- Jan 31, 2011
- 5,769
- 8,194
- 55
Re: In Sikhism, is there soul? Who created soul? Who control soul?
Sorry, I do worry about the translation, a lot..............
Sorry, I do worry about the translation, a lot..............
If you have peace in life, death is just a smooth transition,
uhmm tell that to the many peace loving people who have lost lives in civil unrest, wars, rapes, riots, all people in the wrong place at the wrong time
the trouble with life is that there is no divine, no smoothness, no easy quick transitions, it is hard, and sometimes peace is taken away from you, you react according to Gurbani as to whether to fight for peace, fight for life, these all encompassing statements, to me, seem like the very quotes that you hear from sants and babas trying to peddle their 'way'
no offence intended brotherji, I know we can speak frankly to each other
I consider soul to any living body as energy battery to any vehicle.So the soul can be taken as fuel for the living bodies.Just as no vehicle can be in use without fuel so is any living body without soul.Different bodies have different quantum of power of soul so we find different living bodies have different period of natural death.
This is just a thought.
Prakash.S.Bagga
Harry Haller ji,
Thank you for disagreeing which I take as obvious.We can keep in mind that food can be considered as supplementary source of enegy whereas Soul energy is the Real energy .Like Sun Energy is the Real Energy for vegitation but water,mannure etc are supplement for growth.
I think we should try to know what exists beyond the physical form/forms of the Universe.Isnt this interseting?
We also learn that Soul can not be cut.destroyed by fire or drowned by water so such a thing can be eternal only.What transforms is the Jeev{Thought) in different forms and this JEEV(thought) along with Soul takes up a new journey untill merged with the infinite.
Prakash.s.Bagga
seeker3k ji I thank you immensely to debunk some of the garbage about soul splitting, energy, waves, etc. , to make them sound like Sikhism concepts.
Thank you from the bottom of my heart.
Even though we differ in areas and that is human but in this post you hit the nail right on the head. You are going to get lot of nagging rebuttals to your post from some spners learn to ignore and don't get frustrated. Such people are a great dis-service to future generations of young Sikhs and they are too old to reform is my experience since early this year.
In terms of Sikhism, it is clear that the promoters of re-incarnation, soul living will also some day tell you that such a such person is actually Guru Nanak Dev ji or Guru Gobind Singh ji's soul. There are already few Babey/Sant/Dehras, etc., who already exploit this garbage. Shame on such people. In Sikhism you are born, you live and you die. Good living guidance, teaching and living in consonance with the creator and creation is what Sikhism focuses on, rest is garbage.
Sat Sri Akal.
Seeker9 ji show me where I criticized other religions in my post. I have not changed it yet. Others Sikhs are injecting ridiculous statements in the context of Sikhism and only that is debated. If a Sikh gets hurt it is too bloody bad. If they are misleading the youth with wrong messages or mis-representing Gurbani without proper quoting, it is of more consequence to speak up regardless of your interpretation of the TOS in this forum. Too much energy, waves by armchair Einesteins.Dear Ambarsaria Ji
I can see from your posts you have passion for Sikhism and I have no doubt I have much to learn from you and others as I have already done since I joined SPN
However, I found some of your comments above overbearing and would respectfully draw your attention to the stated terms and conditions of this forum as follows:
Comparative religious discussions can be educational, but ridiculing other faiths or excessive criticism of their beliefs is not constructive and it is not allowed on SPN. We need to be tolerant of our differences and accept people for what they are instead of being critical of their beliefs. All allegations must be backed up by verifiable references from neutral sources.
Critically Important: Sometimes, our zeal to defend the Sikh identity and Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji may lead us to forget that the Sikh Rehat Maryada commands us to respect other religions. When you criticize practices of other religions, or its prominent figures past and present, please weigh your words carefully. Comments and opinions that unjustly generalize or deliberately intend to hurt religious sentiments of followers of other faiths & philosophies, that are inaccurate and or cannot be supported by historical evidence, or that promote negative stereotypes, will be edited or deleted without notice. The major aim of SPN is bridging the gaps between the religions and Failure to comply may result in termination of your membership.
Seeker9 ji show me where I criticized other religions in my post. I have not changed it yet. Others Sikhs are injecting ridiculous statements in the context of Sikhism and only that is debated. If a Sikh gets hurt it is too bloody bad. If they are misleading the youth with wrong messages or mis-representing Gurbani without proper quoting, it is of more consequence to speak up regardless of your interpretation of the TOS in this forum. Too much energy, waves by armchair Einesteins.
I suppose you don't see what I see and that is part of life.
Sat Sri Akal.
PS: Brother look at your own post that has lot more potential violations of the TOS,
http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/hard-talk/37159-sikhism-there-soul-who-created-soul-2.html#post154468
I am not complaining. lol