups who either support it or oppose it. All your references to it are insignificant for me; if you are posting for others, I shall just ignore them

This genie will not go back into the bottle.
There is no genie but imaginations of those who have no inkling how poetic form of a scriptures should be understood.
Veer ji, does your objection relate to the issue that mention of Trimurti and three gunas given in Shri Guru Granth is parallel to what is described in Vaishnav Upanishads? Does it really matter how it is interpreted, so much that it even appears? It is not even a point of interpretation I am giving, but a reference to all the concepts which appear in Gurbani which have an origin in Vaishnava Upanishads. Your objection isn't disproving anything at all. In fact, you only prove how close is the teaching of Guruji and Vaishnavism.
As I told you, Guru ji came above all like a lotus, I am at feet of that lotus, rest the dirt and its significance being there where lotus grew up, are absolutely of no value for me.
Guruji did not even modify Vaishnava philosophy at all, but actually teaches it.
That is a direct insult to Guru’s own originality, I resent that. As there is a saying in Punjabi, “when a hungry person was asked, how much is two plus two?’” “The reply was, “four chapatees( loaf of bread) instead of saying “four” as answer.”
That is what the case is here. You studied Vashanav, every thing you see is Vashnav in Guru teachings. You should think before you say such words about Guru.
The fact that Guruji includes the Trimurti as subordinate sargun manifestations of the Supreme Brahman and three gunas as part of the creation, again, is taken directly from Vaishnava scriptures
NO, Guru ji simply expressed the truth, none is there except HIM, they cooked up stories of Trimrti.
. No other sampradhya has this teaching. It is Vaishnavism.
Guru ji states explicitly that he was asked by the Lord to go and preach HIS Naam,( Majh Ki Vaar) that is enough for me as a Sikh.
We have a reference to the trimurti conception Brahma, Vishnu and Siva in IV. 5, which also indicates the late date of the Upanishad. The three forms are traced to the three gunas, rajas, sattva and tamas in V. 2. ~Maitreyaniya Upanishad
Along with your quote from SGGS 735
Guru ji tells they are Maya inflicted, don’t worry about them, stick to the real WAHEGURU. Why you are quoting it? Because their names are there, that is why? but here their importance in spiritual context is totally negated.
Here reference is used to tell how Guru Shabad takes over those three gun, no other teaching is implied, only message is about importance iof Guru Shabad. Now still you think that Guru Shabad is actual Vashanav Shabad? If yes, you need to study SGGS Ji again with the help of those who have knowledge of poetic form as well as Gurbani.
Your Quote from SGGS 231
Here Brahm is not what you think, it is HIM, also who is called by many names in Gurbani.
I do not see any teaching of Gurbani here which objects to or is fundamentally different from classical Vaishnavism.
It does Bhain ji, you don’t see it. Guru Message is taking the seeker towards Guru Shabad, who is stuck with Vashanav will never understand what Guru ji is saying obviously. Vaishanav have Krishna as the Creator, Guru ji shows him doing deception for women, you see the contrast, Guru’s Krishan is HIM, Ajooni, and,Ram “ jis roop n rekhia..”
So the common objection that Guruji was correcting errors of Hinduism must be modified to state, Guruji was correcting errors of political Brahmanism and hypocrisy in general, and not Vaishnava Vedanta as a philosophic teaching.
ਨਿਰੰਕਾਰੁ ਆਕਾਰੁ ਹੋਇ ਏਕੰਕਾਰੁ ਅਪਾਰੁ ਸਦਾਇਆ
nirankaaru aakaaru hoi aykankaaru apaaru sadaaiaa|
The formless Lord has made His self known in the form of Ekaiikar, the one boundless Being.
ਏਕੰਕਾਰਹੁ ਸਬਦ ਧੁਨਿ ਓਅੰਕਾਰਿ ਅਕਾਰੁ ਬਣਾਇਆ
aykankaarahu sabad dhuni aoankaari akaaru banaaiaa|
From Ekanka came up Oankar, the Word vibration which further came to be known as the world, full of names and forms.

Here your problem again is second hand source obviously. Let me help here
[/FONT]
Bhain ji Guru ji is describing how His Nirgan Form has also Sargan form. Being Nirgan he becomes Sargun Form too through manifestation. See the above Vaak, He the formless manifested in “Akaar= Form” was called as only one INFINITE( Apaar).[/FONT]

[/FONT]
ਇਕਦੂ ਹੋਇ ਤਿਨਿ ਦੇਵ ਤਿਹੁ ਮਿਲਿ ਦਸ ਅਵਤਾਰ ਗਣਾਇਆ
ikadoo hoi tini dayv tihu mili das avataar ganaaiaa|
From the one Lord came out three gods (Brahma-, Visnu and Mahes'a) who further got themselves counted among the ten incarnations (of the supreme Being[/FONT]
Here again metaphoric expression while addressing the prevailed stories. As HE infests in His Sargun Form, those three and the ten Avatars were also His manifestation. There is nothing more than that. Guru message is here to imply importance to HIS being Nirgun and Sargun form as well. The following Vaak clears why I am saying so, reread
ਆਦਿ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਆਦੇਸੁ ਹੈ ਓਹੁ ਵੇਖੈ ਓਨ੍ਹਾ ਨਦਰਿ ਨ ਆਇਆ
aadi purakhu aadaysu hai aohu vaykhai aonhaa nadari n aaiaa|
I salute this primal Being who sees them all but is Himself invisible.
~SGGS Ji p. 26

You see here, Guru ji is saluting HIM, Expression is in amazedness. Why? He manifests and watches over His manifestation but no one can see HIM. Aren’t you amazed how wondrous He is; may be not, you are more busy finding Vishnu and Vashanav doctrine. No offence, please. Just joking.
o even here we see the Vaishnava tradition has always worshipped the (Eka) One God in many forms as part of the spiritual philosophy of Guru Nanak Dev Ji, and no proof that Guruji invalidated Vaishnava Vedanta at any point
Why would he do that? Why? He was enlightened and found out HE is only one and remains detached even being manifested, why Guru ji would go against his enlightenment? Eka Eka you are stressing, is there. any word like “ kartaar”, “ Hukm”, His Grace” in Vashanav? It is well known Guru ji would often address HIM as Kartaar, stresses on Hukm and His grace. Come on, and try to accept what Guru ji himself says about himself. Before doing any Udaasi, as you know, enlightenment happened, so what if there were some Vashanav worshiping Him in form of Krishna with those terms, Others Scriptures couldn’t help except Guru Shabad( M-4 SGGS 455)
. A relationship can be inferred to the sect which pre-dated the ancient Vaishnavas who were known as the Ekantins who worshipped only the One Supreme All-pervading (Vishnu) of Bhagavan Krishna, with the very root definition of Ek Onkar.
Only superficial readings and negative inferences by politicized organizations within Sikhism have made these exaggerated claims and recklessly associated the worst excesses of hypocritical Brahminism with Viashnava Vedanta and created a void of misunderstanding and lack of knowledge as to the Vaishnavist origins in Nanakian philosophy.
It was a revealed religion. Guru Nanak didn’t think and wasted a lot of time on studying various doctrines of the world that some one should call him philosopher, its scholarly ignorance of spiritual heights.
Veer ji, if you do even a superficial study of Vaishnavism, you will see the same identical objections and corrections which they also found to be a "big hindrance on the path of spirituality."
Could be Bhainji, but neither they bother me nor inspire me to go and waste my time to dig into them. Many doctrines of faiths resembles amazingly. Even Christianity has same kind of human virtues promoted as in Sikhism, should Christian start saying ‘ Guru Nanak went to Italy and met pope or religious leaders and started his own faith..”
And it is clear, as these are far older documents, that Vaishnavism is the origination of the reform teaching found in Gurbani.
Are those documentations are more important than Guru’s own words about his experience with HIM to a Sikh?
5. teaching Dharma Bull of the 4 yugs.
Dharma Bull is questioned by stating Dharm and pity with passion are actually holding earth not that BULL.
This is a superficial overview of passages in Gurbani where Singh Sabha scholars have made an effort to distance Gurbani from Vedantic origins. Dharma Bull is not accepted literally, as Guruji refers to it as "mythical." But the teaching of the deteriorating spirituality of the cycle of yugs which the Dharma Bull represents, are cited repeatedly throughout Gurbani. The fact that compassion (actually it's truthfulness) is holding up the bull, and not a literal bull is no negation whatsoever of this Vedantic teaching, which has always been symbolic. To falsely attribute superstition of a real literal Bull holding up the earth to the wisdom teachings of the Bhagavata Puranas is the false view and deliberate distortion by Singh Sabha reformists.
STRICTLY YOUR VIEWS, I don’t know either of them. I am much happy being in disagreement with you on this because being a student of literature their explanation makes more sense than your “ word sticking” attitude while understanding Gurbani.
Upon enquiry he came to know that the cow was mother earth who was lamenting her fate after the departure of her beloved Lord Krishna. The bull was Dharma whose three legs, which represent Austerity, Purity, and Compassion, were mutilated because of the conditions in the Kali yuga. Its fourth leg, the only one left, represents Truthfulness. The man hurting the animals represents the spirit of Kali. Moved and outraged at the pitiable plight of Dharma, King Pareekshit healed its condition by reestablishing the four pillars of Dharma... With the establishment of Dharma once again, mother earth was no longer anguished. This episode is a reminder to us that it is in our hands to establish righteousness in our own lives and unless we do so consciously, values in society will deteriorate very quickly.
This episode is not what Gurbani teaches, so for me it is sheer trash of myths even if such references are quoted in Gurbani to negate their importance.
Mukti is questioned? You're trying to say Guruji doesn't believe in mukti? Can you please clarify this objection?
I answered it above with quotes
Although Kali-yuga is an ocean of faults, there is still one good quality about this age: Simply by chanting the Hare Krishna maha-mantra, one can become free from material bondage and be promoted to the transcendental kingdom. (Srimad-Bhagavatam 12.3.51)
Christian says praise Lord Christ, same way Hindus will promote their Lord, Gurbani promotes only HIM, a big difference, move on please
~SGGS Ji p. 697

Simply by chanting one holy name of Hari, a sinful man can counteract the reactions to more sins than he is able to commit. (Brhad-visnu Purana)
ਹਰਿ ਹਰਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਜਪਹੁ ਮਨ ਮੇਰੇ ਜਿਤੁ ਸਿਮਰਤ ਸਭਿ ਕਿਲਵਿਖ ਪਾਪ ਲਹਾਤੀ
har har naam japahu man maerae jith simarath sabh kilavikh paap lehaathee ||
Chant the Name of the Lord, Har, Har, O my mind; meditating on it, all sins and misdeeds shall be erased.
~SGGS Ji p. 88

Here translator is asleep. There is no Lord HAR HAR, Har is for WAHEGURU, this way you guys will prove that Gurbani inspires to praise Rama, Krishna, Hare Rama Hare Vaishnu bla bla. No sense of Guru Message in totality, it is pitiable condition Bhainji I am sorry for such translators.
Your Quote from SGGS 225
Here is good example how Guru Shabad is used in wrong sense where as it conveys if one remains inflicted with Maya, suffering and frustrations are inevitable.
On your quote from SGGS 1161 and (quote)
As can be seen, this entire philosophical system is not new, but describing in Punjabi the pre-existing teachings of Vaishnavism.
Read carefully what I write, don’t rush. Before Guru ji came, there were words like truth, false, Maya, Dharm ete, can you name any word used in Gurbani was not there before Guru Nanak? Then why are you getting surprised to see all this. Maya word well known in Guru ji’s time, Guru ji describes how it hinders the seeker to move. So what?
ਲਖ ਚਉਰਾਸੀਹ ਜਿਨਿ ਸਿਰੀ ਸਭਸੈ ਦੇਇ ਅਧਾਰੁ
lakh chouraaseeh jin siree sabhasai dhaee adhhaar ||
The One who created the 8.4 million species of beings gives sustenance to all.
~SGGS Ji p. 27

Has any one counted that?, Today science can prove it wrong. It is just expression of His enormous creation, it is not a statement as you are dragging it to other origins.
ਨਰਕੁ ਸੁਰਗੁ ਦੁਇ ਭੁੰਚਨਾ ਹੋਇ ਬਹੁਰਿ ਬਹੁਰਿ ਅਵਤਾਰ
narak surag dhue bhunchanaa hoe bahur bahur avathaar ||2||
You are subject to both heaven and hell, and you are reincarnated over and over again. ||2||
ਸਿਵ ਪੁਰੀ ਬ੍ਰਹਮ ਇੰਦ੍ਰ ਪੁਰੀ ਨਿਹਚਲੁ ਕੋ ਥਾਉ ਨਾਹਿ
siv puree breham eindhr puree nihachal ko thhaao naahi ||
The realm of Shiva, the realms of Brahma and Indra as well - no place anywhere is permanent.
~SGGS Ji p. 214

Here actually” Nark Surag” are interpreted in a`way, means it is coming going through bith and death.. ANOTHER THING, HERE AVTAR IS USED AS BIRTH NOT AVTARAS; ONCE YOU SAID “ AVTAR”S MEANING IS AVTAR NOT TAKING BIRTH, just a reminder, look at it remember.
In this Guru Shabaf it is made clearer that those all discussed in it has no importance in this context.
As per Quote SGGS 1082, Wahaguru is described with the same words with new meaning and the importance of Sant is expressed as` well.

I never made any reference to Moola Mantara,
You did, check your post
but was referring specifically to Naam jap, as in the practice of Naam abhiyaas, to jap Vaheguru Gurmantara which Bhai Gurdas Ji expressly states is Vishnu, Vasudeyva, Hari Krishan, Gobinda, Rama.
YES BUT HE IS A POET, HE MEANS WAHEGURU NAME IS AN ESSENCE OF ALL THOSE LETTERS put together, and REMEMBER WAHAGURU ONLY
Veer ji, it is a prophecy of Guru Nanak Dev Ji of which there are several in Vedic literature, referring to Him as a Vishnu avtaara in 10 forms, and ending in an 11th form which is silent except when you ask a question, Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.
Did any Guru mention there is a prophecy of Guru ji in Veda’s? NO, decorating dream with such references shows mind sees more outside SGGS Ji than in side it.. Remember follower of OSHO try to prove in “ The man who saw Tomorrow” OSHO is mentioned as a prophet who will say” Now Now” all imaginations Bhain ji
Don't say "we Sikhs" as if you only have a monopoly on correct interpretation, even when part of the recognized Panth accepts Vedanta as part of Sikhism.
Well I am sorry, I didn’t intend to hurt any one, and more over, I do not know that Sikhs love to be influenced by others more than their own Gurus.
There have always been points of dispute. Are you suggesting Nihang Jatha is not part of the Panth and are not Sikhs" because of different interpretations between modern Tat Khalsa reform and even from the time of original janam sakhis?

They are not as per Gurbani since they drink a lot of intoxicative things. They call Dasam Granth and Sarbloh Guru. Only wearing five Kakaars doesn’t guarantee to be real Sikh as Sikhi is a battle with mind as per Guru Guidance to win over five primal negative forces. They can be called a tiny cult in Sikh faith. Janam Sakhis are highly imaginative fiction why are we discussing them?
"Quote fomSGGS 341
IT IS ABOUT A STATE OF MIND, VERY PERSONAL EXPERIENCE. You and I are millions miles away from that, better talk some thing we can talk as per our poor record in context of experiencing HIM.
Your Quote SGGS 1403, all about His Sargun form
Your quote SGGS 1359, HERE YOUR VEDAS ARE IN QUESTION,GURU SHABAD ADDRESSES HIS NIRGUN SROOP
It is characteristic of Vaishnavism to teach that the unknowlable, limitless and formless God can also be a personal God in His sargun saroop. So we will find in Gurbani different descriptions of the God which are nirguna and sarguna, without attributes, and with attributes. But the clarity of this teaching is in the Ek Onkar, the formless One has manifested in the Trimurti and the One has become the many. So the creation is ultimately the sargun face of the Creator. Because Maha-Vishnu is the All-pervading One
COME ON SIKH BHAIN JI. As you say If Mahan Vishnu is pervading, then Waheguru is also pervading, then Rama is pervading, then [/FONT]Krishna[/FONT] is pervading, Shiva is pervading. how many are out ther[/FONT]e who are pervading? Will you clarify? If only HE is pervading, that means all names you are talking about are given in Gurbani to HIM, that makes pretty good sense, Sikhs were advised to use WAHAGURU name for Him though they can use any name as well. I believe Bhai Gurdas ji Stressed on SatNaam and Wahaguru is due to the same reason I am facing while debating with you; he might have witnessed people dragging Guru [/FONT] panth to other sects to blend its identity. The last quote ( I am not giving it) is from Sawaye Mehle 5 ke,, it contains simply compliment while showing extreme reverence to Fifth Nanak, I am not going to waste my time on that. I have made clear my views on Guru Nanak in context of all sects and culture around he grew up; I believe him more than any one. You have problem to believe his declaration about this “ Panth” so it be. Thanks.
 
Feb 14, 2006
512
31
Many times I proved your quotations of Gurbani are absolutely incorrectly used, you are bent upon quoting. You never for a moment realize that your understanding of your embraced faith Sikhism has come through second hand source, it could be wrong. Had you had well expertise in poetic form and known Punjabi, you would have seen how totally new meanings are given to old terms by Guru ji. That truth has become hard to swallow.Third and last, I shall not waste my time on debate further if you still bent upon ignoring Guru ji’s own clarification about his enlightenment and getting revealed Gurbani through Creator himself. If you prefer to believe in the entire posted material on INTERNET and refuse to accept what Guru claims, I shall rather study something during that period I waste on telling you again and again that even unfavorable people also accepted Guru’s originality. Why then a Sikh refuses to believe in Guru, I wonder!
Do you realize how arrogant this sounds? First you proved nothing, except how your own views could be different. As I showed how Gurbani does in fact have an interpretation which is not well known by mainstream Sikhs, but in fact has a long history within the Panth, and within those Jathas who embrace a form of Sikhism but are not considered within the Panth. And I mean the Nihangs, certain views (but not all) of sants within Dam Dami Taksal and Bhai Sahib Bhai Randhir Singh ji of AKJ, Nirmalas, and also Naamdharis and Udasis. For you to deny there is a significant population within Sikh tradition or historically close to it as mere "internet material" is a meaningless attempt at invalidation. To be honest, I don't believe any credible Sikh scholar can be the one who just parrots his own accepted opinions without exploring the source material which establishes a historical basis of differing interpretations within Sikh religion. You can feel free to ignore it if it doesn't jibe with your expectation of belief, but don't be so narrow as not to consider there may be more than one way Gurbani has been interpreted historically, and for very meaningful reasons. And don't be so negative as to reject outright things you refuse to believe, not because they aren't true, but maybe they are just not true in a way you are accustomed.



"Na casya kascij janita na cadhipah."
"Of Him there are neither parents nor lord." [Svetasvatara Upanishad 6:9]



"Andhatama pravishanti ye asambhuti mupaste"
"They enter darkness, those who worship the natural elements" (Air, Water, Fire, etc.). "They sink deeper in darkness, those who worship sambhuti (created things)."
[Yajur Veda 40:9]



"Ekam Brahm, dvitiya naste neh na naste kinchan"
"There is only one God, not the second; not at all, not at all, not in the least bit."
"Those whose intelligence has been stolen by material desires surrender unto demigods and follow the particular rules and regulations of worship according to their own natures."
[Bhagavad Gita 7:20]




"When you will transcend the charm of the Vedas and become established in the peace of Samadhi then you will attain Yoga." [Bhagavad-Gita 2:53.]



If in Gurbani, at one point, unlike Vaishanav doctrine, “ Mukti” is said to be not required in the same sense, how will you claim that it is the same doctrine? Will you just look at the word and jump saying” aha, here is the word Mukti ! Any one who wants to understand Gurbani, must be well versed in knowledge of Poetic form and its application because in poetry statements are made through metaphors, words convey beyond their structure; you just cannot read and come to any narrow conclusion because in poetry application some times, exists so broad that untrained mind can never follow the conveyed meaning. Before I give you Gurbani quotes to prove my point that Mukti as per Sikhism is not the same as Vaishanavas. Lets analyze one simple line of a Urdu poem.

What does a poem in Urdu have to do with anything? I don't see how you can say mukti, which is a Sanskrit term, doesn't mean mukti in the classical sense of liberation, but you are entitled to your views. Anyone conversant with Sikh teaching of mukti is immediately familiar with the definition described below:
In Indian religions, Moksha (Sanskrit: मोक्ष mokṣa, liberation) or Mukti (Sanskrit: मुक्ति, release) is liberation from samsara, the cycle of death and rebirth and all of the suffering and limitation of worldly existence. In Hindu philosophy, it is seen as a transcendence of phenomenal being, a state of higher consciousness, in which matter, energy, time, space, causation (karma) and the other features of empirical reality are understood as maya.

Liberation is experienced in this very life as a dissolution of the sense of self as an egoistic personality by which the underlying, eternal, pure spirit is uncovered. This desireless state concludes the yogic path through which conditioned mentality-materiality or nama-roopa (lit. name-form) has been dissolved uncovering one's eternal identity prior to the mind/spirit's identification with material form. Liberation is achieved by (and accompanied with) the complete stilling of all passions — a state of being known as Nirvana...

In Hinduism, atma-jnana (self-realization) is the key to obtaining Moksha. The Hindu is one who practices karma and bhakti, knowing that god is unlimited and exists in many different forms, both personal and impersonal.

There are believed to be four yogas (disciplines) or margas (paths) for the attainment of Moksha. These are: working for the Supreme (Karma Yoga), realizing the Supreme (Jnana Yoga), meditating on the Supreme (Raja Yoga) and serving the Supreme in loving devotion (Bhakti Yoga). Different schools of Hinduism place varying emphasis on one path or other, some of the most famous being the tantric and yogic practices developed in Hinduism. Today, the two major schools of thought are Advaita Vedanta and Bhakti branches.

Bhakti sees God as the most worshippable object of love, for example, a personified monotheistic conception of Vishnu. Unlike in Abrahamic traditions, for example, Smarta Hinduism, this monotheism does not prevent a Hindu from worship of other aspects of God, as they are all seen as rays from a single source. However, it is worthy of note that the Bhagavad Gita discourages the worship of demigods, as it does not lead to Moksha. The concept is essentially of devotional service in love, since the ideal nature of being is seen as that of harmony, euphony, its manifest essence being love. By immersing oneself in the love of God, one's Karmas (good or bad, regardless) slough off, one's illusions about beings decay and 'truth' is soon known and lived. Both the worshiped and worshiper maintain their identities in a personal, divine loving relationship...

Vedanta finds itself split threefold, though the dualist and modified non-dualist schools are primarily associated with the foregoing thought of Bhakti. The most famous today is Advaita Vedanta, a non-dual (i.e. no separation between the individual and reality/God/etc.) perspective which often played the role of Hindu foil to contemporary Buddhist philosophy. In general, it focused on intense meditation and moral realignment, its bedrock being the Upanishads, Brahma Sutras and the teachings of its putative founder, Adi Shankara. Through discernment of the real and the unreal, as a peeling of the layers of an onion, the sadhak (practitioner) would unravel the maya (illusion) of being and the cosmos to find nothing within, a nothingness which was paradoxically being, and transcendentally beyond both such inadequate descriptions. This was Moksha, this was atman and Brahman realized as the substance and void of existential duality. The impersonalist schools of Hinduism also worship various deities, but with the idea that such worship is ultimately abandoned - both the worshiped and worshiper lose their individual identities.

One must achieve Moksha on his or her own under the guidance of a guru..."
Moksha - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Liberation and release from the bondage of Maya, illusions, karmas, and cycle of suffering births and deaths... path of salvation being dhyaan and bhakti, sankirtana and Naam japna tradition of Vaishnavas... to discourage worship of demi-gods as these cannot lead to mukti. Moreover one can unmistakably recognize a blending of Dvaistist beliefs in personal God who delivers you with the Avdaitist concept of an impersonal God, nirguna who is merged with. This unique blending of philosophical positions is characteristic of Vaishnava philosophy, and it is the definition of mukti also found in Nanakian philosophy. But if you don't see the parallels, that's your right. If you want to insist all these parallels are worthless internet babble and have no relationship, that is also your right. But saying does not make it so. And long after we are gone from this world, the close and deeply meaningful parallels will remain.



14. Even as a mirror stained by dust
Shines brilliantly when it has been cleansed,
So the embodied one, on seeing the nature of the Soul (Ātman),
Becomes unitary, his end attained, from sorrow freed.

15. When with the nature of the self, as with a lamp,
A practiser of Yoga beholds here the nature of Brahma,
Unborn, steadfast, from every nature free—
By knowing God (deva) one is released from all fetters!
~ŚvetĀŚvatara Upanishad




Veer ji, if you do even a superficial study of Vaishnavism, you will see the same identical objections and corrections which they also found to be a "big hindrance on the path of spirituality."
Could be Bhainji, but neither they bother me nor inspire me to go and waste my time to dig into them. Many doctrines of faiths resembles amazingly. Even Christianity has same kind of human virtues promoted as in Sikhism, should Christian start saying ‘ Guru Nanak went to Italy and met pope or religious leaders and started his own faith..”

And it is clear, as these are far older documents, that Vaishnavism is the origination of the reform teaching found in Gurbani.
Are those documentations are more important than Guru’s own words about his experience with HIM to a Sikh?
There is no other religion in the world which parallels so exactly. Christianity has no concept of mukti. Islam has no concept of mukti. Buddhism has, but it has no concept of a personal God and even it's concept of mukti comes from Vedic sources. To make the exaggerated claim that because both Vedanta and Sikhi use the term mukti, they use it in a mutually exclusive manner which sets them apart is wishful thinking. It points to Singh Sabhia influence which tried to downplay any and all association with ancient Vedantic teachings. The rush to compare Sikhism as a unique synthesis of Vaishnav and Sufi Islam is also incorrect, as the entire spiritual philosophy in Gurbani is based on Vaishnava Puranas, and contains no element of Abrahamic religion. Everything has been taught academically within Sikh institutions to disregard this association with Vaishnava Vedanta, not withstanding the historical fact that Guru Nanak Dev Ji was born into a Hindu family and every form of Guru was conversant in every major language including mastery of classical Sanskrit, and taught Hindu scriptures and stories, greater proof of which is found in Shri Dasam Granth bani. And Shri Dasam Granth bani has been denied and even reviled, not for the content specifically, not for the obvious nitename banis, but because of it's heavy emphasis teaching Sikhs from Hindu scriptures and stories. On honest examination, the incredible parallels remain between Sikhism and Vaishnava Vedanata regardless of anyones opinion or denial.

How can it be the Hindus cannot have mukti but only the Sikhs can, based on nearly exact teachings and understanding and even same use of same terminology? Again, I think the objection Guruji had was with the oppressive political structure of Brahminism as a form of false religion, and warnings against spiritual hypocrisy. Sikhism has always been a tolerant religion, and Maharaja Ranjit Singh founded a kingdom on exactly this kind of tolerance, commisioning the building of Hindu temples as well as building up Harmandir Sahib.

Why in the modern era is this hostility, negation and denial of Vedantic validity? And I believe it has to do with politicized interpretations of religion which mimic Abrahamic intolerance and insensitivity to undermine every other faith as invalid. This viewpoint is not even part of Sikh history. It's related to the British raj and division into intolerant and separate communities, emphasis on distinction and even arrogant disregarding of others (telling Sikhs they are Aryan race: To this day haven't we heard enough about the presumed superiority of the Jatt Sikh identity? And where did this kind of ideology come from?) It's part of the British social control mechanism to weaken by dividing commonalities, to insert presumed inferiorities and superiorities just like the Bramins have done. So it's my belief the casteism prevalent in the Sikh community today owes more to the British raj than the Brahmins.

Just analyze the case of Maharaja Dalip Singh and the insane manipulation of identity involved, and consider the source and intention. Vaishnavism, in general as different sects will differ, but from teachings of Vaishnav saints taught the traditional Vedic view of the caste and varna system being tendancies of the soul expressed genetically. Somewhat of this is true, because no matter how equal the atma is, people are born in circumstances which will dictate a large measure of his character and opportunity. But the political system of oppression of brahmin elites is absolutely a corruption because being born a brahmin is no special gift of spirituality. Proof of this is the inclusion of Vaishnava bhagats in Gurbani who were dalits. So the Vaishnav definition of caste has to do with the impulses of the individual atma, more than limitation of opportunities to ensure failure among the poor by political elites.



ਆਪੇ ਦਸ ਅਠ ਵਰਨ ਉਪਾਇਅਨੁ ਆਪਿ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਆਪਿ ਰਾਜੁ ਲਇਆ ॥
aapae dhas ath varan oupaaeian aap breham aap raaj laeiaa ||
He Himself created the people of the eighteen castes; God Himself acquired His domain.

ਆਪੇ ਮਾਰੇ ਆਪੇ ਛੋਡੈ ਆਪੇ ਬਖਸੇ ਕਰੇ ਦਇਆ ॥
aapae maarae aapae shhoddai aapae bakhasae karae dhaeiaa ||
He Himself kills, and He Himself redeems; He Himself, in His Kindness, forgives us. He is infallible.
~SGGS Ji p. 553




ਖਤ੍ਰੀ ਬ੍ਰਾਹਮਣ ਸੂਦ ਵੈਸ ਉਪਦੇਸੁ ਚਹੁ ਵਰਨਾ ਕਉ ਸਾਝਾ ॥
khathree braahaman soodh vais oupadhaes chahu varanaa ko saajhaa ||
The four castes - the Kh'shaatriyas, Brahmins, Soodras and Vaishyas - are equal in respect to the teachings.
~SGGS Ji p. 747




ਬ੍ਰਾਹਮਣੁ ਖਤ੍ਰੀ ਸੂਦ ਵੈਸ ਚਾਰਿ ਵਰਨ ਚਾਰਿ ਆਸ੍ਰਮ ਹਹਿ ਜੋ ਹਰਿ ਧਿਆਵੈ ਸੋ ਪਰਧਾਨੁ ॥
braahaman khathree soodh vais chaar varan chaar aasram hehi jo har dhhiaavai so paradhhaan ||
There are four castes: Brahmin, Kh'shaatriya, Soodra and Vaishya, and there are four stages of life. One who meditates on the Lord, is the most distinguished and renowned.
~SGGS Ji p. 861




ਜਾਣਹੁ ਜੋਤਿ ਨ ਪੂਛਹੁ ਜਾਤੀ ਆਗੈ ਜਾਤਿ ਨ ਹੇ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥
jaanahu joth n pooshhahu jaathee aagai jaath n hae ||1|| rehaao ||
Recognize the Lord's Light within all, and do not consider social class or status; there are no classes or castes in the world hereafter. ||1||Pause||
~SGGS Ji p. 349




ਸਾਧੂ ਸਰਣਿ ਪਰੈ ਸੋ ਉਬਰੈ ਖਤ੍ਰੀ ਬ੍ਰਾਹਮਣੁ ਸੂਦੁ ਵੈਸੁ ਚੰਡਾਲੁ ਚੰਡਈਆ ॥੬॥
saadhhoo saran parai so oubarai khathree braahaman soodh vais chanddaal chanddeeaa ||6||
One who seeks the Sanctuary of the Holy is saved, whether he is a Kh'shaatriya, a Brahmin, a Soodra, a Vaishya or the most untouchable of the untouchables. ||6||

ਨਾਮਾ ਜੈਦੇਉ ਕੰਬੀਰੁ ਤ੍ਰਿਲੋਚਨੁ ਅਉਜਾਤਿ ਰਵਿਦਾਸੁ ਚਮਿਆਰੁ ਚਮਈਆ ॥
naamaa jaidhaeo kanbeer thrilochan aoujaath ravidhaas chamiaar chameeaa ||
Naam Dayv, Jai Dayv, Kabeer, Trilochan and Ravi Daas the low-caste leather-worker,

ਜੋ ਜੋ ਮਿਲੈ ਸਾਧੂ ਜਨ ਸੰਗਤਿ ਧਨੁ ਧੰਨਾ ਜਟੁ ਸੈਣੁ ਮਿਲਿਆ ਹਰਿ ਦਈਆ ॥੭॥
jo jo milai saadhhoo jan sangath dhhan dhhannaa jatt sain miliaa har dheeaa ||7||
blessed Dhanna and Sain; all those who joined the humble Saadh Sangat, met the Merciful Lord. ||7||

ਸੰਤ ਜਨਾ ਕੀ ਹਰਿ ਪੈਜ ਰਖਾਈ ਭਗਤਿ ਵਛਲੁ ਅੰਗੀਕਾਰੁ ਕਰਈਆ ॥
santh janaa kee har paij rakhaaee bhagath vashhal angeekaar kareeaa ||
The Lord protects the honor of His humble servants; He is the Lover of His devotees - He makes them His own.
~SGGS Ji p. 835




In religious scriptures the words play in the same sense.” Darshan dejai Khol ke Vaar”( means open the door I can see you” but there is no real door behind which Lord lives, all expressions are metaphoric Never ever get stuck to its appearance, go further deep into its application in the context.
For example, you have the view that "darshan" is just poetic license, to make words rhyme or convey emotional idea when in fact, there is no real door.

When I read darshan relating to opening of dasm duar in Gurbani, I don't have that opinion which you say requires being well-versed in poetic metaphors. I am however, somewhat versed in Vedic terminology and I know that it relates to a yogic concept of expanding one's consciousness to reach the fourth state which transcends the materiality of sansaaric vision and gives darshan of other worlds and of the God Himself because it refers to attaining a spiritual state of consciousness which has been purified of the contaminants that block our sight. I happen to believe this is valid and literal, and not mere poetry. When I read Gurbani, I read as a historically true, scientifically sound, rooted in ancient truths, modern as well as timeless teachings. I do NOT read it as pleasant poetry talking about some "nice" but realistically meaningless concepts. Such concepts may seem that way to someone not familiar with the ancient basis of these teachings, the Vedic Puranas and Yoga sutras.



ਤੁਝ ਬਿਨੁ ਸੁਰਤਿ ਕਰੈ ਕੋ ਮੇਰੀ ਦਰਸਨੁ ਦੀਜੈ ਖੋਲ੍ਹ੍ਹਿ ਕਿਵਾਰ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥
thujh bin surath karai ko maeree dharasan dheejai kholih kivaar ||1|| rehaao ||
Who else can take care of me, other than You? Please open Your door, and grant me the Blessed Vision of Your Darshan. ||1||Pause||
~SGGS Ji p. 856




ਨਉ ਦਰਵਾਜੇ ਕਾਇਆ ਕੋਟੁ ਹੈ ਦਸਵੈ ਗੁਪਤੁ ਰਖੀਜੈ ॥
no dharavaajae kaaeiaa kott hai dhasavai gupath rakheejai ||
The fortress of the body has nine gates; the tenth gate is kept hidden.

ਬਜਰ ਕਪਾਟ ਨ ਖੁਲਨੀ ਗੁਰ ਸਬਦਿ ਖੁਲੀਜੈ ॥
bajar kapaatt n khulanee gur sabadh khuleejai ||
The rigid door is not open; only through the Word of the Guru's Shabad can it be opened.

ਅਨਹਦ ਵਾਜੇ ਧੁਨਿ ਵਜਦੇ ਗੁਰ ਸਬਦਿ ਸੁਣੀਜੈ ॥
anehadh vaajae dhhun vajadhae gur sabadh suneejai ||
The unstruck sound current resounds and vibrates there. The Word of the Guru's Shabad is heard.

ਤਿਤੁ ਘਟ ਅੰਤਰਿ ਚਾਨਣਾ ਕਰਿ ਭਗਤਿ ਮਿਲੀਜੈ ॥
thith ghatt anthar chaananaa kar bhagath mileejai ||
Deep within the nucleus of the heart, the Divine Light shines forth. Through devotional worship, one meets the Lord.
~SGGS Ji p. 954



When Gurbani is talking about a door to the Lord's darshan, it is reference to the tenth gate. You believe this "door" is poetic imagination. Well, that's fine. Believe as you wish. But anyone with even basic yogic knowledge knows there is a thousands year old tradition behind these "metaphors" of Gurbani poetry to something very real.

"Having slit open the divider of the skull, he indeed, entered the body by that door. That door is called vidrti. It is the place of joy. For him there are three abodes and three dreams. This is the abode. This is the abode. This is the abode." ~Aitareya Upanishad, ch 3, sloka 12​

What is the portal of entry for this enjoyer? Where are the gates by which the enjoyer can enter, animate, and spiritualize this body? (The nine gates of the body are the two eyes, the two ears, the two nostrils, one mouth, one generative, and one reproductive organ). There are two portals in the body for entry, namely the crown and the forefoot. In the crown, it is Vidrti [split or crevice], the opening (brahma-randhra) in the sagittal suture of the skull, also known as anterior fontanel―the area corresponding to the soft spot on the top of the baby’s head. It is sahasrara, the highest center of spiritual consciousness in Kundalini yoga and the seat of the thousand-petalled lotus.

By this portal, the self enters the body; the self from the time of entry into the body moves among three abodes of residence according to the level of consciousness: wakefulness, dream sleep, and deep sleep; Turiya is the fourth state experienced only by yogis. The right eye is the abode during the wakefulness, the inner mind during dream sleep, and the space in the heart during deep sleep. ~Veeraswamy Krishnaraj
Creation and Dissolution


The human body is usually called “the city of nine gates” for the nine apertures of the body, but here it has the number eleven. Shankara says this is because the navel and the Brahmarandhra, the “soft spot” at the crown of the head are also being counted as gates. This is appropriate, as before birth we are nourished through the navel, and at death we often depart through the Brahmarandhra.
ATMA JYOTI ASHRAM - Katha Upanishad - The Birthless Self




ਨਾਭਿ ਪਵਨੁ ਘਰਿ ਆਸਣਿ ਬੈਸੈ ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਖੋਜਤ ਤਤੁ ਲਹੈ ॥
naabh pavan ghar aasan baisai guramukh khojath thath lehai ||
The breath is seated in the home of the navel; the Gurmukh searches, and finds the essence of reality.

ਸੁ ਸਬਦੁ ਨਿਰੰਤਰਿ ਨਿਜ ਘਰਿ ਆਛੈ ਤ੍ਰਿਭਵਣ ਜੋਤਿ ਸੁ ਸਬਦਿ ਲਹੈ ॥
s sabadh niranthar nij ghar aashhai thribhavan joth s sabadh lehai ||
This Shabad permeates the nucleus of the self, deep within, in its own home; the Light of this Shabad pervades the three worlds.
~SGGS Ji p. 945



Now, when Gurbani is talking about "the Lord's darshan," again, this is a very old philosophical concept rooted in Upanishadic wisdom and a true mystical teaching rather than poetic license or flowery words. "Darshan of the Lord" is a Dvaitic philosophy as it refers to a God which can be perceived and thus sargun manifestation, or personal God. Vaishnavism is famous for this approach to God realization, and bhakti is considered the way to have His darshan. What has been added within the Vaishnav perspective is the blending of Advaitist teaching that mukti is also merging with the Divine Beloved in a higher state of consciousness, turiya.

So when analyzing the yogic principle underlying Guruji's teaching, it becomes apparent that this process of achieving the fourth state involves bhairaag and bhakti, Naama japa, and the sound current of the Shabad. Is this teaching completely new as a revelation to the world? Or is it a re-establishing of an ancient truth? Everyone will have to decide for themselves based on the available evidence.

Just as a sankalpa - a pure thought - has to pass through several stages before it actually manifests as concrete creative force, the sound of a particular mantra also has to pass through several stages before it is fully experienced by the listener in perfection. These stages are termed as para, pashyanti, madhyama and vaikhari.

Each level of sound corresponds to a level of existence, and one's experience of sound depends upon the refinement of one's consciousness. It takes a realized consciousness to experience the full range of sound, the full range of existence. The seers who can comprehend the four stages of sound are known as Manishis.

The higher three forms of shabda are described in the Rig Veda as hidden in "guha", or within the self, whereas the forth is the external manifested speech, known as laukika bhasha.

These four levels of sound correspond to four states of consciousness. Para represents the transcendental consciousness. Pashyanti represents the intellectual consciousness. Madhyama represents the mental consciousness. And Vaikhari represents the physical consciousness. These states of consciousness correspond with the four states known technically as jagrat, svapna, susupti, and turiya - or the wakeful state, the dreaming state, the dreamless state, and the transcendental state.

Shabda-brahman in its absolute nature is called para. In manifestation the subtle is always the source of the gross, and thus from para-vak manifests the other three forms of sound." ~Jahnava Nitai Das
VEDA - Vedas and Vedic Knowledge Online - Vedic Encyclopedia, Bhakti-yoga in vedas, Library


Before I give you Gurbani quotes to prove my point that Mukti as per Sikhism is not the same as Vaishanavas.
Your understanding of Vaishnavism is very poor and as a consequence, you imagine differences where there are none.

We know a relationship exists between Kabir ji and Sikhism, so what do Kabir panthis think about concepts of narak surag? Do they even believe in them?
I gave quote from Kabir ji himself why we need Kabir panthy now? It is also known as bouncing all over unnecessarily.
Because anyone with scholarly integrity will acknowledge the beliefs of the Kabir panthis about their primary Satguru, Kabir ji will have a truer reflection on who he was, and what he taught. So if we are analyzing the bhagat bani, as well as Guruji's own bani which has collectively been united to become Gurubani, then the definitions which Kabir ji held will most likely be the true ones, as opposed to the newer modernistic definitions imposed on traditional concepts such as Narak Surag. So with integrity, to analyze both the Kabir panthi and Vaishnava interpretation wyhich is rooted in ancient Upanishadic teaching is far more credible as to the origin of such concepts as appear in Gurbani.

I have heard many Sikhs say the Nirmala Panth is based on a lie and a presumption, that Guru Gobind Singh Ji never sent 5 of His Sikhs to study the Vedas, because "Why would He need?" Yet, simple analysis of the Sanskrit terminology in Gurbani, which absolutely lines up and corresponds with Vaishnava Vedanatic interpretations being so completely re-defined in imaginative and unmeaningful, negating ways (such as poetic license or rare skepticism) would be all the example one needs to believe the valid establishment of Nirmala Panth. Not to mention the other point of evidence being Shri Dasam Granth bani almost totally filled with Vedantic stories, teachings and religion. And why do Udasi and Nirmala Panths and Dasam Granth bani even exist? Because there was NO relation between Shaivite yoga and Vaishnav bhakti and Gurbani? Or because there was?

In Gurbani, words are restructured. Ignorant and fanatic Hindu Dayaa Nand Called Guru Nanak illiterate just by looking at a word “ bhao” So please do a justice to Gurbani, in stead of heavily depending on second hand knowledge; as you are intelligent, learn Gurmukhi and Punjabi, you will see the same words loaded with totally new meanings in original.
Why don't you stop being personally insulting about me as an individual and at least acknowledge that the terms we have in contention are Sanskrit and not even Punjabi. And as I am sharing the Vedic origin and definitions of the Sanskrit words, and as there are Panths within Sikh tradition which have been teaching the exact same interpretations I am sharing now, to insult or tear me down as a person, cannot possibly invalidate in the way you hope. How can you make the entire Nirmala Panth just go away? Are they not scholars of Punjabi and Gurmukhi as well as Sanskrit? And besides, Shri Dasam Granth bani is written in Braj. So again, your personal slight has no bearing on the issue, is argumentative and distracting and does not invalidate or establish points of contention as to the origin, meaning and interpretation of Sanskrit concepts in Gurbani.

Here is direct negation on prevailed Mukti in any faith at Guru Nanak’s time. You will see, in Gurbani, still Mukti word is used but its meaning is not understood as in Vashnav or Hinduism.

ਪੰਨਾ 534, ਸਤਰ 4
ਰਾਜੁ ਨ ਚਾਹਉਮੁਕਤਿ ਨਚਾਹਉ ਮਨਿ ਪ੍ਰੀਤਿ ਚਰਨ ਕਮਲਾਰੇ ॥
राजु न चाहउ मुकति न चाहउ मनि प्रीति चरन कमलारे ॥
Rāj na cẖāha*o mukaṯ na cẖāha*o man parīṯ cẖaran kamlārė.
I do not seek power, and I do not seek liberation. My mind is in love with Your Lotus Feet.
ਮਃ 5
Why not Mukti is needed Bhain ji ? all Vashanav and Hindu etc ideology stress on it, here Guru ji says, no it not needed just one thing is important, that is HIS love
Perhaps you are not aware that Vaishnava Vedanta is the original bhakti Panth. The only thing negating is your imagination which is deliberately misconstruing the teachings of vaishnavism to correlate them as the worst of brahmin excesses and corruption. Since the Bhagavatam absolutely teaches that God, nirgun and sargun (by those exact definitions) is obtained by bhakti, loving devotion expressed by Naam japo, your words are simply empty in this regard as they are a contradiction of known facts.

Guruji did not even modify Vaishnava philosophy at all, but actually teaches it.
That is a direct insult to Guru’s own originality, I resent that. As there is a saying in Punjabi, “when a hungry person was asked, how much is two plus two?’” “The reply was, “four chapatees( loaf of bread) instead of saying “four” as answer.”
That is what the case is here. You studied Vashanav, every thing you see is Vashnav in Guru teachings. You should think before you say such words about Guru.
Can someone insult God? Even this is an Abrahamic concept. Resent all you want. Guruji is a Vishnu avtaara. Naturally He will have commonality with Himself. Guru is unique in that this entire philosophy is unique and coherent unity. Only the interpretations that Guruji established something utterly new and contradictory or in violation of Sruti is the imagination. Who can recite:



ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਨਾਦੰ ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਵੇਦੰ ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਰਹਿਆ ਸਮਾਈ ॥
guramukh naadhan guramukh vaedhan guramukh rehiaa samaaee ||
The Guru's Word is the Sound-current of the Naad; the Guru's Word is the Wisdom of the Vedas; the Guru's Word is all-pervading.

ਗੁਰੁ ਈਸਰੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਗੋਰਖੁ ਬਰਮਾ ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬਤੀ ਮਾਈ ॥
gur eesar gur gorakh baramaa gur paarabathee maaee ||
The Guru is Shiva, the Guru is Vishnu and Brahma; the Guru is Paarvati and Lakhshmi.
~SGGS Ji p. 2



And then create fallacy that Vedas are worthless and deny every parallel teaching within Gurbani itself which has Vedic and Upanishadic sources is reminding of Shakespeare: "Methinks he doth protest too much." How can anyone interpret the Abrahamic distortion that Guruji denied the reality of devas, or that devas are completely corrupt and worthless and therefore all Hindu religion in general is corrupt and worthless. And the whole thing is a distorion not only of the bani, but of Hinduism, most particularly because Vaisnavism as well as Vedas and Upanishads teach the Omkar is part of creation, under influence of maya and three gunas, and hence corruptible and do not approach the limits of the nirguna? So it's the same exact teaching within Vedanta as in Gurbani, who invented the deliberate distortion negating Vaishnava Vedanta as an invalid path to mukti?

And one only needs to look at the condition of the Sikh Panth today and ask, what is the basis for the arrogant assumption that Sikhs are any closer to mukti as a community than anybody else? And when you realistically see the same stresses, the same corruption, the same hypocrisy, the same worldliness, the same ignorance that every other religious community has, it begs the question... "What is so unique in Sikhism that shows the world this is the only boat of mukti in the Kaliyug?"

And I can't answer that question in any positive way. Sikhs are very nice people, but are just like everybody else. I don't personally know anyone who is even close to mukti. And I'm being honest. I've seen a man beaten and dragged off by committee members in Gurdwara over some power struggle or other. I watched my divorced amritdhari friend become completely ostracized in the Gurdwara, because her ex-husband was rich and powerful and a committee member. No one cared that he didn't keep amrit, except in appearance, drank, had affairs and beat her. They ostracized and rejected her AND her children. And I watched heartbreaking things repeatedly done at this Gurdwara.

So I'm saying we should be analyzing the spirituality, and not just the arrogant assumptions of superiority of doctrine, or exclusionary teaching. Because in this way Sikhism is parroting Abrahamic religions and losing something Divine of it's authentic Indic heritage. Every manifestation of God which people imagine, is a part of the nirgun God Himself. Gurbani says this in the very concept of Ik Onkar. The creation, beginning with Trimurti, Onkara, is One, with the Divine Oneness of the All-Pervading. Everyone has their own understanding. Who can say Hindus will not achieve mukti? Even Gurbani itself equates a Vaishnav with a Gurmukh.

Do you think authentically spiritual people of Hindu religion are less a saint, are less holy because they are not Sikhs? Do you think Sikhs, just by virtue of being born in Punjabi Sikh community have any speacial spirituality or are immune from corruption or worldly attraction? Do you really think all the millionaire liquor store owners, deli meat store owners, etc whose wives dress in expensive suits and jewely and make-up, who don't bother to say fateh to someone not their caste or social equal are any different from anyone else in any other religion? Maybe that criteria of fluency in Gurmukhi and Punjabi is not an accurate indicator of spiritual maturity.

Too often langar is about feeding Sikhs in a Gurdwara who are members of one community. I acknowldge when there have been disasters like Hurricane Katrina Sikhs were there, but why aren't Sikhs always there? Why is langar being limited to richly feeding our own? The fact is, the Vaishnavas are feeding poor people all over the world, they are taking prasad to them. Look at Amritanandamayi, not only does she feed people in kitchens all over the world, but has established orphanages, schools, a major hospital, and when the Tsunami caused so much destruction, she built thousands of houses. Are these people without a boat of mukti because they are Hindu? And by what criteria do we say Sikhs have God in the pocket?

Let's get real. You know holy people by the way they live their lives, by the way their spiritual teachings impact other people's lives. And I cannot in good conscience elevate Sikhs or denounce Hindus as lights of holiness in the Kaliyug. So something needs to be evaluated in terms of what is missing in Sikhism today that has estranged most people from the spiritual philosophies of authentic transformation?


I shall vanish (from sight) having given a kingdom; My name being Gobind. There will be a time when the Khalsa shall forget the teachings I have given them. Sikhi will only be left in name. Many Wars shall occur. I will have to return again to resurrect the Khalsa. They shall reside in the Punjab.

I shall make people from all four corners into one.
~Karni Nama, Sau Sakhi


YouTube - Vandana Shiva on Biodiversity, seed banks and suicide famers

YouTube - Hare Krishna Food for Life & restaurants

YouTube - Amma - Helping Tsunami Orphans

YouTube - Amma On CNN
 

pk70

Writer
SPNer
Feb 25, 2008
1,582
627
USA
Do you realize how arrogant this sounds? First you proved nothing, except how your own views could be different. As I showed how Gurbani does in fact have an interpretation which is not well known by mainstream Sikhs, but in fact has a long history within the Panth, and within those Jathas who embrace a form of Sikhism but are not considered within the Panth. And I mean the Nihangs, certain views (but not all) of sants within Dam Dami Taksal and Bhai Sahib Bhai Randhir Singh ji of AKJ, Nirmalas, and also Naamdharis and Udasis.

Respected Bhain Ji,you are too emotional, in debate, emotions have no place. Given reasons you deny, like Guru ji’s own words about “ Mukti”, It is called showing your back to the Truth described by Guru Ji. your hammering goes on even after seeing the nail has gone deep in. What is the use of those quotes? None.( in your views)
What is importance of Guru’s own words about enlightenment before smoldering of Vashbava? None( in your views)
What does a poem in Urdu have to do with anything? I
I translated it and explained how words convey much more meaning than their structure, it sounds strange to you , I am not surprised..
In Indian religions, Moksha (Sanskrit: मोक्ष moka, liberation) or Mukti (Sanskrit: मुक्ति, release) is liberation from samsara, the cycle of death and rebirth and all of the suffering and limitation of worldly existence. In Hindu philosophy, it is seen as a transcendence of phenomenal being, a state of higher consciousness, in which matter, energy, time, space, causation (karma) and the other features of empirical reality are understood as maya.
I do not care what you quote. In that Urdu translated line I explained you “ death” changes meaning, just as in Gurbani “ jivat marna” doesn’t mean literally death. Keep that mukti the way you want, Gurbani rejects that with new meaning.
There is no other religion in the world which parallels so exactly. Christianity has no concept of mukti. Islam has no concept of mukti. Buddhism has, but it has no concept of a personal God and even it's concept of mukti comes from Vedic sources. To make the exaggerated claim that because both Vedanta and Sikhi use the term mukti, they use it in a mutually exclusive manner which sets them apart is wishful thinking. It points to Singh Sabhia influence which tried to downplay any and all association with ancient Vedantic teachings
Sikhism has redefined Mukti, quotes were already given, now attitude is “ who cares?” You reject Gurbani that doest align with fully Vaishanva and Hinduism; otherwise quotes are used just for convenient.

(Quote)Why in the modern era is this hostility, negation and denial of Vedantic validity? And I believe it has to do with politicized interpretations of religion which mimic Abrahamic intolerance and insensitivity to undermine every other faith as invalid.
It is not them, it is SGGS Ji, Mukti is achieved while being alive, testimony of Guru ji and Bhagat is there.
For example, you have the view that "darshan" is just poetic license, to make words rhyme or convey emotional idea when in fact, there is no real door.

When I read darshan relating to opening of dasm duar in Gurbani
A sheer display of ignorance about poetic truth, There is no door, an illusions is eliminated, soul gets elevated, I forgot Bhain Ji, you have to go with all upnishdas, vedas’s meaning contrary to personal experience detailed in Gurbani. Disagreement is inevitable. So keep up your search, sorry it is not useful for those who want to just follow Guru. People are more interested in fruit than where the fruit tree was, how it was grown

Now, when Gurbani is talking about "the Lord's darshan," again, this is a very old philosophical concept rooted in Upanishadic wisdom and a true mystical teaching rather than poetic license or flowery words. "Darshan of the Lord" is a Dvaitic philosophy as it refers to a God which can be perceived and thus sargun manifestation, or personal God.
Keep digging and proving Guru ji borrowed every thing from your favorites, why should I care?
Your understanding of Vaishnavism is very poor and as a consequence, you imagine differences where there are none.
So it be Bhain Jo,( and I do not intent to waste my time on such gimmicks ) you the expert failed to come up with otherwise, in this post no mention of Hukm, Grace Of God and the last but not least, outright modification of Mukti as I advocated as per Gurbani. Just bringing quotes from INTERNET shops, can impress others how much you studied, it doesn’t change the truth. I am dead at Guru’s door, for me, he taught what he was enlightened with by the special grace of God; the so called Sikhs, if try to accuse him borrowing from Vashnava or Hinduism, they are literally immaterial to me. I believe every word he wrote down, you, the expert, keep digging, all is His Ordinance. Good luck.

Do you think authentically spiritual people of Hindu religion are less a saint, are less holy because they are not Sikhs? Do you think Sikhs, just by virtue of being born in Punjabi Sikh community have any speacial spirituality or are immune from corruption or worldly attraction? Do you really think all the millionaire liquor store owners, deli meat store owners, etc whose wives dress in expensive suits and jewely and make-up, who don't bother to say fateh to someone not their caste or social equal are any different from anyone else in any other religion? Maybe that criteria of fluency in Gurmukhi and Punjabi is not an accurate indicator of spiritual maturity.

Too often langar is about feeding Sikhs in a Gurdwara who are members of one community. I acknowldge when there have been disasters like Hurricane Katrina Sikhs were there, but why aren't Sikhs always there? Why is langar being limited to richly feeding our own? The fact is, the Vaishnavas are feeding poor people all over the world, they are taking prasad to them. Look at Amritanandamayi, not only does she feed people in kitchens all over the world, but has established orphanages, schools, a major hospital, and when the Tsunami caused so much destruction, she built thousands of houses. Are these people without a boat of mukti because they are Hindu? And by what criteria do we
say Sikhs have God in the pocket?

If you are a good Sikh, kindly prove if ever I have advocated Punjabi Sikhs, criticized Vashnava or other good people doing good things. I strongly resent that. What right do you have to attack me like this from no where. Are we debating who [/FONT]is batter Sikhs or others? If no why these accusations.This is my last response to your comments. For a record, all Sikhs are not and cannot be better than all others as others cannot be better or bad. Good ones are in every faiths. Good spirited people forgive who are living under limitations as per AkaalPurakh's Hukam. I pray the Super Power you believe in, bless you with more humbleness and subtleness. I wish I didn't read your above comments. It is sad, it came from you.Thanks.

[/FONT]
 

Randip Singh

Writer
Historian
SPNer
May 25, 2005
2,935
2,950
56
United Kingdom
Having read through the posts finally I think there is one glaring reason why Vaishnavite thought cannot be compatible with Sikh thought. That is the notion of Ahimsa oe non-violence.

Sikh's are by no means warmongers, but they strongly believe that "when all other mean have been exhausted, it is righteous to draw the sword".

On this one phrase Mahatma Ghandhi (a out and out Vashnavite), called Guru Gobind Singh ji a "misguided patriot".

I see nothing misguided about wanting to defend your freedom and right to existence, and therin is the reason why Sikhi and Vashnavism can never ever be compatible.
 
Feb 14, 2006
512
31
Having read through the posts finally I think there is one glaring reason why Vaishnavite thought cannot be compatible with Sikh thought. That is the notion of Ahimsa of non-violence.
Gandhi had a lot of Jain influences. Ahimsa is also very much misunderstood. Is Hindutva proponent of Ahimsa? Yet many of them are also Vaishnav. So we go back to fundamental interpretation.

When it comes to Gurbani, violence for it's own sake is not propagated. Sikhism absolutely is a Dharmic path. Gandhian non-violence as a political philosophy was a huge failure which led to the violence of partition. It was precisely his failure to act at a crucial juncture to consolidate the unity of India, and pacifistic policies of appeasement with Muslims which divided the country. Just because this man was Vaishnava doesn't mean this is sole interpretation of Vaishnava Vedanta.

To protect the Dharma is the highest good, is the message of Bhagavad-Gita. Bhagavan Krishna tells Arjuna how unmanly it is for him to sink down in the chariot with misguided intentions. Honor for the righteous warrior is righteous combat.

So again, it can be proved from significant sources that entire Sikh philosophy of defending the Dharma as the highest good comes from Vaishnav sources. Sikhism is not a teaching of violence for the sake of ego or as a means to an end. It is the last resort to defend the helpless. So Gandhi, who invented terms such as "satyagrahis" was imparting a false pacifism more akin to Buddhism and Jain religion than teachings of Bhagavad-Gita.


Arjuna's pacifist plea:
"Tutors, sons and fathers, grandsires and grandsons, uncles and nephews, cousins, kindred, and friends! Although they would kill me, I wish not to fight them: no, not even for the dominion of the three regions of the universe, much less for this little earth! Should we destroy them, tyrants though they are, sin would take refuge with us. It therefore behooveth us not to kill such near relations as these. How, O Krishna, can we be happy hereafter, when we have been the murderers of our race?

O Krishna, that a sojourn in hell awaits those mortals whose generation hath lost its virtue. Woe is me! What a great crime are we prepared to commit! Alas! that from the desire for sovereignty and pleasure we stand here ready to slay our own kin! I would rather patiently suffer that the sons of Dhritarashtra, with their weapons in their hands, should come upon me, and, unopposed, kill me unresisting in the field."

When Arjuna had ceased to speak, he sat down in the chariot between the two armies; and, having put away his bow and arrows, his heart was overwhelmed with despondency."
~Bhagavad-Gita ch 1
Did the teaching of Bhagavad-Gita say Arjuna was correct? Was this Gandhian pacifism rewarded as spiritual teaching? Let's read more.

Krishna's rebuke:
"Krishna, beholding him thus influenced by compunction, his eyes overflowing with a flood of tears, and his heart oppressed with deep affliction, addressed him in the following words:

"Whence, O Arjuna, cometh upon thee this dejection in matters of difficulty, so unworthy of the honorable, and leading neither to heaven nor to glory? It is disgraceful, contrary to duty, and the foundation of dishonor. Yield not thus to unmanliness, for it ill-becometh one like thee. Abandon, O tormenter of thy foes, this despicable weakness of thy heart, and stand up."

Arjuna:
"How, O slayer of Madhu, shall I with my shafts contend in battle against such as Bhishma and Drona, who of all men are most worthy of my respect? For it were better to beg my bread about the world than be the murderer of my preceptors, to whom such awful reverence is due. Were I to destroy such friends as these, I should partake of possessions, wealth, and pleasures polluted with their blood. Nor can we tell whether it would be better that we should defeat them, or they us. For those drawn up, angrily confronting us -- and after whose death, should they perish by my hand, I would not wish to live -- are the sons and people of Dhritarashtra. As I am of a disposition which is affected by compassion and the fear of doing wrong, I ask thee which is it better to do."

Arjuna having thus spoken to Krishna, became silent, saying: "I shall not fight, O Govinda." Krishna, tenderly smiling, addressed these words to the prince thus standing downcast between the two armies.

Krishna:
""Thou grievest for those that may not be lamented, whilst thy sentiments are those of the expounders of the letter of the law. Those who are wise in spiritual things grieve neither for the dead nor for the living. I myself never was not, nor thou, nor all the princes of the earth; nor shall we ever hereafter cease to be. As the lord of this mortal frame experienceth therein infancy, youth, and old age, so in future incarnations will it meet the same. One who is confirmed in this belief is not disturbed by anything that may come to pass. The senses, moving toward their appropriate objects, are producers of heat and cold, pleasure and pain, which come and go and are brief and changeable; these do thou endure, O son of Bharata! For the wise man, whom these disturb not and to whom pain and pleasure are the same, is fitted for immortality.

There is no existence for that which does not exist, nor is there any non-existence for what exists. By those who see the truth and look into the principles of things, the ultimate characteristic of these both is seen. Learn that He by whom all things were formed is incorruptible, and that no one is able to effect the destruction of IT which is inexhaustible. These finite bodies, which envelop the souls inhabiting them, are said to belong to Him, the eternal, the indestructible, unprovable Spirit, who is in the body: wherefore, O Arjuna, resolve to fight. The man who believeth that it is this Spirit which killeth, and he who thinketh that it may be destroyed, are both alike deceived; for it neither killeth nor is it killed.

This spirit can never be destroyed in the mortal frame which it inhabiteth, hence it is unworthy for thee to be troubled for all these mortals. Cast but thine eyes towards the duties of thy particular tribe, and it will ill become thee to tremble. A soldier of the Kshatriya (1) tribe hath no duty superior to lawful war, and just to thy wish the door of heaven is found open before thee, through this glorious unsought fight which only fortune's favored soldiers may obtain. But if thou wilt not perform the duty of thy calling and fight out the field, thou wilt abandon thy natural duty and thy honor, and be guilty of a crime. Mankind will speak of thy ill fame as infinite, and for one who hath been respected in the world ill fame is worse than death.

The generals of the armies will think that thy retirement from the field arose from fear, and even amongst those by whom thou wert wont to be thought great of soul thou shalt become despicable. Thine enemies will speak of thee in words which are unworthy to be spoken, depreciating thy courage and abilities; what can be more dreadful than this! If thou art slain thou shalt attain heaven; if victorious, the world shall be thy reward; wherefore, son of Kunti, arise with determination fixed for the battle. Make pleasure and pain, gain and loss, victory and defeat, the same to thee, and then prepare for battle, for thus and thus alone shalt thou in action still be free from sin."

Which is the more logical approach, to say Sant Jarnail Singh Bindranwale's beliefs and actions were the example of every Sikh Jatha and sect, or the teachings directly from Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji? Likewise, how can M.K. Gandhi be anything more than an example of a particular interpretation, which even within Vaishnavism are differences, most notably the direct teachings from Bhagavad-Gita? To be honest, this again, sounds like the oversimplified distorted comparisons arising from Singh Sabha reform to exaggerate differences in a desperate attempt to disprove and deny commonalities. But with historical integrity, such oversimplifications hold no credibility.

Just as no one can say Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale represents all Sikh teaching, how can anyone say M.K. Gandhi does also? Vaishnavism has a sannyasi heritage, and what is not popularly known is the warrior monk heritage during the time of the moghuls and who also resisted the British. It was in fact the Shaivaite and Vaishnava monks who became fearsome warriors who admitted the low caste and even women into their ranks. Does this sound familiar to Sikhism? As I said before, the historical parallels are unmistakable... unless one refuses to acknowledge them.

One early encounter, recorded by the noted Company surveyor James Rennell who at the time (1766) was mapping territory just south of the Himalayan foothill kingdom of Bhutan, bears testimony to the martial potential of armed monks and the resentment of armed sadhus at the new impositions being placed on them by the Company state. Rennell happened upon a skirmish in progress between Company troops and a force of seven hundred such sadhus; the wounds he received included a saber gash that “cut through my right Shoulder Bone, and laid me open for nearly a foot down the Back, cutting through and wounding some of my Ribs, . . . a cut on the left Elbow, which took off the muscular part of the breadth of a Hand, a Stab in the Arm, and a large cut on the head.”[6]

The Company prevailed in that particular confrontation, but over three decades would pass before the akharas (monastic armies) would be disarmed in Bengal or, at the very least, driven beyond Company-controlled territories. This prolonged confrontation between Company soldiers and armed sadhus is generally understood in terms of the Company desire to establish itself as militarily supreme in the province of Bengal. Rarely, if ever, are the ideological implications of the conflict examined by social historians, and the term “rebellion,” considered a political overstatement given the nature of the conflict, seems now to have been discarded.[7] However, the phenomenon of armed monasticism certainly posed more than simply a “law and order” challenge for newly ascendant Company officials. Armed sadhus were the very antithesis of the world the company-state was endeavoring to create in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, namely, a settled peasant society that would render forth vast agrarian revenues on a regular basis with as little resistance as possible. The modern state in India could not countenance recalcitrant sadhus wandering about the countryside armed, dangerous, often naked, and claiming to represent an alternate locus of authority.[8] The Company needed a modern sadhu: a priestly monk unconcerned with worldly power and given over completely to religious contemplation and prayer. Hence Warren Hastings’s proclamation of 21 January 1773 banishing “all Biraugies and Sunnasses [bairagis and sanyasis, or armed Vaishnava and Shaiva monks] who are travellers strangers and passengers in this country” from the provinces of Bengal and Bihar, save “such of the cast of Rammanundar and Goraak [Ramanand and Gorakhnath] who have for a long time been settled and receive a maintenance in land money . . . from the Government or the Zemindars of the province, [and] likewise such Sunasses as are allowed charity ground for executing religious offices.” In other words, those sadhus who were “neither vagrants nor plunderers but fixed inhabitants,” who “quietly employ themselves in their religious function,” could, in Hastings’s view, be tolerated.[9]

Armed monasticism holds more than just military and political-cultural interest, however. There are indications that the rise of Vaishnava and Shaiva monastic soldiering afforded, or in some way reflected, increased entry of people of low social status, particularly those deemed shudra by the twice-born elite, into the major monastic orders in Gangetic north India. In this sense, the history of the armed akharas is not unlike that of the Sikhs in the Punjab, the arming of whom, according to W. H. McLeod, was occasioned by the prolonged infusion of Jat peasants into the Nanakpanthi community.[10] By the eighteenth century the profusion of Jat Sikhs cemented in demographic fact the professed egalitarianism that had long been a powerful ideological component of Guru Nanak’s teaching. Hence for McLeod, Sikh hagiography (which speaks of a unilateral decision on the part of Guru Govind Singh to militarize the Nanakpanth in 1699) masks slow processes of social and demographic transformation.

Similarly, it is possible to perceive the social dimensions of militarization by looking within Shaiva and Vaishnava monastic traditions regarding the decision to take up arms. For example, a widely accepted Dasnami legend recorded by J. N. Farquhar in the early twentieth century held that Shaiva monks took up arms during the reign (and with the approval) of the Mughal emperor Akbar (r. 1556–1605) to defend brahman sanyasis against the persecutions of Muslim fakirs. While the motivational elements of this tradition can be challenged on the basis of both historical and historiographical evidence, it is perhaps more significant that Farquhar also related his general impression that the arming of Shaivas relied on the heavy recruitment of shudras into the elite ranks of the Dasnami order.[11] Whether shudras were indeed actively recruited as soldier Dasnamis, or whether the assertion of past military recruitment became a convenient way of explaining the increasing number of shudras in the order, the fact remains that today certain segments of orthodox, high-caste Dasnamis avoid commensal relations with warrior monks because of the latter’s supposedly low origins.[12]

One can see stronger suggestions of the involvement of shudras (and, indeed, others of low and marginal status such as women and untouchables) in traditions relating to Vaishnava monastic soldiering. One important Vaishnava narrative holds that the arming of bairagis was the product of a conscious decision made in 1713 by leaders of the four main Vaishnava sampraday—often referred to collectively as the chatuh-sampraday, namely, the orders organized around the teachings of Vishnuswami, Madhvacharya, Nimbarkacharya, and Ramanujacharya (in which Ramanandis were included).[13] According to this tradition, the major Vaishnava mahants met at Galta, a temple complex and monastic center very near Jaipur, and decided to resort to arms to defend against increasing attacks by Shaiva monks. Significantly, the Galta meeting in 1713 also marked the emergence of Ramanandis (those who look to Swami Ramanand for inspiration) as the dominant force not only among the followers of Ramanujacharya’s teachings, but among Vaishnavas in north India generally.[14] The Galta tradition provides an interesting twist, however: it was also decided in 1713 to declare the untouchable, shudra, and female members of Ramanand’s original fourteenth-century coterie of disciples as “illegitimate” transmitters of tradition; in other words, untouchables, shudras, and women would continue to be admitted as Ramanandi novitiates, but henceforth they would have to link themselves to the Ramanandi past via one of the original male, twice-born (in this case, either brahman or kshatriya) disciples of Ramanand.
Peasants and Monks in British India

See also Warrior Ascetics And Indian Empires

Shaivite and Vaishnava ascetic acharas were considered monastic armies. Some of the fiercest were the Shaivite naga babas. How can this forgotten history jibe with the colonialist pacifism of Gandhian ahimsa? It doesn't even accord with the teachings of the Bhagavad-Gita. The main factor in this religious focus of this militarism was "protection of the Dharma" and so they considered themselves "holy Armies." Or, "Armies of God." Does the formation of the Khalsa seem out of place within this historical background?

I see nothing misguided about wanting to defend your freedom and right to existence, and therin is the reason why Sikhi and Vashnavism can never ever be compatible.
It isn't incompatible. Ancient Vaishnava and Shaivite scriptures are the source for warrior self-defense and defense of the helpless as positive Dharmic duty. It's only deliberate distortions of history which permit such beliefs about incompatibility. People should be shocked that so much they have learned historically was deliberately distorted. It should be a matter of genuine curiosity why Gandhian ahimsa is portrayed as a Vaishnav teaching, and not Bhagavan Krishna urging Arjuna to fight like a soldier indifferent to the outcome, but to fight, win or lose, because it is righteous and noble to fight for a just cause.

There is a reason the avtaars are K'shatriya. It is the duty of the avtaars to destroy evil, and set the dharma on balance again. That is the essence of Vaishnavism, not ahimsa.
lakshminrisimha.jpg

Narasingh avtaar, the Lion-man who roars and causes others to roar. Shown here destroying the demon king Hiranyakasipu. Not exactly ahimsa.

narasimha_s.jpg

Narasingh destroys the demons. Notice the chakr in his hands?


Why do you think Kalki avtaara is called, "Kalki the destroyer?" It is not because he is powerless or non-violent. Rather he will use destructive ends to achieve his means. He has to destroy the corrupted K'shatriya who contaminate and subjugate the world to right the Dharmic balance. This is the meaning of the demons who take human form in kaliyug in Gurbani. The teachings of Kalki the destroyer tell that in Kaliyug demons are born as evil warriors.
kalki.2.jpg



nwboomb2.jpg
250px-Stealth-bomber.jpg

B2 Spirit Bomber, American Air Force. If you want to understand about evil warrior Armies that contaminate the world, read about the vimanas of the asuras.


ਕਲੀ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਨਾਨਕਾ ਜਿੰਨਾਂ ਦਾ ਅਉਤਾਰੁ ॥
kalee andhar naanakaa jinnaan dhaa aouthaar ||
In this Dark Age of Kali Yuga, O Nanak, the demons have taken birth.
~SGGS Ji p. 556​


YouTube - Neutron Bomb creator speaks

"Gurkha flying in his swift and powerful Vimana hurled against the three cities of the Vrishis and Andhakas a single projectile charged with all the power of the Universe. An incandescent column of smoke and fire, as brilliant as ten thousands suns, rose in all its splendor. It was the unknown weapon, the Iron Thunderbolt, a gigantic messenger of death which reduced to ashes the entire race of the Vrishnis and Andhakas." ~Mahabharata​

~Bhul chak maaf
 
Feb 14, 2006
512
31
f
It is not them, it is SGGS Ji, Mukti is achieved while being alive, testimony of Guru ji and Bhagat is there.
The concept of jivan mukti comes from the Upanishads originally, and is restated in SGGS Ji, not for the first time introduced in SGGS Ji. This "presumed" incompatibility is simply lack of knowledge of Upanishadic philosophy. Jivan mukti isn't a Punjabi word or concept, again, it is Sanskrit and has very ancient origin. Gurbani doesn't change this concept at all. It simply borrows the concept, to express in Punjabi language, a true spiritual teaching.

Jivanmukta (from the Sanskrit words jiva and mukti) is someone who, in the advaita philosophy of Hinduism, has attained nirvikalpa samadhi - the realization of the Self, Parasiva - and is liberated from rebirth while living in a human body. [1]

Jiivanmukta is a unique concept in Hindu philosophy, particularly in the school of philosophy known as advaita. The ultimate goal of Hinduism is liberation from the cycles of re-birth. This liberation is technically called 'moksha'. In all schools of Hindu philosophy except advaita, liberation is necessarily an event beyond the experience of human being. But the advaita school of Shankara envisages that human is already liberated and the soul is already free - one only has only to realise, and to accept, this freedom. Souls who have had this realisation are called jivanmuktas, though they are extremely rare.
Jivanmukta - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I do not care what you quote.
Than why are we pretending to have a discussion?

In that Urdu translated line I explained you “ death” changes meaning, just as in Gurbani “ jivat marna” doesn’t mean literally death. Keep that mukti the way you want, Gurbani rejects that with new meaning.
You are ignoring the obvious. Jivan mukti isn't an altered concept. It means in Gurbani exactly what it means in Sanskrit. The definitions are identical.

When I read darshan relating to opening of dasm duar in Gurbani
A sheer display of ignorance about poetic truth, There is no door, an illusions is eliminated, soul gets elevated, I forgot Bhain Ji, you have to go with all upnishdas, vedas’s meaning contrary to personal experience detailed in Gurbani.
If concept of "door" is mere poetic metaphor, then why does Gurbani teach concept of dasm duar and Naam japna?

Disagreement is inevitable. So keep up your search, sorry it is not useful for those who want to just follow Guru.
So, you are following Guru, and I am not. How arrogant can someone be? You think these are spiritual attitudes?

Keep digging and proving Guru ji borrowed every thing from your favorites, why should I care?
Guruji is avtaara. So Guruji is same as Raam and Krishna and Kalki. So if Krishna taught these concepts which again appear in Gurbani, is it really a "borrowing?" It is only stated to contradict someone who says Vedas are worthless, to show that Guruji used Sanskrit terminology and Vedic teaching. He did this because these are all His teachings, all One Truth, and all a single manifestation of the nirgun God.

So it be Bhain Jo,( and I do not intent to waste my time on such gimmicks ) you the expert failed to come up with otherwise, in this post no mention of Hukm, Grace Of God and the last but not least, outright modification of Mukti as I advocated as per Gurbani. Just bringing quotes from INTERNET shops, can impress others how much you studied, it doesn’t change the truth. I am dead at Guru’s door, for me, he taught what he was enlightened with by the special grace of God; the so called Sikhs, if try to accuse him borrowing from Vashnava or Hinduism, they are literally immaterial to me. I believe every word he wrote down, you, the expert, keep digging, all is His Ordinance. Good luck.
Gurbani says Guruji is an avtaara. Just like Raam. Just like Krishna. That is His special grace of God, because He is the very Jyot of God. I believe every word He wrote down also. I do not believe in poetic metaphors.

If you are a good Sikh, kindly prove if ever I have advocated Punjabi Sikhs, criticized Vashnava or other good people doing good things. I strongly resent that. What right do you have to attack me like this from no where. Are we debating who is batter Sikhs or others? If no why these accusations.This is my last response to your comments. For a record, all Sikhs are not and cannot be better than all others as others cannot be better or bad. Good ones are in every faiths. Good spirited people forgive who are living under limitations as per AkaalPurakh's Hukam. I pray the Super Power you believe in, bless you with more humbleness and subtleness. I wish I didn't read your above comments. It is sad, it came from you.Thanks.
Do you believe this entire discussion revolves around you and your posts? I am sharing problems in the Punjabi Sikh community, that if we are to analyze how Sikhism is a boat of mukti in the Kalyug, in what ways it is failing to be this, so that blind faith in this idea has to be based on authentic spirituality and no ethnocentrism within a culture. Moreover Punjabiyat is actually distancing other people and rejecting converts, so this aspect of Sikhism from the cultural point of view is definitely NOT a boat of mukti. If you want to resent this, go ahead. But it is still the truth. If you want to personalize this as something about you or any post you've written, go ahead. I wrote it because it is my lived experience, and WHY I do not believe Punjabi Sikhs have any spiritual monopoly or are the only right path or have some boat of mukti. It's not an attack on you. I don't even know you. I am pointing out serious weaknesses about the Sikh community I do know, and I haven't even said the most harmful or sad things or what caused me even to mention this. But ignoring is not helping the Sikh community. It needs to be openly discussed. Should I stay silent and pretend not to notice things with a critical effect on spiritual teaching simply because YOU will decide I'm talking about you? Are you a committee member at my Gurdwara? Because I do recall distinctly this was being discussed and not "PK70."

As I said before, quite independant of anything YOU have written, it is my experience that spirituality has to be evaluated based on authenticity, and from this basis it can't just be something Sikhs have and Hindu's don't have. There are lots of holy Hindu's, just as there are lots of unholy Sikhs. So authentic spirituality must be independant of being fluent in Punjabi and Gurmukhi. This is something you implied, and so I was explaining by my own example, why it cannot be the truth, since those fluent in Punjabi and Gurmukhi, and even being gyani's and bhai sahibs in Gurdwara are not even living in concordance with those teachings of Gurbani. To look at what is right and wrong in general, without naming names, but by analysis must be a way to be honest about what is true spirituality, and stop tolerating or praising the fake things. Spirituality has to be something open to the whole world and every person and every religion and every language. And the fact that bhagat bani is included in Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji is proof that being born in Sikh religion is not the only way to be a saint, as many of these bhagats had never even met Guru Nanak to become "Sikhs." So the teaching is there that low caste can become a sant. Truly authentic spiritual persons (not necessarily Sikhs) can become a sant in eyes of Guruji. Why this offends you I do not know. But it is the truth.

For a record, all Sikhs are not and cannot be better than all others as others cannot be better or bad. Good ones are in every faiths.
So what does this say about Sikhism being the only path to mukti in the Kaliyug?

kindly prove if ever I have advocated Punjabi Sikhs, criticized Vashnava
I am not talking about you, but very deliberately gave enough details to mention a particularly powerful and well-respected person who happens to be ex-husband of one of my friends. I also mentioned some very poor behavior on part of a particular Jatha, which I do not believe you are even a part of. With details like these which are clearly not YOU, why do you insist on hurt sentiments?

I pray the Super Power you believe in, bless you with more humbleness and subtleness.
Thank you ji.

I wish I didn't read your above comments. It is sad, it came from you.Thanks.
I am sorry you feel hurt. But I cannot in good conscience fail to speak out against injustices, or pretend not to notice when terribly wrong and hurtful things are being done in this community. Why are we afraid to speak against the female abortions occuring in Sikh communities here in America? Why are we afraid to speak out against the casteism in Sikh communities here in America, including the ostracism of a marriage of one of my firends sons to a Dalit girl? What about the incredible degree of domestic violence against women in Sikh communities in America? And people can pretend to be kirtanis and bhai sahibs doing these things? What about the ostracism of American converts in Sikh Gurdwaras? You know, these things are hurtful and sad. But not talking about them in a discussion of what authentic spirituality really is, is not going to help. If we can't be honest about the problems, we've got even bigger problems. I am from America, and I'm not talking about problems world-wide. I am speaking from direct experience. We can't be this deceived to think ignoring these serious problems makes them go away, and then talk in any reality about Sikh religion being the only boat of mukti. It's just not even believable, and that's why we're losing so many Sikh kids. Something must transpire by way of example which is greater than pointing to Bhagat Puran Singh. If Sikhism is really a boat of mukti, then somethying is missing, and that is my heartfelt opinion at this time. And it is corroborated by Sau sakhi that says Sikhism will lose it's way, and Guruji will have to come back to establish Khalsa Raj and usher in Satyuga. He will do this as Kalki avtaara. He will unite ALL races and all castes and all religions as ONE.
 

pk70

Writer
SPNer
Feb 25, 2008
1,582
627
USA

Please reread it, "
This is my last response to your comments."
[/FONT]I do not churn water to get butter.[/FONT]

[/FONT]
 

Randip Singh

Writer
Historian
SPNer
May 25, 2005
2,935
2,950
56
United Kingdom
Gandhi had a lot of Jain influences. Ahimsa is also very much misunderstood. Is Hindutva proponent of Ahimsa? Yet many of them are also Vaishnav. So we go back to fundamental interpretation.

When it comes to Gurbani, violence for it's own sake is not propagated. Sikhism absolutely is a Dharmic path. Gandhian non-violence as a political philosophy was a huge failure which led to the violence of partition. It was precisely his failure to act at a crucial juncture to consolidate the unity of India, and pacifistic policies of appeasement with Muslims which divided the country. Just because this man was Vaishnava doesn't mean this is sole interpretation of Vaishnava Vedanta.

To protect the Dharma is the highest good, is the message of Bhagavad-Gita. Bhagavan Krishna tells Arjuna how unmanly it is for him to sink down in the chariot with misguided intentions. Honor for the righteous warrior is righteous combat.

So again, it can be proved from significant sources that entire Sikh philosophy of defending the Dharma as the highest good comes from Vaishnav sources. Sikhism is not a teaching of violence for the sake of ego or as a means to an end. It is the last resort to defend the helpless. So Gandhi, who invented terms such as "satyagrahis" was imparting a false pacifism more akin to Buddhism and Jain religion than teachings of Bhagavad-Gita.


Arjuna's pacifist plea:

Did the teaching of Bhagavad-Gita say Arjuna was correct? Was this Gandhian pacifism rewarded as spiritual teaching? Let's read more.

Krishna's rebuke:


Which is the more logical approach, to say Sant Jarnail Singh Bindranwale's beliefs and actions were the example of every Sikh Jatha and sect, or the teachings directly from Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji? Likewise, how can M.K. Gandhi be anything more than an example of a particular interpretation, which even within Vaishnavism are differences, most notably the direct teachings from Bhagavad-Gita? To be honest, this again, sounds like the oversimplified distorted comparisons arising from Singh Sabha reform to exaggerate differences in a desperate attempt to disprove and deny commonalities. But with historical integrity, such oversimplifications hold no credibility.

Just as no one can say Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale represents all Sikh teaching, how can anyone say M.K. Gandhi does also? Vaishnavism has a sannyasi heritage, and what is not popularly known is the warrior monk heritage during the time of the moghuls and who also resisted the British. It was in fact the Shaivaite and Vaishnava monks who became fearsome warriors who admitted the low caste and even women into their ranks. Does this sound familiar to Sikhism? As I said before, the historical parallels are unmistakable... unless one refuses to acknowledge them.



See also Warrior Ascetics And Indian Empires

Shaivite and Vaishnava ascetic acharas were considered monastic armies. Some of the fiercest were the Shaivite naga babas. How can this forgotten history jibe with the colonialist pacifism of Gandhian ahimsa? It doesn't even accord with the teachings of the Bhagavad-Gita. The main factor in this religious focus of this militarism was "protection of the Dharma" and so they considered themselves "holy Armies." Or, "Armies of God." Does the formation of the Khalsa seem out of place within this historical background?


It isn't incompatible. Ancient Vaishnava and Shaivite scriptures are the source for warrior self-defense and defense of the helpless as positive Dharmic duty. It's only deliberate distortions of history which permit such beliefs about incompatibility. People should be shocked that so much they have learned historically was deliberately distorted. It should be a matter of genuine curiosity why Gandhian ahimsa is portrayed as a Vaishnav teaching, and not Bhagavan Krishna urging Arjuna to fight like a soldier indifferent to the outcome, but to fight, win or lose, because it is righteous and noble to fight for a just cause.

There is a reason the avtaars are K'shatriya. It is the duty of the avtaars to destroy evil, and set the dharma on balance again. That is the essence of Vaishnavism, not ahimsa.
lakshminrisimha.jpg

Narasingh avtaar, the Lion-man who roars and causes others to roar. Shown here destroying the demon king Hiranyakasipu. Not exactly ahimsa.

narasimha_s.jpg

Narasingh destroys the demons. Notice the chakr in his hands?


Why do you think Kalki avtaara is called, "Kalki the destroyer?" It is not because he is powerless or non-violent. Rather he will use destructive ends to achieve his means. He has to destroy the corrupted K'shatriya who contaminate and subjugate the world to right the Dharmic balance. This is the meaning of the demons who take human form in kaliyug in Gurbani. The teachings of Kalki the destroyer tell that in Kaliyug demons are born as evil warriors.
kalki.2.jpg



nwboomb2.jpg
250px-Stealth-bomber.jpg

B2 Spirit Bomber, American Air Force. If you want to understand about evil warrior Armies that contaminate the world, read about the vimanas of the asuras.



ਕਲੀ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਨਾਨਕਾ ਜਿੰਨਾਂ ਦਾ ਅਉਤਾਰੁ ॥
kalee andhar naanakaa jinnaan dhaa aouthaar ||
In this Dark Age of Kali Yuga, O Nanak, the demons have taken birth.
~SGGS Ji p. 556

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_QFXGxw6Tk


"Gurkha flying in his swift and powerful Vimana hurled against the three cities of the Vrishis and Andhakas a single projectile charged with all the power of the Universe. An incandescent column of smoke and fire, as brilliant as ten thousands suns, rose in all its splendor. It was the unknown weapon, the Iron Thunderbolt, a gigantic messenger of death which reduced to ashes the entire race of the Vrishnis and Andhakas." ~Mahabharata

~Bhul chak maaf

I knew you would pick on the fact I quoted Gandhi, but the reason I did so is because he embodied what the ideal of Vasnavite philosophy was/is for the majority of Hindu's.

Also is not Shivite philosophy disticntly different from Vashnvite? You seem to be putting the two together. I find that confusing. What you have posted is surely revisionist Vashnavite thinking?

In anycase , I remained unconvinced that Sikhism is anymore following Vashnavite philosophy, then it is following Islam, Sufism, Christianity or any other religion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
📌 For all latest updates, follow the Official Sikh Philosophy Network Whatsapp Channel:
Top