- Jan 31, 2011
- 5,769
- 8,194
- 55
Harry Haller is a curious guy to me. Let me start by saying you sound like a likable and intelligent guy. But I'm mystified by your understanding of Sikhism.
I am glad about that, that means your relatively sane.
You're always quick to say most turban-wearing 'Sikhs' are not indeed Sikhs, presumably because they are close-minded, greedy, selfish, ignorant or whatnot
I take this back completely, if anyone is not a 'sikh' its probably me, not them, but then being a Sikh is different to many people, to me its to leave science to science, and just try and do the right thing. As I believe in nil intervention by a supreme being, that meditation is ultimately quite pointless other than for the self, (I find a big pie works wonders for the self and is much more fun), that ritual and superstition are to, frankly, confusing to me, that death is death, I suppose I follow a line of Sikhism devoid of Abrahamic and Vedic influence. However, if others choose to follow a 'traditional' way learned from the laps of their fathers, then that is their choice, and I have no ruck with that. My ruck is with those that insist their way is supreme and the only way,.
But you state you are a Sikh, right after admitting you are a womanizer, drunk, meat-eating atheist, etc...
I guess better to state I am a Sikh with the following faults then to state I am a Sikh period, maybe I am too honest?
I can't help thinking you were born into Sikh culture and have spent your life trying to reconcile Sikh identity with beliefs and lifestyle that fly in the face of Sikh doctrine
Close, close, no I was born into a Sikh culture that embraced the very facets that I was told made it vital for Sikhism to exist, I remember as a child wondering when I would finally embrace adulthood, and act like an adult, and know all the rituals and sayings that made me look wise and adult. After a while I realised I was watching blind ritual, I remember as a child sitting in a Gurudwara car park and watching a wedding party, I remember at the time thinking there was nothing particularly holy or spiritual about a house of God. It was around that time I rejected adulthood, I am 46 now and still going strong. To fly in the face of Sikh doctrine, one must first know what Sikh doctrine is.
Wouldn't it be easier to renounce Sikhi and go forth as a worldly and thoughtful atheist, rather than spending so much energy trying to explain away, re-word, re-interpret and re-read the literally thousands of descriptions in the Guru of the many aspects and qualities of God?
I believe I pass the conditions of Sikhism as laid out by the SRM.
Just wondering.
By the way, I'm not in disagreement with you that the vast majority of us go through life with the outside appearance of devotion, while in our hearts we are absorbed in low and mundane pursuits.
to me Sikhism is about the truth, people who meet me know the truth straightaway, they do not to spend time unravelling personalities and agenda, it saves so much time, but its not for everyone I guess.