I think your misreading the post. Where have I said "each to his own"??
right here my silly freind:
Blaming corruption of character on ideologies like capitalism without reference to internal motivation is about as lame as it gets.
and what about when you label an entire ethnic group...is it not prejudice, bigotry? is it not lame? are you not in your own words referencing a group without taking into consideration internal motivations?
you wish to irradicate caste differences but ironically you are the most conscious of caste in these discussions.
Jatt society has had a long standing love of wealth and gain long before the term capitalism was ever coined!
A strong feature of Jatt culture is economic dominance of other clans in Punjab.
Jatt society has had a long standing love of wealth and gain long before the term capitalism was ever coined!
and my favourite:
Jatts are possibly one of worse at following this mentality.
isnt that "lame" (to use your own words)?
its not going to solve anything.
You are the one suggesting we are all helpless in the face of capitalism and using that as some excuse/justification for greedy behaviour.
not as an excuse but as a cause (theres the rub). You are unfortunately standing on a mountaintop where the air is thin...i just wish to bring you down to the valley bellow. Sit on the fence for once and look at something with pure objectivity.
I'm suggesting that we have choices on individual levels on whether to buy into that and are not entirely helpless. Has Sikhism becomes so powerless that it offers no protection against capitalism?
to answer your question...yes
im not a capitilistic fanboy....but i recognize it as an entity that is omnipotent to both you and I...probably even god.
I suggest you revisit the old sakhi about Guru Nanak and Malik Bhago for some guidance. What do you think it is trying to get at?
its ok ill pass on childrens stories :rofl!!:
i recommend you reread my posts if nothings clicked so far.